Showing posts with label Best Makeup and Hairstyling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Best Makeup and Hairstyling. Show all posts

Monday, March 4, 2024

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Makeup and Hairstyling


Welcome to this year’s edition of Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, where we will break down each of the 23 categories, analyze the films, and make some guesses at their awards prospects.


Best Makeup and Hairstyling


The nominees are:


Golda

Maestro

Oppenheimer

Poor Things

Society of the Snow


Golda

This was maybe not the best time for a movie celebrating the wartime actions of an Israeli prime minister, in this case Golda Meir’s handling of the Yom Kippur War. To be fair, Golda was released a little more than two months before the current violence in Gaza broke out, but I saw it two months after the fact, and let me tell you, the context has changed.


Anyway, this is a hair and makeup award, so let’s focus on that. This is one of those nominations like Judy a few years ago or The Iron Lady back in 2011 where the whole magic trick is to turn one famous person into another famous person, then have that trick hold up throughout the course of a film. Grading on that scale, Golda is a tremendous success, and Helen Mirren absolutely becomes Meir for the runtime of the movie. 


The work is made more impressive by how much of the movie director Guy Nattiv shoots in closeups on Mirren’s face. The makeup work absolutely holds up under scrutiny, which is no simple feat. The movie, itself, maybe doesn’t hold up under similar scrutiny.


Maestro

I had a whole funny Shakespeare thing here, but it feels a little hokey. Eh, I’ll do it anyway: “What’s in a nose? That which we call a nose, on any other face, would smell as easily.” Perhaps not my best work. The point, in more ways than one, is the nose on Bradley Cooper’s face in this film, the nose that perhaps helps him transform into composer Leonard Berstein just a little better. 


Some folks tried to turn it into a controversy before the movie came out, going so far as to call it “Jew face,” which is its own brand of problematic. The Berstein kids came out and said they were fine with it, that the movie is a lovely tribute to their parents, and that anyone focused on the nose needs to get over it. Their dad had kind of a big nose. It’s not a big deal.


So, the nose took up a lot of air in the room – so many nose puns! – but the onscreen transformation of Cooper into Bernstein is much fuller and richer than a single appendage. The old-age makeup on both Cooper and Carey Mulligan is tremendous, though of course we expect nothing less from Kazu Hiro and team. Hiro is a five-time nominee and two-time winner in this category for Darkest Hour and Bombshell.


Oppenheimer

For all of this film’s wonderful qualities, I thought the old-age makeup on Cillian Murphy and Emily Blunt in the color sequences toward the end of this movie was kind of bad. Robert Downey Jr. gets a similar treatment in the black-and-white portions of the movie, but that holds up quite a bit better. In particular, in the scene when Robert Oppenheimer is receiving his award and congratulations from all the folks we’ve met throughout the film, the makeup is more distracting than enhancing. But, making movies is hard, and that’s just one man’s opinion.


Poor Things

One imagines the two major factors in this nomination were the prosthetic work on Willem Dafoe’s mad scientist and the tattoo work on Kathryn Hunter’s brothel owner, and we’ll get to those in a minute. First, I want to call out the hairstyling in this film, which is exceptional. Despite adding “Hairstyling” to the name of the award a number of years ago, few popular discussions center around the hair part of Makeup and Hairstyling.


In Poor Things, you can almost chart Bella Baxter’s (Emma Stone) entire story through the hairstyling alone. It’s a remarkable achievement, which is not even to mention all of the women in the brothel, as well as the men in this film, who are all stylishly coiffured. So, well-deserved cheers to the hairstyling department that worked on this picture.


As for the prosthetics, they are, of course, superb, telling us everything we need to know about the Dr. Frankenstein-esque God who kicks off this story. The tattoo work on Hunter’s Madame Swiney is also a marvel, with each tattoo telling a different story about this fascinating character’s past – whole lives lived that we get only a peek into thanks to her fabulous body art. One can only imagine how long she must have spent in makeup for all of that.


Society of the Snow

To my eye, this is actually the most impressive work of the bunch. As much as the makeup helps tell the story of Maestro or Golda or Oppenheimer, it’s more of a “nice to have” than a necessity. We would still believe Mirren as Meir or Cooper as Bernstein or Murphy as Oppenheimer without the makeup because they are talented actors who inhabit their characters. The makeup is great, but without it, you’d still have a movie. Not so with Society of the Snow.


For 72 days, the survivors of Flight 571 fought for their lives in the Andes Mountains. They suffered cuts and bruises. Some of those cuts got infected. They were malnourished. It was hell, but as the movie makes clear, it was a slow hell. Things devolved over time, not all at once. From a makeup standpoint, this means keeping track of where each survivor is in his story over the course of all 72 days. When did he get that cut? How much has it progressed? Is it getting worse or better?


The verisimilitude of the film depends on these questions having air-tight answers and those answers translating onto film through the makeup work. Miracle of miracles, it does, and we never once stop believing the reality of what these people suffered. That’s what great makeup can do for a film.


The final analysis


I’m betting on Maestro here. The mild controversy around the makeup is only likely to make more voters sit up and pay attention to the work. Poor Things is a potential spoiler in the category, but it’s hard to argue with what Hiro and team accomplish in Maestro. Fellow nominated makeup artist Kay Georgiou was previously nominated in this category for Joker – an award she lost to Hiro – while this is hairstylist Lori McCoy-Bell’s first nomination.


Will win: Maestro

Should win: Society of the Snow

Should have been here: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3


A note about my favorite snub: I don’t have super strong feelings about this, but I do think the makeup effects in the Guardians of the Galaxy series are about as good as they come in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The first film in the series was nominated in this category – it lost to The Grand Budapest Hotel in 2014 – but neither of the sequels has made it in. The work here at least is a little more fun, inventive, and all encompassing than the work in something like Golda, which while impressive, is more limited in scope.

