Welcome to
Taxi Driver Week at Last Cinema Standing, a week-long celebration of Martin
Scorsese's bruising, beautiful modern classic in honor of the film's 40th
anniversary and a special screening as part of the Tribeca Film Festival.
There are a few keystone actor-director collaborations in
cinema history – Akira Kurosawa and Toshiro Mifune; Federico Fellini and
Marcello Mastroianni; John Ford and John Wayne; Woody Allen and Diane Keaton;
Frank Capra and Jimmy Stewart; and Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro. Those
six collaborations account for at least 15 of the greatest films ever made. In
each case, the artist is great as an individual, but something about their work
together brings out the best in each.
Thousands of pages have been filled and tens of thousands of
words spilled on all of these pairs, Scorsese-De Niro more than most. Without
wanting to be just another leaf on the forest floor, I have to say it is
impossible to consider Taxi Driver
without looking at it in the context of its director and star’s shared body of
work. From 1973 to 1995, they made eight films together, several modern masterpieces,
others misunderstood classics, and one underappreciated gem that almost
destroyed Scorsese.
Mean Streets
(1973)
Their first film working together featured De Niro in a supporting
role as the loose-cannon gambler friend of Harvey Keitel’s low-level mafia
figure. Mean Streets features all the
major themes they would revisit time and again in their careers – crime, the
everyday violence that infects people’s lives, the push and pull of religious
belief, and the brutality and barbarism of men. Before this, Scorsese had made
just two features as a director, and De Niro had appeared in a handful of
films, garnering some acclaim for his performance in Bang the Drum Slowly. After, both artists flourished.
Taxi Driver (1976)
By the time they reunited, De Niro had won his first Academy
Award for his role as the young Vito Corleone in The Godfather Part II, and Scorsese had proved he could step
outside the crime genre with the wonderfully subdued and insightful Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, for
which Ellen Burstyn won the Oscar for Best Actress. Both men were clearly in a
groove, and with Paul Schrader’s magnificent script in hand, they made the
first of the three stone-cold masterpieces they would make together.
For all of the film’s sinister, lurid atmosphere, it
features one scene that stands out as particularly daft, in which a psychotic
man with a gun sits in the back of Travis Bickle’s cab outside his wife’s lover’s
apartment. The psychotic man is played by Scorsese in his first credited
onscreen role, though he had appeared uncredited in three of his previous
features.
The scene is mostly ad-libbed by Scorsese, who as a director
is trying to get a rise out of De Niro and as an actor just keeps piling on the
gory details of the violence he plans for his cheating wife. De Niro barely
moves, shifting his eyes slightly to view the man through his rearview mirror,
but he never engages him. Travis is a man on the edge, and here, he meets a man
who has clearly gone over the edge, and the sequence is deeply disturbing as we
witness the kind of monster Travis could easily become.
New York, New York
(1977)
There is really no way around saying this – by this point in
his career, Scorsese had developed a drug problem. It did not interfere with
his work so much as it interfered with his personal life. The film is an
intentionally stylish and artificial ode to classic Hollywood musicals and
features De Niro as a saxophone player who falls in love with a singer played
by Liza Minelli.
It was a box-office flop – earning $13 million on a $14
million budget – and many critics were put off by the artifice of the whole
enterprise, failing to grasp the intent behind it. Probably best known today
for its title song, made popular by Frank Sinatra, New York, New York is often regarded as a rare misfire by Scorsese,
but that assessment ignores the movie’s greatest virtue as the document of a
filmmaker truly in love with film.
Raging Bull (1980)
Indisputably one of the greatest films of all time, it is
the peak of both artists’ careers, though it might be more fair to characterize
it as a plateau for Scorsese, who in 36 years since has rarely come down much
from these heights. It is also the film Scorsese credits with saving his life.
After the failure of New York, New York,
Scorsese’s drug addiction spiraled out of control, ultimately landing him in
the hospital.
While Scorsese was bedridden, De Niro brought him the story
of Jake La Motta. The director was unsure if he had the energy or creative
passion to make another film, but De Niro insisted. In bringing the rise and
fall of La Motta to the screen, Scorsese found an outlet for all the rage and
frustration that had built up inside him over the years. He found the creative
spirit that had left him in his drugged-out haze. And he found the will to
shoot one of the most devastating portraits of a man at war with himself ever
put to celluloid.
