Sunday, February 9, 2020

It’s so metaphorical! Parasite wins Best Picture, Bong Joon-ho named Best Director



This is the happiest I have ever been to be so wrong in my predictions. Parasite, a South Korean thriller about class warfare, is the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Best Picture of 2019. With no shame, I tell you I jumped out of my seat. I cheered from the couch in my living room, a mere 2.5 miles down the road from where the big night was taking place. There is shock, confusion, elation, and appreciation, all running through my mind at once in celebration of the Best Picture of the year and one of the best Best Picture winners in history.

Bong Joon-ho’s masterpiece took home four awards, including Best Original Screenplay, Best International Feature, and Best Director for the man of the hour. Some films are undeniable. The stats and precursors and every bit of intuition in the world said 1917, a wonderful war picture that would have been a handsome if unadventurous winner. But some films are undeniable. 12 Years a Slave was undeniable. Moonlight was undeniable. Parasite is undeniable.

The show began with a lovely opening number by Janelle Monáe, who came out dressed as Mr. Rogers (with Tom Hanks seated in the front row, no less) and invited the Academy and all of us at home to be her neighbor. Then she blew the roof off the Dolby Theatre (located on Hollywood and Highland, as the broadcast reminded us several times, cross streets that meant nothing to me before I moved here a year ago). It was a fun, high-energy start to a show that nominally had no host.

Steve Martin and Chris Rock, both former Oscar hosts, came out to deliver the traditional opening “monologue” (yeah, I know, two people is a dialogue). They got in a few good jokes, but the timing was creaky, and as much as I love Martin, one wonders why Rock could not have handled the task himself. Rock’s barbs at the industry’s ongoing problems with race were pointed and hilarious. It set a tone that left little place for older white male Martin. But, like that, they were gone, and it was on to the awards.

Brad Pitt won the first Oscar of the night and seemed genuinely overwhelmed at the recognition and support of his peers. All of the acting awards went as planned, with Pitt and Laura Dern winning the respective supporting categories and Renée Zelwegger and Joaquin Phoenix taking the lead awards. Phoenix’s speech was heartfelt, sincere and progressive before he ended with a touching tribute to his late brother, River. The best part of Dern’s win was her mom, Hollywood legend Dianne Ladd, tearing up throughout the entire speech.

The award for best speech of the night, however, goes to Joker composer Hildur Guðanóttir, whose joy and gratitude were evident and who made a powerful appeal to her fellow female composers to make themselves heard. Guðanóttir is the first woman in Academy history to win the award for Best Original Score, and of course, it is about time.

I would say two of the five Original Song nominee performances were truly lovely, and the others just fine. Double nominee Cynthia Erivo’s performance of “Stand Up” was a powerful moment in the room, and there was something moving about seeing Elsas from around the world perform “Into the Unknown” from Frozen II alongside Idina Menzel. We probably could have done without multiple references to the infamous John Travolta “Adele Dazeem” gaffe, but low-hanging fruit is always likely to be picked.

Billy Eilish’s rendition of “Yesterday” for the In Memoriam segment was understated and respectful, while the other major musical performance we got was the most baffling moment of the night. I would put Eminem’s “Lose Yourself” performance this year alongside the Sound of Music medley from a few years back among the most unmotivated and completely dispensable Oscar moments ever. All I can think is the Academy was attempting to right the wrong of Eminem not performing his Oscar-winning song on the broadcast the year he won the award. So, on this, the 17th anniversary of that win, he got the stage. He was okay, but when people complain about the length of the Oscars, it is stuff like this that is so indefensible.

Of course, I was bummed at the Best Adapted Screenplay win for Jojo Rabbit, though it is difficult to begrudge an award to Taika Waititi, who seems like a lovely person. But the near-shutout for Little Women, which won only Costume Design, stings. I take solace in the knowledge that somewhere down the line, Greta Gerwig will direct a film that is, as we are saying, undeniable, and it will sweep everything. I look forward to that day.

Speaking of shutouts, The Irishman went 0-for-10, joining only five other films to match or surpass that goose egg, including Martin Scorsese’s own Gangs of New York. In a particularly cruel irony, one of the awards Gangs of New York was supposed to be a lock for was Best Original Song, “The Hands That Built America” by U2. That song lost to – you guessed it – “Lose Yourself.”

But while Scorsese’s film won nothing, the winners’ speeches were not short on love and admiration for the legendary auteur, who seemed humbled and appreciative of all the recognition. That included Best Director Bong, who shouted out Scorsese as a major inspiration. Bong also made special mention of Quentin Tarantino, who has long been a champion of the Korean director’s work.

I imagine the show ran a little long for some of the more casual viewers, but when Spike Lee read out Bong Joon-ho’s name for Best Director in lull in the telecast was immediately erased by a fresh wave of optimism and enthusiasm. Though the film won Best Original Screenplay, it was passed over in Editing and Production Design, so it looked like Parasite might be relegated to Best International Feature. Then Best Director happened and anything seemed possible. But until Jane Fonda read out the top award, pausing for effect like the pro she is, it didn’t seem real.

I have been watching the Oscars telecast with serious interest for 19 years, and I can count on one hand the number of moments of pure bliss the show has delivered me. Phillip Seymour Hoffman winning Best Actor in 2005. The two-shot of Lupita Nyong’o as Best Supporting Actress and 12 Years a Slave as Best Picture in 2013. Olivia Colman for Best Actress last year. And now, the Parasite sweep of 2019.

There is more to say, more to write, and we will probably go over all of it, the larger context, what this means for the future of the Academy, etc., but for now, I will enjoy my sparkling wine and toast to Parasite, the best picture of the year.

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed 2019 Academy Awards Predictions*



We have not made these predictions in a few years, but it feels like time to get back to it. It has been a great year for films, and it has been a joy to write about these Academy Award nominations. If you are interested in checking out the full breakdown of each of these categories, click on any of the links below and read too many words about all of the nominees.

Countdown to the Oscars: What You Can See (Cinematography, Editing, Production Design, Costumes, Visual Effects, Makeup and Hairstyling)

Countdown to the Oscars: What You Can Hear (Original Score, Original Song, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing)

Countdown to the Oscars: Documentary, Animation, International, and Shorts (Documentary Feature, Documentary Short, Animated Feature, Animated Short, International Feature, Live Action Short)

Countdown to the Oscars: Actors (Lead Actor, Lead Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress)

Countdown to the Oscars: Directors and Writers (Directors, Original Screenplay, Adapted Screenplay)


*I make this guarantee every time, and I stand by it, but don’t ask me about it.

