Thursday, March 7, 2019

New movie review: Woman at War



It can be easy to forget why the fight matters. Saving the earth from the destruction mankind has wrought is a goal that is equal parts grand and abstract. It is certain our survival depends on the fate of a planet that sure as hell did not need us before we got here but desperately needs us now. But what that means in real terms can start to blur around the edges.

Then you look in the eyes of a 4-year-old girl who has lost her family to war. Her face is pleading but resilient as she holds out a small bouquet. A photo of this girl provides the emotional through-line of Woman at War, the new film from Icelandic director Benedikt Erlingsson, which carries on that rich Scandinavian tradition of placing human comedy and human tragedy right alongside each other.

Halldóra Geirharðsdóttir stars as Halla, a choir director in her late 40s or early 50s who has dedicated her off hours to sabotaging Iceland’s smelting industry through direct attacks on its power grid. She is mild-mannered and sweet in her work but brave and determined in her battle, these two sides co-existing within her without irony or contradiction. She is all of these and more and always believably thanks to a fabulous performance by Geirharðsdóttir and a perfectly pitched script co-written by Erlingsson with Ólafur Egilsson.

Halla’s mission is thrown into jeopardy when she receives word an application for adoption she filed long ago – long before beginning her dangerous but vital work – has been approved. She will be mother to Nika, a 4-year-old Ukrainian girl whose parents died in the war and who was discovered with the body of her grandmother, who had been dead for days. She receives the photograph of this small child, alone in the world, and her dilemma is clear.

If Halla continues on her path, she is likely to be caught and thrown in jail, leaving Nika without a mother. At the same time, who is this struggle for if not for Nika? Saving the planet is necessary, yes, but that is the abstract. The specifics are to preserve a habitable home for children like Nika and to prevent the next generation from having to pay the bill for our mistakes. In this light, we see that Halla holds the future of not just one child in her hands, but all children.

The filmmaking throughout is superb, particularly during the thrilling sabotage sequences. Erlingsson makes wonderful use of Iceland’s natural beauty by often framing Geirharðsdóttir alone against vast, verdant fields and a steely gray sky. It is a high-stakes cat-and-mouse game, and Erlingsson milks the suspense for all it is worth. But whimsical flourishes like putting the musicians and singers providing the film’s score right on screen – not to be commented upon as part of the action but there like a record player might be – ensure the drama never becomes self-serious nor the message too heavy-handed.

The script is smart about the way politicians and industry leaders try to spin the climate debate in the press, portraying environmentalism as inherently anti-business and attempting to turn public sentiment against Halla and her quest. There are also some shenanigans with twins, cousins, and a luckless Mexican tourist, but all of this is spice. They provide depth and flavor to the film, but the true meal, the core of the story, is Halla’s responsibility to her future daughter and the future world.

The ending briefly looks as if it will be a little too tidy before closing on a confidently ambiguous and beautifully conceived final shot that ties all of the story’s thematic threads together. The destruction we have rendered is already upon us, it argues. We are knee-deep in it. There is nothing else we can do but forge ahead bravely, holding close and protecting that which matters most.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Countdown to the Oscars: What you can see




In past years, we have gone category by category when looking at the Academy Awards nominees, which was a fun but exhausting exercise for yours truly. This year, if you will allow, I would like to try something a little different: grouping the nominees by theme and examining them together.

To kick this off, I thought we would start with the crafts categories that make their presence known onscreen – in other words, what you can see.

In keeping with tradition, we will take a look at what nominee is likely to walk away with the win on Oscars night, what I would award, and what in a perfect world I would have liked to see on the shortlist.

It neither should escape our attention the Academy has announced the four categories it will not air live during the broadcast of the awards ceremony. Among them are Best Cinematography and Best Editing, to go with Best Makeup and Hairstyling and Best Live Action Short. You will note three of these categories discussed below, and while the entire affair is a travesty, the exclusion of Cinematography and Editing is particularly galling.

Roma director Alfonso Cuarón and reigning Best Director Guillermo del Toro have already weighed in with their displeasure, among many others, including the American Society of Cinematographers guild. ABC and the Academy seem unlike to waver on this point at this late date, so close to the show as we are, but here’s hoping a revolt among nominees – it would have to be led by the actors – can help correct this egregious error.

Best Cinematography


Nominees: Cold War; The Favourite; Never Look Away; Roma; A Star Is Born

Speaking of Cuarón, the director is the odds-on favorite to walk away with the prize here. He would be the first person to win for lensing a film he also directed. His guiding principle, he has said, was “What would Chivo do?” – a reference to longtime friend and collaborator Emmanuel Lubezski. Apart from the gorgeous lighting and lengthy tracking shots, a staple of Lubezski and Cuarón’s work together, Cuarón looks to be taking from Page 1 of the Chivo playbook: Win the Oscar. Lubezski is the only person to win this award three times in a row, taking home the award for Gravity (also directed by Cuarón), Birdman and The Revenant. Now his friend could be following in his footsteps.

The monkey wrench could be Cold War director of photography Lukasz Zal, who won the ASC guild award, though that could have been a group of cinematographers voting for one of their own over an outsider director. Zal’s square-framed, black-and-white work on Pawel Pawlikowsi’s daring romance would not be unworthy. My choice is probably running third here, Robbie Ryan’s daft, iconoclastic work on The Favourite, while six-time nominee Caleb Deschanel (Never Look Away) and twice-nominated Matthew Libatique (A Star Is Born) are probably also-rans, who both were surprise nominees to one degree or another.

This likely comes down to Roma vs. Cold War, and I expect the Academy as a whole will be less reluctant than the cinematographers to reward Cuarón for his lovely work.

