Showing posts with label The Zone of Interest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Zone of Interest. Show all posts

Sunday, March 10, 2024

From the Reign of Terror to the End of War: All 53 Oscar nominees ranked


I was at the Alamo Drafthouse on June 17, 2023, to see a screening of Past Lives, and so began my journey of seeing all 53 films that would go on to be nominated for Academy Awards in 2023. The last of the nominees I saw was Napoleon on March 3 this year. I watched it from the comfort of my couch on AppleTV+. I had missed it in theaters, which is unfortunate because I can only imagine how impressive Ridley Scott’s imagery would have been on the big screen. Hopefully, I’ll catch it at a repertory screening one of these days.


A few of the films at the top of my list are destined to be all-time classics that stand the test of time, and only a couple films at the bottom are not worth your time. Just about everything here is worth checking out, and the nominees this year represent a wonderful sampling of the year in film.


So, here they are, all 53 nominees at the 2023 Academy Awards, ranked for your amusement:


1. Killers of the Flower Moon

2. Anatomy of a Fall

3. The Zone of Interest

4. Oppenheimer

5. May December

6. Barbie

7. Poor Things

8. 20 Days in Mariupol

9. Society of the Snow

10. Perfect Days

11. The Teachers’ Lounge

12. El Conde

13. The ABCs of Book Banning

14. Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

15. Red, White, and Blue

16. Four Daughters

17. Pachyderme

18. Io Capitano

19. Robot Dreams

20. The Last Repair Shop

21. To Kill a Tiger

22. Godzilla Minus One

23. The Barber of Little Rock

24. Knight of Fortune

25. The Holdovers

26. Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part 1

27. Bobi Wine: The People’s President

28. Ninety-Five Senses

29. Napoleon

30. American Symphony

31. The Eternal Memory

32. The Color Purple

33. American Fiction

34. The Boy and the Heron

35. Our Uniform

36. Invincible

37. Rustin

38. The Creator

39. Nǎi Nai & Wài Pó

40. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3

41. Letter to a Pig

42. Past Lives

43. Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny

44. Maestro

45. Elemental

46. Nyad

47. Island in Between

48. Golda

49. Flamin’ Hot

50. The After

51. The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar

52. Nimona

53. WAR IS OVER!

Saturday, March 9, 2024

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Picture


Welcome to this year’s edition of Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, where we will break down each of the 23 categories, analyze the films, and make some guesses at their awards prospects.


Best Picture


The nominees are:


American Fiction

Anatomy of a Fall

Barbie

The Holdovers

Killers of the Flower Moon

Maestro

Oppenheimer

Past Lives

Poor Things

The Zone of Interest


For the second year in a row, the winner of the big prize feels like a foregone conclusion, and as I predicted last year, this time around, it doesn’t bother me so much. Because Oppenheimer is an excellent film and a worthy winner, even if it’s not the winner I’d pick necessarily, this whole process has mostly been a pleasant stroll through an excellent year at the movies.


This kind of Best Picture winner is becoming less and less common as the years go on: a big-budget historical epic from a marquee studio that prioritizes the theatrical experience and makes boatloads of money. The Academy Awards have been in indie-land for a while now, which has produced some excellent Best Picture winners but has perhaps diminished the award in the eyes of a public baffled by some of the more arty and outré choices. 


But, a movie like Oppenheimer is exactly the kind of movie the average moviegoer imagines when he thinks of a Best Picture winner. Over the years, people have complained a lot about the scourge of “Oscar bait,” but my impression is that most people don’t actually know what they mean when they say that. Sure, the occasional Judy will slip through the cracks, but by and large, the Academy Awards are far different today than they were even 20 years ago. 


While there is plenty of room for improvement, the stories and storytellers are more diverse, the styles of the nominated films are more daring, and the variety of films being rewarded is greater than ever. It’s a golden age for the gold standard of Hollywood filmmaking, and the industry is better off for it.