Picture
Will win: 1917
Should win: Parasite

Director
Will win: Sam Mendes for 1917
Should win: Bong Joon-ho for Parasite

Actor in a Leading Role
Will win: Joaquin Phoenix for Joker
Should win: Antonio Banderas for Pain and Glory

Actress in a Leading Role
Will win: Renee Zelwegger for Judy
Should win: Scarlett Johansson for Marriage Story

Actor in a Supporting Role
Will win: Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Should win: Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood

Actress in a Supporting Role
Will win: Laura Dern for Marriage Story
Should win: Florence Pugh for Little Women

Original Screenplay
Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite

Adapted Screenplay
Will win: Jojo Rabbit
Should win: Little Women

Cinematography
Will win: 1917
Should win: 1917

Editing
Will win: Ford V. Ferrari
Should win: Parasite

Production Design
Will win: 1917
Should win: Parasite

Costume Design
Will win: Little Women
Should win: Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood

Makeup and Hairstyling
Will win: Bombshell
Should win: Bombshell

Visual Effects
Will win: The Lion King
Should win: The Irishman

Original Score
Will win: Joker
Should win: 1917

Original Song
Will win: “I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from Rocketman
Should win: “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away” from Toy Story 4

Sound Editing
Will win: 1917
Should win: 1917

Sound Mixing
Will win: 1917
Should win: Ford V. Ferrari

Documentary Feature
Will win: American Factory
Should win: Honeyland

International Feature
Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite

Animated Feature
Will win: Toy Story 4
Should win: I Lost My Body

Documentary Short
Will win: Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)
Should win: In the Absence

Live Action Short
Will win: The Neighbor’s Window
Should win: Saria

Animated Short
Will win: Hair Love
Should win: Mémorable

Enjoy the show!

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Picture


Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series concludes with the nine nominees for Best Picture.


This is the big one, the reason we are all here. This is Best Picture at the Academy Awards. There was much furor over the perfectly fine if bland choice of Green Book last year over Alfonso Cuaron’s masterwork, Roma. Keep in mind, however, there is that kind of upset every year. Every film nominated for Best Picture has passionate supporters – that is how you end up with a Best Picture nomination in the first place – and no matter what wins, someone is upset. You have to go back to 2007 and No Country for Old Men to find a winner that was nearly universally agreed upon, and even then, There Will Be Blood fans wondered where the Paul Thomas Anderson love was.

Some great films are nominated in the Academy’s top category this year. One of them will win Best Picture. Eight others will not. The announcement of a winner does not magically erase the others from existence. All of this is to say: Try not to get too worked up about it. I love this stuff. I genuinely jump for joy win films and people I respect win Academy Awards. When they do not win, it is upsetting, but then I go back and watch films I love and remember why I love them in the first place. It is not because they may win Oscars but because they are great works of art.

These are the nine films nominated for Best Picture of 2019 at the Academy Awards this year, in order of likelihood to win (from least likely to most):


Ford V. Ferrari, directed by James Mangold

I hate using the term “muscular” because it has become so gendered when talking about filmmaking. But we are talking about big, beefy engines, fast cars, and loud noises. I don’t care what gender you are. This is muscular filmmaking. Ford V. Ferrari is the kind of movie the Academy usually eats up. It is a classic tale of American exceptionalism that finds within that structure a critique of the capitalist system. It is about a couple Davids working for Goliath, trying to take down another Goliath. In the end, only the Goliaths win.

Mangold’s direction is tight, precise, and propulsive, Christian Bale and Matt Damon are excellent in the leading roles, and the film is a visual splendor. That said, with no directing nomination, no acting nominations, and no writing nomination, the love for this film appears to stop at its considerable crafts. It will not get many No. 1 votes among these nominees, and the prize will have to be the nomination.


Marriage Story, directed by Noah Baumbach

Despite what you may have heard, Marriage Story is much more than Kramer vs. Kramer 2.0. Baumbach’s film a fairer, more considered work than that earlier film to which it is so often compared. For those who cannot see both sides of this story, it says more about them than it does the film. Baumbach balances his audience’s loyalties and sympathies in a way you rarely see on screen. Marriage Story is evidence of a filmmaker working at the height of his considerable powers as both a writer and director.

It helps that at the center of film are two remarkable leading performances. Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver. They battle and rage and scratch and claw and never given an inch, either as performers or characters. The beauty of the film lies in the way both characters come to realize they have entered a war that cannot be won. It may ultimately be too raw and too close to the bone for voters. It is a hard film to love, but it is worth the effort if you have the patience to meet the film on its level.


The Irishman, directed by Martin Scorsese

It feels impossible that Scorsese could return with another masterpiece and the world could simply shrug at it. As of now, I am predicting The Irishman to win precisely zero of its 10 nominations. That is a feat matched or exceeded by only five other films in history, including Scorsese’s own Gangs of New York in 2002, which similarly went 0-for-10. The list also features American Hustle (10), True Grit (10), The Turning Point (11), and The Color Purple (11). I do not think it is controversial to suggest The Irishman is the blue ribbon of that group.

I wonder how much of this is the Netflix effect. Not simply the Academy’s and the industry’s at large aversion to the growing power of the streaming platform. If anybody could move voters beyond that prejudice, surely Scorsese could. Rather, Netflix’s model, for both its film and television originals, seems to be a major release with much press and hullabaloo. The new piece, say The Irishman or Marriage Story, dominates the cultural conversation for a week or two, then disappears, lost in the sea of content. I cannot imagine a world in which a master director releases a perfect film and it simply disappears into the ether, but here we stand.


Little Women, directed by Greta Gerwig

There is little that irk me more than sight-unseen prejudice. The conversation around the release of Little Women was that men would not see it, that men, in fact, were refusing to see it based on some misguided and phony masculine code. Yet, it is here. It is among the nominees for Best Picture in a male dominated Academy. So, clearly, some men crossed the picket line and saw it. For doing so, they were rewarded with a masterful piece of storytelling in which everything old is new again. Little Women is a rebuke to the very men who would refuse to see it.

Little Women is also a major work from one of the best new directors on the scene. With Lady Bird and now this, Gerwig has proven that she is in this game to play, and not only is she playing – she is winning. Her post-modern take on the March girls saga is the perfect movie of the moment, striking at the very core of what drives conversations around art and the artist. It is a film in conversation with itself and the world at large, daring viewers to judge it, to misinterpret it, and to miss the point. It is challenging, daring, and brilliant, so of course, it will not win. But just wait until Gerwig gets back here again.


Joker, directed by Todd Phillips

The preferential ballot used to determine Best Picture rewards consensus. A controversial, love-it-or-hate-it work is unlikely to win under this kind of system. It does not come much more controversial than Joker when it comes to the Academy’s top award. Many voters will put it down as the No. 1 film of the year. Many others will place it last on their ballots or leave it off entirely. This is not a film that can build consensus, yet its ceremony-high 11 nominations suggest it has strong support across the board.

