Showing posts with label Inherent Vice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inherent Vice. Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2025

Monday Miniatures: The PTA Project and an Animated Masterpiece


Welcome to Monday Miniatures, where I tell you about some of the stuff I’ve been watching in the past week that I wouldn’t otherwise get to share.


The week of Sept. 22-28, 2025:


The Master, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

Inherent Vice, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

Phantom Thread, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

Licorice Pizza, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

One Battle After Another, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

How I watched them: The Master - Blu-ray; Inherent Vice - Amazon Prime; Phantom Thread - Amazon Prime rental; Licorice Pizza - Amazon Prime; One Battle After Another - In theaters (AMC Americana at Brand XL)


The second half of my Paul Thomas Anderson rewatch is complete, ending with a screening of One Battle After Another on opening night. I will have a full review of the film up this week, as well as some thoughts on the whole PTA catalogue and hopefully some other fun bric-a-brac. For the moment, I will say the new film is one of the best films of the year, certainly in the top tier of PTA works, and a movie people will be talking about for a long time.


Flow, directed by Gints Zilbalodis

How I watched it: 4k DVD


The only non-PTA film I had the chance to watch this week, this is my third time seeing Flow but first at home after seeing it twice in theaters. In addition to being one of the best films of last year, it was also one of my favorites, so the moment Criterion announced they would be releasing a 4k edition, I knew I would be getting it. The DVD was released Tuesday of last week and my pre-order arrived Friday. I immediately popped it in.


I chose to watch with the new Zilbalodis commentary track, which offers a ton of insight into the way the filmmaker thinks about character development and using action to move a story forward. He also shared the difficulties in working independently with open-source software – high-definition animation files have a tendency to overwhelm a PC – but also the freedom to tell the kind of story he wanted in his way.


After seeing the film in theaters, I called Flow one of the most gorgeously animated films ever made, and seeing it in 4k has done nothing to change that opinion. The richness of the background details, the smooth camera moves, and the beautiful interplay between light and shadow all come through wonderfully on this transfer. There remain shots in the film – even after listening to Zilbalodis explain how they were done – that I can’t fathom how they were done. I can’t wait to dig into the director’s other work, which is also included in the set.

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

The Best of the 2010s: 20 for 2020



Amid all the list making and best-of roundups, there are films bound to be forgotten. Among these are great films, some heralded in their time and some less so, but all of which deserve to be remembered and shared as the years and decades go on. Last Cinema Standing will, of course, be compiling our Best of the Decade lists and sharing them in this space. We will talk about the best moments in film, the best performances, and the best films, but I wanted to start off this project with the films that might not end up in these other places.

I initially planned to have here a list of movies that should be revisited so as not to be forgotten, but as with so many things, the idea morphed and transformed in the process. What we have instead are the movies that for whatever reason, I could not stop thinking about as the years have passed. Some are big blockbusters while others are little-seen indies, but none has left my mind. So, here are 20 movies – two for each year of the 2010s – that I will be thinking about in 2020 and beyond and that I hope you will give another watch to in the decade to come.

Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010)

Remember when Banksy was nominated for an Oscar? That was no joke, except perhaps on the Academy for buying into the veracity of the notoriously prank-happy street artist’s supposed documentary. But “fact or fiction?” is not really the point in Exit Through the Gift Shop. If you accept it as a documentary, then it is a documentary. If you view it as a satirical jab at the world of high art, then that is what it is.

The characters are verifiably real – or as verifiable as anyone in this world gets – with Mr. Brainwash, Space Invader, Shepard Fairey, and Banksy himself all making appearances. The film captures the guerilla nature of their work but also the craftsmanship inherent in the planning, preparation, and execution of their schemes. It then goes beyond that into the commodification of all that work, questioning the very nature of art as a business.

