Showing posts with label Alan Tudyk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alan Tudyk. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2015

New movie review: Trumbo

Bryan Cranston plays Dalton Trumbo in director Jay Roach's historical drama Trumbo.

The U.S. has suffered a few black eyes over the years, mostly its own doing and mostly revolving around unfounded persecution. Native populations, blacks, women, Japanese, a whole cross-section of Europeans, and practitioners of most major and minor non-Protestant Christian religions have all been on the receiving end of the distinctly American us-vs.-them treatment. In the harsh light of history, all of these cases have been rightly viewed as affronts to human dignity.

Among the more fascinating ages in this country’s short history is the mid-20th century, when we rabidly feared communist aggression and insidious socialist agendas. Not a decade removed from four terms of the most socialist president the U.S. is likely ever to have, congress swung the pendulum the other direction in a big way with the House Un-American Activities Committee and Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s legislative witch hunts.

Hollywood has gone to this well a few times, most recently and most successfully with George Clooney’s stellar Goodnight and Good Luck, about newsman Edward R. Murrow’s fight against McCarthy. Now comes director Jay Roach’s Trumbo, which looks at the role Hollywood itself played in discriminating against ideas deemed dangerous or subversive. Trumbo plays like a lighter companion piece to the Clooney film, neither as hard hitting nor as tightly crafted but not without merit.

Cranston in Trumbo.
Bryan Cranston, in his first major post-Breaking Bad screen appearance, plays Dalton Trumbo, a screenwriter and novelist at the top of the world. As the film begins, Trumbo’s books and movies are never more popular, he and his lovely family live on a massive estate, and he signs a deal to become the highest paid writer in Hollywood. Writer John McNamara, adapting the book Dalton Trumbo by Bruce Cook, spends the first half of his script stripping away everything Trumbo has spent his life building. The second half chronicles his fight against the system that tried to destroy him.

The plot kicks off with Congress becoming concerned with the messages being promoted by Hollywood films – an unsurprising and sadly still relevant turn of events. Showing a cowardice that had hurt it before and would hurt it again, the movie industry took steps to censor itself under the spurious logic that if anyone was going to harm the film business, it might as well be the studios themselves. In this way, the infamous blacklist was born.

The Hollywood Ten, which counted among its ranks Trumbo and Ring Lardner Jr., chose not to answer HUAC’s questions and were cited for contempt of Congress. They took their battle to the Supreme Court, where they lost, and most of them ended up in prison, except for one who turned against the group and cooperated with the investigation. When Trumbo gets out of prison, he finds himself to be a pariah, unable to work or support his family.

He and a number of other members of the Hollywood Ten began taking writing jobs from schlock movie producer Frank King (John Goodman) and producing scripts under aliases. This specific topic was tackled in the tremendous and tremendously underrated 1976 comedy The Front, directed by Martin Ritt. Trumbo certainly has elements of that earlier film but fills in the history around the edges for audiences who are another four decades removed from the era.

Roach, known mostly for comedies such as Meet the Parents and the Austin Powers series, is a bit out of his element directing a historical drama. There is an undercurrent of black comedy running through the film, but it is tempered by the gravity of the events being depicted. Traditionally comic performers such as Louis CK and Alan Tudyk deliver solid, measured performances in supporting roles, and even the most overtly comic character, King, benefits from committed, carefully crafted work by Goodman. It should be noted Diane Lane and Helen Mirren also provide sharp supporting performances in less well defined roles as the wife (Lane as Cleo Trumbo) and antagonist (Mirren as Hedda Hopper).

Helen Mirren and Cranston in Trumbo.
Where Roach gets in trouble is in the details. Namely, there are too many. Running more than two hours, the movie feels at least an hour longer and could easily have been a half-hour shorter. Roach and McNamara get bogged down in their step-by-step recounting of the trials of the Hollywood Ten early on and the writing of the King scripts later. There is something to be said for historical context and a desire to get the details right, but good filmmakers know when to trust the audience, and Trumbo too often feels as though it is holding the audience’s hand.

It is a shame because if ever there were a story that could breeze by on the strength of its emotional resonance, it is this one. The communist witch hunts and Hollywood blacklist are such a clear systemic failure that audiences need just a basic understanding of the events to become invested in the struggle of those facing persecution. Had the filmmakers stripped away some of the minutiae, they could have given the story much more room to breathe and cleared the way for Cranston’s towering central performance.