The critical and industry divide on Joker has been fascinating to watch ever since it won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival. Somehow, winning a major award put a target on Joker’s back. Its worst sin is that it is derivative of early Martin Scorsese, though the homage fits the tone of the piece. From what I can tell, people want to find nothing in the film. People who want to hate will find it empty, though admittedly, some who love are seeing too much. The truth is the film’s existence is something of a miracle, a billion-dollar-grossing comic book film that takes an infamous character and puts a new spin on it. Kudos to Phillips for trying something and succeeding.


Jojo Rabbit, directed by Taika Waititi

This is my least favorite among the nominees. I just want to be upfront about that before I discuss the film’s chances to win Best Picture. Part of me wonders if Waititi just is not my bag. Though I loved Hunt for the Wilderpeople, I could not get on board for any of What We Do in The Shadows, Thor: Ragnarok, Flight of the Conchords, or Jojo Rabbit. While some of the humor works for me, what I found most distressing about Jojo Rabbit were its attempts at sincerity.

Jojo Rabbit wants to be about something important – it is even billed as an “Anit-Hate Satire,” just in case you didn’t get the joke – but it also wants to make you laugh at the antics of an imaginary Hitler. The tonal shifts do not work. The film works for others, and I am happy for them. I will not be happy if this film wins Best Picture, which is a viable outcome for a middlebrow crowd-pleaser that has Life Is Beautiful DNA. Few would call it their favorite film, but few will say they outright dislike, which could be important on a preferential ballot.


Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, directed by Quentin Tarantino

Tarantino shot his shot with this film. I think it is his second-best work after Inglourious Basterds. He says he will retire after his 10th film – this is No. 9 – and it is hard to imagine him producing another work of such profound beauty and introspection. As ever, this Tarantino movie loves movies, and it loves people who make movies, which would be Academy members. If there were ever going to be a fastball down the middle of the plate for Oscar voters, this would be it. And yet, it has gained little traction.

Brad Pitt will win Supporting Actor, Tarantino could win his third Original Screenplay award, and the film is in the mix in a couple below-the-line categories, but the momentum does not seem to exist for the top prize. Like Inglourious Basterds, which came in the year of Avatar vs. The Hurt Locker, Once Upon a Time seems to be running third behind the two Best Picture favorites. Maybe it ends up second on enough ballots and surprises everyone, but it does not seem to be in the cards. Maybe Tarantino will never get there. Hitchcock never did. Nor did Kubrick. Welles couldn’t even get back to the show. If Tarantino does retire and join this group, hey, there is worse company in which to find yourself.


Parasite, directed by Bong Joon-ho

The best film of the year does not always get this close to the top prize. In the 16 or 17 years I have been following the Oscars closely, my favorite film of the year has won the top award three times, and I freely admit that many people disagree with me about those selections. There is not much disagreement that Parasite is the best film of the year. It won the Palme d’Or at Cannes, becoming the first Korean film to do so. It won numerous critical accolades and has broken down barriers across the board for Korean films specifically and foreign language films in general.

There is no one in the industry who does not like this director, this cast, or this film. At industry function after industry function, the enthusiasm and applause for this film and these filmmakers has been off the charts. Bong has been one of the most popular individuals in the room at every party he attends. Parasite is universal. The love is out there. The question is: Will that love translate into votes? The short answer is yes, but will there be enough? We will find out.


1917, directed by Sam Mendes

It is no longer cool to admit you still like American Beauty. There is the Kevin Spacey aspect, the general whiteness of the film, its handling of gay characters, and its generally icky plot about a middle-aged man lusting after a teenage girl. The film has not changed. The culture has. In many ways, I understand. But the fractured take on suburban malaise had not become a cliché at this point. American Beauty is primarily responsible for the wave of imitators that followed. That was 20 years ago when Mendes’ first feature film won Best Picture. Now, he is on the verge of another triumph.

1917 has won all the right awards that would suggest a Best Picture win. It won the Golden Globes, it won the Producers Guild, it won the Directors Guild, and it won all those BAFTAs. There is only one empty spot in the trophy case. 1917 is a strange goliath because it is such a well-made film. It truly is an impressive piece of filmmaking and storytelling. I do not want to root against this film. I really enjoyed it. The crafts are impeccable, the performances are lovely, and the climax is among the most stirring I have seen in a cinema in recent years.

The problem is that Parasite is an unimpeachable masterwork. Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood is stunning. Little Women and The Irishman are brilliant. You want something transcendent to beat that group. 1917 is tremendous, but transcendence is elusive. All signs point to 1917, but it is hard to be excited about that outcome. Of course, the last time I felt this certain about a Best Picture winner was La La Land. Then, Moonlight happened. So, you never know.

Will win: 1917
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Midsommar

Countdown to the Oscars: Directors and Writers



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the writers and directors.

Best Director

Nominees
Martin Scorsese for The Irishman
Todd Phillips for Joker
Sam Mendes for 1917
Quentin Tarantino for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Bong Joon-ho for Parasite

The discussion around the Best Director nominees this year has centered on the lack of women represented in the category. Specifically, there has been a lot of hand-wringing over the lack of a nomination for Greta Gerwig. I sympathize. Gerwig’s work is unimpeachable and deserving, though I wish some of that outrage had been saved for selections further afield such as Jennifer Kent for The Nightingale or Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomnir Stefanov for Honeyland.

Still, this is a high-quality group full of interesting and accomplished work. The near-certain winner is Sam Mendes for the one-shot war film 1917, a feat of filmmaking style that both resonates thematically within the film and cries out for recognition. Director of photography Roger Deakins has gotten a lot of the credit for the craft of the film, but Mendes was there every step of the way, putting together the pieces for a film that is more of a puzzle than it would first appear.

At the beginning of the season, it appeared this awards run would be a coronation for Tarantino, who has made a film that is equal parts impressive and beloved. Tarantino has never won a Best Director Oscar, and he has made no secret of desiring the award. The season has not gone his way, and if he really intends to retire after his next film, he will have just one more shot at the prize. Likewise, Scorsese by now is used to the bridesmaid role at the Academy Awards, and Todd Phillips’ thorough Scorsese homage will not win him the award any more than it ever did Marty.

The spoiler in all of this is director Bong for Parasite, a masterpiece of a thriller that manages to balance tone, story, and character in ways that are above and beyond any other film this year. As we will talk about more in Best Picture, the night comes down to a traditional Academy pick like 1917 vs. the more outre choice, Parasite. As we know, change does not happen all at once, and 1917 and Mendes are likely to triumph. If it goes any other way, it will be a shocking bellwether for things to come at the Oscars.