Meanwhile, De Niro dug deeper than he ever had to find the
heart of a man who is by turns disgusting and pitiable. He became the character
as no other actor has ever accomplished. Much of course has been made of De
Niro’s physical transformation – into the boxer first, then the bloated shell
of a man later – but more impressive than that is De Niro’s spiritual transformation.
He takes on the soul of La Motta in a way that is terrifying, dangerous, and
awe inspiring.
The King of Comedy
(1982)
A comedy in the loosest sense of the word, Scorsese has said
numerous times this is his favorite performance of De Niro’s. As wannabe
comedian Rupert Pupkin, the actor is the simpering embodiment of the Me
Generation, a self-actualized, self-important, self-assured blowhard who
believes he has everything coming to him because he deserves it.
Scorsese had delved into the dark heart of man before but
never with the sharp-edged sword of satire he carried into The King of Comedy. The film has only grown scarier and more honest
with time, serving equally well as a rebuke of the current selfie-obsessed,
fame-hungry generation and their forebears who clearly suffered the same
egomania, a fact they seem all too ready to forget.
Goodfellas (1990)
Feeling they had reached the virtual limit of their artistic
collaboration, Scorsese and De Niro parted ways for much of the 1980s, during
which time Scorsese made the dark comedy After
Hours, the sports film The Color of
Money, and the still controversial The
Last Temptation of Christ. De Niro went off and made other great films such
as Once Upon a Time in America, The Mission, and Midnight Run. But it took another masterpiece to bring them back
together.
If The Godfather
is the mafia as an allegory for the promise of the American Dream and family
loyalty, then Goodfellas is a gritty
examination of the machinery that powers that dream. It is about the mafia as a
business, where money is king. To quote Henry Hill (Ray Liotta), the ethos is: “Fuck
you. Pay me.” De Niro appears in a supporting role as Jimmy Conway, the
lifelong hustler who loves the action and the money. Of course, none of it can
last. American Dream or not, everyone eventually wakes up.
Cape Fear (1991)
The only remake in the Scorsese canon until he finally won
an Oscar for The Departed, this was
an ideal project for someone like Scorsese to take on. It does not achieve the
same brilliance as its predecessor, a quintessential film noir that stood out
as uniquely dark in its time (1962), but Scorsese has no trouble imposing his
vision on the material and making the implied horror of the original more
explicit.
De Niro takes on the role of Max Cady, originated by Robert
Mitchum, an ex-con out for revenge on the defense lawyer who failed to keep him
out of prison (played here by Nick Nolte, taking over for Gregory Peck). If
there is a weak spot in the Scorsese-De Niro oeuvre this is probably it, but its
virtue lies in its commitment to the dirty, disturbing deeds it shows and its
argument that no one – neither tormentor nor tormented – is without sin.
Casino (1995)
Their final collaboration thus far, Casino has been accused of being something of a rehash of Goodfellas, but while it carries many of
the same beats, it features a totally different rhythm. De Niro is Ace
Rothstein, a professional hustler handed the keys to a kingdom. A man who is always
in control of his own wants and desires, he wants total control over his world
as well, but those closest to him lack his sense of restraint and burn the
whole empire to the ground.
One hopes these two brilliant artists find their way back to
each other – they of course are good friends, and rumors swirl constantly of a
ninth collaboration – but if Casino
stands as their final work together, it is a fitting capstone. It features all
of Scorsese’s typical preoccupations – all those things we mentioned back in Mean Streets – and a De Niro performance
that proves subtly captivating and stands up well alongside his best work.
Both men obviously found great success outside their working
relationship, and it is probably for the best the collaboration ended before it
was allowed to become stale or repetitive. However, when the modern history of
film is written, scholars will talk about the work of three different artists –
Scorsese, De Niro, and the unparalleled output of both men together.
1 comment:
Did you know that you can create short links with AdFly and earn money from every visitor to your shortened links.
Post a Comment