There is a pretty clear consensus on this year’s winner, but in an effort to give every nominee its moment in the sun, we will still rank them here from least likely to most likely to win:


Past Lives

This has become a more common occurrence since the Academy expanded its lineup to 10 nominees – the small, well written indie sliding into the Best Picture slate on the strength of members’ general love for the film. These films don’t usually show up in the crafts categories. Sometimes, they pick up an acting nomination or two. Sometimes, they don’t. Regardless of any of that, the filmmakers can always say they had a Best Picture nominee, and that’s not nothing.


American Fiction

If Cord Jefferson keeps making movies with this much wit and heart and intelligence, he’ll keep getting invited to the Oscars. American Fiction is exactly the kind of movie that benefits from this kind of awards attention. I know people who would never have sought it out but for hearing that it was in the mix for a couple Oscars. That’s the power of the Academy Awards. That’s also why it’s so important for the Academy to recognize different voices and amplify voices that otherwise would be drowned out by the din of a fast-moving industry. I look forward to whatever Jefferson makes next.


Maestro

It’s going to happen one of these days. Bradley Cooper is going to make his Oppenheimer, a film that is undeniable, that will finally carry him up onto the Oscars stage. He’ll probably win for directing, maybe even acting, too. That future is out there because Cooper is too talented and cares too much to stop making the art he loves. His movies really haven’t hit for me yet, but I’m never going to knock a filmmaker for following his passion.


Barbie

On paper, it’s pretty remarkable that Barbie made it to the dance at all. On paper, it’s a two-hour toy commercial produced by Mattel. On paper, it’s another chink in the armor that keeps art safe from the data-driven, finance-bro hell the rest of us find ourselves living in. But, that’s on paper. Greta Gerwig and Margot Robbie weren’t worried about how things might look on paper. They were concerned with bringing to life a smart, funny, insightful fantasy about how hard it is to be human, even if you’re a doll. It’s a beautiful statement and further proof that Gerwig is one of her generation’s finest filmmakers.


The Zone of Interest

There should be a place for something this experimental every year. Jonathan Glazer’s Holocaust drama looks different from any World War II movie you have ever seen. It sounds different. It feels different. Largely, that’s because Glazer just is a different kind of filmmaker, unafraid to take chances, to challenge the audience, and to reflect the worst of our shared history back at us. This is a monumental achievement that will be studied and discussed for years to come.


Anatomy of a Fall

From 1946-2010, just 10 films won the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival and got nominated for Best Picture. Of the past 12 Palme d’Or winners since 2011, it has happened five times. Anatomy of a Fall is the latest film to pull this impressive double act and further evidence of expanding tastes within the Academy and a willingness to look beyond American shores for great films. And, make no mistake: Justine Triet’s courtroom thriller is a great film. Simply put, it’s one of the best of the year.


Poor Things

Yorgos Lanthimos’ latest film might be one of the best examples of: Once you’re in the club, you’re in the club. How else to explain the love for a two-hour sci-fi fantasy about a woman’s sexual and spiritual awakening that features more explicit sex scenes than you can count on your two hands? The Academy embraced Lanthimos’ The Favourite back in 2018, itself more subversive than it might first appear, and now he’s in the club, which is great if it means he’s going to bring more weirdos like this along with him.


The Holdovers

This is the kind of quiet, generous movie that people can love easily, and it will appear near the top of a lot of ballots, if not right at the top. If Oppenheimer somehow doesn’t win a majority of votes from the first ballot, interesting possibilities open up, like everybody’s second-favorite film of the year possibly moving into pole position. I’m not saying that’s going to happen, but it’s far from the least likely scenario.


Killers of the Flower Moon

A favorite discussion type among film fans is: What director has the best four-film run? Or, what director started their career best? Or something similar. A rarely discussed topic is: What director ended his career on the best run? Unfortunately, even great directors have been known to toss out a few clunkers toward the ends of their careers. That’s why Quentin Tarantino has been adamant about retiring after 10 films. He wants to protect his legacy.