It is undeniable that Exit Through the Gift Shop is an elaborate practical joke, but on whom will change based on your perspective. Is it on the high-art world, which is shown to be shallow and corruptible? Is it on the street artists, who allow themselves to be taken in by Mr. Brainwash? Is it on us for getting dragged into any of this? Or maybe the joke is ultimately on Banksy, for thinking any of us would get what he was doing in the first place.

See also: 127 Hours, Danny Boyle’s stirring tribute to the human spirit, which gives us James Franco’s finest performance, a wonderful A.R. Rahman score, and one of the most beautiful and uplifting finales of the decade.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)

The revitalization of the Planet of the Apes series is one of the most pleasantly surprising developments of the past decade. Though many of the films are enjoyable, the original series essentially peaked with the twist at the end of the first film. Charlton Heston damns us all to hell, and it is basically downhill from there, give or take an Escape from the Planet of the Apes. Tim Burton’s widely loathed 2001 Planet of the Apes left neither hope nor much desire for a revival.

So, imagine the delight of sitting down for another reboot in a decade of full of them and instead getting a startlingly original vision that refuses to trade on the nostalgia of its predecessors and forges a new path forward. Director Ruper Wyatt strikes gold with the story of a chimpanzee accidentally granted sentience and a society that has no idea how to handle that development. As ever, though, this tale about the rise of another species is truly about the fatal flaw in humanity that precipitates our own downfall.

Of course, Andy Serkis is great as Caesar, the central chimp, and we will talk more about him in another installment of this series. The visual effects work, to this point, was unmatched. How Joe Letteri and team lost the Oscar will be puzzled over. But Wyatt does not rely solely on performance and effects, and in the end, he stages one of the great battle scenes of the decade on the Golden Gate Bridge. He imbues the sequence with the weight it deserves, portraying humanity’s last stand for the futile gesture it is and, perhaps, always was.

See also: Drive, a tangerine dream of a film that made a lot of people (yours truly included) think they could be cool just by throwing on a scorpion jacket and remaining stoic. Perhaps no one will ever be as cool as director Nicolas Winding Refn makes Ryan Gosling look in this movie.



Prometheus (2012)

In 2012, I called director Ridley Scott’s Alien prequel the best film of the year. It was not a well-liked film, and its esteem has not grown in the intervening years. At the time, I thought it was an estimable science-fiction masterpiece. Masterpiece was probably too strong – the film is silly in places and has surface-level flaws I missed while admiring its depths. I still admire its depths. In the wake of Alien: Covenant, I find still more to like in Prometheus.

It is fascinating the four original Alien films were handled by four distinct directors, each putting his spin on the material. Of them, only Scott returned to the franchise. Perhaps, this is because he was the only one who had something left to say on the matter. Taken together, Prometheus and Alien: Covenant reach for a grand statement on humanity’s origins and our never-ending quest to find meaning beyond ourselves.

The android David (Michael Fassbender) is one of the great characters of the decade. He represents both human ingenuity and human vanity. He is the best of our intentions and the worst of our actions. He is both the pride and the fall. He is the film’s final verdict on what we are. Maybe Prometheus does not achieve all its goals, but for setting its aims so high, it is to be applauded.

See also: Chronicle, which like so much else in recent times has been stained by problematic men behind the scenes but which remains the second-best superhero film of a decade dominated by superheroes. Dane DeHaan is marvelous, and as a latecomer to The Wire who never watched Friday Night Lights, this was my introduction to the one, the only Michael B. Jordan.

Inside Llewyn Davis (2013)

This is an already well-regarded film by two of the preeminent filmmakers of the era, which is to say Joel and Ethan Coen’s Inside Llewyn Davis is not exactly at risk of being forgotten. On the contrary, it will be at or near the top of many best-of-the-decade lists, I suspect. And while it will not be on my list, Inside Llewyn Davis is a film that has not left my mind since I saw it. It sticks with you and demands attention, not unlike the cat Oscar Isaac’s Llewyn picks up as a traveling companion.

