Sunday, January 22, 2023

Year in Review: Top 10 Films of 2022



It was a great year for movies. Full stop. Every year, there is a corner of the critical community complaining that this year’s offerings pale in comparison to days gone by. That same corner is back and louder than ever this time around, trying to convince us that one of the best film years of the 21st century was somehow weak or lacking. Do not listen.


The secret truth is that every year is a great year for movies if you know where to look. If you thought 2022 was weak, see more movies. If you think any given year is particularly lacking, see more movies. If you think the artform has long since passed its heyday and remains locked in steady decline, see more movies. The answer is always to see more movies.


It is never (okay, rarely) the movies’ fault. Greatness is out there, but in a world of shuttering theaters and endless streaming options, the onus is on us to seek out the best of what the medium has to offer. So it takes a little extra effort. The rewards are self-evident, but for further proof, I submit the 10 films listed below. 


My top 10 films of 2022 represent a diverse array of nations and genres and filmmakers, but what they share in common is that each film made me think about the world in a different way and made me see the art of cinema itself in a different way. No other medium on earth holds the power and possibility of film, and these 10 films wield that power in ways I have never seen and explore possibilities I had never considered. More than anything, they inspire me to keep searching for greatness in the next scene, the next performance, and the next film. The answer is always to see more movies.


Before we get to the top 10, five more films (listed alphabetically) that made 2022 such an outstanding year at the cinema: Athena, Romain Gavras’ virtuosic polemic against the horrors of state-sponsored violence; Babylon, Damien Chazelle’s everything-and-the-kitchen-sink ode to and takedown of the Hollywood machine; Fire of Love, Sara Dosa’s poignant, beautiful non-fiction tale of two scientists who find love and meaning on the edge of the abyss; Pearl, Part II of Ti West’s X trilogy and a cursed fairy tale for an age with no happily ever afters; and Till, Chinonye Chukwu’s devastating exploration of the aftermath of the murder of Emmett Till. Now, the top 10:


10. Holy Spider, directed by Ali Abbasi



It hit me as I was in the theater watching Holy Spider, Ali Abbasi’s Iran-set true-crime thriller, what is wrong with most American takes on the genre. Even great films like David Fincher’s Se7en or Zodiac ascribe a certain mystical power to their unknown, unseen killers. They become larger than life. The more they hide in the shadows, the more an audience can project a sense of grandeur onto the criminal and his (usually his) crimes.


Abbasi, instead, introduces us to the killer right away, and he is pathetic. He has a family and a day job and an obsession with killing prostitutes, which he claims comes from a religious desire to rid Iran of moral depravity. Maybe that is his reason, but Abbasi shows him checking the newspapers for his nom de crime, the titular Holy Spider, and hanging out by the crime scene to see what people are saying about him. He is a vain, glory-seeker in a world just depraved enough to grant him that glory.


The first two acts of the film belong with the best of the crime genre, but its true power lies in its disturbing final act, when the killer is captured and put on trial. He receives not condemnation but praise. He is hailed as a hero for battling the vices of his nation. The women he killed are shamed and denigrated as their killer finds love and support in the community. It would be shocking if it were not so familiar, but we see it all the time in the US, a country that puts murderers on TV and still asks questions like “What was she wearing?” There is no moral authority, and Holy Spider is less a cautionary tale of what could happen than an insight into what is happening, here and everywhere else.


9. Petite Maman, directed by Céline Sciamma



Sandwiched between Taxi Driver and on the latest edition of the Sight & Sound poll of the greatest films of all time is Céline Sciamma’s Portrait of a Lady on Fire at No. 30. Along with Parasite, down at No. 90, it is the most recent film on the list. It is a beautiful, epic romance that deserves all the praise lavished upon it. It is also, it would seem, an impossible film to follow up. Impossible, perhaps, for anyone except Sciamma, who dials back the scope but not the emotional resonance in this wonderfully intimate gem of a film.


In a breezy 72 minutes, Petite Maman finds the time and power to devastate and uplift in equal measure. It tells the story of a young girl visiting her mother’s childhood home only to encounter her own mother as a child in the surrounding woods. They laugh, they play, and they bond in ways they never could as mother and daughter. It is a story of intergenerational trauma and healing, but it is also a fairy tale told from a child’s point of view.