With that in mind, look at Scorsese’s four most recent films: Killers of the Flower Moon, The Irishman, Silence, and The Wolf of Wall Street. I want Scorsese to continue making movies forever, but if he announced his retirement tomorrow, there’s an argument to be made that this is the greatest closing chapter to a career ever. None of those movies will have won Best Picture, but Scorsese is beyond needing our validation. It’s his world. We’re just lucky to live in it.


Oppenheimer

Going back to 2018, Oppenheimer slots in quite nicely behind Parasite as the second-best winner of Best Picture in recent times. It’s a little tougher to challenge the winners from 2013-2017, when the Academy went on what I believe to be an all-timer run: 12 Years a Slave, Birdman, Spotlight, Moonlight, and The Shape of Water. Not a clunker among them and at least two among the greatest Best Picture winners of all time.


Anyway, it’s probably too early to start talking legacy. Let’s let Christopher Nolan and team celebrate their moment without viewing it through the lens of history. There will be plenty of time to talk about that later. For now, we can simply marvel at a movie that so captured the imagination of the public that for about a month there, we were all talking about J. Robert Oppenheimer (and Barbie, too). That’s what great movies do. They capture the imagination. And, that’s what great Best Picture winners do, too. Oppenheimer will be a great Best Picture winner.


Will win: Oppenheimer

Should win: Killers of the Flower Moon

Should have been here: All of Us Strangers


A note about my favorite snub: I named Andrew Haigh’s All of Us Strangers the best film of the year, so yes, I think it should be in the Best Picture lineup. Even when there was buzz around the actors and the screenplay, a nomination in the top category was always a long shot. That’s okay. Not every great film makes it to the big show. I hope more people check out this gem of a film anyway. It’s a life-changer.

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Director


Welcome to this year’s edition of Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, where we will break down each of the 23 categories, analyze the films, and make some guesses at their awards prospects.


Best Director


The nominees are:


Jonathan Glazer for The Zone of Interest

Yorgos Lanthimos for Poor Things

Christopher Nolan for Oppenheimer

Martin Scorsese for Killers of the Flower Moon

Justine Triet for Anatomy of a Fall


Jonathan Glazer for The Zone of Interest

Glazer is one of the most fascinating filmmakers of the 21st century. He has made just four features in 24 years. Each one of them is a penetrating psychodrama largely about humanity’s worst impulses. He’s also probably most recognizable as the director of the landmark music video for Jamiroquai’s “Virtual Insanity,” one of the defining videos of the ‘90s.


The Zone of Interest is exactly the kind of film the Directors Branch of the Academy likes to nominate in that Glazer’s directorial stamp is all over it. Films are, of course, collaborative, and the acting, sound design, production design, cinematography, and everything else on this picture are superb, but there is not a frame in this movie that does not have Glazer’s authorial hand guiding it. It’s a Holocaust movie, and it’s an experimental art picture, but it’s also a probing domestic drama. Only Glazer could make all of those things fit into one package and make that package as perfect as this.


Yorgos Lanthimos for Poor Things

Lanthimos is one of the giants of international cinema right now and one of my favorite filmmakers working today. He broke into the public consciousness with his second solo feature, 2009’s Dogtooth, which was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the Oscars. He pretty quickly made the leap to English-language features with 2015’s magnificent The Lobster, and his recent creative partnership with Emma Stone seems to have been invigorating for both. Every time she accepts an award for this film, she credits her friend “Yorgo” with bringing out the best in her.


Poor Things is a Lanthimos film, through and through. It is highly stylized, darkly funny, and sometimes just plain weird in the best ways. But, it may also be evidence that Lanthimos is lightening up a little bit. Films like Dogtooth, The Lobster, and The Killing of a Sacred Deer have had laughs, but they have always been couched in a weary despair, a bleakness that reminds of Lars Von Trier, among others. Poor Things, on the other hand, offers a joy of discovery, a wonderment that his other films lack, a note of hope that maybe this world could be a little better. It’s an interesting color on Lanthimos. I think I like it.


