Saturday, February 8, 2020

Countdown to the Oscars: Directors and Writers



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the writers and directors.

Best Director

Nominees
Martin Scorsese for The Irishman
Todd Phillips for Joker
Sam Mendes for 1917
Quentin Tarantino for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Bong Joon-ho for Parasite

The discussion around the Best Director nominees this year has centered on the lack of women represented in the category. Specifically, there has been a lot of hand-wringing over the lack of a nomination for Greta Gerwig. I sympathize. Gerwig’s work is unimpeachable and deserving, though I wish some of that outrage had been saved for selections further afield such as Jennifer Kent for The Nightingale or Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomnir Stefanov for Honeyland.

Still, this is a high-quality group full of interesting and accomplished work. The near-certain winner is Sam Mendes for the one-shot war film 1917, a feat of filmmaking style that both resonates thematically within the film and cries out for recognition. Director of photography Roger Deakins has gotten a lot of the credit for the craft of the film, but Mendes was there every step of the way, putting together the pieces for a film that is more of a puzzle than it would first appear.

At the beginning of the season, it appeared this awards run would be a coronation for Tarantino, who has made a film that is equal parts impressive and beloved. Tarantino has never won a Best Director Oscar, and he has made no secret of desiring the award. The season has not gone his way, and if he really intends to retire after his next film, he will have just one more shot at the prize. Likewise, Scorsese by now is used to the bridesmaid role at the Academy Awards, and Todd Phillips’ thorough Scorsese homage will not win him the award any more than it ever did Marty.

The spoiler in all of this is director Bong for Parasite, a masterpiece of a thriller that manages to balance tone, story, and character in ways that are above and beyond any other film this year. As we will talk about more in Best Picture, the night comes down to a traditional Academy pick like 1917 vs. the more outre choice, Parasite. As we know, change does not happen all at once, and 1917 and Mendes are likely to triumph. If it goes any other way, it will be a shocking bellwether for things to come at the Oscars.

Will win: Sam Mendes for 1917
Should win: Bong Joon-ho for Parasite
Should have been here: Greta Gerwig for Little Women

Best Original Screenplay

Nominees
Knives Out, written by Rian Johnson
Marriage Story, written by Noah Baumbach
1917, written by Sam Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, written by Quentin Tarantino
Parasite, written by Bong Joon-ho and Han Jin-won

Throw a dart. Johnson is a highly deserving nominee, and it is fun to see one of my favorite directors with the “Oscar-nominated” brand in front of his name. But as intricate and impressive as his Agatha Christie-style whodunnit is, he is running in fifth place after the four Best Picture nominees, any of which could take this award. Baumbach’s intimate divorce drama is likely to be an also ran as Marriage Story has lost steam throughout the season, though there was a version of this awards race in which Tarantino won Best Director and Baumbach got Screenplay as a consolation prize. Obviously, that is not the reality in which we live.

So, what you have are three films that could realistically take down Best Original Screenplay. First, there is 1917, the Best Picture front-runner that will win this award if we are looking at a year with a historic sweep. Though I think we are looking at a big night for Mendes’ war picture, I think the love for the film carried it to this nomination but will carry it no further here. The 1917 crowd will have plenty else to celebrate Sunday night.

Second, you have Tarantino, a writer’s writer from the beginning of his career who has won this award twice before. He has joked the award should be named for him if he wins again, though three-time winner and 16-time nominee Woody Allen might have something to say about it. On the other hand, Allen has never bothered to show up for any of his four Academy Awards, so he probably would not care one way or the other. Once Upon a Time is superlative work from Tarantino that stands out in his filmography as something more graceful, empathetic and elegiac than anything he has done before.

Finally, there is Parasite, the critical darling that could sneak up on everyone on the big night. Bong and Han have won the screenplay award at both the Writers Guild Awards (where Tarantino was ineligible) and the British Academy awards (where they beat Tarantino). The love for Parasite is real, as evidenced by the six nominations across multiple categories, and the previous wins are reason for optimism for fans of the film. While I got burned in 2012 predicting Michael Haneke’s Amour (also a foreign language Best Picture nominee) in this category against a winning Tarantino script (Django Unchained), I am going back to the well and predicting Parasite

Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Pain and Glory

Best Adapted Screenplay

Nominees
The Irishman, written by Steven Zaillian
Jojo Rabbit, written by Taika Waititi
Joker, written by Todd Phillips and Scott Silver
Little Women, written by Greta Gerwig
The Two Popes, written by Anthony McCarten

Let’s get this out of the way: Little Women is a masterpiece of adaptation, and in a just world, Gerwig would win this award going away. It is the definition of a great adaptation. Gerwig takes a well-known, oft-explored piece of classic literature and finds a new way to approach it and new themes to parse from its text. She updates the story without losing its soul, making it feel real and alive for a new generation of moviegoers and a new era of filmmaking. Anything else winning would be a travesty, which is not to say I do not like some of the other films or scripts in contention. They just are not Little Women.

Zaillian is an obviously brilliant writer who has been in this game a long time, though he has always been choosy about the projects he takes on. In fact, The Irishman is his first produced feature script since Exodus: Gods and Kings in 2014. That is a long break for one of Hollywood’s preeminent wordsmiths, but it was worth the wait, as Zaillian brings the sprawling “I Heard You Pain Houses” to vivid life in the epic Irishman.

Phillips and Silver are getting credit for putting a new spin on a classic character with their Joker origin story. It is interesting work that is sometimes heavy-handed, and the film is more of a directing and acting showcase than a feat of screenwriting. This is a weird nomination for McCarten, who adapted his own play, which was developed in conjunction with the film script. The Academy’s rule for eligibility are sometimes byzantine, though, and the film is deserving of recognition in one of the writing categories. It is just a little surprising it ended up being this one.