Though the camerawork and art direction are gorgeous, the story is unadorned by any unnecessary flourishes. We accept everything we see fully and without reservation because Sciamma has faith in the strength of her script to carry us along. That faith is well placed, and we are so drawn into this world that we start to forget anything fantastical is happening. At the end, what we are left with are a mother and a daughter who have learned to love and understand each other in deeper ways than they ever could have imagined.


8. All Quiet on the Western Front, directed by Edward Berger



It takes a certain amount of courage to adapt one of the most famous and popular novels of the 20th century. Even more courage to choose one that has already been adapted into one of the most acclaimed and best loved movies of all time. And still even more to cut out large chunks of the plot and insert your scenes and ideas into a story many know by heart. This is the courage it took for German director Edward Berger to bring All Quiet on the Western Front to the big screen.


This is not a word-perfect adaptation of the novel, nor is it, I understand, a particularly accurate depiction of World War I, at least in the specifics. It is, however, completely faithful to the heart and spirit of Erich Maria Remarque’s anti-war masterpiece. Paul Bäumer (an excellent Felix Kammerer) and his friends descend into hell, and Berger pulls no punches in depicting the human suffering and abject misery of war.


The technical achievements of this film are remarkable: from the sound design that emphasizes war as a machine that grinds up soldiers to a score that exists at the precipice of madness and a color palette drained of life. Berger and his crafts team have created something truly astonishing. But as with the novel, what truly sticks with you is the horror of these soldiers’ lived experiences. War is an act of destruction, and as these men’s souls are chipped away, piece by piece, they know and we know there is no putting them back together again.


7. Bardo, False Chronicle of a Handful of Truths, directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu



The “Three Amigos” have been all over town the past month or so, talking about their decades of friendship, their many collaborations, and their insights into Hollywood filmmaking. For those unaware, the Three Amigos comprise Alfonso Cuarón, Guillermo del Toro, and Alejandro González Iñárritu. They had been around for years before gaining massive exposure at the 2006 Academy Awards, where they blew the doors open for Mexican filmmakers in the United States with Children of Men, Pan’s Labyrinth, and Babel, respectively.


From 2013-2018, these three men won five of the six Best Director statues at the Oscars, an award that had never previously been won by a Mexican filmmaker. Iñárritu won back to back statues in 2014 and 2015, the third director ever to accomplish this feat and the first in more than 60 years. I say all this to establish the world into which Iñárritu delivers Bardo. Alongside his friends, he has reached the mountaintop, and as he approaches the age of 60, Iñárritu finds himself looking back and wondering what the mountain even means.


Bardo should not be read as a one-for-one with Iñárritu’s life. It is more phantasmagorical than that. Instead, the film depicts what I imagine it must have felt like for Iñárritu to be a Mexican filmmaker who achieves success in America and questions whether he has exploited his nation and his culture to get there. Then, as I watched Iñárritu speak with Cuarón and del Toro on the awards trail, I realized the film must also speak to their experiences, as well. And to anyone who leaves his or her community behind to achieve something greater. How lonely. How isolating. And yet, how universal.


6. Triangle of Sadness, directed by Ruben Östlund



This is the biggest swing Ruben Östlund has ever taken. His international breakout film, Force Majeure, was a big step up in scale from his early films and put the fragility of modern masculinity squarely under the microscope. His Palme d’Or-winning followup, The Square, went even bigger, taking on the hypocrisy and cowardice of the art world and the moneyed elite. For Triangle of Sadness, Östlund confronts his grandest subject yet and, in so doing, employs his largest canvas.


The superyacht at the center of the film is a symbol of everything that is wrong with society – wealth inequality, the pursuit of pleasure at the expense of all else, and the damaging consequences of believing in a hierarchy that is just waiting to be toppled. Some of the film is perhaps a little on the nose – as when the communist ship captain and Russian oligarch passenger argue about Marxism over the intercom – but a film this bold will require bold strokes, and these moments end up feeling more like a feature than a bug.


