Showing posts with label The Theory of Everything. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Theory of Everything. Show all posts

Monday, December 7, 2015

New movie review: The Danish Girl

Eddie Redmayne and Alicia Vikander star in director Tom Hooper's rich historical drama The Danish Girl.

I sincerely hope that 50 years from now, people look back on how we live today and wonder how we did it. If two or three generations from now kids cannot fathom the way the world worked in 2015, society will have achieved some kind of success. Nothing against today, of course, but we all hopefully want the same thing – for our children’s lives to be better than ours. So far, in the course of human history, we have done pretty well.

In the U.S., for instance, every generation can say it did better than people 50 years previously. We have problems. We always have, and we always will. Perfection is impossible, but progress should never be. Advances in technology, communication, medicine, and human rights have made this the best time to be alive in our collective history, but if future generations do not blow us out of the water with their amelioration, something will have gone horribly wrong.

I thought about all of this a lot while watching director Tom Hooper’s stylish historical drama The Danish Girl. Just as sure as Lili Elbe was born in the wrong body, she was born in the wrong time. It has never been easy to be a transgender person. Still today, despite increased visibility and tolerance thanks to celebrities such as Caitlyn Jenner and Laverne Cox, the battle for basic rights and respect rages on. Now, imagine the first couple decades of the 20th century, when even a basic malady might get you subjected to shock treatments, radiation therapy, or whatever other quackery was en vogue.

Lili’s short, sad journey through life was marked by all of these and more, but it was marked also by compassion, strength, and love, which Hooper and screenwriter Lucinda Coxon go to great lengths to tease out in The Danish Girl. Through its lush cinematography and elegant production design, the film argues – rightly, in my opinion – that the experience of discovering your truest self is as much sensory as it is emotional. The camera lingers on fabrics and textures that illuminate Lili’s inner world, even as she is trapped in the body and life of popular Danish painter Einar Wegener.

Coxon’s script is based on the David Ebershoff novel of the same name, which is a highly fictionalized account of Lili’s life story. Where the historical Lili’s life was more complex and decidedly tragic, Coxon, and Ebershoff before her, draw out the romance at the heart of Lili’s life in her marriage to fellow painter Gerda Wegener. By focusing so acutely on the love story, the filmmakers give the plot an easy-to-follow through line and give modern audiences something more tangible to grasp.

Eddie Redmayne, fresh off an Academy Award win for last year’s The Theory of Everything, plays Lili, and he brings the same commitment and passion to this performance as he brought to that previous biopic. It is a cliché to say that an actor “disappears” into a part, but for Redmayne’s dual role as Einar and Lili, the description is apt. He is tasked with portraying two characters – one long hidden; the other fading away – in a constant struggle for supremacy.

It perhaps goes without saying – yet here I find myself saying it – Redmayne’s work as Lili is the kind of transformative, heady work that, yes, wins Oscars but also takes audiences deep inside the life and mind of the character. However, I found myself even more impressed by his performance as Einar, who is wholly a construct, a façade that can no longer hold back the truth. It is painful to watch as Einar fights to keep up the charade he has propagated while Lili refuses to be denied her right to existence any longer. It is a role with a high degree of difficulty, carried off wonderfully by Redmayne.

Vikander in The Danish Girl.
This makes it all the more remarkable that Alicia Vikander not only holds her own but often outshines Redmayne as Gerda, whose life is thrown into chaos by Lili’s sudden awakening. Vikander was amazing as the possibly sentient robot Ava earlier this year in Ex Machina, and here she brings out a different side of herself, though no less strong or impressive.

The script treats the story of Gerda, who is a talented artist in her own right, as equally important to that of Lili. This allows Vikander to dig deeply into the role of a woman who fears she is losing her husband but also must come to grips with the fact she may never have had one in the first place. She is supportive and understanding, but she refuses to put her life on the back burner, and Vikander infuses her character with a depth of sensitivity and soul few actresses could match.