The late-breaking favorite, though, is Jojo Rabbit, and I have to say: That bums me out. Not solely because a win for Waititi’s World War II “satire” would come at the expense of Little Women but because it is the least accomplished in this group of nominees. I found the humor in Jojo Rabbit grating and its attempts at pathos maudlin. It was not a film for me and feels like the kind of middle-of-the-road pick that would seem edgy to a certain type of voter. It is not edgy. It is not particularly clever. And it sure ain’t the best adapted screenplay of the year. But sometimes, these things happen.

Will win: Jojo Rabbit
Should win: Little Women
Should have been here: Blinded by the Light

Countdown to the Oscars: Actors



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the acting categories.

Best Actor in a Leading Role

Nominees
Antonio Banderas for Pain and Glory
Leonardo DiCaprio for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Adam Driver for Marriage Story
Joaquin Phoenix for Joker
Jonathan Pryce for The Two Popes

Even by the standards of a usually competitive category, this was a historic year for the Best Actor race. You could fill out this list of nominees with a wholly different group of five actors, and it would be just as valid. Off the top of my head, try Robert De Niro (The Irishman), Eddie Murphy (Dolemite Is My Name), Adam Sandler (Uncut Gems), Song Kang-ho (Parasite), and Kelvin Harrison Jr. (Waves). At the same time, my feeling is the group we got is historically great as well.

The nomination for Banderas makes me particularly happy as nominees from foreign films are rare (though Pedro Almodovar has a way with pulling off this trick; see Penelope Cruz for Volver in 2006) and I thought Banderas gave the best male performance of the year. Right after that, you have DiCaprio doing career-best work that is bound to be remembered as an also-ran for the Oscar season, if not in the actor’s career. Pryce’s performance is lovely and technically skilled, and the XX-year-old thespian is well deserving of his first career nomination.

When the season started, it appeared this would be a two-horse race between Phoenix and Driver. It has not worked out that way. For the most part, the performances exist on wildly opposite ends of the spectrum. Driver delivers a subdued, nuanced exploration of character, while Phoenix offers a bold, bombastic interpretation of an iconic villain. Both are great, but Phoenix’s work is showier and of the kind the Academy loves to reward. 

Actors, in particular, have been drawn to Phoenix’s performance since Joker debuted. From the improvised bathroom dance to the vocal inflections to the precise facial expressions, it is the kind of work that screams out for a reward without detracting from the film. Phoenix knows the movie he is in and perfectly pitches his performance to the key of the film. For all of that, he will walk away with his first Academy Award.

Will win: Joaquin Phoenix for Joker
Should win: Antonio Banderas for Pain and Glory
Should have been here: Eddie Murphy for Dolemite Is My Name

Best Actress in a Leading Role

Nominees
Cynthia Erivo for Harriet
Scarlett Johansson for Marriage Story
Saoirse Ronan for Little Women
Charlize Theron for Bombshell
Renee Zelwegger for Judy

Consider me baffled by the way this category shook out this year. Zelwegger is going to win her second Oscar for her imitation of Judy Garland in Judy. That much has seem preordained since the film debuted, and that is what I find so baffling. Zelwegger is good in the film, and she is an extremely likable person. But the film was not a hit, nor is it particularly well liked. Somehow, though, Zelwegger has run roughshod over the competition all season, and no contender has seemed able to challenge her lock on this award.

It is a shame because as delightful as Zelwegger is and accomplished though her work may be, it feels like the least adventurous choice possible. The celebrity biopic is a tried and true formula for winning an Oscar, and a win for Judy feels monumentally uninspired. In truth, however, this list of nominees feels a bit uninspired. More exciting choices such as Lupita Nyong’o for Us or Florence Pugh for Midsommar would have livened up this category. But, as a previous Best Actress winner said in her winning role, this is the story you get.

Johansson is doing career-best work in Marriage Story, and if there were going to be a spoiler, the smart money would be on Johansson, particularly with the history of double-nominated performers in mind. Theron is quite good in Bombshell, but as far as voters go, it is possible the quality of the performance is hidden partially by the stellar makeup work that transforms Theron into Megyn Kelly. Cynthia Erivo is the lone actor of color nominated this year, and similarly to Zelwegger, she is working in straight biopic territory. One wishes she had been recognized for her wonderful supporting turn in Widows last year.

Finally, you have Ronan, who at 25 years old is already a four-time Oscar nominee. She appears to be sliding comfortably into the Kate Winslet group of talented young actresses who rack up nominations but have to wait until later in their careers to be honored. She is the beating heart and artistic soul of Greta Gerwig’s amazing Little Women adaptation, but for the third time in five years, the nomination will have to be her reward.

Will win: Renee Zelwegger for Judy
Should win: Scarlett Johansson for Marriage Story
Should have been here: Florence Pugh for Midsommar

Best Actor in a Supporting Role

Nominees
Tom Hanks for A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Anthony Hopkins for The Two Popes
Al Pacino for The Irishman
Joe Pesci for The Irishman
Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood

What a group! Here we have five previous Academy Award wins represented (Hanks 2, Hopkins 1, Pacino 1, and Pesci 1), and the lone non-acting winner, Pitt, previously won an Oscar as the producer of the best film of the decade (12 Years a Slave). As with all of the acting categories this year, this has seemed like a lock for months, and Pitt will soon join his fellow nominees as an Oscar-winning actor for his role as a past-his-prime stunt double in Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood.

Hanks perfectly captures the spirit of Mr. Rogers in Marielle Heller’s non-traditional “based on a true story” film, and he is back in the Oscar game after 19 years without a nomination, including a shocking snub for Captain Phillips in 2013. On just his sixth nomination, Hanks is less an Academy favorite than his reputation as the prestige actor of his time would suggest. His back-to-back wins for Philadelphia (1993) and Forrest Gump (1994) remain among the more delightful anomalies in Academy history, and perhaps this nomination portends a new era for Hanks with this voting body. Not that it will hurt the ever-popular Hanks either way.

