Showing posts with label Unbroken. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unbroken. Show all posts

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Sound Mixing and Best Sound Editing


Chris Kyle, played by Bradley Cooper, calls home in American Sniper.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

The two most important questions to answer are: What is sound mixing, and what is sound editing? Here is the quick version. Sound mixing is easy to understand and pretty self-explanatory if you are at all familiar with how music or a radio broadcast or anything else is recorded. Sound mixers take all of the sounds that go into making a movie – the dialogue, the music, the sound effects, the ambient noise, etc. – and adjust the levels at which they play over each other.

Fairly simple, right? The hero is returning home, so let’s have the music get a little louder here. Suspense sequence? Well, let’s drop the noise out so all we hear is breathing and a heartbeat. Courtroom scene? Make sure the dialogue is crisp, clear, and loud, but remember to leave enough ambient noise in the background so it sounds like the real world and not some set on a soundstage. That is it. Bring it up, take it down, and try to match the intensity or the emotion being played on screen. Yet, as simple as it may seem, it takes a master to get it right.

What about sound editing? The award used to be called Best Sound Effects Editing, which I feel is more explicative, but here we are. Basically, this is the sound effects award. It goes to the person or team creating all the little noises that must be pieced together to create the sonic environment of a film. From the clicks, clacks, and clanks of a factory to the gunfire and explosions on a battlefield, sound editors are the ones who make it happen.

When it comes to the Oscars, conventional wisdom will tell you that the same film will likely win both categories. This makes a certain amount of sense if you assume voters do not know the difference between the two and check off a film they like for both awards, but history does not necessarily bear this out. Six times in the last 14 years, a film has won in both categories, so a little less than half the time. It helps to remember that voters are professionals in the film industry. They are savvy enough to know what sound editors and sound mixers do.

With that in mind, the Academy does have tendencies in each category. Musicals do exceedingly well in the Sound Mixing category, as evidenced by wins for Les Miserables, Dreamgirls, Ray, and Chicago since 2002. No musical has ever won Best Sound Editing in the current incarnation of the award. In Sound Editing, the winners tend to be war films, action films, and epics, really anything with a hell of a lot of noise going on. Luckily for voters, there is no shortage of noisy movies in the running.

Best Sound Mixing


The nominees are


Whiplash – Here is your sort-of musical in the category this year, and just to drive my point home from above, note that it is also the only one in this group not also nominated for Sound Editing. My best guess for why that is and why no musical has won Sound Editing is that in a musical – or pseudo-musicals such as this or Ray – the music is the star. The sound editors do not create anything there. But, just like on a pop record, the mixing is paramount.

Production sound mixer Thomas Curley and sound re-recording mixers Craig Mann and Ben Wilkins, all first-time nominees, do a phenomenal job making the jazzy soundtrack pop against the more hushed and ambient tones of the rest of the film. It is not an easy task as the music has a very staccato vibe even when allowed to play through, let alone with all the starts and stops of the practice sessions. Music drives this film, and the sound team seems to have an innate feel for when to push it and when to dial it back.

American Sniper – As well as musicals often do in this category, however, war films are right there in the thick of it always. For the most part, I think this has to do with the modulation of sound and the building of suspense. While Chris Kyle (Bradley Cooper) spends a good deal of American Sniper embroiled in fire fights, he spends as much time staking out his targets and patiently waiting in silence for the his moment to strike.

Sound department heads John T. Reitz and Gregg Rudloff are both six-time nominees who shared in the win for The Matrix, while Rudloff also earned this award for the Civil War drama Glory. Sound mixer Walt Martin, who died in July and earned this nomination posthumously, had been nominated once before and worked on every one of Clint Eastwood’s films since 1999. The team was tasked with balancing the extreme violence and noise of the war scenes with the quieter moments back home in the states, and they do so expertly.

Birdman – The least conventional of these nominees, Birdman is a talky showbiz satire that moves at a mile a minute. It reminds of the late director Robert Altman’s best work such as M*A*S*H or Nashville in its constantly overlapping dialogue, hyper-witty characters, and unceasing forward momentum. Sound re-recording mixers Jon Taylor and Frank A. Montaño are double nominees this year for this and Unbroken, while production sound mixer Thomas Varga is enjoying his first nomination.

In addition to the rapid-fire dialogue, the sound mixing team must also contend with a loopy, arrhythmic percussion score and voiceovers that drop in and out at will. Through the work of Taylor, Montaño, and Varga, all these disparate elements coalesce into an appropriately unsettling sonic environment for the film.