Adam Driver gave an interview to the New Yorker a couple months back in which he stated he no longer watches his own performances, citing his performance in this film as a reason why. In particular, he mentioned the famous “Please, Mr. Kennedy” sequence, which is the most out-and-out funny moment in a movie that is otherwise blackly comic at the best of times. I bring this up because at Driver’s mere mention of the scene, my mind spiraled in a dozen different directions, analyzing the film’s structure, its humor, and its performances, all of which remain richly nuanced on every viewing.

The story is not so much a straight line of incidents but a densely interwoven tapestry of accidents and ironies – all meticulously planned by the Coens, of course. Though I do not have this on my list of the best films of the decade, it tops the list of films I have thought about most in the past 10 years. It is impossible not to think of Llewyn and his brushes with greatness, his travels parallel to the road that leads to success and fame, a road he will never walk.

See also: Stories We Tell, Sarah Polley’s poignant and pointed work of autobiography, functioning both as a deeply felt exploration of the relationship between parents and their children and a larger investigation of the nature of truth and truth-telling.

Inherent Vice (2014)

In a decade that saw Paul Thomas Anderson produce two universally acclaimed masterworks (The Master and Phantom Thread), it is the film that came between those two that stands out the most in my mind as a hidden gem. It is truly PTA’s middle child of the decade – forgotten, underappreciated, and a little bitter. Where The Master and Phantom Thread trade on their mannered stateliness, Inherent Vice is an irreverent freakout, content in its strangeness and unbothered by its messiness.

Adapted from a seemingly unfilmable Thomas Pynchon novel, Inherent Vice is less about its twisty, private-eye mystery plot than it is about a mood. With an all-time Joaquin Phoenix performance at its center, the film tangles you up in knots, daring you to pull at any thread and see what happens. Sometimes, it feels as though the film itself is unsure what will happen if you look too closely, though of course, Anderson is always in control, no matter how out of control his creation seems to be.

The hippie dream has never been portrayed as foggier or more distant than here, where characters walk around seemingly aware that any change they longed for has eluded them and any peace they sought has curdled into boredom and discontentment. Anderson knows this, and his film is unafraid to show us how all that bitterness builds up in those who had so much hope dashed so unceremoniously. And, suddenly, all the fun stops, and we are left with only emptiness, and we can hardly picture what once may have filled the void.

See also: Mr. Turner, about what happens when a world we thought we knew passes us by and we are left to reflect on what remains. Mike Leigh delivers a gorgeously shot tribute to the life and work of a singular artist that serves as a reminder of what makes all artists special and just a little crazy.


The Kindergarten Teacher (2015)

I have not seen Sara Colangelo’s 2018 remake of this film. I hear Maggie Gyllenhaal is exceptional in the title role. Considering I can think of no bad Gyllenhaal performances, I am sure that she is. But we already have Sarit Larry’s sublime performance in Nadav Lapid’s original, and to ask for more would seemingly be greedy.

Beyond Larry’s stellar work, there is also Lapid’s constantly seeking camera, following characters around at ground level, spotting the nuances and flavors of everyday lives that have seemingly been sapped of both. It is a film about art that is as cynical as Exit Through the Gift Shop but drained of satire. The Kindergarten Teacher is deadly serious.

When the film came out, Lapid called the titular teacher a “terrorist for art,” and she certainly proves willing to blow up her life, metaphorically, for the cause. As we slide further into a culture that ignores beauty for the banal, Lapid was already here on the front line before we knew there was a war, calling it a battle before the first shot was fired. It all seems so clear now, but The Kindergarten Teacher knew then.

See also: 99 Homes, when Andrew Garfield finally got to step away from the Spider-man mask that was always ill-fitted and show us once again the thespian underneath. Few films understood and conveyed the economic realities of the decade better than this vital Ramin Bahrani work.