Östlund’s greatest coup is to flip the tables, however briefly, in the last third. He gives the models and influencers and oligarchs – all of whom have been propped up by capitalist structures – a true lesson in supply and demand. In this final stretch, we get a hero in Abigail (Dolly de Leon, in a star-making turn), the cleaning woman who serves as the ultimate heart of a story that risks living too much in the head. This is why the film’s closing moments and Östlund’s last shot of Abigail land like a punch to the gut. It’s all fun and games for the rich. For Abigail, it’s life and death.


5. EO, directed by Jerzy Skolimowski



Roger Ebert was fond of citing the W. G. Sebald quotation that “Men and animals regard each other across a gulf of mutual incomprehension.” Because of Ebert, I come back to this quote often, usually with regard to that time-tested story conflict: Man vs. Nature. It comes up a lot in film, but rarely is the story told from the point of view of nature. The accomplishment of Jerzy Skolimowski’s EO suggests we could certainly stand to have more stories like it.


EO, the donkey of the title (say it out loud), travels the countryside in search of his first owner, a circus performer who loved him but could not care for him. On his journey, he meets many people, some sympathetic, others cruel, but all lacking any understanding of what EO wants or needs. Similarly, EO cannot figure out who these people are or why they do the confounding things they do. Such is the gulf of mutual incomprehension.


The conclusion Skolimowski seems to draw in his film is that the misunderstanding arises not from the donkey’s unknowability but from our own inherent beastliness. We try to project meaning and intention onto the donkey, but why, when so much of human toil lacks either meaning or intent? EO is an innocent, and innocence is a state of being humans are particularly ill-equipped to understand. Where is his brutality? Where is his selfish self-interest? Where is his need to conquer? He has none of these, and we are indicted by the fact that we even asked the question.


4. TÁR, directed by Todd Field



Power pools. It coalesces. It calcifies until it can be wielded as a cudgel. Lydia Tár’s power resides in a literal baton, which she uses to control time itself, she says. She is the conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic. She is an award-winning composer, a celebrated scholar, and one of the brightest stars in the universe of classical music. She is also a bully, a predator, and in some respects, a fraud. She is also completely fictional and sprang fully formed from the mind of writer-director Todd Field and the incomparable performance of Cate Blanchett.


I mention the fictional aspect because a funny, if baffling, pseudo-controversy sprung up around the movie as viewers and critics believed it to be a based-on-a-true-story biopic then were left disappointed and dumbfounded that no person such as Lydia Tár exists – at least not in a literal sense. A quick Google search could have saved people a lot of trouble, but that is not the point. The point is that Field and Blanchett came together to create a portrait so real and vivid that viewers believed it must be true.


There is such verisimilitude in the details of Field’s writing and filmmaking and of Blanchett’s acting choices that it truly boggles the mind at how any of it was accomplished. However, to consider the film only in terms of its considerable filmmaking achievements is to hold it at a distance, to ignore its true intent. Field is here to investigate abuses of power, the tendency toward corruption, and the emptiness of the genius myth, all through a lens we have never before seen. The film is everything its central character pretends to be – it is brash, it is bold, and it is brilliant.


3. The Banshees of Inisherin, directed by Martin McDonagh



It is hard to believe it has been 14 years since Martin McDonagh made his feature film debut with In Bruges. I have lived essentially my entire adult life since that film came out, and though it remains among my favorite films of all time, I feel older, hopefully a little wiser, and certainly more world weary since that movie hit theaters. All of which is to say I was primed for The Banshees of Inisherin, which could only have been made by a director who had grown older, wiser, and more world weary.


On its surface, the film is about the dissolution of a friendship. McDonagh would seem to stretch this simple premise to its breaking point, leaning heavily on the indelible performances of his main cast (Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Kerry Condon, and Barry Keoghan), but by the end, you find yourself in a place of such profound pain and sadness that you can barely remember how you arrived there. The same is true of McDonagh’s characters, who with the exception of Condon’s Siobhán, seemed pulled along their journeys by an invisible hand. McDonagh’s, yes, but perhaps also that of fate itself.


