Showing posts with label Hell or High Water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hell or High Water. Show all posts

Friday, February 24, 2017

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Picture

Writer-director Barry Jenkins' masterful Moonlight is among the nine nominees this year for Best Picture.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day leading up to the ceremony for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories and more.

Best Picture


The nominees are:

Arrival
Fences
Hacksaw Ridge
Hell or High Water
Hidden Figures
La La Land
Lion
Manchester by the Sea
Moonlight

It has been a few years now since a movie ran away from the pack. Last year, it felt like any of four films could have been called out for the top award. Before that, Birdman and Boyhood battled it out for the big prize, and 12 Years a Slave and Gravity the year before. You have to look back to Argo in 2012 for the last time a film gobbled up everything on its way to the big win at the Oscars. Jack Nicholson and Michelle Obama presented that award. Can you imagine such a thing now? Damn it, it has only been a month, and it seems so long ago that hope mattered or was even possible.

We have talked in this series about the new president and his administration and how these awards reflect a cultural backlash against our just-beginning national nightmare. It is no coincidence we see films nominated like Iranian master Asghar Farhadi’s The Salesman, Ava DuVernay’s 13th, and shorts like The White Helmets, Watani: My Homeland, 4.1 Miles, and Ennemis Intérieurs. All of these films directly confront the most pressing issues of the day.

I have every hope the winners of Academy Awards on Sunday will use the platform of the ceremony to speak out, to protest, and to sound a rallying cry to the rest of us. There is no doubt the administration and its supporters, in an attempt to stoke class divisions and nurture their beloved us-vs.-them mentality, will point to this as yet another example of Hollywood elitism. I prefer to think of the Academy as speaking for the majority of Americans, who do not support the hate, racism, sexism, bigotry, and ignorance spewing from and encouraged by the White House.

The Academy Awards are a big, fancy-dress ball being held at a time when it almost does not seem worth it to get out of bed in the morning. It has been hard all season to look forward to Sunday evening with any real joy or anticipation. Political events seemed to have sucked the very idea of joy out of our national consciousness. So, I understand if some people do not want to watch (mostly) rich people get dressed up and award each other gold statues, but I would also argue it means more than that.

Th nine Best Picture nominees listed above and discussed below are about us and how we feel right now in this place and time. Some of us want escape, some want confrontation, some need inspiration, and others just need to see themselves reflected in a world turned upside down. Roger Ebert, that greatest of all film writers, once said: “For me, the movies are like a machine that generates empathy. It lets you understand a little bit more about different hopes, aspirations, dreams, and fears. It helps us to identify with the people who are sharing this journey with us.” If ever there were a time we needed that machine, it is now.

La La Land (directed by Damien Chazelle) – As an Oscar contender, there is nothing that compares to La La Land in the history of the Academy. It is just the third film in 89 years of ceremonies to garner 14 nominations. The first to do so was All About Eve in 1950. While both films are ostensibly show-business films, All About Eve is a dark, cynical satire, while Chazelle’s film is an earnest paean to the magic of art. The other film with 14 nominations is Titanic, which like La La Land is a romance, but let’s not compare the scale of the two. No one need be reminded of the epic nature of James Cameron’s historical fiction, and by comparison, the Hollywood musical seems small.

Chazelle’s film, then, is in a class by itself. It has pulled away from everything else in such an historic manner, I would not be surprised to see it break the record for Oscar wins, shared at 11 by Ben-Hur, Titanic, and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. La La Land is double nominated in Best Original Song, so there is one it cannot win, except in the unlikely event of a tie. Ryan Gosling is not among the frontrunners for Best Actor, so there are two. That leaves 12 and the record within reach.

Here are the Awards we can be nearly certain of: Picture, Director, Actress, Cinematography, Art Direction, Costume Design, Original Song, Original Score, and Sound Mixing. That’s nine, which would be an impressive haul and the most since The Return of the King in 2003. Editing and Sound Editing are a toss-up between La La Land and Hacksaw Ridge, while Original Screenplay is between this and Manchester by the Sea, and that is all that stands between Chazelle and history.

The question lingers: Why? Why this film? Why now? A starry-eyed musical romance about two dreamers following their lives’ passions – how does this speak to us today? Well, it is an escape into a fantasy land of hope and optimism, two hours during which you can sink into your chair, click your heels, and be whisked away into another world entirely, a happier world. It is natural, in times such as these, to need such an escape.

I have felt every day since the election: ‘Just bring me another drink, in bed; no worries, I’ll pull the covers back over my head myself.’ I do not suppose I am the only one. La La Land is the briefest of respites from the national depression. It is also a marvelously realized film, and whatever minor flaws it has are covered by its audacity and unbridled enthusiasm.  With it, Chazelle takes his place as one of the modern visionaries of cinema.

Moonlight (directed by Barry Jenkins) – There are a couple films here with an outside shot of upsetting the apple cart, and we will discuss those in a moment, but the only film with a reasonable chance of toppling La La Land is Moonlight. It is the critical favorite by a wide margin. It is second in nominations total behind La La Land, tied with Arrival at eight. More than any of that, though, and what will linger long after the awards have been handed out, it is a uniquely artistic, gorgeously rendered examination of a life. Talk about a machine that generates empathy.

As the film opens, Little (Alex R. Hibbert) could be any of us. He is a small, shy, sensitive boy being bullied for who he is. He meets his mentor, Juan (Mahershala Ali), a drug dealer but a kind man. He grows and becomes Chiron (Ashton Sanders), who is not yet comfortable in his own skin and has difficulty adjusting to the emotional and physical upheaval of adolescence. Finally, he is Black (Trevante Rhodes), a man who embodies all of that – the shy boy, the angry teen, the kind mentor – but still has little idea who he truly wants to be.