Unbroken – This is Taylor’s first pair of nominations, but Montaño has a total of seven nominations to his credit, and most of those came for films more similar to Unbroken than to Birdman such as Wanted, Under Siege, and The Fugitive. By the way, how great is it that Under Siege is an Oscar-nominated film? While Taylor and Montaño are looking for their first wins in this category, their Unbroken collaborator, David Lee, won previously for his work with Reitz and Rudloff on The Matrix.

Unbroken is a more traditional war picture than American Sniper, possibly because World War II was a more conventional war than the current conflict in the Middle East. There is some great aerial sound work amid a dog fight and plane crash, but often, the mixing team allows the score to intrude too much on the story in a blatant attempt to force emotion on the audience. The mix is classic war film work, but I can think of a few other more deserving nominees than this one. If you are looking for another action-war flick, there is Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, or if you want to step outside the box a bit, there is the great work done on Ruben Ӧstlund’s Force Majeure.

Interstellar – The most controversial nominee on the list, the sound mix of Interstellar was criticized heavily upon the film’s release. Some complained the score was too loud or that the dialogue was too muddy. The problem seems to have been the detail and micromanaging that director Christopher Nolan and team put into the sound mix, meaning that if the cinema conditions were not set up just right, the film could sound bad.

I viewed the film in an IMAX theater personally vetted by the film’s composer, Hans Zimmer, and I thought the mix was fantastic. For transitions back and forth between quiet moments of character reflection and epic, large-scale action sequences, little can match Interstellar. The music is loud, but it is immersive, an integral part of the landscape of the film.

Re-recording mixer Gregg Landaker is a giant in the field and has three Oscars to his name for Raiders of the Lost Ark, Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back, and Speed. Re-recording mixer Gary Rizzo has four nominations and a win for Inception, and sound mixer Mark Weingarten is a three-time nominee. If you are going to give anyone the benefit of the doubt, I would say it should be this group of craftsmen.

The final analysis


American Sniper is a popular war picture with a solid mix that hits all the right beats and keeps the film humming along nicely. It would by no means be an undeserving winner. Whiplash will have its fans, but the scale of the film may be too small to compete. Previous musical winners, in addition to simply being musicals, also had a sense of scale and grandiosity that Whiplash lacks by design. Interstellar could be a threat for the win simply because of the attention drawn by the controversy. All publicity is good publicity. Still, American Sniper is probably in the driver’s seat for this one.

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Birdman
Wish it had been here: Force Majeure

Best Sound Editing


The nominees are:

American Sniper
Birdman
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
Interstellar
Unbroken

American Sniper – If American Sniper is a prohibitive favorite for Sound Mixing, it is the clear frontrunner for the Sound Editing award. Bullets, explosions, crashes, and bangs – these are the hallmarks of a war picture and of an Oscar winner in this category. Its candidacy is helped along by the fact that so much of the sound drops out around Kyle taking sniper shots. What that means is that the sound effects work that goes into each shot is crystal clear and instantly memorable.

Supervising sound editors Alan Robert Murray and Bub Asman have shared in five nominations together and won the Oscar the last time director Clint Eastwood brought a war picture to the big show, Letters from Iwo Jima. Murray also has two other nominations with previous partner Robert G. Henderson. A popular Best Picture nominee with a clearly defined sound design is like catnip to Oscar voters, and Murray and Asman should be well on their way to collecting their second awards.

Interstellar – If its mix is controversial, there should be no question about the quality of the sound effects editing on Interstellar. Credited to five-time nominee and three-time Academy Award winner Richard King, the environment of Interstellar is a perfect melding of visual effects, production design, and sound editing. While I found the former two elements lackluster, the sound effects work is impeccable.

The movie practically howls at the audience as the winds of distant worlds swirl around the characters. They explode through space, slosh through a water planet, and crunch their way across frozen tundra, endeavors that feel real because we can hear them and experience them along with our intrepid heroes. Just based on the number of different environments King is asked to recreate or invent, we are unlikely ever to hear another feat of sound editing quite like this.

Birdman – If you have never been backstage during a theater production, I urge you to seize the opportunity, should it arise. Nothing else can compare. While the actors play calm, cool, and collected in front of the audience, chaos reigns behind the scenes. During rehearsals, the chaos is multiplied 10-fold as cast and crew alike shuffle about, slam doors, shift sets, and generally run around like the sky is falling.