The script, of course, is loaded with the filmmaker’s particular brand of bleak Irish humor, but it is more measured here, tempered by a contemplativeness that is deeper and weightier than McDonagh has ever employed. He has said the two main characters represent the two halves of his own personality – the artist who wishes to leave a legacy through his work and the nice guy whose prime concern is to leave the world a kinder place than he found it. There is value in both men, but they cannot see the value in each other. Therein lies the tragedy.


2. All the Beauty and the Bloodshed, directed by Laura Poitras



The best documentaries weave together the personal and the political into a tapestry that shows us something about the world in which we live. OJ: Made in America uses the trial of one disgraced football star to tell the modern history of race in Southern California. Grizzly Man transforms a singular tragedy into a fable about humanity’s relationship to the natural world. Laura Poitras’ own Citizenfour turned the story of Edward Snowden into a story about the government’s intrusion into every part of our private lives.


Now, Poitras is back with this riveting study of famed artist Nan Goldin and her quest to bring down the pharmaceutical empire most responsible for the opioid epidemic in this country. Goldin is an inherently fascinating subject, and Poitras jumps back and forth in time to link the photographer to a number of pivotal social movements in the latter half of the 20th century. The effect is to demonstrate that Goldin comes by her activism honestly and that this fight is nothing new for her – the Sackler family may be a modern enemy, but they are just the latest in a long line of powerful people looking to exploit the powerless for profit.


The filmmaker makes deft use of Goldin’s art to illuminate and elucidate the film’s many themes, chief among them that the machinery of capitalism would gladly grind us all to dust but for the efforts of warriors such as Goldin and her kind. Despite a life touched in one way or another by mental illness, domestic violence, addiction, and HIV/AIDS, Goldin’s resolve never seems to have diminished. She is a perfect fighter for our times in that she inspires the rest of us to take our place beside her on the front lines.


1. Women Talking, directed by Sarah Polley



Sometimes a movie is everything you thought it would be, yet it still exceeds expectations by being more intelligent, empathetic, and beautifully mounted than you ever could have conceived. Sarah Polley’s Women Talking is just such a feature. It is the kind of picture that reminds you of the heights to which great films can ascend. It is simultaneously of the moment and timeless. It is a mirror that reflects who we are, but it is also a vision of who we could be.


Based on the Miriam Toews novel and adapted for the screen by Polley, the story follows a group of women in a cloistered religious community who must confront the fact that they have all been victims of repeated druggings and sexual assaults at the hands of the men in their lives. They grapple with questions of faith, vengeance, personhood, and the place of justice in an obviously unjust world. Ultimately, they must decide whether they will leave the only world they have ever known or stay to fight a likely losing battle of revenge.


I do not necessarily blame anyone put off by that description of the plot. It is heavy stuff, and the stakes are nothing less than the soul of modern society. However, Polley and her stunning cast – led by Rooney Mara, Jessie Buckley, and Claire Foy – convey the text with a matter-of-factness that prevents the material from becoming either melodramatic or underbaked. The truth is clear. What is left is a moral reckoning. Is there anything here worth saving, or should they burn it to the ground and start anew?


Polley’s film believes in the power of conversation, and her script is filled with heartbreaking speeches and deeply considered arguments. Rare is the film that finds time to listen to its characters and their concerns. These are women society has left behind, but what is past is always present, and their world is not so far removed from our own. The power of Polley’s film is in giving these women a voice to speak their grievances aloud. She leaves it to us to hear what they have to say.


Check back next time for Part III of Last Cinema Standing’s Year in Review series as we look back on the best performances of 2022.

Last Cinema Standing’s 2022 Year in Review


Maybe I can keep this brief. That has not been my strong suit in the past, but 2022 was a great year for movies, and I would rather let the movies speak for themselves. Some developments in my personal and professional life – mostly very positive developments – kept me out of theaters and away from this site more than I would have liked last year.


That said, I got back to writing reviews, an artform I love and had missed. Hopefully, there will be many more to come in the new year. Longform reviews are one of the main reasons I started this blog. I love thinking deeply about films and truly engaging with their themes and intent, and the few reviews published in 2022 were a great reminder of that for me.