Christopher Nolan for Oppenheimer

A Nolan Oscar win has felt inevitable for quite some time now, and I don’t just mean for Oppenheimer specifically. I mean the general air around Nolan is that he is the kind of filmmaker who should have an Academy Award. He represents exactly what the Academy and the industry at large want to be. He is a filmmaker who makes smart, critically acclaimed work that makes a ton of money every single time out, a perfect nexus between art and commerce. 


Oppenheimer is the apex of that experience: a three-hour historical drama that asks serious questions about war, science, and humanity’s capacity for violence but one which also made just shy of a billion dollars at the global box office. Perhaps it goes without saying that it is also superbly mounted, an epic tale that makes space for real human drama. It’s a truly remarkable achievement.


Martin Scorsese for Killers of the Flower Moon

This makes an even 10 Best Director nominations for Martin Scorsese, breaking a tie with Steven Spielberg as the most nominated living director. Woody Allen is sitting at seven, and those are the only three living directors with more than even four nominations. It’s an exclusive club, is what I’m saying, and Scorsese sits at the head of the table. William Wyler is the most nominated director ever with 12. It’s not off the table for Scorsese to get there, but let’s not get greedy. It’s enough to appreciate what’s right in front of us.


And, what’s right in front of us is one of the greatest filmographies of any American director in the history of the medium. Here are some of the movies he was not nominated for Best Director for: Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, After Hours, Cape Fear, and Silence. Any one of those would be the best film on almost any other director’s resumé. That’s not even to mention Raging Bull, Goodfellas, The Departed, or The Wolf of Wall Street.


The point is that we have to stop ourselves from getting complacent with a director like Scorsese – or, I should say, with Scorsese; there are no other directors like Scorsese. Killers of the Flower Moon is a masterpiece. It’s not normal for a director just to be churning out masterpieces. This is special in a way we are unlikely ever to see again. It’s an event. It’s a privilege to live at a time when he is making new movies. It’s important that we acknowledge that.


Justine Triet for Anatomy of a Fall

Lina Wertmüller. Jane Campion. Sofia Coppola. Kathryn Bigelow. Greta Gerwig. Chloé Zhao. Emerald Fennell. Triet. Those are the eight women ever nominated for Best Director. Hopefully, in the near future, the list will be too long to include without looking foolish. As always, it also feels fair to point out that Zhao is the only woman of color on the list, and among the six black directors ever nominated for this award, none has been a woman.


The honor is well-deserved for Triet, who also joined Campion in 2023 as the only women ever to win the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival. Anatomy of a Fall is a masterwork of tension and storytelling, one of the finest courtroom dramas ever made, and a brilliant psychological thriller. It’s the kind of calling card a director can point to for the rest of her career and say, ‘If you give me what I need, I can give you one of these.’


The final analysis


It’s a little surprising that this is just Nolan’s second nomination for Best Director, given his status within the industry, but I think there’s a part of the Academy that has always been a little wary of the director’s weirder impulses. Films like The Prestige, Inception, and Interstellar perhaps veered too closely to science-fiction for the high-minded Directors Branch. Even with the respectability Nolan lends them, superhero movies like the Dark Knight trilogy are outside the Academy’s wheelhouse.


No, they needed him to make something like Oppenheimer to feel comfortable fully embracing him. Well, he has made that now. And, here they are, ready to fully embrace him. It’s his time.


Will win: Christopher Nolan for Oppenheimer

Should win: Martin Scorsese for Killers of the Flower Moon

Should have been here: Emerald Fennell for Saltburn


A note about my favorite snub: I could have gone with Gerwig here, too, or Radu Jude for Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World, but it feels like Saltburn got a bad rap from the beginning. Critics thought it was beneath them and kind of buried it, apart from the many internet memes it inspired. The Academy didn’t bite. It seems in some circles, it’s almost embarrassing to admit you like this candy-coated thriller. That’s, of course, silly. Like what you like. I like Saltburn, and Fennell has the goods. And when the tide turns on this movie in five years and folks try to claim they were on board from the beginning, don’t let them forget how they missed the boat.

Thursday, March 7, 2024

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Adapted Screenplay


Welcome to this year’s edition of Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, where we will break down each of the 23 categories, analyze the films, and make some guesses at their awards prospects.