Moonlight is glorious because it charts the path of a life that could be any life, but in its specifics and details, it opens a door and invites us to step into this life, which we perhaps only understood intellectually. Jenkins helps us understand emotionally. At the margins of this society are people with the same hopes, fears, dreams, and aspirations as everyone else, but because opportunity never knocked on their doors, their lives took a different path. Most of us will never walk a mile in those shoes, but Moonlight shows us what it is like to lace them up.

Hidden Figures (directed by Theodore Melfi) – Every year, there is a popular favorite, a movie everybody saw and everyone liked and everyone thinks should win Best Picture. Call it the People’s Choice. In the recent past, that would have referred to movies like The Martian, American Sniper, and Gravity. These movies are usually well made, conventional but with an arty pedigree, and huge hits at the box office. Enter Hidden Figures, a well-made flick that feels conventional but has a degree of artiness and is the highest grossing of these nine nominees.

USA Today conducted a recent poll, in conjunction with Fandango, asking 8,000 movie-goers – a sample size a little larger than the Academy – what should win Best Picture. Hidden Figures led with 26 percent of the vote, followed closely by La La Land. Now, 26 percent will get you nowhere on a preferential ballot, which requires 50 percent plus one vote to win, but it is still informative. In a group that contains several crowd-pleasing entertainments, Melfi’s film is the one that pleased the crowd most. That it happens to be about three smart, black women is a wonderful bonus.

Katherine Johnson (Taraji P. Henson), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer), and Mary Jackson (Janelle Monáe) are American heroes for what they accomplished, yes, but more for how they accomplished it. To be black in this country has never been easy, and to be a woman in this country has never been easy, and black women have had perhaps the toughest time of anyone. The story of these brilliant people and their work at NASA is inspiring, the script is witty, and the performances are superb, but what matters most is if one more young, black girl – hopefully many more – decides to pursue a career in science or mathematics. That is what we mean when we talk about the power of these movies.

Manchester by the Sea (directed by Kenneth Lonergan) – There is no formula for winning Best Picture or making the kind of movie that will even be nominated. The more cynical among the film commentariat will sometimes see a log line or cast list and declare a film signed, sealed, and delivered for the Academy. Often as not, they are wrong. Speaking in the most general terms, a film needs one of two things to win Best Picture: wow factor or importance. If a film features both, so much the better. The last three Best Picture winners could not be more dissimilar, but they all had one or the other – Spotlight (importance), Birdman (wow factor), and 12 Years a Slave (both).

I mention all of this because Manchester by the Sea was tabbed as an early favorite for the top prize based on the critical response, which was breathless, and its cast and performances, which are universally superb. While it has found love in the nominations process everywhere, it has not caught on anywhere but for lead actor Casey Affleck, though even he is battling off a late charge by Denzel Washington. The reason, it seems to me, is that it lacks either the wow factor of some of these contenders, such as La La Land, Hacksaw Ridge, or Arrival, or the importance of films like Moonlight, Hidden Figures, and even Hell or High Water.

None of this is to say Manchester by the Sea is not a wonderful film, which it is, nor that it failed to accomplish what it sets out to accomplish, which I believe it does. Lonergan’s script is a remarkable achievement of character development, emotional resonance, and quiet humor, and he very well could win an Oscar for it. The work by Affleck, Michelle Williams, Lucas Hedges, and the rest of the cast is outstanding. However, next to the frontrunners, and indeed some of the films ostensibly trailing it, Manchester by the Sea lacks that essential element that would drive Academy members to vote for it.

Hacksaw Ridge (directed by Mel Gibson) – The Oscar story of Hacksaw Ridge is the story of Gibson’s return to the good graces of the Academy. The film, Gibson’s first as director since Apocalypto in 2006, premiered out of competition at the Venice Film Festival and received a 10-minute standing ovation. Its adequate, if not stellar, domestic box-office numbers are mitigated by a solid overseas haul, and the capper came nominations morning with six nods, including Best Picture. Mel Gibson, at least for now, is fully back. We talked a lot about the ethical quandary of that in discussing Best Director, so I will not rehash it here. The work stands alone.

And what beautiful work. Gibson’s credentials as a filmmaker have never been in doubt, and his twin Oscars for directing and producing Braveheart are hard-won, if not necessarily the choices I would have made. What he has needed – what all directors need – has been a story worthy of his gifts. He finds it in the true-life tale of Desmond Doss, a Quaker and conscientious objector during World War II who nonetheless joins the U.S. Army in an effort to preserve as much life on the battlefield as he can while refusing to take a life or even to carry a gun.

For a film that is ostensibly about the virtue of nonviolence, Gibson packs a hell of a lot of blood and guts into his picture, but at no point does he fall into the trap of making war look pretty or poetic. It is gritty, grimy, gross business, and the film depicts the honest darkness with a refreshing lack of sentiment. This is the big action star and action filmmaker in Gibson putting his talents to use in service of a cause larger than mere thrills or entertainment. Hacksaw Ridge uses its trappings as a brutally gory war flick to hide its true nature, that of a grand, glorious anti-war statement.

Arrival (directed by Denis Villeneuve) – Speaking of films that hide their true nature, anyone walking into Arrival expecting to see a traditional alien-invasion movie, with all the attendant firepower and destruction, left sorely disappointed. That is, unless they were able to give themselves over to one of cinema’s truly unique experiences this year – an elliptically told story about the power of words and virtue of patience that ultimately speaks volumes about the world in which we live.

The short story on which the film was based – “The Story of Your Life” by Ted Chiang – was published in 1998, nearly 20 years ago, but its themes and ideas grow more relevant with each passing day. It is a story of communication, of seeing the world through eyes that are not your own, and of accepting that our lives and views are not so big in the grand scheme of things. In a world of radical self-importance and nihilistic individuality, this is perhaps not the message most want to receive, but it is the message we all most need.