Though it is not factually accurate, the story Coxon chooses to tell of Lili and Gerda feels emotionally honest. It is a love story, though ultimately a platonic one. Once Einar is irretrievably lost, leaving only Lili in his place, Gerda must decide what it was she loved about Einar and whether she can give that same love to Lili. It is a tale of acceptance and tolerance that would not be out of place today, nearly 85 years since the real Lili died. So, maybe I am wrong, and we have not come as far as I would like to think, but in 50 years, who knows?

See it? Yes.

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Totally accurate, 100 percent guaranteed Academy Awards predictions*



The big night is finally here, and Last Cinema Standing has spent the last two weeks trying to get you all prepared. It all comes down to this. What’s it going to be? Birdman or Boyhood? Richard Linklater or Alejandro González Iñárritu? Eddie Redmayne or Michael Keaton? Will American Sniper pull off a few surprises? Everything remains in flux until the envelopes are opened.

For now, here are Last Cinema Standing’s Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed Academy Awards Predictions*. Click on any category to jump to a full breakdown of that categories nominees and check back after the show to see me return with my tail between my legs and admit just how many of these I got flat-out wrong.

*Offer not valid in the U.S. or greater solar system.

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Selma

Will win: Richard Linklater for Boyhood
Should win: Alejandro González Iñárritu for Birdman

Will win: Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything
Should win: Michael Keaton for Birdman

Will win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Should win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice

Will win: JK Simmons for Whiplash
Should win: JK Simmons for Whiplash

Will win: Patricia Arquette for Boyhood
Should win: Emma Stone for Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: Birdman
Should win: Birdman

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Boyhood

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: “Glory” from Selma
Should win: “Everything Is Awesome” from The Lego Movie

Will win: Interstellar

Will win: Citizenfour
Should win: Citizenfour

Will win: Ida
Should win: Leviathan

Animated Feature**
Will win: How to Train Your Dragon 2
Should win: The Boxtrolls

Will win: The Phone Call
Should win: Aya

Will win: Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
Should win: Joanna

Will win: The Dam Keeper
Should win: The Dam Keeper

**This was the one category I did not break down in my Countdown to the Oscars previews because I have only seen two of the five nominees. Perhaps those of you with children can let me know what you thought of the rest – or those of you who just really enjoy animation. No judgments here at Last Cinema Standing.

Predicted big winners:

Boyhood – 4
The Grand Budapest Hotel – 4
The Theory of Everything – 3
American Sniper – 2

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Picture



Birdman, starring Michael Keaton, is the frontrunner for Best Picture at tonight's Academy Awards.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

Best Picture


The nominees are:

The Grand Budapest Hotel

It would be difficult for this year’s Academy Awards to top last year’s for me, just from an awards perspective. After more than a decade of closely following the Oscar race, seeing 12 Years a Slave win Best Picture was one of the most exciting things I have ever seen on the show. Just thinking about it still gives me chills – but 12 Years a Slave is a once-in-a-generation movie. For a film like that not only to get into the Oscar race but to triumph in Best Picture, that does not happen every year. It cannot happen every year.

What we have, then, is a group of fine films, and several of these would make handsome winners, the kind the Academy will be able to look back on fondly. These eight films share little in common, covering a wide variety of subjects and characters – from history makers to artists to ordinary people in extraordinary situations and ordinary people in ordinary situations. There are biopics, war films, and prestige pictures of the kind we normally associate with the Academy, and there are small-scale fantasies and fables that found an audience outside the art house this year.

Some have called this a weak year for Oscar films, but the eclecticism of this group of nominees speaks directly to how patently absurd that is. Sure, there are more deserving films that have been left on the sidelines, but not one of these will go down as an embarrassment when the history books are opened and the year in film is reconsidered. The Academy can be proud of this group – and of course, so can the responsible filmmakers – and that alone is something to cheer about. A case could be made for any of these winning – and that is what we will try to do below – but it really comes down to two films: Birdman or Boyhood.

Birdman (directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu) – All signs point to Birdman, and particularly after its coronation at the Independent Spirit Awards last night, this seems like a foregone conclusion. If that is true, you will get no complaints from me. It is a formally daring, technically impressive film with great performances, sharp wit, and a strong point of view on the world we inhabit. About an aging actor who just wants to make art raging against the Hollywood system that has produced endless sequels and superhero films, you could see why the industry might embrace Birdman.