As with his famous portrayal of television anti-hero Walter White, Cranston absolutely commands the screen as Trumbo. He imbues his Trumbo with a brash, swaggering confidence and a palpable sense of righteous indignation. He has the maniacal single-mindedness of someone who believes there is a right and wrong answer to every question and also believes he always has the right answer.

The world according to Trumbo: Early in the film, his daughter asks him if she is a communist since he is. He proposes a scenario in which she has a sandwich and another child at school does not. Would she share her sandwich or tell the other kid to get a job and buy his own sandwich? Share, she says. Then, she is as much a communist as he is. The script occasionally buys into this highly simplified worldview, but Cranston never does. At all times, he is selling the nuances of a broken system that Trumbo refuses to let break him.

Cranston does not play Trumbo as a hero so much as an indignant rabble rouser who happens to be on the side of good. It is because of people like Trumbo, Murrow, the Hollywood Ten, and others that we are able to look back critically on times when ignorance and injustice threatened to destroy us from within – if only we could look at ourselves with the same critical lens, learn from our mistakes, and not repeat them. That world might be an okay place to live.

See it? Yes.

Friday, October 17, 2014

31 Days of Horror: Tucker and Dale vs. Evil



Tyler Labine and Alan Tudyk encounter force they cannot begin to understand in Tucker and Dale vs. Evil.
In addition to our regular programming, every day this month, Last Cinema Standing will be bringing readers recommendations from the best of the horror genre as we make our way to Halloween. This should not be treated as a “best of” list but more as a primer. You can read the full introduction to Last Cinema Standing’s 31 Days of Horror here, and be sure to check back each day for a new suggestion.

Day 17: Tucker and Dale vs. Evil (2010)

It is alright for friends to disagree, and with that in mind, today we are going to discuss something about which a lot of true-blue horror fans disagree: parody. Bad parody is just the worst. It is depressing, and because its tropes and rules are so well defined, the horror genre tends to be the target of a lot of parody. Most of it is unfortunate and unwatchable.

The best parodies are made with love and appreciation for the subject being lampooned. In this respect, Shaun of the Dead is probably the most popular and successful example, and Edgar Wright’s second feature is a thorough skewering of horror in general and zombie films in particular. It is quite good, and I would not begrudge anyone who has not seen it adding it to the list. But one of my goals is to champion the underdog, and writer-director Eli Craig’s little-seen gem of a debut feature, Tucker and Dale vs. Evil, definitely qualifies as an underdog.

Craig and co-writer Morgan Jurgenson take all of our favorite horror movie clichés – a diverse group of students, a dilapidated cabin in the woods, back-country hillbillies, etc. – and shift the audience’s perspective on these tropes in very slight ways. In so doing, they turn up the absurdity to the proverbial 11, but it is absurdity as high art. Craig and Jurgenson’s change of focus forces viewers to consider the ways their preconceived notions affect how they relate to the characters.

Case in point, Alan Tudyk and Tyler Labine play Tucker and Dale, two country-boy friends on a fishing trip at their cabin, a vacation home that is a fixer-up at best. Due to a series of increasingly insane but never implausible misunderstandings, they are positioned as hillbilly serial killer-stalker-kidnappers and a threat to an obnoxious group of college kids whose path they cross. The audience knows better, but in traditional horror films, we would be seeing through the eyes of the college kids, who it must be said have a legitimate if misplaced gripe.

This is where prejudices and preconceptions come into play. Craig and Jurgenson give the audience the benefit of seeing things from Tucker and Dale’s point of view, but the college kids do not have that overarching perspective. What they see are hillbillies, malice, and danger. They feel under attack because they are programmed to be the victims in this situation. By reacting violently against that stereotype, without considering their own stereotyping of the predicament, the college kids become the villains, leaving Tucker and Dale as unlikely, unprepared, and almost blissfully unaware heroes.

If horror has never been your cup of tea – and it is not for a lot of people, which is fine because, again, it is alright for friends to disagree – I still would urge you to give this a try. It is gory and constantly threatening to fly of the rails into insanity, but it is hilarious, honestly unparalleled. I have seen a lot of parody, even good parody, but I have never laughed as hard as I have at Tucker and Dale battling evil.

Tomorrow, we tag along with another unwitting duo in a classic horror-comedy of the first order.