Best Adapted Screenplay


The nominees are:


American Fiction

Barbie

Oppenheimer

Poor Things

The Zone of Interest


Alright, let’s dive into this. It is absolutely absurd that the Academy reclassified Greta Gerwig’s and Noah Baumbach’s script for Barbie as an adapted screenplay. Every other awards body on earth rightly acknowledged it as an original work. The Writers Guild, in nominating Barbie, nominated it as an original screenplay. The BAFTAs nominated it as an original screenplay. Where the hell did this decision even come from?


It basically comes down to the Academy considering the Barbie doll a piece of intellectual property that Gerwig and Baumbach have adapted for the screen, but this is a ludicrous interpretation of the concept of adaptation. Point me to the piece of Barbie IP where she delivers a monologue about the plight of modern womanhood. Point me to the Barbie universe jokes about The Godfather, Stephen Malkmus, and the Snyder Cut. I look forward to viewing the piece of previous Barbie material where the doll identifies that impermanence is inherent in the beauty of life.


Of course, none of those things exists because Gerwig and Baumbach did not adapt any Barbie IP. They used the world of Barbie to tell a completely original story. It’s like saying the Birdman team “adapted” the New York theater world. Yeah, it existed before, but it’s being used in a whole new way. It applies a ridiculous purity test to the concept of “originality,” as though if every element of a story did not spring fully from your imagination, you cannot claim to have had an original idea.


Judd Apatow pointed all of this out on social media in the immediate aftermath of the decision and took a lot of heat for what I think is a pretty uncontroversial opinion. You had waves of writers and critics leaping to defend the Academy’s decision, making truly galling leaps of logic to support an awards body they generally make careers on disagreeing with.


If I were to posit a theory about the situation, it is that Barbie die-hards and Gerwig stans, of which there are many of both, are desperate for Gerwig to win an Oscar, and Original Screenplay seemed like the most likely path there. This was all even before she was left off the Best Director slate. However, in their fervor, the twin fandoms became annoying to a large segment of folks who are sick of hearing about it. This situation presented a perfect opportunity for that segment of people to tell the fans to sit down, shut up, and just deal with it.


So, fine, some people were annoying and some people were annoyed, but you can’t just throw logic out the window because it’s convenient to your cause. Barbie existed before the movie. Sure. No argument here. But, let’s ask ourselves what else existed.


The Spotlight team at the Boston Globe and their fact-based newspaper reporting definitely existed before Tom McCarthy and Josh Singer won an Original Screenplay for the movie Spotlight.


King George VI had a stutter and a speech teacher who helped him through that long before David Seidler won the Original Screenplay Oscar for The King’s Speech.


You may be shocked to learn Harvey Milk was a real person, who lived a well documented public life, before Dustin Lance Black used all of the written, video, and other archival materials to adapt the politician’s story into Milk, the winner of Original Screenplay in 2008.


I can do this all day, and if those people who think Barbie is so clearly an adapted screenplay want to have a conversation about true stories being considered original, then I’m here to have it. But, I haven’t heard anyone saying that because it’s not about that. It’s not about logic or really even caring about the Academy Awards. It’s about some grumpy folks who were all too excited to put some fans in their place.


As far as what the Academy was thinking? Damned if I know. With that, I present four films adapted from books and Barbie.


American Fiction

Writer-director Cord Jefferson’s first film is sharp, witty, and genuinely moving in ways that surprised me. It has been sold as a broad satire of the literary world and the inherent messiness in telling “black stories.” It certainly has all of that, but what I wasn’t prepared for was the family drama at the center of this film that lends the story much of its emotional weight. I’ve heard Jefferson speak about some of the changes he made to the Percival Everett novel on which this film is based, and all of the adjustments sound prescient and well considered. This is a smart film, though I wish it dug a little deeper.