Sound designers Aaron Glascock and Martín Hernández capture the environment perfectly. Together, they create the rich tapestry of production sounds and city noise that make up the unforgettable experience of Birdman. It is a film that surrounds you, envelopes you, and immerses you in its world until you feel like you are part of the crew and your life depends on the success of the production.

Unbroken – It is definitely possible the craftspeople are seeing something in Unbroken that I simply cannot see. After all, they are the experts in their field, and I am a humble observer. To my eyes, Unbroken is a serviceable war drama that feels overly familiar in nearly every regard. If the crafts are solid, they are let down by a sappy, melodramatic storyline that is hard to look past.

Supervising sound editors Andrew DeCristofaro and Becky Sullivan are sharing in their first Academy Awards nomination for their work on the film. Sullivan notably is the only woman nominated in either sound category this year, a depressing reflection of the realities of the industry. The pair’s work here is fine, but it is overshadowed by a mediocre project.

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies – “Battle of the Five Armies.” Doesn’t that just scream noisy? Sad to say, I have not seen the latest Hobbit film. Truth be told, Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy really did nothing for me, and thus far, the Hobbit films have been a step down from that. Someone who has seen the film could probably give you a more thorough analysis, but allow me to posit a few guesses.

The film almost certainly delivers on the promise of its title and features a tremendous climactic battle, as well as several smaller battles before and during that, no doubt. Swords clank off one another, structures crumble to the ground, and many fantastical creatures make barely recognizable noises that resemble a combination of things we know from the real world. It honestly seems like a sound editor’s dream. It probably is, but as this is the film’s only nomination and the love for Jackson’s ventures to Middle Earth has dwindled considerably, sound editors Brent Burge and Jason Canovas will probably have to content themselves with the nomination.

The final analysis


I recognize that I spent the entire introduction to this piece differentiating between the two sound categories and making the case that the Academy can and will split these awards between two deserving movies. I stand by that, but this year feels a lot like last year, when Gravity was head and shoulders above rest of the field and rightly took home both awards. If American Sniper is not quite the tech juggernaut that Gravity was, it makes up for it by being the kind of down and dirty action picture that thrills and engages all kinds of viewers. Interstellar is a definite threat, but at the end of the day, American Sniper just makes sense for this award.

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Interstellar
Wish it had been here: Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

Monday, February 9, 2015

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Cinematography



Timothy Spall stars as JMW turner in the gorgeous Best Cinematography nominee Mr. Turner.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

Best Cinematography


The nominees are:

The Grand Budapest Hotel
Ida
Mr. Turner

This is my favorite category. What distinguishes film as a storytelling medium from others such as radio or literature or even television in many cases is its ability to tell stories visually. We take it for granted. With Facebook and Instagram, we are all essentially telling our life stories through images, but if you stop for a second and really think about it, it should become clear what a revolutionary idea that is.

Nothing connects the world like moving images. We cannot all read the same books or listen to the same speeches, but we all understand that shadows are scary, chases are thrilling, and pratfalls are funny. All it takes is the right image, and a filmmaker can speak to the whole world. The cinematographers are the artists who craft those images, and the best of their work serves as a masterclass in why films are important.

This year’s nominees run the gamut from war stories to chamber dramas, color to black and white, and statue still to ever-moving. What they share, however, is impeccable craftsmanship and a dedication to visual storytelling. Only one nominee this year is a previous winner, and he is the most likely and deserving winner as well, so that is where we will begin our analysis.

Birdman – There is not another film this year that blends the innovation and integration of director of photography Emmanuel Lubezki’s work on this picture. A lot has been written about the work, and I have written about it a number of times, but to see it is to know you are witnessing greatness. The basic trick of the film is that it looks like one unbroken take. The camera darts and dives, swoops and spins, but never looks away. Save for couple moments at the beginning and end, the film’s few edits are hidden within the structure of the camerawork.

The style is the logical result of the direction Lubezki has been heading his entire career, particularly in his collaborations with director Alfonso Cuarón, who is good friends with Birdman director Alejandro González Iñárritu. Cuarón has always favored long takes, and Lubezki has proven his aptitude with such shooting conditions time and again. He won the Oscar for his work last year on Cuarón’s Gravity and should probably have another two for his lensing of Cuarón’s Children of Men and Terrence Malick’s gorgeous The Tree of Life. No matter. He will most likely win his second award in a row this year.