Pacino and Pesci are here representing Martin Scorsese’s mob epic The Irishman. While Pacino has the flashier role as outsized union president Jimmy Hoffa, Pesci has been the one earning all the hosannas for his quietly menacing portrayal of an aging mob boss. Hopkins is a bit of a surprise nominee here, and his performance for me was somewhat overshadowed by Jonathan Pryce’s leading performance in The Two Popes, but it seems the Academy was just excited to see Hopkins back doing good work on the big screen (as long as you didn’t just see the film on Netflix).

The winner, however, is Pitt. He has picked up all the precursor awards, and he has the backing of basically an entire industry excited to see the former Sexiest Man Alive recognized for his acting prowess. The role is a variation on certain notes contained within the Pitt persona, which makes this smart casting on Tarantino’s part, but Pitt is making enough distinct choices with the character that the performances is allowed to bloom fully. So, while this is something of a lifetime achievement award for Pitt, the Academy at least is picking the right film for such an honor.

Will win: Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Should win: Al Pacino for The Irishman
Should have been here: Wesley Snipes for Dolemite Is My Name

Best Actress in a Supporting Role

Nominees
Kathy Bates for Richard Jewell
Laura Dern for Marriage Story
Scarlett Johansson for Jojo Rabbit
Florence Pugh for Little Women
Margot Robbie for Bombshell

Stop me if you have heard this before, but this race has been over for months. Dern locked up this award early in the season and just kept delivering funny, heartfelt speeches. She has been nominated twice before this, but this is the first time she has been within shouting distance of the win, and it does not appear to be getting away from her. Her empowered, feminist divorce lawyer is one of the most refreshing parts of Noah Baumbach’s Marriage Story, and Dern makes strong choice after strong choice to bring fully to life a character who could seem one note on the page.

Speaking of characters who could be one note on the page, a popular hashtag around Little Women this year has been #JusticeForAmy, referring to the bratty middle sister in Louisa May Alcott’s classic tale. Portrayed almost always as immature, whiny, and downright unlikable, Pugh finds the wounded heart at the core of the character and infuses her with reason and understanding like we have rarely seen. Beyond the story elements, though, Pugh is transformative in the role, and it completes a trifecta of stunning turns this year from the young performer. This will not be her last nomination.

The Bates nomination may seem out of left field for a movie that received mixed to negative critical notices and utterly bombed at the box office, but never underestimate the Academy’s love for one of its own. Bates is a true actor’s actor, and she has ridden that love to her fourth nomination. Robbie, meanwhile, is good in Bombshell and has a couple of standout scenes, but I cannot help but think she is here for the wrong film. I would much rather have seen her recognized for her role as Sharon Tate in Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, but a lack of dialogue probably doomed her chances for that.

Then, there is Johansson, who becomes just the 12th actor in Academy history to be nominated for two performances in the same year. Of the previous 11, seven of those performers ended up with an Oscar at the end of the night. Johansson seems destined, however, to join the other group, those who lost two awards on the same night. It is a good group, consisting of Cate Blanchett, Julianne Moore, Emma Thompson, and Sigourney Weaver. Perhaps there is some solace in that, though of course, there is no shame in losing to Dern here.

Will win: Laura Dern for Marriage Story
Should win: Florence Pugh for Little Women
Should have been here: Shuzhen Zhao for The Farewell

Countdown to the Oscars: Documentary, Animated, International, and Shorts



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the features and shorts.

Best Documentary Feature

Nominees
American Factory, directed by Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
The Cave, directed by Feras Fayyad
For Sama, directed by Waad Al-Kateab and Edward Watts
The Edge of Democracy, directed by Petra Costa
Honeyland, directed by Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov

In keeping with tradition, this is a powerful, if dour, group of Documentary Feature nominees. Two contrasting tales of women’s experiences during the Syrian war, one about globalization and the follies of capitalism, another about the rise of fascism in South America, and finally a parable about resource scarcity and environmental collapse. I cannot promise you will come away from these films feeling particularly good about the world or our place in it, but each is a vital document about how we live now and how we may be living sooner than we think.

Executive produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, American Factory has a leg up on the competition by virtue of name recognition alone. The filmmakers spent years embedded in a small Ohio town, capturing the fall, rise, and near fall again of the factory that provided many local jobs. Bognar and Reichert gain intimate access to the workers and managers of a factory bought by a Chinese manufacturing firm, and we are given ground-level access to a story that is equal parts international cooperation and culture clash.

For Sama and The Edge of Democracy are deeply personal stories with direct ties to their filmmakers but which nevertheless speak to all viewers on a human level. The Cave, about female doctors in Syria, is similarly intimate, raising equally important questions and providing thought-provoking answers. Honeyland, meanwhile, is one of the best films of 2019, following a Macedonian beekeeper as she struggles to keep maintain environmentally sound practices in an economy that sees only a bottom line.

American Factory is the odds-on favorite for the win and is beloved by many, though I cannot say I share the same affection for it. I found it illuminating and interesting, but when compared to the other films on this slate, it cannot help but feel slight. Mine is a minority opinion on that matter, however, and on popularity and name recognition alone, it is the likely winner. There are no bad films in this group, but part of me wishes that in a collection this worldly, the winner would not be the only film set in America and chiefly about Americans. It is a much bigger world out there.

Will win: American Factory
Should win: Honeyland
Should have been here: One Child Nation

Best Documentary Short

Nominees
In the Absence, directed by Seung-jun Yi
Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl), directed by Carol Dysinger
Life Overtakes Me, directed by John Haptas and Kristine Samuelson
St. Louis Superman, directed by Sami Khan and Smriti Mundhra
Walk Run Cha-cha, directed by Laura Nix

It is tempting often to look for a through line in the documentary shorts, to say, “Well, all of these films are about X.” There is nothing so cut and dry in this set of nominees except that each forces us to ask: What are we doing to each other and ourselves? The subjects are grieving parents in South Korea, Balkan refugees in Sweden, young girls in war-torn Afghanistan, black activists in St. Louis, and Vietnamese émigrés in Los Angeles. Little on the surface connects them but circumstances outside their control that forced them to take whatever actions they took.