Riggan Thompson (Michael Keaton) stands in for all of the voters who got into this game for the love of the art and have watched as the industry is corrupted by money and rots from the inside out. He speaks for them when he talks about passion for the work and respect and adulation and the desire to make something that lasts. So much of what Hollywood produces is ephemeral. It matters today and means nothing tomorrow. Thompson is fighting a losing battle against the transitory nature of the business.
No one wants to be left behind, and that includes Oscar voters, so why would they not vote for the film that speaks most directly to them?

Boyhood (directed by Richard Linklater) – If feels like we have lived with Boyhood for a long time. After The Grand Budapest Hotel, Linklater’s low-key coming-of-age drama was released the longest ago of the Best Picture nominees, hitting theaters back in July last year. Still, no one has lived with it longer than Linklater. His dedication to the project has been remarkable, filming over a dozen years, shooting concurrently with a number of his other projects, and remaining squarely focused on one goal: to tell the story of what it is like to be a young boy growing up in America.

It has been a long road for the film from its inception to its filming to its release to nominations morning. For the most part, that road comes to an end tonight in the Dolby Theater. There is a very real possibility that road ends with Linklater holding two Oscars for producing and directing Boyhood. It would be a fitting image, something like finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. He could just as easily win neither award, but hey, at least we all still have the rainbow.

The Grand Budapest Hotel (directed by Wes Anderson) – What makes The Grand Budapest Hotel different from any of Anderson’s other movies? It is a question I have wrestled with throughout this Oscar season. It is critically beloved, sure, but so are many of his films. Anderson fans have embraced as they would be expected to, but less expected, for me at least, has been its tremendous awards run, which I fully believe will continue tonight. It will not win Best Picture, but I would call it the frontrunner in at least five of the nine categories in which it is nominated.

If it wins five awards, that will be the biggest haul of the night, and I can envision a world in which that will happen, but I still do not get it. It is a confectionary blend of Anderson-style whimsy and dollhouse design work that layers on top an allegory about World War II and fascism. I can only imagine voters feel its darker elements even out the sugary sweetness of it all. It is a fun romp, no doubt, and Ralph Fiennes’ leading performance is absolutely magnificent, but it is a far jump from there to the industry’s top award.

American Sniper (directed by Clint Eastwood) – If you ask the majority of folks on the street what will or should win Best Picture, they will tell you without hesitation American Sniper. It makes sense. To the movie-going public, this is the most popular, best film in the lineup. It is a box-office smash with more than $300 million in earnings, starring a huge international star and directed by a beloved Hollywood icon. It is a smart, well made war film with not a lot going against it, but it will not win.

American Sniper may have captured the public zeitgeist – and with an ongoing trial related to events depicted in the film, it is very much in the news – but the industry has not embraced it the way it otherwise might. Obviously, Warner Brothers would love to add “Best Picture winner” to all its advertising, but the studio’s victory is this film’s phenomenal financial success, not to mention its public adoration. It is certainly a threat for the win, but it would be a shocking upset to most pundits, if not to viewers.

The Theory of Everything (directed by James Marsh) – Anchored by two brilliant leading performances, both nominated tonight, The Theory of Everything is a tribute to the kind of love it takes to overcome any obstacles and how difficult that truly is to achieve in real life. The story of Stephen and Jane Hawking is one of passion and struggle but also of inspiration and perseverance. The movie makes it clear that while Stephen Hawking is a rightly renowned physicist and mathematician, both he and his wife are extraordinary people.

When the Oscar race began this season, it was easy to compare The Theory of Everything to The Imitation Game, given their similar, Awards-baiting premises and obvious sight-unseen merit. To the surprise of many, however, The Theory of Everything has been the more beloved story, even beating out The Imitation Game for best British film at the British Academy of Film and Television awards. The reason seems pretty clear. While the Alan Turing biopic holds its audience at a distance, Marsh’s film seems like it is pulling viewers in to embrace them. It would be hard not to embrace it back.