We lost two more great movie theaters last year – The Landmark and the Laemmle Playhouse. Both were excellent places to see a movie, and two of my most frequented theaters in Los Angeles. We saw Alex Garland’s Men on the final night of screenings at The Landmark. The mood was somber and strange, like a wake for a friend still clinging to life. 


The Landmark Theaters chain shortly thereafter announced it would take over the halls of the former Laemmle Playhouse. That space reopened at the end of December, and we attended a screening of Damien Chazelle’s Babylon. It will take time for that house to feel like a home, but at least it is there. Meanwhile, the Laemmle family will be forced to close theaters in North Hollywood and Claremont soon, making way for upscale apartments.


One wonders what all these new residents will do for recreation once anything remotely resembling local color is bulldozed to make way for still more residences. Have we learned nothing from Jonathan Kaplan’s masterpiece of teen rebellion, Over the Edge, in which the city planners put the interests of business over the interests of citizens to disastrous effect?


Maybe it is on my mind because we had the opportunity to attend a screening of the 1979 film at the Los Feliz 3 in November. Kaplan, co-writer Tim Hunter, and star Pamela Ludwig spoke afterward of the difficulties of making a low-budget film and the pain of watching their movie get bungled by the marketing department and nearly lost before an early ‘80s HBO revival turned it into a cult classic. That is where my father discovered what would become and remain to this day his favorite film of all time. I thought of him as I sat in the theater and was happy I could call him the next day to recap.


There were other wonderful theater experiences, such as catching Women Talking – a film you will read more about in this space over the next few days – at the American Film Institute Festival. The true wonder of 2022, however, resides in the films themselves. So, let’s get to those. As always, I hope to be in this space more this year than last and more next year than this one. For now, thanks for being here.


Check back next time for Part II of Last Cinema Standing’s Year in Review series as we name the Top 10 Films of 2022.

Friday, December 9, 2022

New movie review: EO

One of six donkeys portraying the title character in EO.

A donkey is many things. It is a beast of burden. It is powerful, stubborn, and curious. It is adorable, yes, but it is also dangerous. It is possessed of an almost singularly unpleasant voice. This unmistakable bray gives the main character of Jerzy Skolimowski’s new film his name: EO. Say it out loud. Now, imitate a donkey. You get it. It’s a joke, but also, it is not. The same could be said of this film, which is one of the most beautiful and heartbreaking achievements of the year.


Directly inspired by Robert Bresson’s French New Wave masterpiece Au Hasard Balthazar, though not strictly a remake of that film, EO follows the life of the titular donkey as he wanders aimlessly, though importantly not without thought, from town to town and circumstance to circumstance. Skolimowski has been open about his desire to break with traditional narrative structures and find a nonlinear way to take audiences through a story. This film, co-written by Skolimowski and Ewa Piaskowska, accomplishes that goal and more.


We meet EO, portrayed by six different donkeys throughout the film, as a circus performer. He has purpose, he has fans, and he has the love of his caring trainer, Kasandra (Sandra Drzymalska). Soon, however, animal rights activists have the circus shut down over the cruelty of using live animals in performance. The activists are the first set of well meaning but shortsighted and misguided humans we meet. They will not be the last.


He is taken to work at a horse stable, the grand opening of which is apparently a big enough deal that local luminaries make speeches and participate in a ribbon-cutting ceremony. Skolimowski observes the horses closely. They are big, muscular, and beautiful. We witness their motion, their freedom. EO’s eyes follow these cousins of his, and he seems to envy them. 


One horse in particular, a gorgeous all-white animal, is given the majority of the workers’ attention. In one telling sequence, it is painstakingly bathed, head to tail, as EO looks on from a nearby stall. EO will not receive this same attention, and we are left to wonder what separates the horse from the donkey. Why is one worthy of our care and consideration and the other condemned to a life of servitude and neglect? EO proves ill-suited to work at the stable, and he is shipped off to a farm in the Polish countryside.