Villeneuve’s direction, Amy Adams’ central performance, and the script by Eric Heisserer combine to make sense of a story that by design, has no beginning or end. Events occur, or have occurred, or will occur, seemingly at random, but as the pieces fall together, we get closer to understanding what it all means and how it all fits. This is the character’s journey as well, slowly, methodically coming to understand the whys of the world around her and finally coming to grips with that understanding.

Lion (directed by Garth Davis) – Some movies sneak up on you. You are not prepared for their depth or beauty. You cannot conceive of their brilliance until you are awash in it. I did not expect much from Lion. I had heard all the rave reviews, but most described it as a sort of weepy, which to me suggested it would be emotionally manipulative in some way, that it would not play fair with our hearts and minds. Its trailers did it no favors in selling it as just that kind of film. I went in with decidedly lowered expectations. How wrong I was to have doubted.

Davis’ film is anything but the generic, based-on-a-bestseller melodrama I so dreaded. It is a contemplative, quietly moving, deeply affecting look at the inner turmoil and emotional upheaval of a person whose life is split in two and who cannot move forward until the pieces are put back together. In addition to the remarkable, heart-on-its-sleeve story, the artistry put on display by first-time feature director Davis is positively splendid. The director daringly transitions from a neo-realist, nearly silent opening half into a more dreamlike, surreal second half that blends memory and reality, sensation and absence into a whirlwind of competing emotions that perfectly mirrors the main character’s headspace.

Lion is one of those rare pleasant surprises at the movies. I see enough and read enough that I know what to expect when I buy my ticket and take my seat – most of the time. When a movie comes along like Lion, though, and from the first frame to the last simply bowls me over with its intelligence, its grace, and its beauty, I can do nothing but marvel and appreciate that I have had an experience that does not come around very often.

Hell or High Water (directed by David Mackenzie) – I have a little game I play every year, like a thought experiment, in which I try to guess which Best Picture nominees my dad would enjoy most. I learned my love of film from my father, then as I grew older, I grew a different appreciation for the art of cinema from the one I knew as a child renting VHS tapes from the video store across the street. Suffice to say, my father’s and my taste have diverged.

While there are few films he enjoys that I do not – apart from a few tiresome comedies, which I would not begrudge anyone – I feel certain most of my favorite films would not appeal to him. This does not bother me and is perfectly normal, but when I find a movie I know my father will love, I get excited. It is fun to show something to the man who showed me everything when I was growing up. All of this is a long way of saying Hell or High Water is the kind of rollicking, adventure thriller that will appeal to anyone with an appreciation of cinema or anyone who just wants to have a good damn time.

The magnificence of Mackenzie’s film, written by Taylor Sheridan, lies in its ability to be two things at once. It is a whip-smart, down-home thriller about a couple good ol’ boys on the run from the law and the lawman chasing after them. However, it is also an earnest condemnation of the big-business world and the politics of money that have depressed entire regions of this nation, destroying livelihoods and wrecking futures for generations to come. So few movies can be all things to all people, but Hell or High Water succeeds in entertaining and informing in a way of which I think my dad would approve.

Fences (directed by Denzel Washington) – In just the past two months, I have written thousands of words about the greatness of Fences – its performances, its direction, and above all its writing. There is not much more I can do to convince the unconvinced, to interest the disinterested. I simply sit and wonder how anyone could not be shaken to the bone, moved to their very core, by the story of Troy Maxson (Washington), his wife, Rose (Viola Davis), their son, Corey (Jovan Adepo), Troy’s first son, Lyons (Russell Hornsby), his brother, Gabriel (Mykelti Williamson), and his friend Bono (Stephen Henderson).

Playwright August Wilson’s masterpiece is about these people and the way they live. It is about how they communicate, how they interact with the world, how the world treats them. It is about the ways they wrong each other, care for each other, love each other, and find equal amounts of joy and sorrow in one another. No work of American literature has better captured or better expressed the basic humanness of us all. It is not a blueprint for how to live our lives but a blueprint for how we have already lived. Wilson writes as if he knows who we are, what we have done, and what we will do. He writes this way because he knows all of this of the Maxsons, who stand for every one of us and yet stand alone.

The play, as Wilson’s only true peer Shakespeare once wrote, is the thing. Every bit of brilliance in Fences stems from the words on the page. But Washington’s task does not end there. He is the first director to bring a work by Wilson to the big screen, and his responsibility in so doing is immense. Of course, lest we forget, this is Denzel Washington, one of the great talents of our time, and he lives up to every responsibility he has to the text. He mounts the picture marvelously, performs in it incomparably, and directs it admirably. We are lucky, now, to live in a world where such greatness was captured, even for an instant.

The final analysis


There are certain years in Academy history that stand out for their Best Picture lineups. The first, and most often cited as the greatest year in film history, let alone Academy history, is 1939, when nominated for Best Picture were winner Gone with the Wind, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Stagecoach, The Wizard of Oz, and Wuthering Heights, among others.

Another is 1967, 50 years ago now, and as is my understanding the subject of one of those strange, themed Academy Awards ceremony tributes that honor films that came out in the anniversary of the ceremony year, not the year of the films being celebrated. For instance, the ceremony of 50 years ago, honored the films of 1966, much as this one celebrates the achievements of 2016. I digress. In 1967, the nominees were winner In the Heat of the Night, The Graduate, Bonnie and Clyde, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, and Doctor Doolittle.

Less often spoken of but to my mind no less miraculous is 1976, when the nominees were winner Rocky, Taxi Driver, Network, All the President’s Men, and Bound for Glory. It has been a while since we have had a year of such vintage, though I would argue 2005, which honored Crash alongside Capote, Goodnight and Good Luck, Brokeback Mountain, and Munich, belongs in the conversation.

La La Land will win Best Picture this year. It will probably sweep the awards in a possibly record-setting fashion. It will do so, however, at the head of a class of nominees that deserves a place on that illustrious list of best years in Academy history. Moonlight and Fences belong to the ages. La La Land is an invigorating, admirable champion from an exciting, young visionary director, and it will be looked back upon fondly.