Will win: Roma
Should win: The Favourite
Should have been here: First Man

Best Editing


Nominees: BlacKkKlansman; Bohemian Rhapsody; The Favourite; Green Book; Vice

An eclectic group to say the least, here we find a police procedural, a music biopic, a costume drama, a serio-comic road movie, and a political satire. The only thing missing is a war movie and we would have Best Editing BINGO.

Patrick J. Don Vito (Green Book) and Yorgos Mavropsaridis (The Favourite) do the least-flashy work here, though The Favourite features some spectacular dissolves, particularly during its end sequence. If Green Book maintains its cooling Best Picture heat, it is possible Don Vito scores here, but that is less likely by the day. Meanwhile, Barry Alexander Brown provides BlacKkKlansman with the kind of tight, crisp editing thrillers thrive on, and if the film picks up steam, he could be one to watch (or not, as again, this award will be presented during a commercial break).

In my estimation, however, it comes down to John Ottman for Bohemian Rhapsody and Hank Corwin for Vice. Both films traverse an expansive amount of time, incorporating flashbacks and flash forwards, and each is a feat of continuity. Corwin was previously nominated for The Big Short, while this is the first nomination for Ottman, who is the usual editor for disgraced director Bryan Singer, though Singer’s crimes should not be held against Ottman.

Many in the punditry are predicting a win for Vice here, but I do not see it. While that film’s buzz has cooled off the closer we have gotten to the ceremony, Bohemian Rhapsody remains at the forefront of the conversation amid a DVD release this week and lead actor Rami Malek’s ever-presence on the awards circuit. With all the whip-cracking cuts to the copious music and elegant blending of concert and studio footage, I will back Ottman’s work on the Queen biopic.

Will win: Bohemian Rhapsody
Should win: BlacKkKlansman
Should have been here: First Man

Best Production Design


Nominees: Black Panther; The Favourite; First Man; Mary Poppins Returns; Roma

Four period pieces and a fantasy, here is a group that is not exactly stepping outside its wheelhouse. At the same time, these nominees are as different as they are impressive, each bringing to vivid life the worlds they are eager to depict.

Fiona Crombie’s and Alice Felton’s work on The Favourite is the most traditional nominee among these, as a period piece set in the halls of British royalty, and it may very well be our winner. It would be hard to deny the film is a sumptuous feast for the eyes, though its most slam-dunk proposition may be the next category down.

Eugenio Cabellero and Barbara Enriquez recreated entire blocks of Mexico City for Roma, bringing a richness of detail and truth to the proceedings, while Nathan Crowley and Kathy Lucas brought the Apollo missions to life in First Man for a generation that barely remembers a time before “One small step.” John Myhre and Gordon Sim created a delightful world for Mary Poppins Returns, though the lengthy animated sequence at the film’s center may confuse the point for some voters.

Finally, Hannah Beachler and Jay Hart made the Wakanda of Black Panther a real place, as futuristic and fantastical as it may seem. It should also be said Beachler is the first African American to be nominated in this category, which should be considered an honor for her and a glaring oversight throughout the years by the Academy.

If you are asking me for a prediction, go with the clearly popular, heavily nominated period piece set mostly in the big, fancy castle, but watch out for a Black Panther-sized upset.

Will win: The Favourite
Should win: The Favourite
Should have been here: The Death of Stalin

Best Costume Design


Nominees: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs; Black Panther; The Favourite; Mary Poppins Returns; Mary Queen of Scots

Even more beholden to period work than the production designers, the costumers did not even bother nominating a worthy contemporary film such as Crazy Rich Asians. But if La La Land, which lost this award to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them two years ago, could not break the stranglehold – no contemporary film has won since The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert in 1993 (1994 ceremony) – this wasn’t going to be the year.

Academy favorite Sandy Powell (14 nominations, three wins) is a double nominee this year for The Favourite and Mary Poppins Returns, which also happen to be the two best designed films of the year. Don’t expect Powell to split her vote, as Academy members are likely to rally behind The Favourite and give it the deserved win here.

Alexandra Byrne’s costumes for Mary Queen of Scots are wading in the same territory as The Favourite but for the far less-acclaimed film. Mary Zophres’ The Ballad of Buster Scruggs is a bit of an outsider nominee, though not Zophres herself. She was previously nominated for the above-mentioned La La Land and the Coen Brothers’ other pure western, True Grit.

The spoiler could be Ruth E. Carter’s stunning Afro-futurist designs for Black Panther. Expect to read that a lot in this space, as Black Panther is a threat anywhere it is nominated, up to and including the big award. All it had to do was get to the dance, and the work will speak for itself.

Still, old habits die hard and Powell is a deserving and likely winner for the crazed, distressed rags of a monarchy in decline.

Will win: The Favourite
Should win: The Favourite
Should have been here: BlacKkKlansman

Best Makeup and Hairstyling


Nominees: Border; Mary Queen of Scots; Vice

It is a fascinating quirk of processes like these when for the third time in four years, an obscure (to Americans, at least) Swedish film is nominated in this category. The previous two times, it was the team of Love Larson and Eva von Bahr for The 100-year-old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared and A Man Called Ove. This time around, we have Göran Lundström and Pamela Goldammer for the strange and hypnotic Border. Like their countrymen, this team is the least likely winner, simply for the low profile of the film, but the work is tremendous and there is clearly something going right in the Swedish makeup and hairstyling community.

One need only look at the posters and other promotional materials to understand how Jenny Shircore, Marc Pilcher, and Jessica Brooks landed here for Mary Queen of Scots. The work on Margot Robbie alone likely would have been enough to score the nomination – though I actually found the prosthetic nose Robbie wore distracting. The film, however, is not held in high regard, and while their fellow craftsmen were always a strong bet to recognize this team, the Academy at large is less so.