The farm appears to be hard work but not without its rewards. The owners run a side business, making their many donkeys available as therapy animals to disabled children. They play, they hike, they bond, and all the while, EO seems content. This is until one night when Kasandra shows up on the back of a motorcycle. She has brought a carrot cupcake to her former performing partner for his birthday. She can only stay a short while, and when she leaves, EO is inspired to break free from the farm and find her.


Through the rest of the film’s brisk 88-minute runtime, he will dream of her in good times and bad. His memories of the one person to show him real love remind us of ourselves. Are we thinking of EO as humanlike, or are we realizing how much like animals we truly are? What follows will argue the latter through sequences of chaos, randomness, and brutality. 


Skolimowski and cinematographer Michał Dymek obey no rules in giving us a donkey’s-eye view of the world. Lights will flash. We will stare at the ground when the action is above us. The camera will move forward while spinning 360 degrees on the vertical plane. It is disorienting to be in the head of an animal that is unknowable but onto which we are invited to project so much.


As EO wanders through the forest – the film’s most beautiful sequence – a wolf is killed by hunters. A bird is killed by the blades of a wind turbine. Two more instances of well meaning humans wreaking havoc on the animal world. Long stretches of the back half of the film will focus on the cruelty of factory farms and meat consumption. Skolimowski and Piaskowska have both stated that they drastically cut their own meat consumption after working on the film. It is easy to understand why.


To go into further plot specifics is to steal the power of the film, which is best enjoyed as an episodic adventure. It does not matter what happens in any given sequence as much as it matters what the cumulative effect of all these sequences is. There is violence alongside humor alongside tragedy, and it all adds up to the story of a life. Through that life, we are asked to consider our own existence.


Are we doing enough to be kind in this world? Or, are we contributing to the random cruelty and harshness in ways of which we may not even be aware? It is impossible to ignore the importance of the donkey as a Christian symbol, appearing often in the bible as a representation of suffering and humility. As Piaskowska said in an interview, donkeys are innocents. They take our blows because they don’t know any better. They take everything we dish out to them. EO asks us: Must we dish out so much pain? If so, why?


See it? Yes.

Thursday, December 8, 2022

No. 1 stunner: Jeanne Dielman takes top spot in latest Sight & Sound poll

Delphine Seyrig in Jeanne Dielman

Chantal Akerman’s masterpiece of slow cinema Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles is the new title holder as Greatest Film of All Time. That is according to the 2022 Sight & Sound Magazine poll, a survey of critics and filmmakers from around the world held every 10 years since 1952. This year’s poll included the top 10 lists of 1,639 film luminaries, the largest sampling ever conducted. It was bound to lead to shake-ups on the list, but even in that context, Akerman’s film is a true avant garde coup.


For 59 years, Citizen Kane ruled as the undisputed king of cinema, topping every list from 1962 until 2012, when it dropped to No. 2 and lost its crown to Alfred Hitckcock’s Vertigo. This time around, Orson Welles’ debut fell another spot to third place, and Vertigo held on in second place. Yasujriō Ozu’s beloved family drama Tokyo Story slipped one spot to No. 4; it has not fallen farther than fifth since 1992. Rounding out the top 5 is Wong Kar Wai’s sensorial romance In the Mood for Love.


Also in the top 10 are Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey at No. 6, Claire Denis’ Beau Travail at No. 7, David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive at No. 8, Dziga Vertov’s Man with a Movie Camera at No. 9, and Stanley Donen and Gene Kelly’s Singin’ in the Rain at No. 10. Dropping out of the top 10 are The Rules of the Game (formerly No. 5, now No. 13), Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (was No. 6, now No. 11), The Searchers (was No. 7, now No. 15), The Passion of Joan of Arc (was No. 9, now No. 21), and 8 ½ (was No. 10, now No. 31).


A Brief Editorial Aside: I wrote the above Dec. 1 in the immediate aftermath of the announcement with every intention of publishing my instant thoughts, reactions, and analyses. However, the release of the list coincided with my coming down with a rather severe flu. Cogent analysis would not have been my strong suit under those circumstances. In waiting several days to finish this piece, I am now painfully aware of the “discourse” around the selected titles. So, the rest of this piece will combine my personal thoughts on the list with my reactions to the ever-disappointing online film discourse. I am also feeling much better now; thanks for asking.