The other six nominees are all glorious achievements and a year featuring any one of them could not have been a bad year for the movies. These nine films speak to who we are today, the people we were yesterday, and the people we could be tomorrow. Their individual accomplishments are many, but taken together, it is one of the greatest groups the Academy has ever produced, and years from now, generations yet to be born will look back on these films and know something good came from the mess we made of this world. If we cannot say the same about the society we have fostered, at least we do not have to be embarrassed of its cinema.

Will win: La La Land
Should win: Moonlight
Should have been here: O.J.: Made in America

This weekend: I will have up a couple more fun items tomorrow and Sunday morning, including a ranking of all 62 nominated films, so be sure to check back for that, and then, at long last, the big show arrives.

Monday, February 13, 2017

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Supporting Actor


Michael Shannon is nominated for Best Supporting Actor for his work in Nocturnal Animals.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day leading up to the ceremony for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories and more.

Best Supporting Actor


The nominees are:

Mahershala Ali for Moonlight
Jeff Bridges for Hell or High Water
Lucas Hedges for Manchester by the Sea
Dev Patel for Lion
Michael Shannon for Nocturnal Animals

This is an unusual year in that none of the characters portrayed by these five men is a villain. Supporting Actor generally is the home of the villain at the Oscars. There was a run from 2007-2009 when Javier Bardem (No Country for Old Men), Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight), and Christoph Waltz (Inglourious Basterds) won this award for playing over-the-top, larger-than-life villains who steal their respective films right out from under the heroes. Just two years ago, JK Simmons swept up every award in sight for his mercilessly villainous role in Whiplash.

The reasons for this over-representation of villainy seem clear enough. From the earliest films noirs through the Bond villains of the 1960s right on through to today, writers have crafted their antagonists as witty, urbane, fun, and out-sized, while actors dig right in every time, chewing up scenery and stealing the show. Villains have always been big, and the Academy loves to reward big. How wonderful, then, this year, the actors went another way.

Beyond not being villains, it would be hard to characterize any of these performances as any one thing. They are complex, three-dimensional portraits of mostly good people trying to do the best they can in worlds of limited options. The five nominated actors here do not so much steal the show as weave themselves into the fabric of the stories being told. They disappear in their roles and resurface in these characters to give us a better understanding of their points of view and their experiences.

Mahershala Ali for Moonlight – In a year of complex character studies, few characters are as complex or as studied as Ali’s Juan, a kind-hearted drug dealer who befriends and scared, lonely young boy. There is never any question of Juan’s status within his community – he is a kingpin and rules over all he surveys. He commands respect at every turn and gets it. He lives a hard life on hard streets in hard times, but he refuses to let his circumstances make him a hard man. Such is the power of a script that exists solely to force the audience to confront its prejudices and preconceived notions.

None of this would land as well, however, without Ali’s strong, confident performance at its heart. He infuses his character with a gentleness you would not expect. He displays a tenderness he not only refuses to bury but even seems eager to share. Ali is quiet and still, communicating in small gestures and nods, letting the world – and thereby, the audience – come to him. Juan only appears in the first of the film’s three acts, but Ali’s performance makes us feel both his absence and his impact throughout the rest of the story.

Dev Patel for Lion – I complain every year about category fraud, and I promise – or warn, as the case may be – I will rail about it tomorrow, when we discuss Best Supporting Actress. The fraud here is more subtle. Lion is the story of Saroo Brierly and his long journey to find the family he lost. The film’s opening 45-50 minutes concern Saroo’s early life, and in these passages, he is played wonderfully by Sunny Pawar. The second half of the film – more than, if we wish to count minutes – is the adult Saroo’s search for his family, when he is portrayed by Patel. But make no mistake: This is Patel’s film, and he carries it magnificently.

It is sometimes baffling to me the way these things go down. Patel faced the same scenario in 2008, when he was campaigned in Supporting Actor for Slumdog Millionaire despite being the demonstrable lead of the film. The difference is he was not nominated then, and he is now. However, he was deserving then, and he is deserving now. To focus too much on these awards distinctions, as I have done, perhaps distracts from Patel’s powerful work in Lion.

He must embody both sorrow and rage, grief for the family he lost and anger at the world that would allow this to happen. He is by turns the well-adjusted adopted son of Australian parents and the mournful, emotionally guarded orphan torn from his family. Patel is remarkable in all facets of this character, and were it not for the fact American films rarely cast actors of Indian heritage in leading roles, he would be a much bigger star even than he is. Let us hope such casting prejudices change and Patel soon takes his rightful place among the acting elite.

Jeff Bridges for Hell or High Water – An interesting bit of Academy Awards trivia: Katherine Hepburn holds the record for the longest span between an actor’s first and last nomination – 48 years from Morning Glory in 1933 to On Golden Pond in 1981. Bridges, now on his seventh nomination, earned his first in 1972 for The Last Picture Show, 45 years ago. If things keep going the way they have been, this will not be his last nomination, and we will not see that last nomination hopefully for a long, long time.

In the current decade, Bridges has settled into a comfortable groove, playing tough, grizzled men who cannot afford to show weakness but whose world weariness has taken a toll. He won his first, and to date only, Oscar for just such a role in Crazy Heart and was most recently nominated for perhaps the most grizzled hero of all, Rooster Cogburn in True Grit. In Hell or High Water, he offers a new take on this archetype as a southern lawman whose only purpose is justice in a world that no longer seems to know what that word means.

Lucas Hedges for Manchester by the Sea – Bridges had already secured three nominations by the time fellow nominee Hedges was born in 1997. It calls to mind, for me at least, the time in 1999 when Michael Caine, during his acceptance speech for The Cider House Rules, shouted out his co-nominees, including an 11-year-old Haley Joel Osment, there for The Sixth Sense. It is one of the things that makes the Oscars ceremony so beautiful, the different generations of artists all coming together to celebrate each other’s work.