Will win: Sam Mendes for 1917
Should win: Bong Joon-ho for Parasite
Should have been here: Greta Gerwig for Little Women

Best Original Screenplay

Nominees
Knives Out, written by Rian Johnson
Marriage Story, written by Noah Baumbach
1917, written by Sam Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, written by Quentin Tarantino
Parasite, written by Bong Joon-ho and Han Jin-won

Throw a dart. Johnson is a highly deserving nominee, and it is fun to see one of my favorite directors with the “Oscar-nominated” brand in front of his name. But as intricate and impressive as his Agatha Christie-style whodunnit is, he is running in fifth place after the four Best Picture nominees, any of which could take this award. Baumbach’s intimate divorce drama is likely to be an also ran as Marriage Story has lost steam throughout the season, though there was a version of this awards race in which Tarantino won Best Director and Baumbach got Screenplay as a consolation prize. Obviously, that is not the reality in which we live.

So, what you have are three films that could realistically take down Best Original Screenplay. First, there is 1917, the Best Picture front-runner that will win this award if we are looking at a year with a historic sweep. Though I think we are looking at a big night for Mendes’ war picture, I think the love for the film carried it to this nomination but will carry it no further here. The 1917 crowd will have plenty else to celebrate Sunday night.

Second, you have Tarantino, a writer’s writer from the beginning of his career who has won this award twice before. He has joked the award should be named for him if he wins again, though three-time winner and 16-time nominee Woody Allen might have something to say about it. On the other hand, Allen has never bothered to show up for any of his four Academy Awards, so he probably would not care one way or the other. Once Upon a Time is superlative work from Tarantino that stands out in his filmography as something more graceful, empathetic and elegiac than anything he has done before.

Finally, there is Parasite, the critical darling that could sneak up on everyone on the big night. Bong and Han have won the screenplay award at both the Writers Guild Awards (where Tarantino was ineligible) and the British Academy awards (where they beat Tarantino). The love for Parasite is real, as evidenced by the six nominations across multiple categories, and the previous wins are reason for optimism for fans of the film. While I got burned in 2012 predicting Michael Haneke’s Amour (also a foreign language Best Picture nominee) in this category against a winning Tarantino script (Django Unchained), I am going back to the well and predicting Parasite

Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Pain and Glory

Best Adapted Screenplay

Nominees
The Irishman, written by Steven Zaillian
Jojo Rabbit, written by Taika Waititi
Joker, written by Todd Phillips and Scott Silver
Little Women, written by Greta Gerwig
The Two Popes, written by Anthony McCarten

Let’s get this out of the way: Little Women is a masterpiece of adaptation, and in a just world, Gerwig would win this award going away. It is the definition of a great adaptation. Gerwig takes a well-known, oft-explored piece of classic literature and finds a new way to approach it and new themes to parse from its text. She updates the story without losing its soul, making it feel real and alive for a new generation of moviegoers and a new era of filmmaking. Anything else winning would be a travesty, which is not to say I do not like some of the other films or scripts in contention. They just are not Little Women.

Zaillian is an obviously brilliant writer who has been in this game a long time, though he has always been choosy about the projects he takes on. In fact, The Irishman is his first produced feature script since Exodus: Gods and Kings in 2014. That is a long break for one of Hollywood’s preeminent wordsmiths, but it was worth the wait, as Zaillian brings the sprawling “I Heard You Pain Houses” to vivid life in the epic Irishman.

Phillips and Silver are getting credit for putting a new spin on a classic character with their Joker origin story. It is interesting work that is sometimes heavy-handed, and the film is more of a directing and acting showcase than a feat of screenwriting. This is a weird nomination for McCarten, who adapted his own play, which was developed in conjunction with the film script. The Academy’s rule for eligibility are sometimes byzantine, though, and the film is deserving of recognition in one of the writing categories. It is just a little surprising it ended up being this one.

The late-breaking favorite, though, is Jojo Rabbit, and I have to say: That bums me out. Not solely because a win for Waititi’s World War II “satire” would come at the expense of Little Women but because it is the least accomplished in this group of nominees. I found the humor in Jojo Rabbit grating and its attempts at pathos maudlin. It was not a film for me and feels like the kind of middle-of-the-road pick that would seem edgy to a certain type of voter. It is not edgy. It is not particularly clever. And it sure ain’t the best adapted screenplay of the year. But sometimes, these things happen.

Will win: Jojo Rabbit
Should win: Little Women
Should have been here: Blinded by the Light

Countdown to the Oscars: Actors



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the acting categories.

Best Actor in a Leading Role

Nominees
Antonio Banderas for Pain and Glory
Leonardo DiCaprio for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Adam Driver for Marriage Story
Joaquin Phoenix for Joker
Jonathan Pryce for The Two Popes

Even by the standards of a usually competitive category, this was a historic year for the Best Actor race. You could fill out this list of nominees with a wholly different group of five actors, and it would be just as valid. Off the top of my head, try Robert De Niro (The Irishman), Eddie Murphy (Dolemite Is My Name), Adam Sandler (Uncut Gems), Song Kang-ho (Parasite), and Kelvin Harrison Jr. (Waves). At the same time, my feeling is the group we got is historically great as well.

The nomination for Banderas makes me particularly happy as nominees from foreign films are rare (though Pedro Almodovar has a way with pulling off this trick; see Penelope Cruz for Volver in 2006) and I thought Banderas gave the best male performance of the year. Right after that, you have DiCaprio doing career-best work that is bound to be remembered as an also-ran for the Oscar season, if not in the actor’s career. Pryce’s performance is lovely and technically skilled, and the XX-year-old thespian is well deserving of his first career nomination.

When the season started, it appeared this would be a two-horse race between Phoenix and Driver. It has not worked out that way. For the most part, the performances exist on wildly opposite ends of the spectrum. Driver delivers a subdued, nuanced exploration of character, while Phoenix offers a bold, bombastic interpretation of an iconic villain. Both are great, but Phoenix’s work is showier and of the kind the Academy loves to reward. 

Actors, in particular, have been drawn to Phoenix’s performance since Joker debuted. From the improvised bathroom dance to the vocal inflections to the precise facial expressions, it is the kind of work that screams out for a reward without detracting from the film. Phoenix knows the movie he is in and perfectly pitches his performance to the key of the film. For all of that, he will walk away with his first Academy Award.