That leaves Vice, the Best Picture nominee featuring showy prosthetics and hairstyling work throughout, supplementing another of Christian Bale’s miraculous – and disgusting, if you ask my wife – physical transformations. It has been written in this space before, but when there is a lone Best Picture nominee among this group, that is your winner almost every time. The last time that logic did not hold was 1997, when Titanic lost to Men in Black. Men in Black, however, was a showy, popular blockbuster. Vice faces no such competition.

Will win: Vice
Should win: Vice
Should have been here: Suspiria

Best Visual Effects


Nominees: Avengers: Infinity War; Christopher Robin; First Man; Ready Player One; Solo: A Stars Wars Story

Boy, the industry really held those kinda-funky rhinos against Black Panther this season. After the visual effects society most shied away from the Best Picture-nominated blockbuster, the Academy’s visual effects branch went a step further and failed even to nominate it. The snub seems a bit extreme when so much of the rest of the film was so brilliantly rendered, but here we are.

Avengers: Infinity War is holding down the Marvel Cinematic Universe spot this year, and while the MCU has been well represented among the past nominees, no Marvel film has won this award – not counting Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2, which won in 2002, prior to the rise of the modern Marvel universe. This year, however, it feels as though Avengers: Infinity War is likely to win almost by default.

Solo: A Star Wars Story was always a good bet for a nomination, considering every Star Wars film but Episode III has been named in this category. The nominating committee clearly likes these films, but the Academy has cooled to them, and no film outside the original trilogy has taken home gold here. The least acclaimed of the new-generation Star Wars films is unlikely to break that streak.

Steven Spielberg’s not-well-loved Ready Player One adaptation certainly features a lot of effects work, but to my eyes, much of it was dingy and unpleasant. First Man would be a deserving winner, but one fears its effects are too seamlessly integrated into the film to be noticed for their wonder – an ironic fate, to be sure. Meanwhile, Christopher Robin’s fuzzy Hundred Acre Wood residents are brought to life with all the charm one would hope for. I cannot let the moment pass without saying the film is an unmitigated joy, a nostalgia-inducing pleasure from beginning to end, though that will do nothing to carry it to the win.

Unless we are looking at another year as strange as that time Ex Machina swooped in and snatched this award, it appears Marvel will finally find the winner’s circle. Of course, none of these would be as shocking as that Ex Machina victory, which remains unlikely to be topped in that regard.

Will win: Avengers: Infinity War
Should win: First Man
Should have been here: Black Panther

Next time on the Countdown to the Oscars, we tackle What You Can Hear.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Countdown to the Oscars: Welcome to 2019



Time for a confession that won’t come as a shock to anyone who has followed the site: I am a longtime Academy apologist. If you have read my reviews of past Oscar ceremonies, you know this. If you have listened to me argue for Crash as the superior film to Brokeback Mountain, you know this – though I would argue Capote was that year’s best nominated film. I enjoyed the ceremony where Anne Hathaway tried her best to host with a high-out-of-his-mind James Franco, fully understanding my friends and I might be the only ones.

The Oscars ceremony is an event I look forward to all year, every year. It is not an exaggeration to say my calendar year revolves more around the Academy Awards than New Year’s Day. I say all this so you will understand it is out of deep love that I say this: Bluntly, I fear this year’s ceremony will suck. I don’t know that there is a better, more elegant way to put it. Sometimes, simple is best, and simply, this year might suck.

The Academy and its host network, Disney-owned (isn’t everything?) ABC have tripped all over themselves throughout this awards cycle, making mistake after mistake, correcting some, leaving others, until the ceremony they are proposing has begun to sound not like a classical celebration of movies but a grinding chore.

Let’s take a look at some of what’s gone on so far:

The Best Popular Film category: This was a clear disaster from the start. Before we get into it, let’s keep in mind that the driving force behind all of this is ratings. Ratings equal money, and there is no decision that has been announced, at least initially, that is not brutally aware of the bottom line. Of course, we all know how well bottom-line thinking and art co-exist.

Clearly, this attempt at broadening the variety of films nominated was aimed at including blockbusters like Black Panther, which of course is a popcorn masterpiece that was recognized in the top category on merit. The thinking goes: Blockbusters equal viewers because people will tune in to see movies they know about and enjoyed. Supporters of this theory will point to years like 1997 (1998 ceremony), when Titanic won Best Picture and the awards received their highest viewership ever.

This is a juicy premise, and it is understandable why the money men and women would choose to believe it, but it does not hold up to scrutiny. The Titanic ceremony drew 55.25 million viewers, the most ever, but the most watched ceremony by audience percentage was in 1970, when Midnight Cowboy – the X-rated drama about a gigolo, which no one would confuse with a blockbuster – won the top award.

The telecast numbers have gone down every year since 2014, five years of declining ratings resulting in last year’s show being the least watched ever. The Best Picture winner: The Shape of Water, a weird Cold War fish-sex romantic drama, which happened also to be the best film of the year. Perhaps understandable that no one tuned in for that? But keep in mind, box-office-wise, The Shape of Water outperformed every Best Picture winner since the downturn began.

The Academy and ABC are under the misconception that the nominated films somehow are keeping people away. They are not. Let me suggest the obvious – meaning I will not have been the first to say this. It is simply choice. When Titanic was named Best Picture of the year in 1998, 55 million people tuned in because what else were they going to watch. Hell, The Sopranos had not even debuted. Last year, roughly 26 million people watched, nearly half of the Titanic numbers. That looks bad, but in a different light, that represents half as many viewers who had 100 times the choice.

No single similar event but the Super Bowl (which, by the way, suffered dramatically reduced viewership this year) will ever draw 55 million viewers again. It just doesn’t happen in an era when there are 800 channels to watch and infinite streaming options.