The primary goal in expanding the voting pool for this year’s edition of the list was to expand the canon. As the unofficial “official” ranking of the greatest films of all time, the Sight & Sound poll goes a long way toward determining what films are considered historically important, culturally significant, and worthy of preservation and study. As regards expansion, frankly, it is about damn time.


I love the classical film canon. Though I grew up on action flicks and ‘90s comedies, my true love of film came through discovering films like Casablanca and Citizen Kane and artists like Billy Wilder and Gene Kelly. I found Truffaut and Godard, Fellini, Bergman, and all the traditionally revered greats. But, now, I look at all those names, among many other wonderful filmmakers, and I see a lot of white, European men. That has been the film canon for too long, and the previous versions of the S&S poll reflected that.


The 2012 top 10 included no films by women and just one film by a non-white director (Ozu). The highest ranking film directed by a woman was Akerman’s Jeanne Dielman, which came in at No. 35 last time around. Denis’ Beau Travail was the only other woman-directed film in the top 100 (No. 78). Worse still, just one film by a black filmmaker made the top 100 – Djibril Diop Mambety’s Touki Bouki at No. 93. This is to say nothing of the general lack of Latin American films.


This lack of diversity derives from many places, but a major factor has always been in polls like this. White male critics and filmmakers, who learned from and admired critics and filmmakers who looked like them, pass on their opinions to the next generation and so on. This is how perceived wisdom becomes so ingrained in evaluating culture. It was necessary for Sight & Sound to invite diverse voices to the party or risk irrelevance.


To a degree, the effort worked. We have Akerman as the new queen of cinema. Denis is in the top 10. Brilliant female filmmakers such as Agnès Varda, Maya Deren, Věra Chytilová, and Céline Sciamma all reside near the top of the list now. Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing sits comfortably at No. 24 (we’ll get my personal rankings a little later on), followed farther down the list by Killer of Sheep, Moonlight, Daughters of the Dust, and yes, Touki Bouki, all by tremendous black artists.


There are still no films in the top 100 by Latin American directors. The top 10 is still nine white people along with Ozu and Wai. Satiyajit Ray, whose Pather Panchali clocks in at No. 35, has long been the only Indian filmmaker deemed worthy of serious critical consideration in Western circles. And on and on. There is work to be done, but with that being said, the 2022 edition is a far better representation of cinematic history than ever previously documented by this list.


It should go without saying, but I will say it anyway: These films are all worthy of consideration for this list. No list of 100 will ever be perfect, but there is not a “token” choice among these. Of course, any time there are fewer seats at the table for white men, the hand wringing – almost exclusively by white men – begins. No matter the specific gripes, which I will not bother delineating here, it always breaks down to some version of that racist bromide, “They will not replace us.” As if any film not included in the top 100 is immediately removed from the history books, all copies destroyed, and further discussion banned.


If you love Raging Bull or Touch of Evil – and I love both those films and think they are great – continue to love them. Those films and many more just like them will remain in our hearts and minds and history books for as long as we are studying the history of film. To consider other films their equal does nothing to lessen their value. The pantheon should always be growing. It’s a constant debate in baseball circles: Are you a Small Hall or a Big Hall person, referring to how many players you believe are Hall of Fame worthy? I’m a Big Hall person. The long story of cinema will be better told when told from diverse points of view.


And now, I have spent more than 1,000 words on this list without actually talking about the movies themselves. So, here are some brief thoughts on the top 10 before I close out with my would-be selections:


10. Singin’ in the Rain, directed by Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen

A gorgeous tribute to old Hollywood, just stunning set piece after stunning set piece, some of the greatest dance choreography ever put to celluloid, and one of the single most iconic moments in the history of the medium.


9. Man with a Movie Camera, directed by Dziga Vertov

The crowning achievement of the Soviet montage movement, an experimental collage of images and motion and machinery, life unfolding before our very eyes like it had never been captured before and has rarely been captured since.