In the Absence chronicles the sinking of the Sewol ferry and its aftermath as the nation of South Korea comes to grips with a system that would allow through inaction the deaths of 291 people, mostly teenagers and kids. Meanwhile, Life Overtakes Me follows refugee parents who are not so much grieving as they are in limbo, watching helplessly as their children slip into a mysterious stress-induced coma. St. Louis Superman is the one in this group most likely to break your heart if you let it, following activist and politician Bruce Franks as he navigates the waters of government, desperate to make difference in his community.

The outliers here are Learning to Skateboard and Walk Run Cha-cha, both of which are downright optimistic by the standards of this category. I could see either pulling the win here, but Learning to Skateboard has the sheen of importance provided by its subject matter and setting: the importance of female education and empowerment set against the backdrop of war in Afghanistan. Walk Run Cha-cha is about two people who fled the communist regime in Vietnam and have used their latter years in America to become talented dancers. It is a delight but is certainly the least substantial of these nominees.

The Academy really likes issue movies in the Documentary Short category, and voters like to feel like it means something when they check the box next to a film. With that in mind, one could see a path to victory for nearly any of these nominees, but the one that fits most neatly alongside recent winners such as The White Helmets, A Girl in the River, and most particularly Period. End of Sentence is Learning to Skateboard. It sends a message while providing uplift, which is a powerful one-two punch in this category.

Will win: Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)
Should win: In the Absence

Best Animated Feature

Nominees
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, directed by Dean DeBlois
I Lost My Body, directed by Jérémy Clapin
Klaus, directed by Sergio Pablos
Missing Link, directed by Chris Butler
Toy Story 4, directed by Josh Cooley

In any other year, this award might have felt predestined, but that is not the way the season has shaken out. Pixar traditionally would win this in a walk, particularly for the likely capstone to its marquee franchise, and that still may happen. Toy Story 4 has Disney behind it, kind if not rapturous reviews, and huge box office and tremendous likability. Again, this would usually add up to a win, but the awards have not gone its way.

The Golden Globe went to the Laika adventure movie Missing Link, which has moments of fun but is not Laika’s best film by far. The Annies split their awards between Netflix’s Santa Claus origin story Klaus and the independent French film (also on Netflix) I Lost My Body. Any of these is a potential spoiler to Woody and Buzz’s last adventure. How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, the third installment in the franchise, is probably running in last here, and the franchise as a whole appears likely to go down as a well-respected moneymaker that could never win the big prize at the Oscars. Universal will probably take the $522 million in worldwide box office and call it good.

Missing Link relies on the kind of classic Laika stop motion animation fans have come to love and features a frothy story about a Yeti who becomes an Indiana Jones style adventurer. It is fine, but not to the standard of previous Laika efforts such as Kubo and the Two Strings or the superb and underappreciated The Boxtrolls. Klaus comes from Spain but features big American money and big American stars. It also represents an intriguing advance in 2D storytelling, using strategic animation and lighting techniques to give the hand-drawn animation a uniquely three-dimensional feel.

Best in show by a country mile, however, is the strange, beguiling I Lost My Body, which is beloved by nearly all who see it and could win this category if it gets in front of enough eyes. It tells the story of a severed hand that gains sentience and attempts to reconnect with the body to which it once was attached. The animation is gorgeous and the storytelling is bold and daring in ways that make you wish more animation took these kinds of risks. It is anyone’s game, but even with its weakness throughout the awards season, I expect Pixar to take the crown at the Oscars, as it has done so many times before.

Will win: Toy Story 4
Should win: I Lost My Body

Best Animated Short

Nominees
Hair Love, directed by Matthew A. Cherry
Dcera, directed by Daria Kashcheeva
Sister, directed by Siqi Song
Mémorable, directed by Bruno Collet
Kitbull, directed by Rosana Sullivan

The animation branch truly outdid itself with this year’s crop of outstanding Animated Short nominees. They represent an eclectic mix of hand-drawn animation, stop motion, and mixed-media, but above all, they represent a grand gesture of storytelling. As always, the best animated shorts deliver a real punch in a small package, with none of these running longer than 15 minutes and three of them coming in at sub-10 minutes.

The film with the most juice behind it is probably Cherry’s sweet Hair Love, which tells the story of a black father trying to make his young daughter’s hair dreams come true. It is a poignant, powerful little story that speaks to the heart of a very specific experience. Cherry is a former NFL player trying to become just the second professional athlete to win an Oscar, following in the footsteps of the tragically recently departed Kobe Bryant. Hair Love has Sony Animation Studios behind it and the star power of cherry and voice actor Issa Rae.

Kitbull comes from Pixar animators and tells of a friendship between a pit bull forced into a dog fighting ring and a kitten that lives nearby. Sister is an interesting companion piece to the snubbed documentary One Child Nation and it’s felt-based stop motion is tactile and immersive. Dcera (Daughter) is a fascinating drama out of the Czech Republic about the complicated relationship between a dying man and the daughter he raised on his own. It is by turns touching and heartbreaking, squeezing maximum emotion out of its category-long 15-minute runtime.

My favorite of the bunch is Mémorable, from French animator Collet. Chronicling the relationship between a husband and wife as the man slips further into dementia, the film seamlessly blends painterly abstraction with real-world stakes to create a loving tribute to the lengths we go to for love. Think of it as a kinder, gentler Amour. Sometimes, the power of emotion can win this category, but when all else fails, go with the big names and the big money, which in this case means Hair Love.

Will win: Hair Love
Should win: Mémorable
Should have been here: The Bird and the Whale

Best International Feature

Nominees
Corpus Christi, directed by Jan Komasa
Honeyland, directed by Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov
Les Misérables, directed by Ladj Ly
Pain and Glory, directed by Pedro Almodóvar
Parasite, directed by Bong Joon-ho

Full disclosure: I have not seen Corpus Christi, and I will not have the chance to see it before the ceremony. Such are the vagaries of International Feature eligibility. My understanding is that it is a pretty good movie but a surprising nominee, and as such, it is probably running in fifth place here. Of the other nominees, three are in my top 10 films of the year – Parasite (1), Pain and Glory (5), and Honeyland (8) – and Les Misérables is riveting French crime thriller from a vital new voice in European cinema.