The hosting debacle: Let’s say this right off – Kevin Hart would have been a fine host, in the vein of a Jimmy Kimmel, Jon Stewart, or Chris Rock. He would not have been blatantly offensive like Seth McFarlane, and he would not have been overly milquetoast like Ellen DeGeneres or Neil Patrick Harris, both whose hosting gigs I genuinely enjoyed. He likely would have hit the sweet spot in his opening monologue of pointed political humor and general inside-Hollywood jocularity. It would have been fine.

That said, I cannot fault anyone for their reactions to his past homophobic material, and Hart did not help himself with his half-hearted non-apologies. The Academy then suffered the unfortunate look of no one wanting to host the show, which has led to a host-less ceremony, the first of its kind since 1989, when 42 million people tuned in to watch Rain Man win Best Picture. That is roughly equivalent to the 42 million who watched Rock host in 2005 (Million Dollar Baby) and the 43.7 million who watched DeGeneres host in 2014 (12 Years a Slave), the highest-rated ceremony of the new century.

A good host is a bonus. He or she makes the ceremony more fun, more enjoyable, perhaps more whimsical. It is not, however, a make-or-break proposition. No one tunes in to see the host, which is among the most thankless jobs in Hollywood. No one ever likes the show, so you do your best, you try to have fun, then you try to forget about it. This should not have mattered as much as it did, but welcome to the modern era.

The tyranny of the three-hour show: This is ABC’s latest scourge, which has been evident in all of its decision-making and was painfully obvious at the normally loose and fun Academy Awards luncheon, where producer Donna Gigliotti stressed repeatedly the importance of keeping speeches short and getting the ceremony in in under three hours.

As we discuss this, keep in mind the longest Academy Awards on record came in 2002, when A Beautiful Mind was named Best Picture. The show lasted four hours and 23 minutes. The number of viewers: 40.5 million. Don’t let anyone tell you length matters to the viewer, or more specifically, the viewership numbers.

This myth that a three-hour show will help revive viewership has led to all of the worst ideas to come out of this year’s proposed ceremony: the plan to perform just two of the five Best Original Song nominees (corrected by virtue of nominee solidarity); the limiting of speech time to 90 seconds, including walk time; and most offensive of all, the shunting off to commercial breaks those categories that might be considered less sexy or viewer friendly.

I must believe – for sanity’s sake if nothing else – that these ideas were proposed by ABC. Otherwise, I would have to reconcile the idea that Academy has no idea what it is or what makes its show tick.

Limiting the songs to two is such a jaw-dropping idea one wonders how it could ever have been pitched. Some of the show’s best moments come from those songs – Common and John Legend’s performance of “Glory” from Selma is a watershed moment in Academy history. The nominees rightfully revolted, and we will have a full complement of songs – if shortened and bastardized to fit into a pre-determined window of time.

On speech length – counting walking time is by far the pettiest thing the producers can do to cut down on show runtime – let’s do some math. With 24 categories, at 90 seconds each, that is 36 minutes of speeches. With the allotted – and ludicrous – seven minutes to perform five original songs, that is 42 minutes of show. Say – and this is a rough estimate – they have to fill two hours and 10 minutes, with 50 minutes of commercials in their dream three-hour show. What you are left with is 88 minutes of host-less banter between awards speeches.

Throw in the In Memorium sequence and we have roughly 80 minutes of free-flowing, unmoored nonsense. This is the Oscars. It is about the winners. Any other belief is misguided and wrong-headed. The speeches are why one tunes in. We do not need to see comedians and actors and the like performing stilted “witty” conversations in lieu of the honest emotion of an artist reacting to the most important moment of his or her life.

Which brings us to the idea of hiding certain categories during the commercial break – rumored to be five or six categories with no word on which as of yet. The very idea is disgusting, and the Academy should be ashamed for allowing such an idea to make it out of a brainstorm – and for not firing the person who brainstormed it.

The Oscars are about celebrating movie-making, and there is not one person nominated in any category who is less important than another in the art of filmmaking. The show is supposed to be about giving them their moment in the sun. Not to do so is a betrayal of what the Academy Awards stand for.

I know it is all about commerce, and the show is essentially one big commercial for the movie industry. Love us, buy tickets, see movies. I get that. But at the same time, when the legendary Roger Deakins wins Best Cinematography on his 14th nomination, that is a moment to cherish. When a documentary filmmaker calls out the presidential administration for its lies and falsehoods, that is a moment. The show is about moments, and the artists are the ones who give us those moments. And that means all the artists, not just the ones whose faces we recognize.

How to fix the Oscars

This year’s ceremony cannot be saved. We are in an expect-the-worst, hope-for-the-best scenario already. But what can be done in the future? I would make a single change that would address all of the current demons haunting the Academy Awards.

Make it pay-per-view.

The dwindling numbers are evidence that given the preponderance of entertainment options – be they on TV, the internet, your phone, or some combination of all of these – only hard-core fans are going to watch the ceremony. This is fine. In fact, in the age of new media, it is ideal. It is impossible to survive by trying to be all things to all people. By attempting to pull this off, the Academy is not drawing in new viewers, but it is alienating its core viewers. With an entire media world at everyone’s fingertips, it is important to fill a niche. The Oscars are a perfectly constructed niche. Those who desire to watch will pay – a la carte viewership is the current wave of television consumption anyway.

In addition, by divorcing itself of a network and of corporate demands, the Academy is free to be its true self. This will be offputting to some – even I, a fan, would describe that true self as elitist, leftist, and self-congratulatory – but they would not watch to begin with. Instead, the Academy would be free to form a deeper connection with those it appeals to most. This creates loyalty and repeat viewership.