Except for a short segment in the omnibus film To Each His Own Cinema, this is Lubezki’s first collaboration with Iñárritu, but the two are already hard at work shooting another film together – The Revenant, starring Leonardo Dicaprio, which is due out at the end of this year. If the results of Birdman are any indication, we should all be very excited about the next collaboration from these two unique artists.

Mr. Turner – If it were not for the brilliant, boundary-pushing work of Lubezki, cinematographer Dick Pope’s painterly lensing of Mike Leigh’s JMW Turner biopic would be this year’s hands-down winner. It is just as deserving, and in many ways, it is the more classical nominee, a throwback to the old style of shooting a film. While Lubezki’s camera flies in and out of scenes like it is on a mission, Pope carefully crafts each moment, each frame for maximum impact.

The film is about a painter who is famous for his impressionist landscapes, and Pope steps up to the challenge of matching the story of England’s greatest artist with some of the most beautiful compositions you are ever likely to see. While several sequences are set up to recreate the look and feel of a Turner painting in real life, the work in between these bravura scenes is just as stark and just as rewarding.

If you are a voter, you could flip a coin to choose between these two pictures and come up with a deserving winner every time. The best part of both pieces is how the cinematography is integrated into the storytelling. These are not self-conscious gimmicks. Lubezki’s unbroken take is indicative of the maelstrom of activity constantly swirling around the characters in Birdman, while Pope’s picture-perfect frames are a window into the world as an artist might see it. When it comes to picking a winner, you’re damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.

Ida – One of the best things about the cinematographers’ branch is that its members are willing to look outside the box for nominees. From Poland, Ida is nominated for Best Foreign Language Film this year, in addition to this cinematography nod. It is highly deserving of the recognition in both cases. Shot in black and white by the team of Lukasz Zal and Ryszard Lenczewski, Ida tells the story of a Catholic nun who spends a few nights with a less-than-virtuous aunt before taking her final vows.

Similar to Pope’s work on Mr. Turner, Zal and Lenczewski let the framing do the work for them, and some of their choices are so brilliant as to boggle the mind. These are two characters trapped by circumstance and convention, and in nearly every scene, Zal and Lenczewski place objects in the frame to trap them further. From car trunks to lamp posts to electrical wires, these two women are constantly placed in boxes inside boxes, a stunning evocation of the characters’ mindsets and their place within the context of society as a whole.

The Grand Budapest Hotel – Robert Yeoman is probably the least assuming of the nominees this year, having shot mostly either independent or studio comedies throughout his career. He has been the director of photography on every one of director Wes Anderson’s live-action films, which makes a certain amount of sense. Anderson has such a unique and specific visual style that his films could almost only be shot by one person, someone who understands exactly what the director is going for.

As in each of their previous collaborations, Yeoman does a great job of balancing Anderson’s usual hyperactivity with an unfailing precision of movement and framing. Yeoman and Anderson favor symmetrical setups and proscenium staging, allowing for the maximum amount of action to take place within the dollhouse like structure of a film in which characters move in packs from room to room and set to set.

My only real problem with this nomination is how much the work feels of a piece with what Yeoman and Anderson have done before. They are not stretching their visual style so much as fine tuning it, but perhaps that is okay when the style itself is so striking. As I have mentioned, The Grand Budapest Hotel is the first of Anderson’s films to catch on with the Academy in a big way, and that success has swept up a lot of Anderson’s below-the-line collaborators, Yeoman among them.

Unbroken – Roger Deakins is a god among cinematographers and rightly so. His work with the Coen brothers alone is enough to place him in the pantheon of the greatest of all time (Fargo, No Country for Old Men, True Grit, The Man Who Wasn’t There, etc.), not to mention his incomparable work on films such as The Shawshank Redemption, Skyfall, and The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. A living legend, this is his 12th nomination in this category. He has never won, and this will not be the year that streak ends.

As good as Deakins is, Unbroken stands as the least impressive among these nominees, primarily because it falls into the trap of so many recent war films – desaturated colors, poorly integrated effects, and an overreliance on grand vistas that mean little in context. Deakins never gives less than 100 percent, and he has been highly deserving of all his previous nominations, but this seems like one case in which name recognition alone was enough to get him onto the shortlist.

The final analysis


As I said, you cannot go wrong with either Birdman or Mr. Turner, but now that Lubezki already has the gold seal of approval from the Academy, there seems to be little in the way of a repeat win in this category.

Will win: Birdman
Should win: Birdman
Wish it had been here: Goodbye to Language