8. Mulholland Dr., directed by David Lynch

Not my favorite Lynch, but I have seen it only once and not since college, so it would not be fair for me to judge. I have not always taken to the director’s film work, but Twin Peaks: The Return is one of the crowning television achievements of the new millennium. 


7. Beau Travail, directed by Claire Denis

A movie I have seen just once and did not care for; I find Denis’ films icy and stubbornly oblique. There is certainly an artfulness to her filmmaking style, and I appreciate the audacity of this film’s famous ending, but at first blush, it was not for me.


6. 2001: A Space Odyssey, directed by Stanley Kubrick

A perfect film. One of my favorites of all time and one of the best ever made. An immersive cinematic achievement that is without equal, almost incomprehensibly beautiful, and singularly thought-provoking. Often imitated, referenced, and homaged, but never matched.


5. In the Mood for Love, directed by Wong Kar Wai

It has been too long since I have watched this, but what sticks with me every time is the elegance – of the story, of the compositions, of the performances, all of it. Wai uses silence like a symphony, imbuing every furtive glance and pregnant pause with meaning and melancholy.


4. Tokyo Story, directed by Yasujirō Ozu

A director famed for his stillness and the way he orchestrates his action within the frame, Ozu pulls off one of the most stunning camera moves in history toward the tail end of this quietly tragic family drama. A heartbreaking study of honor, duty, aging, and the small joys we all take for granted.


3. Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles

We will get to this below, but this is my pick. Eighty years later, it has not been topped. A 25-year-old radio and theater prodigy came out to Hollywood and perfected the form. It’s the storytelling, it’s the acting, it’s the artistry, it’s the way Welles brings all of it together in ways no one had ever seen and few understood. Like the title character’s second wife, ill-fated opera singer Susan Alexander, we stare at this film like a puzzle, wondering how all these pieces fit, baffled by its complexity, marveling at its intricacy, in awe of its perfection.


2. Vertigo, directed by Alfred Hitchcock

Despite its placement here, it is not exactly a rare opinion to say Vertigo is not my favorite Hitchcock. I did not care for it much the first time I saw it, though subsequent rewatches have revealed more of its appeal. Still, I find it distractingly over-directed with a tone so arch it borders on camp. Happy to see it unseated from the top spot.


1. Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles, directed by Chantal Akerman

The new champion is bold, beguiling, and brilliant. Maybe it is not the movie I would pick, but it is an inspired choice nonetheless. A deeply fascinating experiment in building tension through repetition. As the main character goes through her routine, over and over, a sense of unease and disquiet builds until the film erupts in its glorious climax. Some have called the film plotless. This is incorrect. The structure is unconventional, sure. The story requires our patience and attention, yes. But, the plot is there, plain as day and perfect as a circle. 


The 24-year-old Akerman was already a rising star by the time she unleashed this feminist screed on the world, and this is not her only film on the Sight & Sound list. News from Home, her documentary followup to Jeanne Dielman, clocks in at No. 52. Not many filmmakers’ legacies could support having the “greatest film of all time” on their resumés. However, like De Sica, Welles, and Hitchcock before her, Akerman’s legacy will hold up just fine, and in the coming years, this selection will feel less and less out of left field. We will call Jeanne Dielman the best film ever made, and it will feel just right.


My list

Here are my top 10 films of all time, as of today. Ask me again next week, a couple of these might be different, but the ones at the top would remain the same. I think all of these are unimpeachable, the finest works in the artform’s history. These are “Water Lilies” by Monet, Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the examples without equal. They define the medium. Someday, I will put together my definitive list and write out big, long explanations for my choices. Not today. Just 10 films and a lifetime of cinematic memories.


10. Pather Panchali, directed by Satiyajit Ray

9. The Battle of Algiers, directed by Gillo Pontecorvo

8. Raging Bull, directed by Martin Scorsese

7. The Wild Bunch, directed by Sam Peckinpah

6. Do the Right Thing, directed by Spike Lee

5. The Exterminating Angel, directed by Luis Buñuel

4. Army of Shadows, directed by Jean-Pierre Melville

3. , directed by Federico Fellini

2. 2001: A Space Odyssey, directed by Stanley Kubrick

1. Citizen Kane, directed by Orson Welles