As far as the actual effect on the show, as we said, length is not a problem for viewers who care to watch in the first place. Moreover, on pay-per-view, commercial breaks are eliminated. For breaks when those in attendance – or those at home – might want to hit the bar, visit the bathroom, or just mingle, there are the montages the Academy loves so much each year. But now, instead of taking up valuable network airtime, they are the breaks in action, entertaining but disposable and perfectly suited to this function.

Ironically, this elimination of commercial breaks would naturally bring the length of the show down to three hours or less, but of course, that is not something the pay-per-viewers would care about. However, perhaps the show could move to Saturday night, when the pay-per-view could air live the entirety of the ceremony. Then, a network could buy the rights to an edited version of the ceremony to air later the same night or the next night – the traditional Sunday. This increases revenue and decreases running time.

Of course, by airing a tape-delayed version the next night, everyone will already know the winners, but the primary function of the show at that point would simply be as a piece of entertainment. With countless big-name stars, big musical numbers from the Original Song nominees, and a smart opening with a talented, funny host, it would be the best show on TV and would still draw the 25 million or so viewers who are watching anyway.

***

So, there it is. I am only a fan, and maybe I am way off base – but certainly no more than the Academy and ABC. I look forward to Oscars night every year, but this is the first year a sense of dread has crept into the equation. If the Academy cannot figure out what makes those who love it and follow it want to love and follow, it will die. And that would be a shame.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, which will proceed a little differently this year. Keep checking back here at the site for more analysis and discussion of the year’s Academy Award-nominated films.

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Roma, The Favourite top nominees for 91st Academy Awards

Roma


The Academy, so reluctant in recent years to embrace Netflix and the streaming revolution in general, has kicked that bad habit cold turkey this year with massive support for Alfonso Cuarón’s masterful Roma.

Nominees for the 91st Academy Awards were announced early Tuesday morning, and Roma led the way with 10, tied with Yorgos Lanthimos’ royal comedy The Favourite. A Star Is Born and Vice each picked up eight nominations, while Ryan Coogler’s powerful superhero epic Black Panther garnered seven.

All five of those films earned Best Picture nominations and are joined in the top category by BlacKkKlansman (six nominations), Bohemian Rhapsody (five), and Green Book (five).

Roma had been expected to be among the leaders and picked up expected nominations for Director, Cinematography, Sound Editing, and Sound Mixing but showed its true strength with well-deserved nominations for Yalitza Aparicio in Best Actress and Marina de Tavira in Best Supporting Actress. It also picked up nods for Production Design, Original Screenplay, and of course Foreign Language Film.

All of that means Cuarón is in position to walk away with five Academy Awards on the big night, as he served as writer, director, producer, and cinematographer on Roma. His name would also be on the statue in the Foreign Language category. He missed out on a sixth potential nomination when the film was surprisingly passed over for Best Editing, a category often seen as a bellwether for Best Picture.

Lanthimos, who had missed out with the Directors Guild, earned his first nomination for Best Director – a development that delights me to no end – and his wonderfully daft film showed up everywhere it conceivably could have. Its stars, Olivia Colman (Actress), Emma Stone (Supporting Actress), and Rachel Weisz (Supporting Actress) all picked up nominations, and though I would have liked to see all three in the leading category, I won’t argue with the recognition. The gorgeously mounted film was also named in Editing, Cinematography, Production Design, Costume Design, and Original Screenplay.

Filling out the Best Director category are Pawel Pawlikowski for Cold War, which also picked up a Cinematography nod and joined Roma among the Foreign Language nominees, Adam McKay for Vice, and Spike Lee with his long-overdue first directing nomination for BlacKkKlansman. That left Peter Farrelly (Green Book) and most shockingly Bradley Cooper (A Star Is Born) on the outside looking in, although both picked up other nominations – Farrelly for Original Screenplay and Cooper for Best Actor.

Coogler sadly did not make the final five for his work elevating the superhero genre to new heights, but the film’s stellar showing is evidence the Academy can embrace a Marvel blockbuster when it’s done right. Coogler, of course, knows how to do it right. In addition to Best Picture, Black Panther was cited for Costume Design, Production Design, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, Original Score, and Original Song. It was not included among the Visual Effects nominees, where Avengers: Infinity War will carry the Marvel banner.

Joining Cooper on the Best Actor list are Rami Malek (Bohemian Rhapsody), Christian Bale (Vice), Viggo Mortenson (Green Book), and Willem Dafoe (At Eternity’s Gate). Aparicio and Colman will compete for Best Actress with Glenn Close (The Wife), Lady Gaga (A Star Is Born), and Melissa McCarthy (Can You Ever Forgive Me?).

The Supporting Actor category features Adam Driver (BlacKkKlansman), Sam Elliott (A Star Is Born), Mahershala Ali (Green Book), Richard E. Grant (Can You Ever Forgive Me?), and Sam Rockwell (Vice). Amy Adams (Vice) and Regina King (If Beale Street Could Talk) round out the Supporting Actress category with Stone, Weisz, and de Tavira.

It is traditional for film lovers and Oscar watchers to spend the rest of nominations morning grousing about the movies and performances that were not nominated, but on a celebratory day such as this, I like to keep positivity on the menu.

In that spirit, I shall dispense with small gripes as quickly as possible. I wish Ethan Hawke and Amanda Seyfried had found more appreciation for their work in First Reformed. While Mary Poppins Returns pulled down four nominations (Score, Song, Costume Design, and Production Design), it would have been nice to see Emily Blunt recognized for finding her own take on the titular character and Rob Marshall cited for his fluid and fanciful direction. Other minor quibbles can be saved for another day.

In the plus column – and the plus far outweighs the minus today – I am overjoyed by the showings of both The Favourite and Roma, for my money the two best films of the year. Lanthimos’ and Lee’s directing nominations are music to my ears. Also, it is about time Paul Schrader gets some love from the Academy with an Original Screenplay nod that by no means should be his first but somehow is.