Moana (2016)

Moana made $690 million worldwide. It was a critical hit. It featured a popular soundtrack spearheaded by the brilliant Lin-Manuel Miranda. And in its time across various streaming services, it has proved to be endlessly rewatchable. Despite all of this, it feels as though the film is destined to animated also-ran status for the 2010s.

The Frozen franchise was the biggest animated hit of a decade bookended by a pair of Toy Story sequels (Toy Story 3 in 2010 and Toy Story 4 in 2019), part of Pixar’s continued dominance in the animation realm. Hayao Miyazaki made his supposed swan song (The Wind Rises in 2013, though he may have further features yet to come). Spiderman: Into the Spider-Verse changed how we look at animation and animated heroes. This all went on, and still, I keep coming back to Moana.

I can’t think of a better animated story to save for future generations than that of a young Polynesian girl who takes control of her destiny, saves her people, and defeats a “villain” not with violence but empathy. It is classic Disney, presented in a way that is anything but classic. There is no princess. There is no prince. There is just a fearless warrior, who instead of urging us to let it go, asks us to wonder how far we’ll go.

See also: 20th Century Women, Mike Mills’ loving portrait of the women who raised him, which stands among the most empathetic films of a time in which empathy seems in short supply. Annette Bening, Greta Gerwig, and Elle Fanning are remarkable at the head of an ensemble of lives that feel truly lived.

In the Fade (2017)

Each of us is dealing in some way with forgiveness and reconciliation, be it on a small scale within ourselves or our families or on a grander scale with a society that continues to oppress and marginalize the most vulnerable among us. There is no easy answer, there is no quick fix, and no peace appears to be on the horizon. So, what are we left with? Fear. Anger. Resentment. Hatred. And a lack of avenues to explore and work through these feelings. In that spirit, director Fatih Akin’s In the Fade sure seems like the movie of the moment.

Despite winning the Golden Globe for best foreign language film and despite starring Diane Kruger, one of Germany’s most famous actresses internationally, who won best actress at the Cannes Film Festival for this performance, In the Fade was criminally underseen. Perhaps it was too raw for American audiences. Tell me if this sounds familiar: A person of color is killed, and the system spends its time investigating the deceased for reasons it is his fault he is dead. Throw in the true antagonists, a band of Neo Nazis, and though set in Germany, this begins to resemble the America a lot of us know today.

Kruger plays the wife of the Turkish man who is killed along with their son in a terrorist bombing, and when the system fails to achieve justice, she is left to face a world that would rather protect Nazis than avenge an immigrant. So, we return to forgiveness and reconciliation. The Christian bible says Jesus wants us to forgive 77 times – or maybe 70 times 7. In the Fade asks what of that next time and whether practicing forgiveness and reconciliation simply comforts evil-doers. What of and at what cost accountability? Akin’s answer comes not from the bible but another worldly scribe: Don’t let the sun go down on your grievances.

See also: The Florida Project, about mostly good people mostly trying to do good in a world that has little time or patience for small kindnesses. Writer-director Sean Baker’s film is equal parts damning and triumphant, portraying the American Dream as a flickering candle, a beacon of hope that at any moment could be extinguished.


Black Panther (2018)

Ryan Coogler dominated the decade. I say that as a plain fact. I am on the record all over this website calling Coogler the best director in the game today, and I have not seen a compelling argument for anyone else. He burst on to the scene in 2013 with Fruitvale Station, an underseen masterwork. From there, he took over one of the most storied franchises in American film and made it relevant again with Creed in 2015. Finally, to close out the decade, he gifted the world Black Panther.

For 2018, Black Panther simply was the culture. Think about how remarkable this is: A black man directs a script from two black writers (Coogler and Joe Robert Cole), starring a mostly black cast, and the film becomes the highest-grossing domestic box-office hit (until Avengers: Endgame took back the title) in a series that is otherwise painfully white. But leave aside for a moment everything the film means to the industry and the world at large, and what you are left with is a tremendous work of art and, for my money, the finest superhero film ever made.