Will win: Joaquin Phoenix for Joker
Should win: Antonio Banderas for Pain and Glory
Should have been here: Eddie Murphy for Dolemite Is My Name

Best Actress in a Leading Role

Nominees
Cynthia Erivo for Harriet
Scarlett Johansson for Marriage Story
Saoirse Ronan for Little Women
Charlize Theron for Bombshell
Renee Zelwegger for Judy

Consider me baffled by the way this category shook out this year. Zelwegger is going to win her second Oscar for her imitation of Judy Garland in Judy. That much has seem preordained since the film debuted, and that is what I find so baffling. Zelwegger is good in the film, and she is an extremely likable person. But the film was not a hit, nor is it particularly well liked. Somehow, though, Zelwegger has run roughshod over the competition all season, and no contender has seemed able to challenge her lock on this award.

It is a shame because as delightful as Zelwegger is and accomplished though her work may be, it feels like the least adventurous choice possible. The celebrity biopic is a tried and true formula for winning an Oscar, and a win for Judy feels monumentally uninspired. In truth, however, this list of nominees feels a bit uninspired. More exciting choices such as Lupita Nyong’o for Us or Florence Pugh for Midsommar would have livened up this category. But, as a previous Best Actress winner said in her winning role, this is the story you get.

Johansson is doing career-best work in Marriage Story, and if there were going to be a spoiler, the smart money would be on Johansson, particularly with the history of double-nominated performers in mind. Theron is quite good in Bombshell, but as far as voters go, it is possible the quality of the performance is hidden partially by the stellar makeup work that transforms Theron into Megyn Kelly. Cynthia Erivo is the lone actor of color nominated this year, and similarly to Zelwegger, she is working in straight biopic territory. One wishes she had been recognized for her wonderful supporting turn in Widows last year.

Finally, you have Ronan, who at 25 years old is already a four-time Oscar nominee. She appears to be sliding comfortably into the Kate Winslet group of talented young actresses who rack up nominations but have to wait until later in their careers to be honored. She is the beating heart and artistic soul of Greta Gerwig’s amazing Little Women adaptation, but for the third time in five years, the nomination will have to be her reward.

Will win: Renee Zelwegger for Judy
Should win: Scarlett Johansson for Marriage Story
Should have been here: Florence Pugh for Midsommar

Best Actor in a Supporting Role

Nominees
Tom Hanks for A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
Anthony Hopkins for The Two Popes
Al Pacino for The Irishman
Joe Pesci for The Irishman
Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood

What a group! Here we have five previous Academy Award wins represented (Hanks 2, Hopkins 1, Pacino 1, and Pesci 1), and the lone non-acting winner, Pitt, previously won an Oscar as the producer of the best film of the decade (12 Years a Slave). As with all of the acting categories this year, this has seemed like a lock for months, and Pitt will soon join his fellow nominees as an Oscar-winning actor for his role as a past-his-prime stunt double in Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood.

Hanks perfectly captures the spirit of Mr. Rogers in Marielle Heller’s non-traditional “based on a true story” film, and he is back in the Oscar game after 19 years without a nomination, including a shocking snub for Captain Phillips in 2013. On just his sixth nomination, Hanks is less an Academy favorite than his reputation as the prestige actor of his time would suggest. His back-to-back wins for Philadelphia (1993) and Forrest Gump (1994) remain among the more delightful anomalies in Academy history, and perhaps this nomination portends a new era for Hanks with this voting body. Not that it will hurt the ever-popular Hanks either way.

Pacino and Pesci are here representing Martin Scorsese’s mob epic The Irishman. While Pacino has the flashier role as outsized union president Jimmy Hoffa, Pesci has been the one earning all the hosannas for his quietly menacing portrayal of an aging mob boss. Hopkins is a bit of a surprise nominee here, and his performance for me was somewhat overshadowed by Jonathan Pryce’s leading performance in The Two Popes, but it seems the Academy was just excited to see Hopkins back doing good work on the big screen (as long as you didn’t just see the film on Netflix).

The winner, however, is Pitt. He has picked up all the precursor awards, and he has the backing of basically an entire industry excited to see the former Sexiest Man Alive recognized for his acting prowess. The role is a variation on certain notes contained within the Pitt persona, which makes this smart casting on Tarantino’s part, but Pitt is making enough distinct choices with the character that the performances is allowed to bloom fully. So, while this is something of a lifetime achievement award for Pitt, the Academy at least is picking the right film for such an honor.

Will win: Brad Pitt for Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood
Should win: Al Pacino for The Irishman
Should have been here: Wesley Snipes for Dolemite Is My Name

Best Actress in a Supporting Role

Nominees
Kathy Bates for Richard Jewell
Laura Dern for Marriage Story
Scarlett Johansson for Jojo Rabbit
Florence Pugh for Little Women
Margot Robbie for Bombshell

Stop me if you have heard this before, but this race has been over for months. Dern locked up this award early in the season and just kept delivering funny, heartfelt speeches. She has been nominated twice before this, but this is the first time she has been within shouting distance of the win, and it does not appear to be getting away from her. Her empowered, feminist divorce lawyer is one of the most refreshing parts of Noah Baumbach’s Marriage Story, and Dern makes strong choice after strong choice to bring fully to life a character who could seem one note on the page.

Speaking of characters who could be one note on the page, a popular hashtag around Little Women this year has been #JusticeForAmy, referring to the bratty middle sister in Louisa May Alcott’s classic tale. Portrayed almost always as immature, whiny, and downright unlikable, Pugh finds the wounded heart at the core of the character and infuses her with reason and understanding like we have rarely seen. Beyond the story elements, though, Pugh is transformative in the role, and it completes a trifecta of stunning turns this year from the young performer. This will not be her last nomination.

The Bates nomination may seem out of left field for a movie that received mixed to negative critical notices and utterly bombed at the box office, but never underestimate the Academy’s love for one of its own. Bates is a true actor’s actor, and she has ridden that love to her fourth nomination. Robbie, meanwhile, is good in Bombshell and has a couple of standout scenes, but I cannot help but think she is here for the wrong film. I would much rather have seen her recognized for her role as Sharon Tate in Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, but a lack of dialogue probably doomed her chances for that.

Then, there is Johansson, who becomes just the 12th actor in Academy history to be nominated for two performances in the same year. Of the previous 11, seven of those performers ended up with an Oscar at the end of the night. Johansson seems destined, however, to join the other group, those who lost two awards on the same night. It is a good group, consisting of Cate Blanchett, Julianne Moore, Emma Thompson, and Sigourney Weaver. Perhaps there is some solace in that, though of course, there is no shame in losing to Dern here.

Will win: Laura Dern for Marriage Story
Should win: Florence Pugh for Little Women
Should have been here: Shuzhen Zhao for The Farewell

Countdown to the Oscars: Documentary, Animated, International, and Shorts



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the features and shorts.