Hedges is wonderful in Manchester by the Sea as Patrick, a teenager whose father dies unexpectedly and is left in the care of his uncle (Casey Affleck). Hedges brings to the part the right mixture of general teenage angst and self-centeredness and more specific, restrained grief over the loss of his father. His breakdown scene while putting meat in the freezer – reminding him of his father’s body being kept on ice until the ground thaws enough to bury him – is one of the great moments in cinema this year. Though his feature credits to this point represent a limited list, including small parts in Wes Anderson’s two most recent films, Hedges’ future seems limitless.

Michael Shannon for Nocturnal Animals – I have spent a fair amount of space on this site over the years talking about the greatness of Michael Shannon. He is among my favorite performers working today, and he will win an Oscar sooner or later. He should have been nominated last year for 99 Homes, and it is hard not to think this nomination, though deserving in its own right, is a make-good for his just missing the nod last time.

No matter. Make-good or not, Shannon commands the screen with his intimidating frame and overwhelming presence, taking over as the skewed moral center of Nocturnal Animals. He plays Bobby, a lawman helping Jake Gyllenhaal’s character seek revenge against the men who wronged him. In an otherwise uneven film, all of the performances are great, but Shannon stands tall above them all. Audiences are instinctively drawn to this mysterious live wire of a character, and Shannon masterfully pulls us deeper into his web like one of Bobby’s ill-fated criminal targets.

The final analysis


This category presents an interesting conundrum this year. The signs point to Ali. He was the critics’ favorite choice for supporting actor, and he won the Screen Actors Guild award. On top of that, Moonlight is a clearly beloved film, and the character of Juan and Ali’s performance in the film’s early passages are unforgettable.

However, apart from the Screen Actors Guild, the two biggest Academy Award precursors are the Golden Globes and the BAFTAs. Ali was beaten to the Golden Globe by Nocturnal Animals star Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who is not nominated here, and to the BAFTA at yesterday’s ceremony by Patel. Now, Patel is British, and it is possible the British Academy was looking to reward one of its own, but it certainly gives us pause in predicting this category.

Perhaps the BAFTAs are an indication Patel has the momentum and the inside track to the Oscar, though he has picked up almost no other awards this season. Perhaps the frayed nature of the precursors with three different actors winning at the three different shows suggests anything can happen, such as a Shannon or Bridges win. But maybe – and I think this is most likely – the winds really are blowing the direction they are pointing, and these other victories are simply misdirection on the road to Ali’s well-deserved coronation.

Will win: Mahershala Ali for Moonlight
Should win: Mahershala Ali for Moonlight
Should have been here: Ben Foster for Hell or High Water

Tomorrow: Best Supporting Actress

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Original Screenplay


Jeff Bridges (left) and Gil Birmingham in Hell or High Water, nominated for Best Original Screenplay

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day leading up to the ceremony for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories and more.

Best Original Screenplay


The nominees are:

20th Century Women, written by Mike Mills
Hell or High Water, written by Taylor Sheridan
La La Land, written by Damien Chazelle
The Lobster, written by Yorgos Lanthimos and Efthymis Filippou
Manchester by the Sea, written by Kenneth Lonergan

Each of the films nominated here is defined by its singularity of vision. They could only have come from the minds of their respective writers because they present ways of looking at the world that are wholly unique. Four of these films were also directed by their writer or co-writer, which is for the best because in most cases it would be folly to hand over one’s point of view to an outside perspective.

Every one of these films is a fully realized universe unto itself, whether a Santa Barbara boarding house in the 1970s, the desolate South amid a recession, a dreamer’s fantasy of Hollywood, a singles retreat in a dystopia, or a small fishing community in New England. All of these writers, through their words and stories and characters, have taken us somewhere new, somewhere unexpected, and showed us lives we never thought we would see and of which we never knew we needed to be a part.

The Lobster – Dystopias have been all the rage for a while now. It perhaps has something to do with the success of The Walking Dead on TV or perhaps all those young-adult adaptations like The Hunger Games. Whatever the case, everyone seems to be piling on, and it seems every week we get a new version of our post-apocalyptic future. Each new creative team wants to go bigger, darker, and scarier than the last, trying to top whatever the newest invented threat is. Truthfully, and some of you must agree, it is exhausting.

I say all of this by way of introduction to the world of The Lobster, a dystopia in which co-writers Lanthimos, who also directed, and Filippou argue the tools of our oppression are already at hand and they are as mundane as a dinner party at a stuffy hotel. The writers do not need to invent a new threat for their world. What greater threat could there be to our humanity than bureaucracy, which by its very nature is inhumane?

Beyond this of course, The Lobster is set in a world in which humans must pair off or face being transformed into an animal of their choosing. The premise alone, executed as well as it is here, would be enough to earn a nomination, but Lanthimos and Filippou are not satisfied with just their intriguing and admittedly oddball scenario. Their script is a scathing satire of the ways in which we live today, a dark warning not of where we are headed but of where we already are.

La La Land – Now, if I may flip 180 degrees in the other direction, Chazelle’s bright, poppy fantasia is the world as we wish it would be. Set in a Hollywood where dreamers and their dreams matter, La La Land is the story of what it is to struggle and chase and search, of getting knocked down and wondering if you have the strength to get back up again.

Chazelle rightly does not pretend achieving one’s goals comes without sacrifice or does not require hard work and dedication, and as we all know, even those qualities sometimes are not enough. The fantasy of La La Land is not success without struggle but that our struggles ultimately will prove worth it, that we are not simply spitting into the wind.

The coup de grace of course is to make all of this a musical in the grand tradition. In a culture in which cynicism is cool and winking at the audience is expected, Chazelle plays it straight with sincerity and earnestness. You want to doubt him and scoff at his creation, but from its opening song-and-dance number, you are too busy being enthralled and delighted to remember you came to laugh at the movie, not with it.

