Showing posts with label Ginger Snaps. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ginger Snaps. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

31 Days of Horror: Inside



Beatrice Dalle torments Alysson Paradis in French horror-thriller Inside.
In addition to our regular programming, every day this month, Last Cinema Standing will be bringing readers recommendations from the best of the horror genre as we make our way to Halloween. This should not be treated as a “best of” list but more as a primer. You can read the full introduction to Last Cinema Standing’s 31 Days of Horror here, and be sure to check back each day for a new suggestion.

Day 22: Inside (2007)

I have seen a lot of horror films – more than most people and not as many as some. They have been of wildly differing quality, and most have offered wildly differing experiences. I have seen extreme levels of blood, guts, and gore, and I have seen films that revel in their restraint. If asked to put a figure on it, I would say I have seen something in the neighborhood of 600 or 700 horror films. I say none of this to boast, only to provide context for the following statement: Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury’s Inside (À l’Intérieur) is the most intense film I have ever seen.

It is 82 minutes of gripping tension broken by the occasional act of extreme violence, but rather than providing release at any point, each new incident further tightens the screws. Gallons of blood is spilled over the course of this film, but the moments between the violence are what leave you shocked into silence and rigid with terror. We have spoken of descents into madness this month. Well, this movie begins at madness proceeds to dig down to whole other levels of depraved insanity.

All you need to know about the plot can be summed up in two sentences. A pregnant woman is home alone on the eve of her planned delivery. Outside, there is a violent would-be intruder who wants the baby. That is it. Co-directors/co-writers Bustillo and Maury do not waste a lot of energy layering extra detail on top of their bare-bones plot, but do not think of it as thin. Think of it as razor sharp. It is not a marathon but a bloody, barefoot sprint over broken glass.

Alysson Paradis stars as Sarah, the pregnant woman under attack. Vacillating between hysterical, if justified, fear and unbreakable resolve, the character is a throwback to the classic scream queens of the 1980s, but as with everything else in this movie, the filmmakers take an old trope and multiply its intensity by a factor of 10. For a performance that requires her to be locked in one room or another for much of her screen time, Paradis is excellent as the blood-spattered mother-to-be.

Matching her blow for blow in the role of the stalker is Béatrice Dalle. She is sinister, calm, and professional until things begin to get out of hand, at which point she absolutely rages. Dalle sells both aspects of the character with aplomb. She does not speak much and is often in shadows, but as the very essence of evil, she is terrifying.

As discussed earlier this week with Ginger Snaps, this is another rare horror film in which both the protagonist and antagonist are women, but I would never go so far as to call this movie feminist. There is some troubling imagery – allegedly added by a producer against the wishes of the filmmakers – of the fetus inside the womb, which critics rightly point out reduces our main character to a vessel for the baby rather than a person in her own right.

Even beyond that, the simple fact of two women fighting over a baby seems like an ill-advised appropriation of gender stereotypes. At the same time, both of the main characters are strong, intelligent women with fiercely independent streaks – to admittedly different ends – of the kind rarely seen in movies, and it would be wrong to apply too much thematic intention to a film that exists on a purely visceral level. This is not a movie for everyone. It is not a movie for most people, in fact, but it is a damn good movie no less.

Tomorrow, we step back in time with an early master of the genre who gives us bodies and horror but not in the ways we have come to expect.

Monday, October 20, 2014

31 Days of Horror: Ginger Snaps

Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins play sisters on the verge of womanhood and so much more in Ginger Snaps.

In addition to our regular programming, every day this month, Last Cinema Standing will be bringing readers recommendations from the best of the horror genre as we make our way to Halloween. This should not be treated as a “best of” list but more as a primer. You can read the full introduction to Last Cinema Standing’s 31 Days of Horror here, and be sure to check back each day for a new suggestion.

Day 20: Ginger Snaps (2000)

This post will be a little graphic. Even for a month dedicated to discussing gore and bloody mayhem across nearly a century’s worth of horror films, this post will be graphic for some people, so bear with me. Ginger Snaps presents a traditional werewolf narrative in a way that is both on the nose and surprising, it features two fantastic performances from its co-leads, and it mercifully puts to rest the idea that a horror film needs a male character in either a protagonist or an antagonist role.

One need not count too high to list the horror films with a female hero and female villain, wherein men are not simply shoehorned into the plot for the sake of testosterone. The film’s writer, Karen Walton, was initially reluctant to take on the project because of the historical treatment of women in horror films. Director John Fawcett assured her this would be different, and the filmmakers set out to create a movie that employs traditional techniques in wholly unique ways. On all fronts, they succeeded.

Emily Perkins and Katharine Isabelle star as sisters Brigette and Ginger. They are the outcast girls, the Goths, the kids in school no one approaches, and that is just fine with them. They have their own world. Despite being high school age, neither has hit puberty, a concern for their over-sharing, busy-body mother and something their father would rather never think about or discuss. One night while out for a walk, plotting their revenge on a bully, Ginger gets her first period, and the sisters are attacked by a werewolf.

Here is the wonderful thing about this movie. It is possible, even easy, to ascribe meaning to events and symbols that may or may not have any inherent meaning. A viewer could read this movie either as an intensely feminist take on a genre known for misogyny or simply as a thrilling, entertaining horror picture with an intriguing gender flip applied to the main characters.

Case in point, Ginger is attacked almost precisely at the moment she begins to menstruate. This could be a clever coincidence, but let us look at it another way. We have a culture in which, I hope we can agree, children are over-sexualized, and young girls in particular are subject to unfortunate hyper-sexualization. One need only look at the Halloween costumes currently on the racks to confirm this. Seen through this lens, what does it mean that the instant Ginger becomes sexually viable, she is attacked by an alpha predator? I am not saying there is intention here, but I am saying the question is there to ask.

We can keep going like this. As Ginger’s transformation into the wolf begins, her peers begin to take notice of her. There is something that draws them to her. It is her newfound sexuality, expressed as a wild lack of inhibition and animalistic savagery within the confines of a high school girl’s form of self-expression. It is the precise kind of fun and crazy girl to whom adolescent boys and immature men are attracted.

There is much overt talk about sex and sexuality in the film and specifically about sexually transmitted diseases. As the werewolf is incubated in Ginger’s still-human body, it takes the outward form of an increased libido, but when she engages in sex, it passes on the “infection.” So now we have lycanthropy as a metaphor for puberty and literally as a sexually transmitted disease.

There is still more to ponder about full moons and menstruation, moon cycles and werewolves, but I will let you discover all of that on your own. The point is that it is all there if you wish to look for it, and none of it is there if you choose to ignore it. In this sense, we are all Ginger’s parents as we watch the movie – the mother so delighted by her daughter’s blossoming womanhood and all its disturbing manifestations and the father with his head down, ears covered, and eyes closed to the whole bloody mess.

Tomorrow, we take body horror to a whole other level with the only director qualified to get us there.