Oscar Isaac and Domhnall Gleeson star in Alex Garland's sci-fi thriller Ex Machina. |
Empathy is probably the distinguishing feature of humanity. Our ability
to care about other life forms and imagine ourselves in their place is unique
and a little strange, when you get right down to it. From an evolutionary perspective,
it is hardly advantageous to concern ourselves with the feelings of animals or
lesser life forms, particularly those we eat and those that pose a danger to
us. Yet, vegetarianism and veganism do not seem to be going anywhere, and the
list of protected alpha predators just keeps growing.
Other species do not do this. The lion does not think for a second
about the zebra before it pounces, but I defy most people – even some avid
hunters – to pull the trigger on a deer without a moment of hesitation or a
pang of regret. Some of you cannot kill a bug without wondering about the
implications. This sense of understanding for the lives of other feels as
natural as breathing, but we cannot explain it. This puts humanity in a
precarious place when it comes to beings as intelligent as we are or more so.
In writer-director Alex Garland’s Ex
Machina, not only do we meet that being, but we are responsible for its
creation. Garland made his bones writing the screenplays for such intelligent,
thought-provoking science-fiction films as 28 Days Later, Never Let Me Go, and
the critically maligned Sunshine. Now,
with his first go around in the director’s chair, he has produced yet another
smart exploration of how people understand themselves and each other in
extraordinary circumstances.
Domhnall Gleeson (Frank, Unbroken) is Caleb a computer programmer
who works for a Google-like corporation. He wins a contest to visit the remote
estate of the company’s founder for a week, during which time he believes he
will be mentored by the reclusive genius, Nathan, played by Oscar Isaac (Inside Llewyn Davis, A Most Violent Year). Nathan has other
plans. Caleb has been brought to the estate to help test the world’s first true
artificial intelligence.
Utilizing a variation on the famous Turing test – in which a computer
is said to be artificially intelligent if the tester cannot distinguish between
an interaction with it and a human – the two men set out to prove the
legitimacy of Nathan’s technological achievement. However, we are well beyond
the traditional Turing test, so we are introduced to Ava. She is an AI computer
in the body of a humanoid robot brought to life by the remarkable Alicia
Vikander.
Complications arise as Ava becomes more and more stunning in her
humanness, and Caleb begins to question whether something so intelligent that
seems to think and feel as he does should be subjected to testing and
confinement such as this. During one of their sessions together, Ava tells
Caleb she has never left her room and dreams of going into the world just to
watch the people. Vikander sells Ava’s emotions with a perfect blend of
computerized affectation and schoolgirl naiveté.
Alicia Vikander in Ex Machina. |
This year should be something of a coming out party for the Swedish ingénue,
and Vikander’s IMDB page lists no fewer than six films in which she appears set
for release in 2015. Based solely on her performance in Ex Machina, she deserves the increased profile. The portrayal of
Ava is a tightrope walk. She is a computer and must always have that
artificiality, but she must also be so human it is haunting. In Vikander’s mannerisms
and line readings, she crafts a complete character from a being that has never
before existed, and though she was created by the hands of a man, she is
incomprehensible to his mind.
Nathan sees Ava as an experiment, the success of which would only feed
his immense ego. When Caleb tells him that bringing about new life is the
business of gods, Nathan takes this to its logical extreme, stating: “I am a
god.” As the founder of the world’s largest search engine, he already has the
ability to peer into the hearts, minds, and souls of humanity through his users’
search histories – an advantage he uses to form the basis of Ava’s artificial
intelligence. Now, he wants the feeling of creation.
Part of the brilliance of Garland’s script is the way it plays with
certain religious and mythological overtones while still delivering a riveting
psychological thriller. The sci-fi genre has always been ripe for allegory
because it allows artists to create worlds that reflect our own but show us
something we have never seen. Garland is a master at this, hooking audiences on
a visceral story level and using that engagement to force them to consider
perspectives of which they may not have even been aware.
Nathan comes off as the villain to us because he seems cold,
calculating, and mysterious. On the other hand, we connect to Caleb because he
is open, honest, and sensitive. Ava is a wild card that represents both and
neither. She is the manufactured evolution of humanity – a computer that
expresses vulnerability. Nathan can only relate to her as a computer, whereas
Caleb relates to her vulnerability. She is a lab rat, part of an experiment
Nathan wishes to see through to its conclusion. He pokes and prods and wants
results. Caleb sees the rat, but he also sees its pain and how it is afraid.
She asks Caleb what will happen to her if she fails the test. Most
likely, she will be shut off and reconfigured. Put another way, she will be
killed. By design, it is unclear if she understands the full implications of
her own death, but like any conscious life form, she instinctually knows it is
something to be avoided at all costs. Caleb, however, understands what dying
would mean, and he can put himself in her place and understand her fear. He is
determined to save her because in the end, it remains empathy that makes us
truly human – and truly flawed.
See it? Yes.
No comments:
Post a Comment