For Oscar watchers, there is not much suspense in this category unless you are looking to manufacture drama. Parasite should win this walking away. No film has ever been nominated in the same year for Best International Feature (formerly Best Foreign Language Film) and Best Picture without winning the International award. None of those films has also gone on to win Best Picture, but that is part of the discussion for a future installment of this series.

Now, about that manufactured drama: If you think the Academy will give the top prize to Parasite and try to spread the wealth here (which makes no actual sense), Pain and Glory is probably your beneficiary. The Academy loves Almodóvar, and his tender portrait of an aging director also earned Antonio Banderas a nomination for Best Actor. There is also the excellent Honeyland, which is the only film ever nominated for both Documentary Feature and International Feature, which suggests a strong degree of support among voters. But, really, let’s not think too hard about this one.

Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Atlantics

Best Live Action Short

Nominees
A Sister, directed by Delphine Girard
Brotherhood, directed by Meryam Joobeur
The Neighbor’s Window, directed by Marshall Curry
Saria, directed by Bryan Buckley
Nefta Football Club, directed by Yves Piat

This is my favorite category every year. That is probably why I am terrible at predicting the winner. I get too attached. But the truth is I love these films. Every now and then, I come across one that does not strike the right chord with me, but by and large, the nominees for Live Action Short are stellar across the board, year in and year out. This year is no exception and might be the hardest to predict since I started in on this little fool’s errand of mine.

The oddsmakers like Brotherhood, about a Tunisian farmer whose son returns from war with a child bride. This is my least favorite among the nominees this year. Though its ending packs a serious punch, much of the dialogue is too on the nose and the characters are often simply stating the subtext, a tool that can be useful in short films but which I found overbearing here. That said, it is hard to argue with the technical aspects of the filmmaking, and the subject matter is handled delicately and intelligently.

A Sister is an effective little thriller about a kidnapping victim who secretly calls emergency services and tries to hide her conversation from her captor. It has echoes of another French former nominee in this category, Just Before Losing Everything in 2013. Nefta Football Club is a delightful trifle of a short film, fulfilling the categories need for something a little lighter. It follows to young brothers who find a mule loaded down with a shipment of heroin. Hijinks ensue.

The two U.S.-produced films in contention are Curry’s The Neighbor’s Window and Buckley’s Saria. The Neighbor’s Window is a lightly comic tale about learning to appreciate what you have and reaching out to those closest to you. Curry is an interesting director, and this is his fourth nomination overall in a third different category. He previously was nominated twice for Best Documentary Feature and once for Documentary Short. This film is based on a true story, as well, though, so it is not too far outside his wheelhouse.

Saria is an absolute gut punch of a film that I believe to be the best of the bunch. I will not spoil the details of the story here, but every element of this short is working to build to its powerful conclusion. The storytelling, camerawork, editing, and performances are all superb, and I encourage anyone to seek this film out. For the win, while Brotherhood may have the inside track, I am loath to bet against the lone English-language nominee directed by a previous Oscar nominee. It is Curry’s time.

Will win: The Neighbor’s Window
Should win: Saria

Countdown to the Oscars: What You Can Hear



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the crafts you can hear.

Best Original Score

Nominees
Joker, Hildur Guðnadóttir
Little Women, Alexandre Desplat
Marriage Story, Randy Newman
1917, Thomas Newman
Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker, John Williams

It does seem like Williams gets nominated just for getting out of bed in the morning and going to the studio these days. Williams will be 88 years old within the week after this year’s Oscars ceremony, and he is on his 47th nomination, which – need I say – is a record. Remarkably, he has won just five times from all those nominations and not since Schindler’s List in 1993. This is his 20th Original Score nomination (he also has an Original Song nomination in there) since that win, which is a lot of tuxes to rent (he probably owns by now, right?) without winning an award. He will not win this year for his familiar Star Wars work, but I think it is good to remember exactly who we are talking about when we talk about John Williams.

Randy Newman, of course, is another Academy favorite, though he is more known for his songs than his scores. He has been nominated nine times for Original Score, but this is his first recognition in the category since 2001. He has never won for a score. Randy’s cousin, Thomas Newman, has also never won for score, despite a record-tying 14 nominations (just to be clear, that is the record for nominations without a win). I found the Marriage Story score to be so contrapuntal as to be distracting, though I know a lot of people love it. The 1917 score on the other hand is a beautiful example of the form, building tension and perfectly complementing the onscreen action.

Desplat’s work on Little Women is a wonderfully propulsive burst of energy that fits like a glove on Greta Gerwig’s modernist take on the material. Finally, there is Guðnadóttir’s creepy, ominous work on Joker, which fills the film with its deep sense of dread. Some have complained that the tones and strings are overbearing, telling the viewer how to feel rather than evoking a feeling. I disagree. That overbearing is the feeling being evoked, a crumbling city falling down all around and finally on top of you. I found it deeply moving, and the season seems to be pointing this way. If Guðnadóttir wins – and she is the current favorite – it will be richly deserved.

Will win: Joker
Should win: 1917
Should have been here: Midsommar

Best Original Song

Nominees
“I’m Standing With You” from Breakthrough, Dianne Warren
“Into the Unknown” from Frozen II, Kristen Anderson-Lopez and Robert Lopez
“Stand Up” from Harriet, Cynthia Erivo and Joshua Brian Campbell
“I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from Rocketman, Elton John and Bernie Taupin
“I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away” from Toy Story 4, Randy Newman

I have been very clear in the past how I feel about this award. I hate it. Clear enough? Not because I think the best film songs of the year do not deserve to be rewarded but because that is not what tends to happen in this category. Every year, voters – and the nominating music branch – fail to ask: Does this song complement and enhance the themes of the film? Is it integral to the plot? Does it evoke the mood of the story and improve our understanding of the characters? Instead, they ask: Is this person famous? Was this song a hit? Do I like this movie?