Best Documentary Feature

Nominees
American Factory, directed by Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
The Cave, directed by Feras Fayyad
For Sama, directed by Waad Al-Kateab and Edward Watts
The Edge of Democracy, directed by Petra Costa
Honeyland, directed by Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov

In keeping with tradition, this is a powerful, if dour, group of Documentary Feature nominees. Two contrasting tales of women’s experiences during the Syrian war, one about globalization and the follies of capitalism, another about the rise of fascism in South America, and finally a parable about resource scarcity and environmental collapse. I cannot promise you will come away from these films feeling particularly good about the world or our place in it, but each is a vital document about how we live now and how we may be living sooner than we think.

Executive produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, American Factory has a leg up on the competition by virtue of name recognition alone. The filmmakers spent years embedded in a small Ohio town, capturing the fall, rise, and near fall again of the factory that provided many local jobs. Bognar and Reichert gain intimate access to the workers and managers of a factory bought by a Chinese manufacturing firm, and we are given ground-level access to a story that is equal parts international cooperation and culture clash.

For Sama and The Edge of Democracy are deeply personal stories with direct ties to their filmmakers but which nevertheless speak to all viewers on a human level. The Cave, about female doctors in Syria, is similarly intimate, raising equally important questions and providing thought-provoking answers. Honeyland, meanwhile, is one of the best films of 2019, following a Macedonian beekeeper as she struggles to keep maintain environmentally sound practices in an economy that sees only a bottom line.

American Factory is the odds-on favorite for the win and is beloved by many, though I cannot say I share the same affection for it. I found it illuminating and interesting, but when compared to the other films on this slate, it cannot help but feel slight. Mine is a minority opinion on that matter, however, and on popularity and name recognition alone, it is the likely winner. There are no bad films in this group, but part of me wishes that in a collection this worldly, the winner would not be the only film set in America and chiefly about Americans. It is a much bigger world out there.

Will win: American Factory
Should win: Honeyland
Should have been here: One Child Nation

Best Documentary Short

Nominees
In the Absence, directed by Seung-jun Yi
Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl), directed by Carol Dysinger
Life Overtakes Me, directed by John Haptas and Kristine Samuelson
St. Louis Superman, directed by Sami Khan and Smriti Mundhra
Walk Run Cha-cha, directed by Laura Nix

It is tempting often to look for a through line in the documentary shorts, to say, “Well, all of these films are about X.” There is nothing so cut and dry in this set of nominees except that each forces us to ask: What are we doing to each other and ourselves? The subjects are grieving parents in South Korea, Balkan refugees in Sweden, young girls in war-torn Afghanistan, black activists in St. Louis, and Vietnamese émigrés in Los Angeles. Little on the surface connects them but circumstances outside their control that forced them to take whatever actions they took.

In the Absence chronicles the sinking of the Sewol ferry and its aftermath as the nation of South Korea comes to grips with a system that would allow through inaction the deaths of 291 people, mostly teenagers and kids. Meanwhile, Life Overtakes Me follows refugee parents who are not so much grieving as they are in limbo, watching helplessly as their children slip into a mysterious stress-induced coma. St. Louis Superman is the one in this group most likely to break your heart if you let it, following activist and politician Bruce Franks as he navigates the waters of government, desperate to make difference in his community.

The outliers here are Learning to Skateboard and Walk Run Cha-cha, both of which are downright optimistic by the standards of this category. I could see either pulling the win here, but Learning to Skateboard has the sheen of importance provided by its subject matter and setting: the importance of female education and empowerment set against the backdrop of war in Afghanistan. Walk Run Cha-cha is about two people who fled the communist regime in Vietnam and have used their latter years in America to become talented dancers. It is a delight but is certainly the least substantial of these nominees.

The Academy really likes issue movies in the Documentary Short category, and voters like to feel like it means something when they check the box next to a film. With that in mind, one could see a path to victory for nearly any of these nominees, but the one that fits most neatly alongside recent winners such as The White Helmets, A Girl in the River, and most particularly Period. End of Sentence is Learning to Skateboard. It sends a message while providing uplift, which is a powerful one-two punch in this category.

Will win: Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)
Should win: In the Absence

Best Animated Feature

Nominees
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, directed by Dean DeBlois
I Lost My Body, directed by Jérémy Clapin
Klaus, directed by Sergio Pablos
Missing Link, directed by Chris Butler
Toy Story 4, directed by Josh Cooley

In any other year, this award might have felt predestined, but that is not the way the season has shaken out. Pixar traditionally would win this in a walk, particularly for the likely capstone to its marquee franchise, and that still may happen. Toy Story 4 has Disney behind it, kind if not rapturous reviews, and huge box office and tremendous likability. Again, this would usually add up to a win, but the awards have not gone its way.

The Golden Globe went to the Laika adventure movie Missing Link, which has moments of fun but is not Laika’s best film by far. The Annies split their awards between Netflix’s Santa Claus origin story Klaus and the independent French film (also on Netflix) I Lost My Body. Any of these is a potential spoiler to Woody and Buzz’s last adventure. How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World, the third installment in the franchise, is probably running in last here, and the franchise as a whole appears likely to go down as a well-respected moneymaker that could never win the big prize at the Oscars. Universal will probably take the $522 million in worldwide box office and call it good.

Missing Link relies on the kind of classic Laika stop motion animation fans have come to love and features a frothy story about a Yeti who becomes an Indiana Jones style adventurer. It is fine, but not to the standard of previous Laika efforts such as Kubo and the Two Strings or the superb and underappreciated The Boxtrolls. Klaus comes from Spain but features big American money and big American stars. It also represents an intriguing advance in 2D storytelling, using strategic animation and lighting techniques to give the hand-drawn animation a uniquely three-dimensional feel.

Best in show by a country mile, however, is the strange, beguiling I Lost My Body, which is beloved by nearly all who see it and could win this category if it gets in front of enough eyes. It tells the story of a severed hand that gains sentience and attempts to reconnect with the body to which it once was attached. The animation is gorgeous and the storytelling is bold and daring in ways that make you wish more animation took these kinds of risks. It is anyone’s game, but even with its weakness throughout the awards season, I expect Pixar to take the crown at the Oscars, as it has done so many times before.

Will win: Toy Story 4
Should win: I Lost My Body

Best Animated Short

Nominees
Hair Love, directed by Matthew A. Cherry
Dcera, directed by Daria Kashcheeva
Sister, directed by Siqi Song
Mémorable, directed by Bruno Collet
Kitbull, directed by Rosana Sullivan

The animation branch truly outdid itself with this year’s crop of outstanding Animated Short nominees. They represent an eclectic mix of hand-drawn animation, stop motion, and mixed-media, but above all, they represent a grand gesture of storytelling. As always, the best animated shorts deliver a real punch in a small package, with none of these running longer than 15 minutes and three of them coming in at sub-10 minutes.