Manchester by the Sea – What springs immediately to mind with this film is grief. Oh, there are a few other words, to be sure, but grief is what stands out. The beauty of Lonergan’s script is that it is not about Hollywood grief, the kind of all-consuming sadness and recovery we have seen in countless films before. You know the movies. They would be called weepies in another time. Characters experience loss and tragedy and are devastated, but through some force of will or outside strength, they move on happily. Manchester by the Sea is not that kind of film.

Lonergan instead examines the true nature of grief in all its messy, painful, frightening, and sometimes humorous ways. His characters experience a tragedy and loss with which we are all familiar, and they react in ways that feel real and human, which in itself is shocking enough to see in a film. Lonergan knows there is no magical cure-all, and there are some wounds even time cannot heal. The people in Manchester by the Sea grasp for meaning and search for ways to make sense of it all, but unmoored by grief, they really are just looking for connection to anything or anyone.

Hell or High Water – Sheridan is probably best known as an actor, particularly for his long-running role on the TV show Sons of Anarchy. Another couple scripts like his first two, though, and he will not be known primarily as an actor much longer. His first produced screenplay was for last year’s popular slow-burn thriller Sicario, which creates tension and intrigue mostly through silence. This is what makes his script for Hell or High Water such a surprise and delight.

While ringing all the tension and thrills it can out of a story of Texas outlaws, Sheridan’s screenplay is also highly literate, gifting its characters with the kind of sinewy monologues and smart, rapid-fire dialogue actors just devour. And the audience eats it up as well. There is, however, a third level to Sheridan’s brilliant script beyond its sturdy premise and whip-cracking dialogue. Underneath it all, it tells a tale of an area of this country left decimated by the recession and still struggling to survive.

Bank robbers have long been portrayed in movies as heroes, but here, that classic trope takes on an even deeper meaning. The banks represent the institutions that have destroyed these towns and these people, and these men’s crimes, as the community sees it, are extracting payment for the debts these banks owe us all.

20th Century Women – Writer-director Mills has made just three features, with five years passing between the first two and six years between the second and this one. One imagines the problem is more of financing than will or desire to work. If that is the case, let us hope some brave studio steps up and gets Mills working again because I cannot not imagine waiting another five or six years for the next Mills gem.

Like his wonderful previous feature, Beginners, Mills sketches the lives of his characters in a gorgeous array of images and impressions, offering up a kaleidoscopic view of the whole. 20th Century Women is the story of five very different people and how they are defined both by their actions and their reactions to the rapidly evolving world around them. Mills takes the kind of characters we think we know – the arty punk girl, the quiet shy boy, the down-to-earth bohemian, etc. – and explores the choices and contradictions that make them who they are, not simply who we think they are.

The final analysis


This award has gone to the Best Picture winner the previous two years and a Best Picture nominee each of the past 11. So, while The Lobster and 20th Century Women would both be deserving winners, they are probably out of the running, their profiles not high enough to compete in this group.

There was a time early in this Oscar season when it looked like Manchester by the Sea might be a serious Best Picture force and like Lonergan would be a shoe-in for this award. The film, after all, rests almost entirely on his shoulders, and his script carries most of the burden. However, that time seems to have passed, and even the award Manchester by the Sea looked assured of (Casey Affleck for Best Actor) is in doubt.

That leaves Sheridan and Chazelle, Hell or High Water and La La Land. The smart money of course is on the big, bold Best Picture frontrunner. Only once since 2001 has the Best Picture winner been nominated in this category and not gone home with the prize – in 2011, when Woody Allen won for Midnight in Paris over The Artist, the script for which was most likely undervalued for being for a silent film; also, the Academy just really loves Allen’s writing. The point is if La La Land really is going to sweep its way to Best Picture, it better win here. But the Academy is not above throwing a curveball just to keep us all honest, and Hell or High Water is the exact kind of dialogue-heavy, intricately plotted script they have loved in the past and will love again, sooner or later.

Will win: La La Land
Should win: The Lobster
Should have been here: Jackie

Tomorrow: Best Adapted Screenplay

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Editing


Andrew Garfield stars in Hacksaw Ridge, which is nominated for Best Editing.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day leading up to the ceremony for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories and more.

Best Editing


The nominees are:

Arrival
Hacksaw Ridge
Hell or High Water
La La Land
Moonlight

In general, the Academy likes to see its crafts up on the screen. The movies that win in the below-the-line categories are often the biggest, the boldest, or the flashiest in the bunch, which usually makes it easy to pick a winner. When it comes to nominations, this maxim often holds true as well. However, the editors branch can be more particular, more discerning in its tastes. Oh, they go for flashy as often as the Academy at large, but they also fall for far subtler work that would likely miss the eye of a non-expert in the field.

Smaller human dramas such as Spotlight last year and Dallas Buyers Club three years ago, as well as Moonlight this year, can garner a nomination in this category. This is because editors can see the work their fellow craftspeople put into building stories and characters scene by scene, shot by shot, and frame by frame. These movies rarely threaten for the win because those outside the craft may be hard-pressed to identify the nuances of the work, but the nominations reflect a willingness within the branch to look closer and really consider what “best” means.

While the five nominees this year all come from the Best Picture lineup, the two awards are no longer as closely linked as they once were since Best Picture expanded beyond five nominees. In the seven years since that change, only two films have won both awards, whereas in the seven years prior, they matched five of seven times. With that in mind, this is an interesting year because the presumed Best Picture frontrunner and potential crafts juggernaut does not feature the flashiest work in this category. That belongs to our first nominee below.