Sunday, February 5, 2017

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Makeup and Hairstyling

Sofia Boutella in Star Trek Beyond, nominated for Best Makeup and Hairstyling.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day leading up to the ceremony for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories and more.

Best Makeup and Hairstyling


The nominees are:

A Man Called Ove
Star Trek Beyond
Suicide Squad

God bless this branch. The makeup artists and hairstylists who nominate these films do not give a toss what anyone thinks of their nominations. I say it every year, but it bears repeating: For this branch, these nominations are about the quality of the work, nothing more and nothing less. It is an art about which I know little – except to say old-age Leonardo DiCaprio in J. Edgar: pretty good; old-age Armie Hammer in J. Edgar: pretty bad – but it still is among my favorite categories just for its unbridled strangeness.

Two years ago, in the inaugural edition of this column, I listed some of the odd, awful, and out-of-left-field contenders this category has produced. I did the same last year. In that spirit, let’s see if I can conjure a few more names to add to our list of films you would never guess are Oscar-nominated. Keep in mind, the award has only been around since about 1981, so eventually I will run out of titles, but not yet. How about: The Clan of the Cave Bear; Bicentennial Man; and Albert Nobbs?

Idiosyncratic as ever, this is the first time since 2011 there is no Best Picture nominee in the lineup. In each of those previous four years, a Best Picture nominee took home the prize, most likely because the Academy, unlike the makeup branch, will vote for the movie it likes best. This helps explain a win like The Iron Lady, for which Meryl Streep also won Best Actress. This year pits two mega-hit franchise films with just this single nomination against a popular Swedish indie that is also nominated for Best Foreign Language Film. So, yeah, this branch goes its own way. 

A Man Called Ove – Filling a niche the Academy probably did not know existed, A Man Called Ove represents the second straight year in which an oddball Swedish film featuring extensive old-age makeup has found its way into the lineup. To make the final three, it bested fellow finalists Deadpool, The Dressmaker, Florence Foster Jenkins, and Hail, Caesar!, any of which the Academy at large is more likely to have seen. Perhaps its inclusion here says more about its chances in the Foreign Language category than vice versa.

To be sure, its inclusion here is not as out of left field as last year’s nomination for the delightful Swedish blockbuster The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared. While A Man Called Ove is a fine film, more about which we will discuss later in this series, it does not reach the heights of its fellow nominees in the makeup and hairstyling department. It is admirable the transformation the film’s star, Rolf Lassgård, undergoes to become Ove, but the scale of the work simply does not compare here. Of course, how could it?

Makeup designers Love Larson and Eva Von Bahr were nominated for their work last year on The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared, and they are operating in much the same territory here. There is never a moment where the much younger-looking actor Lassgård looks like anything other than the elderly, pudgy Ove. The work is seamless in close-ups and under certain extreme conditions. It is to be applauded, but it lacks, by design, the grandeur and scope of the other two nominees.

Star Trek Beyond – For scope and grandeur in this category, you cannot beat Star Trek Beyond. Director Justin Lin’s film simply could not exist without its special makeup effects. Background characters in this world feature the kind of makeup effects that would win awards in other years. The various alien and mutant creatures that populate the Star Trek universe are a veritable playground for makeup artists, and they have made good use of it throughout the years. This is the fourth film of the various Star Trek franchises to receive a nomination in this category, and it won the award last time out.

Special makeup effects artist Joel Harlow, who has been Johnny Depp’s personal makeup artist for about a decade now, won an Oscar for the 2009 Star Trek reboot and previously was nominated for Depp starrer The Lone Ranger. This is Richard Alonzo’s first nomination, though he did work as a makeup artist on the 2009 Star Trek. The pair’s makeup and prosthetics work here is remarkable, particularly for the villain Krall (Idris Elba) and the Enterprise team’s new partner Jaylah (Sofia Boutella).

Suicide Squad – It has some competition, but there is a good chance this is the worst film nominated for an Academy Award this year. Suicide Squad is just the fourth comic-book superhero movie cited in this category, joining Batman Returns, The Dark Knight, and Guardians of the Galaxy. Note the presence of Batman – the greatest superhero – in three of the four and the fact none of the four has ever won this award.

The Academy does not care much for superhero movies, perhaps thinking they signal the death of the cinema – and if any does, it is Suicide Squad – but it would be a mistake to discount the dirty-old-man factor. The Academy, despite reform efforts, still is made up of mostly older, mostly white men who simply may enjoy watching Margot Robbie – who, to take nothing away from her, is quite good if badly underutilized for her acting in the film. Of course, if Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman didn’t do it …

All that aside, you cannot fault this branch for appreciating the work of first-time nominees makeup and hair designer Alessandro Bertolazzi, wig supervisor Giorgio Gregorini, and Christopher Allen Nelson, who is credited as department head for the Killer Croc (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje) effects makeup. Killer Croc arguably is the film’s greatest achievement, but the wigs and makeup for Harley Quinn (Robbie) and the outstanding tattoo work on Diablo (Jay Hernandez) are also of particular note.

The final analysis


Take your pick. There is no real precedent to which to point. The Academy likes popular films and popular people. While Suicide Squad is the biggest box-office hit of the bunch, members may be reticent to hand a trophy to a film that is so poorly regarded. A Man Called Ove is the only multiple nominee named here, but its work pales next to the other two and it may not have been seen by enough of the Academy. That leaves Star Trek Beyond as the safe, middle-ground choice – a highly successful entry in a franchise that always does well in this category.

Will win: Star Trek Beyond
Should win: Star Trek Beyond
Should have been here: The Dressmaker

Tomorrow: Best Visual Effects