This might be my favorite Costume Design group in a long while, featuring the double Sandy Powell nomination (The Favourite and Mary Poppins Returns) and the out-of-this world Ruth Carter designs on Black Panther. Excited to see Bing Liu’s Minding the Gap in Documentary for the kind of long-form character study Liu’s mentor, Steve James, usually gets overlooked for. And finally, bravo for Hirozaku Kore-eda’s Shoplifters making the final five for Foreign Language.

That’s all for now folks. Click here for the full list of nominees, and check back on the site over the next month for more about these awards and these great films.

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Year in Review: Top 10 Films of 2018



Another year is in the books, and here at Last Cinema Standing, it was a year less productive than I might have hoped. Less productive in the sense that fewer words were written and fewer films were discussed. However, I got married, traveled across Europe for the first time, explored Canada some, and never stopped going to the movies.

The cinema was there through every step of it, and though I did not check in here as I would have liked, the mission never changed: to explore the defining art of our time and to encourage interest in and enthusiasm for the artists who make it.

For this go-around, in lieu of the traditional series of top 10 lists and a sort of state of the cinema, I thought we would just jump right in with the Top 10 Films of 2018. Some may disagree – and I should like to meet them and discuss – but I felt this year was among the best in recent memory. Several masters of the form returned with beautiful new works, while many young talents announced themselves to the world with vibrant, vital pieces.

What struck me most in compiling this list was the manner in which these films reflect the many worlds that surround us, both far flung and close to home. The below filmmakers could serve as a case study in the desperate need for differing points of view and fresh perspectives – whether that be a Chinese woman reinventing the American cowboy picture or a black man changing the way we think about superheroes.

There was a time – and for many, we are still living in that time – when such voices would not have been heard on such topics. That’s a shame and a travesty. I feel sorrow for all the voices held silent throughout the years, voices that could have made conversations in and about the cinema that much more interesting and informed. However, I feel joy for the voices we will hopefully hear in the future because these filmmakers stood up and shouted above the noise, demanding to be heard. It’s a better cinema and a better world when all voices have a say.

First, five films that did not make the top 10 but which will have left an indelible mark on the year in movies no less (alphabetically): Pawel Pawlikowski’s devastating Cold War, a doomed romance that effortlessly makes the personal universal; Paul Schrader’s triumphant return to form, First Reformed, following a crisis of faith in a world in which faith holds little value; Barry Jenkins’ If Beale Street Could Talk, a quietly radical tale of two lovers’ strength; Bing Liu’s moving, years-in-the-making documentary of youth and young manhood, Minding the Gap; and first-time feature director Paul Dano’s searing portrait of mid-20th century family life, Wildlife.

Without further ado, Last Cinema Standing’s Top 10 Films of 2018:

10. Blindspotting, directed by Carlos López Estrada


López Estrada’s feature debut defines “blindspotting” for us as an inability to see two realities at the same time, to witness the multitudes that surround us, or to accept people for everything they are and not just the one thing we see them as. Written by and starring childhood best friends Daveed Diggs and Rafael Casal, Blindspotting makes a poignant case that we are all losing a piece of our humanity by refusing to engage with the humanity in others.

The film – part of an Oakland Cinema Renaissance that also featured in movies like Black Panther and Sorry to Bother You this year – casts a wide net, tackling topics as diverse as gentrification, racial profiling, the prison system, and identity. It does so with insight and ingenuity, grabbing our attention with story of ex-con Collin (Diggs) trying to make things right and holding it with an engaging exploration of the political and social realities that make that quest so difficult.

Diggs, perhaps best known for his stage work in Broadway smash Hamilton, draws you into Collin’s world and makes you feel the pain and persecution he lives with, while never letting you forget the resilience it takes to make it through the day. When the world tries to break him, it leads to a climax that is at once unexpected and perfect. Collin stands in for all those struggling to keep their heads above water while the weight of history pulls them down. The struggle is the story, and in that story are multitudes, there to see if only we chose to look.

9. First Man, directed by Damien Chazelle


Neil Armstrong’s voyage to the moon is among the defining moments of the collective human experience. It connects us all, striking at the thing inside us that demands to know what else is out there and whether we are capable of finding it. As such, it is simply shocking the story had not been made into a major motion picture, daunting as the challenge may seem. Leave it to Chazelle, then, to take the classic hero’s journey and turn it on its head.

First Man is thrill ride as character study. This is not The Right Stuff, an exhaustive historical accounting of the space program. Nor is it Apollo 13, a crowd-pleasing space flick about the power of human ingenuity and spirit. No, it is something else entirely. Coming off the $150 million-grossing La La Land, Chazelle’s latest effort was a surprise box-office failure. This, of course, says less about the film’s merit than it does about the audience’s desire for heroes to be bold and triumphs to be black and white (to say nothing of the inane flag non-controversy that dogged the film).

What the low grosses are proof of most of all, however, is the risk Chazelle took – undertaken as well by stars Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy – to tell an intimate tale of grief and loss across the backdrop of the most exciting adventure on which humankind has ever embarked. The great lead performances express all of the repression and fragility innate in these characters, trying to hold a life together while one of them travels farther from the other than any human has ever been from humanity. In the end, it turns out Chazelle was less interested in exploring that physical distance than the emotional distance between two souls and whether that gap can ever be bridged, here on earth or in the heavens.

8. Mary Poppins Returns, directed by Rob Marshall


It occurs to me how little unfettered, unabashed, all-out genuine joy many of us experience in our day-to-day lives. The world is not so peachy, and lives are hard, but it seems there must be room for joy. Never is that sense more palpable than when confronted with a pure distillation of exuberance, happiness, and, yes, joy. That is precisely what veteran musical director Marshall finds in Mary Poppins Returns.