That is how you end up with a list of nominees that looks like this. If you are looking for the winner, it probably comes down to “Stand Up,” “I’m Gonna Love Me Again,” or “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away.” The Frozen II nomination feels like a token Disney nod for the third-best song in a middling to bad movie. “I’m Standing With You” can be explained by the music branch’s love of Warren, who is an 11-time Best Original Song nominee and has never won the award. She will be bridesmaid once again this year.

For Newman, this is his 13th songwriting nomination, and he won his last time out, but that was for Toy Story 3 10 years ago. He has won this award twice, though, and it seems unlikely the Academy will award him again. So, it comes down to “Stand Up” or “I’m Gonna Love Me Again.” Rocketman was a huge hit, and people love Elton John, who previously won this award and was thrice nominated for The Lion King in 1994. But, because Erivo is highly unlikely to win Best Actress, this is another place they can award a performer and movie they clearly liked. In the end, I think John and Taupin take it just based on star power, but watch out for “Stand Up.”

Briefly, I should say my biggest Oscars snub of the year came in this category (boy, it feels like that is always the case). I will never understand how the music branch could have slept on the tremendous “Glasgow” from the underseen but spectacular Wild Rose. Jessie Buckley plays a woman who dreams of being a country singer, and the film culminates in Buckley’s powerful performance of this song. This is the kind of song this award is meant for and should be rewarding, but it almost never does, so I suppose I should not be surprised. If nothing else, please seek out Wild Rose, which is also a better film than any of these nominees.

Will win: “I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from Rocketman
Should win: “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away” from Toy Story 4
Should have been here: “Glasgow” from Wild Rose


Best Sound Editing

Nominees
Ford V. Ferrari, Donald Sylvester
Joker, Alan Robert Murray
1917, Oliver Tarney and Rachel Tate
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Wylie Stateman
Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker, Matthew Wood and David Acord

Okay, we have talked about the difference between sound editing and sound editing a few times before on this site, so I will not totally rehash it here. If you want a detailed look at it, you can head over here or here. For the layman, think of it this way: Sound editing equals sound effects, and sound mixing equals levels of all sound (score, sound effects, dialogue, etc.). That difference being stated, the Academy sound branch does not differentiate much in its nominees, as you can see above and below.

The mix of nominees in Sound Editing this year is interesting, featuring a couple classic actioners (1917 and Ford V. Ferrari), two more subdued works (Joker and Once Upon a Time), and a science-fiction yarn (Star Wars). It is always kind of remarkable to me the Star Wars films have not done better in this category, considering their green-screen worlds rely heavily on sound effects to bring everything to life. Is there any more iconic movie sound than the light saber swoosh? But, as ever, the nomination is the respect of the craftspeople in the branch who recognize the work.

The larger Academy tends to be swayed by both prestige and more tangible, visceral work, in this case films like the war epic 1917 and the race car flick Ford V. Ferrari. Either would be an admirable winner, though I will make the case below for Ford V. Ferrari in the other sound category. Most likely, the Academy’s love for 1917 as a whole and the recognition of the film as a clear technical achievement will carry it to victory here. Never mind that it is also probably the most deserving of the nominees.

Will win: 1917
Should win: 1917
Should have been here: The Nightingale

Best Sound Mixing

Nominees
Ad Astra, Gary Rydstrom, Tom Johnson, and Mark Ulano
Ford V. Ferrari, Paul Massey, David Giammarco, and Steve Morrow
Joker, Tom Ozanich, Dean A. Zupancic, and Tod A. Maitland
1917, Mark Taylor and Stuart Wilson
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Michael Minkler, Christian P. Minkler, Mark Ulano

Swap out Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker for Ad Astra – one space adventure for another – and you have pretty much the same lineup for Sound Mixing as Sound Editing. Once again, the Academy members are likely to be swayed by the overall technical achievement of 1917 and tick off the boxes all the way down the ballot. Make no mistake, the balancing of Thomas Newman’s score with all those effects is an admirable feat, but it is perhaps not most impressive among this group.

For that, I want to single out two films: Quentin Tarantino’s breezy comedy caper Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood and James Mangold’s superior sports film Ford V. Ferrari. Tarantino has talked extensively about using the diegetic sound in the movie to create the atmosphere necessary for his story. In particular, the songs playing out of car radios and off record players in the homes are omnipresent, and they are omnipresent in the way music is in our lives and in the lives of these characters. It is loud without being obtrusive, underpinning the dialogue in a way that feels authentic and true to life.

Meanwhile, Ford V. Ferrari is a film about the intricacies of building an automobile. It is about characters attuned to every subtle change in the look, feel, and yes, sound of the car. Featuring a rousing score – sadly overlooked by the music branch – and all those engine noises and screeching tires, Massey, Giammarco, and Morrow help make the world of Ford V. Ferrari visceral without it being overwhelming. It is not a sensory overload so much as it is a perfect balancing act of sensation. All that being said, do not predict two separate films in the sound categories (unless there is a serious musical in play, which is a discussion for another year). Go with 1917.

Will win: 1917
Should win: Ford V. Ferrari
Should have been here: The Nightingale

Countdown to the Oscars: What You Can See



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. We start with the crafts you can see on screen.

Best Cinematography

Nominees
The Irishman, Rodrigo Prieto
Joker, Lawrence Sher
The Lighthouse, Jaren Blaschke
1917, Roger Deakins
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Robert Richardson

This is the Deakins show once again. Deakins famously was nominated 13 times without winning before winning on his 14th nomination for Blade Runner 2049 in 2017. He will not have to wait long to repeat the feat. Much has been made of the single-take format of 1917, and debate rages over whether it is a gimmick or a useful storytelling tool. I lean more toward the latter, but either way, Deakins’ technical achievement is unmatched among the nominees in the category this year. The framing, the constant motion, the day-for-night shooting, Deakins makes you question how he accomplished all of this but never takes you out of the story.