Black Panther is great because as thrilling as its set pieces are, as cool as its technology is, as fun as its heroes are, it is a film equally concerned with ideas. Though it ends with a big fight sequence – as required by Marvel formula – the battle is about more than brawn. It is about ideas, about ideology. Coogler engages the audience intellectually in a way that even few non-superhero films have the courage to do. That he does so while entertaining so thoroughly makes Black Panther like watching a magic trick – and Coogler, right now, is the world’s greatest magician.

See also: The Other Side of the Wind, the final Orson Welles film, about which we do not talk enough, perhaps because we take for granted a masterpiece from one of the greatest directors ever to step behind a camera. It is the perfect coda to a sadly imperfect career, marred by a system that could not understand or appreciate the genius in its midst.

The Nightingale (2019)

Writer-director Jennifer Kent seemed to spring forth fully formed with her astonishing horror debut The Babadook in 2014. Her second feature, the equally horrific but decidedly less supernatural The Nightingale, proves that first film was no fluke and that Kent will be a filmmaker to be reckoned with in the coming decade.

A revenge thriller where the antagonist is nothing less than European colonialism, The Nightingale takes place 200 years ago and could not feel more of the moment. Our heroes are a white convict woman (Aisling Franciosi) and an aboriginal tracker (Baykali Ganambarr), who each have reasons to be angry with the hand life has dealt them, or more specifically, the hand their white male overseers have dealt them.

As they trek through the Tasmanian wilderness, doggedly pursuing those who have wronged them, we are confronted with the kinds of banal, everyday violence that make up life in a world destroyed by its conquerors. The film is brutal, bloody, and assaultive, all of which I mean as compliments, as Kent never shies from her duty to portray the truth of this place and these people. This is not about the nobility in the fight – there is no nobility or grace to be found here – but rather the necessity of struggle. No one wanted things to be this way, but they are, and we do what we must.

See also: Aquarela, which is the most beguiling and entrancing documentary to come along in quite some time, demonstrating the power of the natural world and, thereby, humanity’s inherent powerlessness. We are guests here, and not permanent ones at that.

___

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Totally accurate, 100 percent guaranteed Academy Awards predictions*



The big night is finally here, and Last Cinema Standing has spent the last two weeks trying to get you all prepared. It all comes down to this. What’s it going to be? Birdman or Boyhood? Richard Linklater or Alejandro González Iñárritu? Eddie Redmayne or Michael Keaton? Will American Sniper pull off a few surprises? Everything remains in flux until the envelopes are opened.

For now, here are Last Cinema Standing’s Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed Academy Awards Predictions*. Click on any category to jump to a full breakdown of that categories nominees and check back after the show to see me return with my tail between my legs and admit just how many of these I got flat-out wrong.

*Offer not valid in the U.S. or greater solar system.

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Selma

Will win: Richard Linklater for Boyhood
Should win: Alejandro González Iñárritu for Birdman

Will win: Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything
Should win: Michael Keaton for Birdman

Will win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Should win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice

Will win: JK Simmons for Whiplash
Should win: JK Simmons for Whiplash

Will win: Patricia Arquette for Boyhood
Should win: Emma Stone for Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: Birdman
Should win: Birdman

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Boyhood

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: “Glory” from Selma
Should win: “Everything Is Awesome” from The Lego Movie

Will win: Interstellar

Will win: Citizenfour
Should win: Citizenfour

Will win: Ida
Should win: Leviathan

Animated Feature**
Will win: How to Train Your Dragon 2
Should win: The Boxtrolls

Will win: The Phone Call
Should win: Aya

Will win: Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
Should win: Joanna

Will win: The Dam Keeper
Should win: The Dam Keeper

**This was the one category I did not break down in my Countdown to the Oscars previews because I have only seen two of the five nominees. Perhaps those of you with children can let me know what you thought of the rest – or those of you who just really enjoy animation. No judgments here at Last Cinema Standing.