Hacksaw Ridge – This film was a dicey proposition for a couple reasons. First, there are the obvious and legitimate concerns about honoring a film by an artist as troubled as Mel Gibson, an issue we will discuss at greater length later this month. However, this is also a war film about a pacifist, leaving potential audiences to wonder just how exciting a film with such a description could possibly be. The answer: remarkably so. Hacksaw Ridge builds to become one of the most harrowing portraits of war this side of the D-Day landing in Saving Private Ryan.

Nominated editor John Gilbert uses the natural rhythms of battle to create a push-and-pull dynamic that leaves the viewer breathless. As soon as the characters have a quiet moment to reflect on their predicament – and to let the viewer catch up – the next brutal reminder of war and its carnage is at hand. Gilbert is a previous nominee for his work on The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, and while this cannot match that film’s epic scale, it more than exceeds it for emotional intensity. What is most impressive, perhaps, are the cuts Gilbert chooses not to make, letting moments linger so that the audience can engage in the full depths of what we are witnessing.

Hell or High Water – Director David Mackenzie’s southern bank robbers saga is a thriller of the highest order. From its opening tracking shot to is elegiac epilogue, we know we are in the hands of a master storyteller. The world of the film is so well established at every step the audience is never left fishing for answers about motivations or logic. It is spelled out and plainspoken like the characters the story portrays. Hell or High Water is a heart-pounding tale that lets off the gas at just the right moments to delve into the humanity and loss that exist at its core.

Jake Roberts is a first-time nominee who made his name in European character dramas such as Starred Up and Riot Club, but his best-known previous work is probably last year’s Best Picture-nominated romance Brooklyn. This brand of storytelling is 180 degrees from anything like Roberts’ previous work, but he adapts his style wonderfully to the rhythms and cadences of the American southwest. With two other films likely leading the way in this category, Roberts could end up the beneficiary of a split vote and surprise with a win, which would be wholly deserved.

La La Land – Even if we accept the term “musical” as a relatively nebulous concept, I think we are safe in saying no musical has won this award since Chicago in 2002 and before that All That Jazz in 1979. Depending on your definition, no musical has even been nominated for this award since Walk the Line in 2005. However, when your film carries the record-tying nominations haul of writer-director Damien Chazelle’s La La Land, precedents are bound to fall.

Editor Tom Cross is the only previous winner nominated this year, having taken home the award for his only previous nomination, Chazelle’s last film, Whiplash. Interestingly, like that earlier collaboration, La La Land builds to an emotionally powerful climax that is a masterclass in montage, worthy of recognition in its own right. However, while that sequence rightly calls attention to itself, much of Cross’ best work in the film is seamless like the “single” take song-and-dance number that opens the film, which is in fact several shorter takes stitched together. From beginning to end, Cross is integral to every step of the film’s success.

Arrival – A movie that is ultimately about how we experience time was bound to be a tricky feat of editing. Editor Joe Walker and director Denis Villeneuve step up to the challenge, employing a series of flash-forwards, flashbacks, and flashbacks within flash-forwards to establish the circular nature of the film’s storytelling. There is no linear way to tell this story, and Walker embraces that as an opportunity to find new ways to shepherd the audience through the film’s vertiginous narrative.

Walker was previously nominated for his work on Best Picture winner 12 Years a Slave and probably just missed out on a nomination last year for the drug-war thriller Sicario. Villeneuve also brought Walker on board for his Blade Runner sequel, Blade Runner 2049, due out later this year. Walker’s gift with Arrival is to take a story that could be too twisty or involuted in less capable hands and to make it palatable and comprehensible without sacrificing its quintessentially loopy plot.

Moonlight – We talked yesterday about Bradford Young becoming the first black American nominated for Best Cinematography by the Academy, and today, we shift to another bit of history. Joi McMillon is the first black woman nominated for Best Editing. Another barrier broken, and yet still more to fall. McMillon is joined in the nomination by co-editor Nat Sanders. Both are first-time nominees, and both were students with writer-director Barry Jenkins at Florida State film school.

Much attention has been paid to the emotional reality of Moonlight and the way it maintains the truth at the core of its characters over the 20-plus years the story takes place. Credit due of course to the wonderful script and performances, but it becomes McMillon’s and Sanders’ task to find and establish the thread that carries the film from start to finish. This is easily the subtlest work of the nominees and, therefore, the least likely winner, but Moonlight does not become the remarkable film it is without the contributions of McMillon and Sanders.

The final analysis


The America Cinema Editors guild, which overlaps with the editors branch of the Academy, named its winners last week, awarding La La Land in its comedy category and Arrival in its drama category. While La La Land was not up against any of its fellow nominees here, Arrival beat out the other three Oscar nominees – Hacksaw Ridge, Hell or High Water, and Moonlight. That would seem to position La La Land and Arrival against each other for the win.

However, the members of the editors guild are almost certainly more likely to recognize the degree of difficulty in editing Arrival than the Academy at large, who may be more wooed by the bolder strokes of Hacksaw Ridge. Ultimately – and you may as well get used to hearing this now – the award is La La Land’s to lose, and I would not bet on it losing.

Will win: La La Land
Should win: Hacksaw Ridge
Should have been here: O.J.: Made in America

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Academy Award nominations announced: La La Land ties record with 14 nominations

Moonlight, La La Land, and Lion all came away with multiple Oscar nominations this morning, including Best Picture.

There you have it. La La Land, from wunderkind writer-director Damien Chazelle, becomes just the third movie in Academy history to score 14 nominations, joining All About Eve and Forrest Gump. Both of those films won Best Picture, and the kind of momentum the throwback Hollywood musical is likely to receive from its record-setting nominations haul could carry it through to the big night.

In total, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominated nine films for Best Picture this year, and those challenging La La Land for the top prize are those we pretty much expected: Arrival, Fences, Hacksaw Ridge, Hell or High Water, Hidden Figures, Lion, Manchester by the Sea, and Moonlight.