Rare is the film that leaves you sore from smiling and happier for it. Rarer still is the film that accomplishes this without once feeling forced or false. Marshall, screenwriter David Magee, and star Emily Blunt approach the story with neither irony nor the winking snark that sours so much of today’s pop cultural landscape. Instead, the filmmakers embrace this bold, lovely tale in all its dreamy, technicolor glory, and they ask us to do the same.

The film version of Mary Poppins, that magical nanny who descends from the clouds, has always been about letting the pains and pressures that tie us down fade into the background and allowing the small pleasures to lighten and lift us up. It is a cheery message, to be sure. Some might say sappy or, worse, naïve. And maybe Mary Poppins Returns is the escapist fantasy its detractors claim it to be, but I say that is a feature, not a flaw. The sooner we can grab hold of that, the sooner we can all float on.

7. The Rider, directed by Chloé Zhao


White American men have not said all there is to say about The Western, that most American and male of genres. They have, however, said all they have to say about it – then repeated it and spit it back out ad infinitum throughout the history of the medium. It took Chinese émigré Zhao to find something new to say and, more importantly, a new way to say it.

This is a dusty, dirty tale of masculinity set in a frontier that is shrinking, in idea if not land. It is a cowboy picture of the highest order, but Zhao has no interest in the mythmaking that implies. Rather, her camera is fascinated by the hardscrabble lives of young men with few options or outlets and the rites and rituals they enact, more out of habit than desire.

With a cast populated by non-actors, all playing some version of themselves, The Rider tells the story of Brady (Brady Jandreau), who knows only one life and is one more bad accident from losing that life forever. If a rider cannot ride, who is he, the film asks. In so asking, it forces us to question how we define ourselves and those around us and what more there could be than what is there at first glance. At every turn, Zhao and her gorgeous film upend our expectations, and perhaps more impressive, they demand we set greater expectations, not only for ourselves but for the world we inhabit.

6. The Other Side of the Wind, directed by Orson Welles


The miracle of this film’s existence would be enough to make it a must-see. The long, troubled history of The Other Side of the Wind is by now common knowledge to those who would seek out such knowledge. For those wishing to know more, Morgan Neville’s superlative documentary They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead is an excellent starting point. All of this is to say to the film did not have to be a masterpiece to be magnificent, but in life, Welles could make nothing less. The same holds true in death, as the long-gone master delivers one last lesson.

Much has been said and will be said of the metatextual narrative of the film: An aging, legendary filmmaker is having trouble pulling together the financing for what would be his final film while critics and sycophants alike hover around like vultures, looking for scraps to gnaw from the carcass. But as much as we want to see Welles in his lead character, director Jake Hannaford (John Huston), the magician behind the camera is cleverer than that.

Welles weaves a shapeshifting tale of debauchery and hedonism among the Hollywood elite, an Eden overrun with sin. At the same time, he unleashes some of the most boldly satirical and astonishingly experimental filmmaking of his career in the film within the film, itself titled “The Other Side of the Wind.” What we are left with is the final document, the evidence – if there needed to be any further – of an iconoclast who pushed the boundaries of cinema right to the end and, it turns out, after as well.

5. Shoplifters, directed by Hirokazu Kore-eda


There have been films made before about how the best families are the families we choose. At this point, it is something of a clichéd logline. There are fewer movies – none comes to mind – about how difficult it is to keep that chosen family together. More than anything, Kore-eda, the humanist Japanese auteur, has made a film about the forces, internal and external, that pull us away from the things we need in this life.

On its face, Shoplifters does not appear to have much going on outside its central story of a family of thieves that takes in a young girl from the cold. However, in every new revelation about who these people are and what truly drives them, Kore-eda finds new meaning and new depth, which he mines for maximum empathy. It is a film of fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, husbands and wives, but it is also none of these things. We ultimately discover these are just people fulfilling that most basic of human needs: connection.

With a deft directorial hand and a storyteller’s knack for pulling you into the drama, Kore-eda, who also wrote the script, builds tension and anxiety until you fear you will jump out of your seat and leap to the screen, wishing to grab these characters and tell them someone out here cares for them. The very effortlessness with which Kore-eda communicates all of this serves as proof of just how difficult it really is. For, if were so easy to craft a gem such as this, would not we have more of them?

4. Black Panther, directed by Ryan Coogler


There has never been a more important superhero movie than this. Some movies capture the zeitgeist. Black Panther simply is the zeitgeist. Coogler, named multiple times on this site as the best young director in the game, stands up and practically demands that title with this Afro-futurist pop fantasia that is as radical as it is crowd-pleasing. Black Panther – yes, the big-budget, comic-book behemoth – is certainly the movie of our time, but in a just cinematic universe, it would be the movie of the future as well. Every blockbuster should be so bold and brilliant.

The superhero formula – and the Marvel formula in particular – can sometimes feel like it was handed down from on high, etched into stone tablets. Coogler takes those tablets, destroys them, and rearranges the pieces into a new form that reflects not the cold calculation of a studio board room but the beating heart of an artist. With a predominantly black cast and a crew of collaborators of the kind overlooked by big Hollywood for too long, including cinematographer Rachel Morrison and costume designer Ruth E. Carter, Coogler smashes down the doors of the establishment and plants his flag.

The story of King T’Challa (Chadwick Boseman) and the usurper Erik Killmonger (Michael B. Jordan) is a story of African determinism and black activism dressed up in the robes of a high-tech, sci-fi shoot-‘em-up. Simply populating the world with strong, intelligent, relatable black characters would be radical enough in the history of Hollywood, but Coogler takes it the extra step further with a film that demands the viewer be actively engaged. It dares to challenge and subvert the standard narrative of all those films that look like it but could never be it. Black Panther requires your attention and your thought. And it gets it.