Predicted big winners:

Boyhood – 4
The Grand Budapest Hotel – 4
The Theory of Everything – 3
American Sniper – 2

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Adapted Screenplay



Miles Teller (left) and JK Simmons star in the Best Picture-nominated Whiplash.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

Best Adapted Screenplay


The nominees are:

American Sniper, written by Jason Hall
The Imitation Game, written by Graham Moore
Inherent Vice, written by Paul Thomas Anderson
The Theory of Everything, written by Anthony McCarten
Whiplash, written by Damien Chazelle

The Writers Guild of America hosted its annual awards ceremony Saturday night. For best original screenplay, the writers chose Wes Anderson and Hugo Guinness’ The Grand Budapest Hotel, and for adapted, they chose Graham Moore’s The Imitation Game. This has a number of people picking those two films for the same awards at the Oscars. Though it is certainly possible, the outcome is by no means a sure thing.

While the writers’ branch of the Academy does not have the same kind of eligibility issues as the music branch has shown, the Writers Guild has some very specific guidelines for what can and cannot compete for its awards. Every year, these guidelines prevent a number of top contenders from competing against each other, making the Writers Guild awards a poor bellwether at best.

Recent history shows missing out with the Writers Guild means little when it comes to the Academy Awards. Just last year, John Ridley won the Oscar for adapting 12 Years a Slave, despite not being eligible with the Writers Guild. Two-time Academy Award winner Quentin Tarantino has never competed at the Writers Guild. The point being: It is a nice feather in the cap for a contender, but it is hardly a golden ticket to the Dolby Theater stage.

As with Best Original Screenplay, a little Best Picture heat does not hurt an Adapted Screenplay contender, and four of the five nominees this year are in the mix for the top prize. None is a likely threat to win Best Picture, but the heat is enough. The fifth nominee, the most deserving and least likely winner, is a beloved auteur whose film did not do as well with the Academy as it might have, but his films rarely do.

Overall, I would call this a fairly weak category this year – not because this is the worst lineup I have ever seen but because the two most likely winners are middling films about British science geniuses that almost completely ignore science, one is a terrible script that was turned into a passable movie by a great director, the best film and script in the lineup is the least likely winner, and the last nominee comes from a brilliant script that has no business in this category because it is most certainly an original screenplay and not an adaptation.

The Theory of Everything – McCarten made an interesting choice in deciding to adapt the memoir of Stephen Hawking’s first wife, Jane Hawking, rather than a more conventional biography of the famed mathematician. The shift in perspective is an intriguing direction for such a film, but due to the obvious interest Stephen Hawking’s life draws, McCarten is forced to straddle the line between telling a story about a world-renowned theoretical physicist and the scientist’s long-suffering wife. McCarten is intermittently successful.

One wishes he had committed fully to telling Jane Hawking’s unique story of love, strength, and perseverance rather than attempting to combine her story with her husband’s. What results is a biopic about Stephen Hawking that seems strangely more interested in his relationship than with his world-changing science. McCarten is clearly a talented writer, and for what he was attempting, the screenplay has a loose, natural feel to it. It would have been nice to see what McCarten could have done had he focused solely on Jane Hawking.

The Imitation Game – From one film about a brilliant man to another film with similar issues, Moore zeroes in on the events of Alan Turing’s (Benedict Cumberbatch) life around World War II and his part in cracking the German enigma code. Spoilers for those who do not know their history, but Turing cracks the code and helps win the war. It is a thrilling story about one man’s mathematical and technical genius saving the lives of millions. Unfortunately, nowhere in the film are we shown the process of Turing’s work. We must simply take it on faith that he is a genius. Turing says as much in the film.