La La Land came away with every nomination it conceivably could have, being named for Picture, Director, Original Screenplay, Actor (Ryan Gosling), Actress (Emma Stine), Cinematography, Editing, Production Design, Costumes, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, Original Score, and twice in Original song for “Audition (Fools Who Dream)” and “City of Stars.”

Mel Gibson directing Hacksaw Ridge
As we predicted here, the Academy matched the DGA 4-for-5, nominating Chazelle, Denis Villeneuve for Arrival, Kenneth Lonergan for Manchester by the Sea, and Barry Jenkins for Moonlight but opting for Mel Gibson and Hacksaw Ridge over Garth Davis for Lion. Gibson’s big, bloody anti-war film came up big, also pulling down the all-important Editing nomination, notices in both sound categories, and recognition for Andrew Garfield in Best Actor.

Also with six nominations were Lion, which found room for both Dev Patel and Nicole Kidman in the respective Supporting categories, as well as Cinematography, Score, and Adapted Screenplay, and Manchester by the Sea, which as predicted secured only above-the-line nominations for Picture, Director, Original Screenplay, and three acting awards, Casey Affleck in Actor, Lucas Hedges in Supporting Actor, and Michelle Williams in Supporting Actress.

Trailing La La Land with the second-most nominations were Villeneuve’s emotional sci-fi epic Arrival and Jenkins’ tender coming-of-age tale Moonlight, which each garnered eight nominations. Arrival’s haul was predicted, and it added Adapted Screenplay, Cinematography, Sound Editing, Sound Mixing, Production Design, and Editing to its Picture and Director nominations. The strength of Moonlight, however, was the morning’s most pleasant surprise and indicates the Academy really loved this beautiful little film. In addition to Picture and Director, it picked up nods for Mahershala Ali in Supporting Actor, Naomi Harris in Supporting Actress, Adapted Screenplay, Editing, Cinematography, and Score.

Hell or High Water (Picture, Original Screenplay, Jeff Bridges for Supporting Actor, and Editing) and Fences (Picture, Denzel Washington for Best Actor, Viola Davis for Supporting Actress, and Adapted Screenplay) each came away with four nominations, while Hidden Figures trails the Best Picture nominees with three notices (Picture, Octavia Spencer for Supporting Actress, and Adapted Screenplay).

Outside the Best Picture nominees, which sucked up most of the air in the room, the Academy spread the love around. Jackie came away with three nominations – Natalie Portman for Best Actress, Costumes, and Score – and no other film garnered more than two.

Ruth Negga in Loving
Joining Stone and Portman in Best Actress are Isabell Huppert for Elle, Meryl Streep for Florence Foster Jenkins, and, in a lovely surprise, Ruth Negga for Loving. Affleck, Garfield, Gosling, and Washington will be joined in Best Actor by Viggo Mortenson in Captain Fantastic. The Supporting Actress nominees – Davis, Harris, Kidman, Spencer, and Williams – all come from Best Picture nominees, as do four of the five Supporting Actor nominees – Ali, Bridges, Hedges, and Patel, who are joined by Michael Shannon for Nocturnal Animals.

It was a morning short on surprises, but the biggest one was probably Gibson getting in for Best Director. Perhaps this means the industry has forgiven him for the multiple personal scandals that made him a pariah for years, or perhaps it means only his artistry in bringing Hacksaw Ridge to the screen could not be denied.

Shannon and Negga were wonderful surprises in their respective categories. Shannon likely got in over co-star Aaron Taylor-Johnson (while Hedges probably pushed out Hugh Grant in Florence Foster Jenkins), and Negga’s mention meant there was no room for Amy Adams in Arrival or Annette Bening for 20th Century Women, a performance which sadly never picked up steam this season in a crowded field, though the film did pick up a well deserved Original Screenplay nomination for writer-director Mike Mills.

Moana
My favorite nominations this morning came in the Documentary category, where a trio of powerful films about race in America dominated – O.J.: Made in America, I Am Not Your Negro, and 13th – joined by Fire at Sea and Life, Animated. I was delighted to see The Lobster nominated for Original Screenplay and to see Moana pull down two nominations, for Animated Feature and Original Song for Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “How Far I’ll Go.” That August Wilson is an Academy Award nominee for writing Fences pleases me to no end, and both of Jackie’s crafts nominations were well earned.

It was unfortunate the Academy could find no room for Weiner in Best Documentary, nor anywhere for the powerful Irish drama I, Daniel Blake, which was a hit with the BAFTA but was probably too Anglo-centric for Oscar voters. I also wish the Academy would have given more consideration to Martin Scorsese’s masterful Silence, which was nominated only for its lush cinematography. Time will reveal Scorsese’s passion project to be the brilliant work of art that it is.

As for my predictions, I nailed Best Picture, with my nine most likely nominees all getting in. I had guessed Hell or High Water’s David Mackenzie bumping Lion’s Garth Davis over Gibson in Best Director. In Actor and Actress, I also hit four out of five, as the Academy went with Mortenson over my longshot pick, Jake Gyllenhaal for Nocturnal Animals, and Negga over Adams. I went 5-for-5 in Supporting Actress but just 3-for-5 in Supporting Actor, failing to predict Shannon over Taylor-Johnson and thinking Hedges’ age might keep him out for Grant. I hit Adapted Screenplay with a perfect 5-for-5 but missed 20th Century Women in Original, opting instead for Zootopia.

I have yet to see the online chatter – something I try to avoid under the best of circumstances anyway – but I enjoyed the Academy’s nominations show. It was fun seeing past nominees discuss what it felt like to wake up nominations morning and hear your name called, and I thought it was a breezy, fleet-footed affair that I would not mind seeing blown out even a little more.

As far as what might win when the statues are handed out, we will discuss that in great detail over the next five weeks, but La La Land is sitting pretty and could very well sweep this whole season. Moonlight, however, with its stronger-than-predicted showing, cannot be counted out just yet. We will know soon enough. Until then, I’ll see you at the movies.

For a full list of nominees, click here.