3. BlacKkKlansman, directed by Spike Lee


Lee picked up an honorary Oscar in 2016, a career achievement award from an Academy that had to that point failed to recognize duly any of the filmmaker’s career achievements. It is the kind of award given to artists toward the end of their careers, when their best work is behind them. How silly the Academy must feel now that Lee has produced his best film in years, a film that by all rights should be Lee’s first Best Picture nominee and earn him his long-overdue first Best Director nomination. Of course, it is not about awards. It is about respect – the respect Lee has gone too long without. Here, he garners it without compromising one bit of the vision that has made him who he is.

BlacKkKlansman is at once a buddy-cop drama, a ’60s radical picture, and a prestige period drama, all filtered through a lens that is best described only as Spike. Ron Stallworth (John David Washington) and Flip Zimmerman (Adam Driver) – a black man and a Jewish man – infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan in a tale that if it were not true, would be impossible to believe. Lee exposes and dissects the dark heart of a nation still stained by the virulent plague of racism and which to this day, would rather look away than confront its deeply troubled past. ‘That’s a problem that existed,’ we wish to say, and Lee rebuts: ‘It is a problem that exists.’

The racist Klansmen of the film are buffoons, yes, but Lee never lets us forget they are well-connected buffoons, powerful buffoons, dangerous buffoons. It is not up for debate that the KKK is a terrorist organization that exists only to strike fear in the hearts of its enemies. Klansmen are terrorists who live here. Work here. Shop here. And march in our streets. It was true then and it is true now. And here is Lee with BlacKkKlansman, to show us how far we have not come.

2. Roma, directed by Alfonso Cuarón


Roma is a love letter to a place, a people, a history, written by the only filmmaker who could write so beautifully and so elegantly. Cuarón is hardly the first filmmaker to pen an ode to the times of his youth. On the contrary, the coming-of-age film is almost a rite of passage. This is not that, though. Cuarón is too smart a writer for that, too canny a filmmaker. With Roma, his masterpiece, he crafts a loving paean to the women who raised him, immortalizing their stories in ways the cinema has rarely seen.

Newcomer Yalitza Aparicio stars as Cleo, nanny to a wealthy family in Mexico City. Right away, we are privy to the visible and invisible class structures that define her life and the lives of those with whom she interacts. We see Cleo’s routine – she mops, she scrubs, she washes, she hangs the laundry out to dry – and we feel the rhythm of her day. All the while, the sights and sounds – oh, the sounds – of Mexico surround her and us, enveloping us and making the world of the story a fully lived in place, marked by hopes and dreams, loves and losses, life and death.

Immersion is too small a word for what Cuarón accomplishes with Roma. The film surrounds you, makes you a part of its whole, piling layer on top of layer, emotion on top of emotion, sensation on top of sensation. You are held speechless, breathless, enthralled by a new kind of cinema. Cuarón, who serves here as writer, director, producer, editor, and cinematographer, has dazzled us with his technical prowess before (Gravity and Children of Men spring to mind), but never before has he employed those gifts in service of a story this worthy. It is cinema and storytelling as high art, and with Roma, Cuarón has carved his name alongside the cinema’s foremost artists.

1. The Favourite, directed by Yorgos Lanthimos


It was only a matter of time, really, before Lanthimos made the best film of the year. Every film he has made has been in contention for the title. Dogtooth was a bleak comic fable. The Lobster a moving meditation on romance and fascism. The Killing of a Sacred Deer a strange, haunting morality play. Now, finally, Lanthimos achieves full Kubrickian splendor with a daft comedy of royal intrigue that is as unabashedly entertaining as it is formally accomplished. Everything he has made has been building to this satirical haymaker that lands with the blunt force of a sledgehammer to the chest.

From a biting and brilliant script by Deborah Davis and Tony McNamara, Lanthimos crafts a whole new kind of costume drama, one that isn’t afraid to roll around in the muck, literally and figuratively. It is the early 1700s, in the court of Queen Anne (Olivia Colman), and Lady Sarah (Rachel Weisz) controls the queen through sly mind games and overt sexual manipulation. Into this closed world arrives Abigail (Emma Stone), a ruthless social climber who will stop at nothing to achieve her ends. The power struggle that forms among these three women forms the basis of the wildest, most irreverent tale of the monarchy ever put to film.

Every element of the film has been fashioned to feed into the nightmare these characters have allowed to fester around them – the luxurious but tattered costumes; the fright-fest hair and makeup; the crumbling architecture of the set design; and most of all, that insane, near-fisheye camerawork that spins you like a top then stops you on a dime. Of course, it is the three-headed beast of a performance among Colman, Weisz, and Stone that ensures the film reaches its greatest potential, each actress delivering work that is by turns loony and lyrical, depraved and delectable.

From the irreverent title design onward, The Favourite is everything you could want from the cinema. It provides a sumptuous banquet for the eyes, the ears, and the mind. It is a gluttonous experience and a film filled to the brim with gluttons. Gluttons for food, power, wealth, influence, status, you name it. Lanthimos’ final trick is to show us the corrosive emptiness of getting everything you ever wanted – all it does is make you want more. And I will admit to suffering the same sin when it comes to films like this: Give me more.

Note: We will hopefully in the coming days explore the rest of 2018’s wonderful offerings, with discussions on the performances, moments, and quotes that stood out last year. The Oscar season will be fully upon us Tuesday with the announcement of the 2018 nominees, and we will be here to discuss that as well.

Last year, we got cut off in the middle of this. The goal this year is to make the workload more manageable so that it will not happen again. Let’s see how this goes. All I can promise is that I’ll be here, ready and willing, to talk about the cinema.