It is a structural mess, bouncing around from the war to Turing’s childhood to his final years, when he was persecuted by the British government for his homosexuality. While the film wants to make a larger point about that persecution, it treads so lightly around the issue of Turing’s sexuality that it undercuts its message of tolerance by fearing the audience might not be tolerant of a gay war hero. I said as much in my review that there is a great film to be made from telling Turing’s life story. This is not it, and much of the fault lies in Moore’s lacking screenplay.

Whiplash – I love Whiplash, and Chazelle’s script absolutely shines. It is sharp, funny, and insightful in ways that few others are. It is also wholly original. Due to a weird quirk in the eligibility guidelines brought to light during the nominating process, Chazelle’s script was forced to compete in the Adapted Screenplay category rather than Original, where it rightly belongs. You can read more about it here, but the short version is that Chazelle filmed a scene from the feature script as a proof of concept to raise money to make the film. Though the “short” came from Chazelle’s original screenplay, the Academy rules dictate the feature is an adaptation of the short. It makes no sense, but here we are.

Luckily, the error did not cost Chazelle a well deserved nomination, despite being caught long after nominating ballots were already in hand. Chazelle is a fierce young talent, and any recognition his film gets has been hard earned. Whiplash is a complex portrait of two obsessives that does not paint either as a villain or a hero. Chazelle’s script refuses to hold the audience’s hand through a dizzying series of power reversals and shifting sympathies that builds to a stunning climax. It is magnificent work that will hopefully give Chazelle the capital to continue making films.

American Sniper – I actually enjoyed American Sniper quite a bit. It is a well made action picture with a great central performance that manages to thrill while making engaged audiences think. Its script, however, is the least of its virtues. I would go so far as to say the film succeeds in spite of its script, and though director Clint Eastwood makes the most of what he is given, he does not start out with much. Eastwood famously does not interfere with the screenplays he chooses, shooting more or less the story that is on the page. While the final product is a good war film, Hall’s script would have benefited from a more authorial director.

Hall is to be commended for attempting to insert important questions about the war on terror and the nature of heroism, but the ham-fisted way he does so is to the film’s overall detriment. Too often, Hall has characters come out directly and state the themes of the film rather than allowing his ideas to develop organically through the plot. The film is structurally boring, as well, based as it is around Chris Kyle’s (Bradley Cooper) four tours in the Middle East. He falls into a pattern of home, deployed, home, deployed, etc., that becomes tiresome about halfway through the film.

Inherent Vice – Seeing Anderson in this group of writers is a bit like playing “One of these things is not like the other things.” While the other four nominees have a total of 12 feature screenplays among them, Anderson has written and directed seven features, each the brilliant vision of a once-in-a-generation auteur. Anderson has been nominated for six Academy Awards in his career, four for writing, one for directing, and one for producing his Best Picture-nominated There Will Be Blood. He will win an Oscar one day, but it will not be for this film.

I wish, however, that he were in the conversation because this is masterful work. Inherent Vice was one of my top 10 films of the year, and almost all of the credit for the film’s tremendous artistic success goes to Anderson. He adapted a basically unfilmable Thomas Pynchon novel into a stunning masterpiece that is as much a stoner comedy as it is a poignant examination of the death of the hippie dream. No one writes films like Anderson because no one takes the chances he does. His films, up to and including Inherent Vice, have always been as challenging as they are entertaining, and he will get his Oscar due – just not this time.

The final analysis


The two British biopics will probably duke this one out to the end. While The Imitation Game won the Writers Guild award, The Theory of Everything was not eligible. When these two films did go head to head at the British Academy of Film and Television Awards, McCarten came away the winner. Of course, the BAFTA win comes with the caveat that three years running, the Academy has gone a different direction in this category than its British counterpart.

Chazelle could swoop in at the last minute and take this as well if the love for Whiplash runs as deep as its Best Picture nomination suggests. Whiplash has yet to go up against any of these films as it has competed in the best original category at every other awards show. It should be a fun fight to the finish, and we will not know the winner until the envelope is opened.

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Inherent Vice
Wish it had been here: A Most Wanted Man