The film with the most juice behind it is probably Cherry’s sweet Hair Love, which tells the story of a black father trying to make his young daughter’s hair dreams come true. It is a poignant, powerful little story that speaks to the heart of a very specific experience. Cherry is a former NFL player trying to become just the second professional athlete to win an Oscar, following in the footsteps of the tragically recently departed Kobe Bryant. Hair Love has Sony Animation Studios behind it and the star power of cherry and voice actor Issa Rae.

Kitbull comes from Pixar animators and tells of a friendship between a pit bull forced into a dog fighting ring and a kitten that lives nearby. Sister is an interesting companion piece to the snubbed documentary One Child Nation and it’s felt-based stop motion is tactile and immersive. Dcera (Daughter) is a fascinating drama out of the Czech Republic about the complicated relationship between a dying man and the daughter he raised on his own. It is by turns touching and heartbreaking, squeezing maximum emotion out of its category-long 15-minute runtime.

My favorite of the bunch is Mémorable, from French animator Collet. Chronicling the relationship between a husband and wife as the man slips further into dementia, the film seamlessly blends painterly abstraction with real-world stakes to create a loving tribute to the lengths we go to for love. Think of it as a kinder, gentler Amour. Sometimes, the power of emotion can win this category, but when all else fails, go with the big names and the big money, which in this case means Hair Love.

Will win: Hair Love
Should win: Mémorable
Should have been here: The Bird and the Whale

Best International Feature

Nominees
Corpus Christi, directed by Jan Komasa
Honeyland, directed by Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov
Les Misérables, directed by Ladj Ly
Pain and Glory, directed by Pedro Almodóvar
Parasite, directed by Bong Joon-ho

Full disclosure: I have not seen Corpus Christi, and I will not have the chance to see it before the ceremony. Such are the vagaries of International Feature eligibility. My understanding is that it is a pretty good movie but a surprising nominee, and as such, it is probably running in fifth place here. Of the other nominees, three are in my top 10 films of the year – Parasite (1), Pain and Glory (5), and Honeyland (8) – and Les Misérables is riveting French crime thriller from a vital new voice in European cinema.

For Oscar watchers, there is not much suspense in this category unless you are looking to manufacture drama. Parasite should win this walking away. No film has ever been nominated in the same year for Best International Feature (formerly Best Foreign Language Film) and Best Picture without winning the International award. None of those films has also gone on to win Best Picture, but that is part of the discussion for a future installment of this series.

Now, about that manufactured drama: If you think the Academy will give the top prize to Parasite and try to spread the wealth here (which makes no actual sense), Pain and Glory is probably your beneficiary. The Academy loves Almodóvar, and his tender portrait of an aging director also earned Antonio Banderas a nomination for Best Actor. There is also the excellent Honeyland, which is the only film ever nominated for both Documentary Feature and International Feature, which suggests a strong degree of support among voters. But, really, let’s not think too hard about this one.

Will win: Parasite
Should win: Parasite
Should have been here: Atlantics

Best Live Action Short

Nominees
A Sister, directed by Delphine Girard
Brotherhood, directed by Meryam Joobeur
The Neighbor’s Window, directed by Marshall Curry
Saria, directed by Bryan Buckley
Nefta Football Club, directed by Yves Piat

This is my favorite category every year. That is probably why I am terrible at predicting the winner. I get too attached. But the truth is I love these films. Every now and then, I come across one that does not strike the right chord with me, but by and large, the nominees for Live Action Short are stellar across the board, year in and year out. This year is no exception and might be the hardest to predict since I started in on this little fool’s errand of mine.

The oddsmakers like Brotherhood, about a Tunisian farmer whose son returns from war with a child bride. This is my least favorite among the nominees this year. Though its ending packs a serious punch, much of the dialogue is too on the nose and the characters are often simply stating the subtext, a tool that can be useful in short films but which I found overbearing here. That said, it is hard to argue with the technical aspects of the filmmaking, and the subject matter is handled delicately and intelligently.

A Sister is an effective little thriller about a kidnapping victim who secretly calls emergency services and tries to hide her conversation from her captor. It has echoes of another French former nominee in this category, Just Before Losing Everything in 2013. Nefta Football Club is a delightful trifle of a short film, fulfilling the categories need for something a little lighter. It follows to young brothers who find a mule loaded down with a shipment of heroin. Hijinks ensue.

The two U.S.-produced films in contention are Curry’s The Neighbor’s Window and Buckley’s Saria. The Neighbor’s Window is a lightly comic tale about learning to appreciate what you have and reaching out to those closest to you. Curry is an interesting director, and this is his fourth nomination overall in a third different category. He previously was nominated twice for Best Documentary Feature and once for Documentary Short. This film is based on a true story, as well, though, so it is not too far outside his wheelhouse.

Saria is an absolute gut punch of a film that I believe to be the best of the bunch. I will not spoil the details of the story here, but every element of this short is working to build to its powerful conclusion. The storytelling, camerawork, editing, and performances are all superb, and I encourage anyone to seek this film out. For the win, while Brotherhood may have the inside track, I am loath to bet against the lone English-language nominee directed by a previous Oscar nominee. It is Curry’s time.

Will win: The Neighbor’s Window
Should win: Saria

Countdown to the Oscars: What You Can Hear



Welcome to the Last Cinema Standing Countdown to the Oscars for the 2019 movie season! Throughout this series, we will break down all 24 categories with predictions and hopes for the big night. The series continues with the crafts you can hear.

Best Original Score

Nominees
Joker, Hildur Guðnadóttir
Little Women, Alexandre Desplat
Marriage Story, Randy Newman
1917, Thomas Newman
Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker, John Williams

It does seem like Williams gets nominated just for getting out of bed in the morning and going to the studio these days. Williams will be 88 years old within the week after this year’s Oscars ceremony, and he is on his 47th nomination, which – need I say – is a record. Remarkably, he has won just five times from all those nominations and not since Schindler’s List in 1993. This is his 20th Original Score nomination (he also has an Original Song nomination in there) since that win, which is a lot of tuxes to rent (he probably owns by now, right?) without winning an award. He will not win this year for his familiar Star Wars work, but I think it is good to remember exactly who we are talking about when we talk about John Williams.

Randy Newman, of course, is another Academy favorite, though he is more known for his songs than his scores. He has been nominated nine times for Original Score, but this is his first recognition in the category since 2001. He has never won for a score. Randy’s cousin, Thomas Newman, has also never won for score, despite a record-tying 14 nominations (just to be clear, that is the record for nominations without a win). I found the Marriage Story score to be so contrapuntal as to be distracting, though I know a lot of people love it. The 1917 score on the other hand is a beautiful example of the form, building tension and perfectly complementing the onscreen action.