Barbie

You already know how I feel about this one. Original or adapted, nobody could have made this work better than Gerwig and Baumbach. This was an impossible task that others in Hollywood had taken on before and failed to crack. Gerwig and Baumbach cracked it wide open in a way that has resonated with millions of people across the globe and that will be talked about for years to come. 


This is Gerwig’s third screenplay nomination and fourth nomination overall. She was previously nominated for Adapted Screenplay for the marvelous Little Women and for Director and Original Screenplay for Lady Bird. Baumbach also has three screenplay nominations and four nods overall. He previously was nominated for Original Screenplay for The Squid and the Whale and for Marriage Story, for which he also received a Best Picture nomination.


Oppenheimer

Now, this is a feat of adaptation, Christopher Nolan adapting the massive J. Robert Oppenheimer biography American Prometheus into a coherent, entertaining film. Perhaps you have heard that Nolan wrote the screenplay in the first person from Oppenheimer’s point of view. That’s a pretty amazing gambit, one that you can try when your films have grossed billions of dollars and your wife is your producer. But, that’s really window dressing. The substance is that Nolan has taken a 700-page book and turned it into a taut, gripping thriller about the folly of man. He still can’t write women, though.


Nolan has previously been nominated twice for Original Screenplay for Memento and Inception, in addition to five other nominations spread across the Picture and Director categories.


Poor Things

In the movie business, it’s good to have a niche. Right now, no one is doing period comedy with serious social themes better than Tony McNamara. From his Oscar nominated original screenplay for The Favourite, which he co-wrote with Deborah Davis, to the television show he created, The Great, to this, McNamara is just fully in his element. Somewhere in there, he also found the time to write the better-than-it-had-any-right-to-be Cruella movie, also starring Emma Stone. McNamara’s smart, funny, and insightful script for Poor Things was based on the Alisdair Gray novel of the same name.


The Zone of Interest

The Martin Amis novel that gives Jonathan Glazer’s film its title sounds really interesting. It doesn’t sound like it has anything to do with the movie Glazer made – apart from the general setting – but it sounds like a fascinating read and perhaps I will get to it one day. 


It is fascinating that in a year with so much discussion around the Barbie screenplay awards placement, Glazer just quietly slipped into Adapted for a largely original story. But, because there’s a book everyone can kind of point to, no one gets too upset. Anyway, the story Glazer does write is bone-chilling and brilliant. Glazer, who is also nominated for Best Director, is a first-time nominee this year.


The final analysis


This category is shaping up as one of the most interesting this year. In most years, with a Best Picture contender as strong as Oppenheimer, the screenplay award would just go to that film. But, one thing about Nolan’s films is that he is known as such a director that his writing is often either undervalued or overlooked. I would also add that for all the wonderful things Nolan does, writing is maybe not his greatest strength. And, as wonderful a feat of adaptation as Oppenheimer is, it still features some clunky, on-the-nose dialogue and those woefully underdeveloped women.


All of which is to say: The door is open. So, let’s speculate. American Fiction actually feels really strong here because the Academy clearly likes this movie and will want to find a way to reward it, and this is the most logical place.


Lingering good will over her Best Director snub could propel Gerwig (and Baumbach) to the win here for Barbie, but frankly, that didn’t help last time. Gerwig missed out on a much-deserved Director nomination for Little Women, too, and still did not pick up the screenplay Oscar. This despite Little Women being one of the finest and most daring adaptations of the century and Oscar winner Jojo Rabbit being truly embarrassing.


As for Poor Things and The Zone of Interest, the former is seen as much more of a director’s and actors’ film, while the latter, as silly as it is, may get dinged for a lack of dialogue.


It’s not exactly a safe move to bet against the Best Picture frontrunner here, but my gut is telling me American Fiction is the one to go with.


Will win: American Fiction

Should win: (abstain out of protest)

Should have been here: All of Us Strangers


A note about my favorite snub: My favorite film of the year, Andrew Haigh’s adaptation of the Taichi Yamada novel Strangers is simply stunning. It is one of the most powerful and emotionally perceptive films I have seen in quite some time, and it is one of the great misses of this Oscars season that this film did not get more love in the industry.