Among those nominees, Prieto’s tender work in The Irishman stands out, as does frequent Quentin Tarantino collaborator Richardson’s sun-dappled photography for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, a film that is in tone and execution a single long sunset. Sher’s grimy take on the world of Joker is suitable but familiar. I was not among those who fell so hard for Blaschke’s squared-off, high-contrast cinematography for The Lighthouse, but black and white has a way of forcing itself into the conversation. All of it is running second to Deakins, who will quickly go from long overdue for an Oscar to a two-time winner.

Will win: 1917
Should win: 1917
Should have been here: Midsommar

Best Editing

Nominees
Ford V. Ferrari, Michael McCusker and Andrew Buckland
The Irishman, Thelma Schoonmaker
Jojo Rabbit, Tom Eagles
Joker, Jeff Groth
Parasite, Yang Jinmo

This is an intriguing category this year since the presumptive Best Picture frontrunner is nowhere to be found. Of course, the aforementioned single-take magic of 1917 means the editing is well hidden and of the sort likely to be overlooked here anyway (remember Birdman faced the same challenge and won Best Picture anyway).  

The outlier here is Ford V. Ferrari, which though a Best Picture nominee has no momentum for the top prize. Any other film winning here would be a major show of strength, particularly Jojo Rabbit or Parasite. That being said, Ford V. Ferrari could take it solely on the flashiness of McCusker’s and Buckland’s work. They certainly would be deserving winners for wrangling together all of the car racing footage in a way that ensures the viewer is never lost amid all the action.

Schoonmaker is a legend and can never be counted out for an award, and if the Academy wants to reward The Irishman this is the most likely place to do it (or possibly Visual Effects, but we will get to that below). The nearly four-hour runtime of The Irishman flies by, and that is a credit to Scorsese’s longtime collaborator.

Yang’s piecing together of Bong Joon-ho’s puzzle box thriller would be deserving, and a win here for Parasite would be a huge boost to its chances for potentially taking the top prize. Ditto Eagles’ work on Jojo Rabbit, which won the ACE award for comedy editing and is to be respected in this category. Then you have Joker, for which Groth did away with all of the traditional superhero movie tropes in favor of a more patient subdued style that goes a long way toward making the film work. 

Any of these has a strong case to win, but I see a year like 2011 here, when The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo won the award without even being nominated for Best Picture. It was a feat of editing that simply could not be denied. That is Ford V. Ferrari, which will not win Best Picture but is unquestionably well edited. Keep in mind, as a Best Picture nominee, James Mangold’s film is one the Academy clearly likes and will want to recognize. 

Will win: Ford V. Ferrari
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Little Women

Best Production Design

 Nominees
The Irishman, Bob Shaw (production design) and Regina Graves (set decoration)
Jojo Rabbit, Ra Vincent (production design) and Nora Sopková (set decoration)
1917, Dennis Gassner (production design) and Lee Sandales (set decoration)
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Barbara Ling (production design) and Nancy Haigh (set decoration)
Parasite, Lee Ha Jun (production design) and Cho Won Woo (set decoration)

The most surprising and delightful nominee in this group is Parasite, and the Neon team did a good job getting the word out that the film’s two main settings were entirely constructed environments. Lee’s work as a production designer is front and center, but the set decoration spearheaded by Cho is a marvel, as well, particularly in scenes set in the lower-class family’s household, which is all meaningful clutter. Not an inch of the set is wasted space, so good on the Academy’s production designers and set dressers for recognizing that. There is much good will for the film, and the biggest hurdle to a win probably was the nomination itself, so do not be surprised to hear this one called out here.

The stiffest competition comes most likely from two vastly different period films - The Irishman and Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood. Shaw’s and Graves’ work on the sprawling Irishman is marvelous, covering nearly 40 years of American history and style with a lived-in effortlessness. Once Upon a Time is closer to Parasite, in as much as it is a set-piece film, taking place primarily at Rick Dalton’s house, Spahn Ranch, or the Lancer set. Haigh and Ling make each space unique and visceral in ways without which the movie could not succeed. Jojo Rabbit recreates a bombed-out World War II Germany, while 1917 recreates a bombed out World War I countryside. Unless we are in for a 1917 sweep, I am guessing they cancel each other out, however admirable their recreations are.

There are a couple of ways to think about the win here. Parasite could take it if they really love the movie, but history is not on its side. The last contemporary, non-fantasy film to win this award was All the President’s Men in 1976 (depending on how you categorize La La Land and All That Jazz, but both of those films rely heavily on fantastical musical sequences, so they do not truly fit the mold of a traditional contemporary piece). In recent years, the Academy has tended to pick one film as its crafts juggernaut - think Mad Max: Fury RoadLa La Land, and Gravity - and if that is the case again this year, then 1917 is the most likely beneficiary.

Will win: 1917
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Little Women

Best Costume Design

Nominees
The Irishman, Sandy Powell and Christopher Peterson
Jojo Rabbit, Mayes C. Rubeo
Joker, Mark Bridges
Little Women, Jacqueline Durran
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Arianne Phillips

Every crafts branch has its favorite people (see again 15-time cinematography nominee Roger Deakins), and the costume designers more than most like to nominate designers they love. Case in point, this is three-time winner Powell’s 15th nomination after she was a double nominee last year for The Favourite and Mary Poppins Returns. She shares this nomination with Peterson, and their work on The Irishman is most impressive for its ability to subtly evoke the many different eras on display in the epic crime drama. It is undoubtedly a “men in suits” movie, but the many style shifts and the love for Powell are enough to make The Irishman a formidable contender.

As with production design, this branch loves period work. In fact, the last non-period, non-fantasy film nominated in this category was I Am Love in 2010, and even that film was set 10 years prior to its release. Before that, you have to go back to 102 Dalmatians in 2000 to find a film set in the year it was released. Anyway, of course, all of these are period films, though four are set from the 1940s onward. Little Women represents the only traditional costume drama in the group, which could work in its favor. Durran is a six-time nominee and previously won this award for Anna Karenina in 2012.