Desplat’s work on Little Women is a wonderfully propulsive burst of energy that fits like a glove on Greta Gerwig’s modernist take on the material. Finally, there is Guðnadóttir’s creepy, ominous work on Joker, which fills the film with its deep sense of dread. Some have complained that the tones and strings are overbearing, telling the viewer how to feel rather than evoking a feeling. I disagree. That overbearing is the feeling being evoked, a crumbling city falling down all around and finally on top of you. I found it deeply moving, and the season seems to be pointing this way. If Guðnadóttir wins – and she is the current favorite – it will be richly deserved.

Will win: Joker
Should win: 1917
Should have been here: Midsommar

Best Original Song

Nominees
“I’m Standing With You” from Breakthrough, Dianne Warren
“Into the Unknown” from Frozen II, Kristen Anderson-Lopez and Robert Lopez
“Stand Up” from Harriet, Cynthia Erivo and Joshua Brian Campbell
“I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from Rocketman, Elton John and Bernie Taupin
“I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away” from Toy Story 4, Randy Newman

I have been very clear in the past how I feel about this award. I hate it. Clear enough? Not because I think the best film songs of the year do not deserve to be rewarded but because that is not what tends to happen in this category. Every year, voters – and the nominating music branch – fail to ask: Does this song complement and enhance the themes of the film? Is it integral to the plot? Does it evoke the mood of the story and improve our understanding of the characters? Instead, they ask: Is this person famous? Was this song a hit? Do I like this movie?

That is how you end up with a list of nominees that looks like this. If you are looking for the winner, it probably comes down to “Stand Up,” “I’m Gonna Love Me Again,” or “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away.” The Frozen II nomination feels like a token Disney nod for the third-best song in a middling to bad movie. “I’m Standing With You” can be explained by the music branch’s love of Warren, who is an 11-time Best Original Song nominee and has never won the award. She will be bridesmaid once again this year.

For Newman, this is his 13th songwriting nomination, and he won his last time out, but that was for Toy Story 3 10 years ago. He has won this award twice, though, and it seems unlikely the Academy will award him again. So, it comes down to “Stand Up” or “I’m Gonna Love Me Again.” Rocketman was a huge hit, and people love Elton John, who previously won this award and was thrice nominated for The Lion King in 1994. But, because Erivo is highly unlikely to win Best Actress, this is another place they can award a performer and movie they clearly liked. In the end, I think John and Taupin take it just based on star power, but watch out for “Stand Up.”

Briefly, I should say my biggest Oscars snub of the year came in this category (boy, it feels like that is always the case). I will never understand how the music branch could have slept on the tremendous “Glasgow” from the underseen but spectacular Wild Rose. Jessie Buckley plays a woman who dreams of being a country singer, and the film culminates in Buckley’s powerful performance of this song. This is the kind of song this award is meant for and should be rewarding, but it almost never does, so I suppose I should not be surprised. If nothing else, please seek out Wild Rose, which is also a better film than any of these nominees.

Will win: “I’m Gonna Love Me Again” from Rocketman
Should win: “I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away” from Toy Story 4
Should have been here: “Glasgow” from Wild Rose


Best Sound Editing

Nominees
Ford V. Ferrari, Donald Sylvester
Joker, Alan Robert Murray
1917, Oliver Tarney and Rachel Tate
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Wylie Stateman
Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker, Matthew Wood and David Acord

Okay, we have talked about the difference between sound editing and sound editing a few times before on this site, so I will not totally rehash it here. If you want a detailed look at it, you can head over here or here. For the layman, think of it this way: Sound editing equals sound effects, and sound mixing equals levels of all sound (score, sound effects, dialogue, etc.). That difference being stated, the Academy sound branch does not differentiate much in its nominees, as you can see above and below.

The mix of nominees in Sound Editing this year is interesting, featuring a couple classic actioners (1917 and Ford V. Ferrari), two more subdued works (Joker and Once Upon a Time), and a science-fiction yarn (Star Wars). It is always kind of remarkable to me the Star Wars films have not done better in this category, considering their green-screen worlds rely heavily on sound effects to bring everything to life. Is there any more iconic movie sound than the light saber swoosh? But, as ever, the nomination is the respect of the craftspeople in the branch who recognize the work.

The larger Academy tends to be swayed by both prestige and more tangible, visceral work, in this case films like the war epic 1917 and the race car flick Ford V. Ferrari. Either would be an admirable winner, though I will make the case below for Ford V. Ferrari in the other sound category. Most likely, the Academy’s love for 1917 as a whole and the recognition of the film as a clear technical achievement will carry it to victory here. Never mind that it is also probably the most deserving of the nominees.

Will win: 1917
Should win: 1917
Should have been here: The Nightingale

Best Sound Mixing

Nominees
Ad Astra, Gary Rydstrom, Tom Johnson, and Mark Ulano
Ford V. Ferrari, Paul Massey, David Giammarco, and Steve Morrow
Joker, Tom Ozanich, Dean A. Zupancic, and Tod A. Maitland
1917, Mark Taylor and Stuart Wilson
Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood, Michael Minkler, Christian P. Minkler, Mark Ulano

Swap out Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker for Ad Astra – one space adventure for another – and you have pretty much the same lineup for Sound Mixing as Sound Editing. Once again, the Academy members are likely to be swayed by the overall technical achievement of 1917 and tick off the boxes all the way down the ballot. Make no mistake, the balancing of Thomas Newman’s score with all those effects is an admirable feat, but it is perhaps not most impressive among this group.

For that, I want to single out two films: Quentin Tarantino’s breezy comedy caper Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood and James Mangold’s superior sports film Ford V. Ferrari. Tarantino has talked extensively about using the diegetic sound in the movie to create the atmosphere necessary for his story. In particular, the songs playing out of car radios and off record players in the homes are omnipresent, and they are omnipresent in the way music is in our lives and in the lives of these characters. It is loud without being obtrusive, underpinning the dialogue in a way that feels authentic and true to life.

Meanwhile, Ford V. Ferrari is a film about the intricacies of building an automobile. It is about characters attuned to every subtle change in the look, feel, and yes, sound of the car. Featuring a rousing score – sadly overlooked by the music branch – and all those engine noises and screeching tires, Massey, Giammarco, and Morrow help make the world of Ford V. Ferrari visceral without it being overwhelming. It is not a sensory overload so much as it is a perfect balancing act of sensation. All that being said, do not predict two separate films in the sound categories (unless there is a serious musical in play, which is a discussion for another year). Go with 1917.

Will win: 1917
Should win: Ford V. Ferrari
Should have been here: The Nightingale