Jojo Rabbit is perhaps the outlier of this group, and war films do not traditionally do well here, but Rubeo’s many looks for Scarlett Johansson’s character in the film certainly stick in the mind. Bridge’s specific take on The Joker’s costume has become an instant classic, while the rest of Joker is filled with grimy, era-appropriate looks. My favorite among the nominees is Phillips, who evokes a breezy, ‘70s style that is specific to the Hollywood scene, but even more so specific to the characters at the story’s core.

This is the first time in Oscars history that all five nominees have also been Best Picture nominees, which makes predicting this category that much more difficult. The Academy loves a good costume drama, and the desire to reward Little Women will be strong. Strong support for either Joker or Once Upon a Time could pay off here in a win, and while Powell is a star, The Irishman could be too subdued for the Academy’s tastes. Jojo Rabbit would be the surprise winner. When all else fails, go with the most costumes, which means Little Women.

Will win: Little Women
Should win: Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Should have been here: Dolemite Is My Name

Best Visual Effects

Nominees
Avengers: Endgame, Dan DeLeeuw, Russell Earl, Matt Aiken, and Dan Sudick
The Irishman, Pablo Helman, Leandro Estebecorena, Nelson Sepulveda-Fauser, and Stephane Grabali
The Lion King, Robert Legato, Adam Valdez, Andrew R. Jones, and Elliot Newman
1917, Guillaume Rocheron, Greg Butler, and Dominic Tuohy
Star Wars: Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker, Roger Guyett, Neal Scanlan, Patrick Tubach, and Dominic Tuohy

When it comes to predicting Best Visual Effects, recent history teaches us two things: 1) if there is a single Best Picture nominee in the group, that is probably your winner; 2) if there are multiple Best Picture nominees, look elsewhere. However, the modern Visual Effects award has been around since just 1963, and there have only been five nominees in the category since 2010 (yes, right around the time the industry model became almost singularly focused on effects-driven films).

The last time multiple Best Picture nominees competed here was 2015, when Mad Max: Fury Road, The Martian, and The Revenant all presumably split the vote and we got that shocking (wholly deserved) Ex Machina win. There is no Ex Machina equivalent in this group, which consists entirely of massive undertakings, mostly from Disney films. The effects of The Irishman have been talked about since the film was announced, but they are controversial and divisive, which will hurt its chances. 1917 will depend on how much voters want to attribute its single-take wizardry solely to the photography. For both, there is the Best Picture split vote possibility, though as we have said, 1917 could simply be a juggernaut.

Then, you have the Mouse House. No Star Wars film outside the original trilogy has been awarded in this category, and The Rise of Skywalker is not well liked. As far as effects, it looks like a Star Wars film, which is fine. Avengers: Endgame, the other “conclusion” (we’ll see) to an epic saga, is the highest-grossing film of all time and simply could not exist without its effects. Again, no Marvel film has ever won this award, and the studio’s lone Best Picture nominee (Black Panther) was not even nominated. At best, most of Marvel’s films simply feature the most effects, and sometimes, those effects are spotty.

On the other hand, The Lion King is a film that has no reason to exist except to show off the brilliance of its visual effects (that, and to make a billion dollars). One thing the Academy loves, as well, is when a film brings to life realistic animal characters, whether it is done well (The Jungle Book, Life of Pi) or done poorly (The Golden Compass). Here, it is done exceptionally well. Expect 1917 and The Irishman to split the prestige vote and for The Lion King to win a well-deserved award. Then, expect Disney to learn the wrong lesson from that award. I look forward to the photorealistic A Bug’s Life in 2030.

Will win: The Lion King
Should win: The Irishman
Should have been here: Ad Astra

Best Makeup and Hairstyling

Nominees
Bombshell, Kazu Hiro, Anne Morgan, and Vivian Baker
Joker, Nicki Ledermann and Kay Georgiou
Judy, Jeremy Woodhead
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, Paul Gooch, Arjen Tuiten, and David White
1917, Naomi Donne, Tristan Versluis, and Rebecca Cole

The Academy can be a strange and mercurial organization, and it is sometimes difficult to parse its reasoning. For the first time in the history of this award, we have five nominees. The most prior to this had been four, once in 1999, and there traditionally are three or fewer nominees. There was no statement about it, no specific reason. The branch just nominated five. That brings it in line with the rest of the categories, and truth be told, it was always silly not to have five. It is not as if there are not five or more worthy films every year. So, here we are.

The same Visual Effects-Best Picture logic tends to hold in this category. You have to go back to Titanic in 1997 to find a year when a Best Picture nominee lost Makeup or Makeup and Hairstyling to anything other than a fellow Best Picture nominee, and it has never happened in a year with multiple Best Picture contenders nominated. Joker and 1917 are both quite good but also quite subtle, apart from some of the gore effects in 1917 and Joaquin Phoenix’s face paint in Joker. Maleficent: Mistress of Evil is an outlier here but does feature some wonderful prosthetics work, while Judy’s one trick is to turn Renee Zelwegger into Judy Garland. Mission accomplished.

Really, all that history is just so you know the precedent I am betting against this year. Hiro is a prosthetics genius who has been nominated four times and previously won this award for Darkest Hour in 2017. You can see elements of his Darkest Hour work in Bombshell with John Lithgow’s transformation into Roger Ailes. But of course, the showstopper is Charlize Theron becoming Megyn Kelly. The work is truly remarkable, and Kelly even admitted on Instagram that the poster of Theron in the film even fooled her own toddler.

The Academy is not afraid of awarding less heralded films in this category if the work is strong enough. After all, this is category that made Oscar winners of films such as Suicide Squad, The Wolfman, and The Nutty Professor. So, while history says to go with 1917 or Joker, instinct says the work of Hiro, Morgan, and Baker on Bombshell is undeniable.

Will win: Bombshell
Should win: Bombshell
Should have been here: The Irishman