Whiplash (directed by Damien Chazelle) – Festival hits have a tendency to die quick deaths. They can look like a breakout hit one minute, then as soon as the next shiny object comes along for admiration, they are no more. Whiplash was the talk of the town at Sundance in 2014, and now, more than a year later, it remains as much in the conversation as ever. Since Little Miss Sunshine broke through in 2006, Sundance has been a launching pad for independent films into the Best Picture race. No Sundance film has won the top prize yet, and Whiplash will not be the first, but by any measure, Chazelle’s film has been a success.

What is remarkable is that while no one believes the film has a shot at Best Picture, myself included, Whiplash is legitimately in the mix for each of the four other awards for which it is nominated. JK Simmons will win Best Supporting Actor. It would not be surprising for Chazelle to take Best Adapted Screenplay. The editing has seen support from a number of different awards bodies, and musicals always have a chance in Best Sound Mixing. Something else will be named Best Picture, but it will not be shocking if Whiplash comes away feeling like the night’s big winner.

The Imitation Game (directed by Morten Tyldum) – Early in the season, The Imitation Game was picked as the frontrunner for Best Picture, and why not? It checks all the boxes we think of when we think of prestige, Academy Award-winning movies. It is a true story about a great historical figure and his accomplishments set during World War II. It features a lot of fancy design work and some great performances, and it closes with an important social message. Audiences have taken to it both at festivals, where it has won a number of audience awards, and at the box office, where it has earned an impressive $159 million worldwide.

However, it now finds itself trailing in this race, not only behind the frontrunners but behind several other second-tier candidates. So, what happened? I would say that the film just is not that good, but that is a subjective and only semi-defensible position. The film did garner eight nominations, behind only Birdman and The Grand Budapest Hotel. There is obviously support for it. Backed by The Weinstein Company and one of the best Oscar strategy teams in the business, the success has been getting a good-but-not-good-enough movie this far in the race.

Selma (directed by Ava DuVernay) – To me, Selma was the best American film of the year. Of these nominees, it is the most deserving winner, but it will not be getting anywhere near the Dolby Theater stage. If it were to win, it would constitute one of the biggest upsets in Oscar history. That is not hyperbole. The numbers back that up. The victory, then, is that the film made it into the Best Picture lineup at all, which is nothing to sneeze at. The love is there, just not enough

Sadly, Selma got caught up in a political firestorm both before and after the nominations. Amid its release and subsequent critical acclaim, conservative talking heads blasted the film for its supposed historical inaccuracies. After the film was mostly shut out at the Oscars, liberal pundits lambasted the Academy for racism and elitism, a furor that spawned the ubiquitous #OscarsSoWhite hashtag. It has been a political and cultural hot potato all season, which is unfortunate.

If audiences could get beyond all the noise on both sides of the issue and simply see the film, they would find an unparalleled artistic achievement announcing the arrival of a bold, brilliant new voice in cinema. DuVernay’s film deserves to stand on its own, apart from all the commotion caused by forces beyond its makers’ control. That does not seem possible now, but in a few years, when we have long forgotten the controversy, Selma will be ripe for rediscovery. Then, it will take its place in the pantheon.

The final analysis


The numbers say Birdman, and it is really hard to get away from that. A film that many pundits thought would be divisive in the industry has proven to be anything but. In truth, based on guild awards and insider talk, Birdman is one of the most broadly popular movies since Slumdog Millionaire won eight Oscars in 2008. Even in categories where it is not nominated such as Art Direction, Score, and Editing, it has support. It is a widely liked film that remarkably few have anything bad to say about, but I cannot shake the feeling that Boyhood will triumph.

I have little to go on to support that assertion except the immense critical praise lavished on Boyhood and the fact that it won the Golden Globe for best drama and the BAFTA for best film. Thanks to the preferential balloting system, which requires voters to list their choices from favorite to least favorite, movies that can be loved by many and liked by most have the best shot at winning this award. To me, that describes Boyhood. Either could win, and neither would shock me, but recent history suggests Academy members vote with their hearts, not their heads. As smart and well made as Birdman is, Boyhood feels like the heart vote.

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Selma
Wish it had been here: Leviathan

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Actor



Eddie Redmayne is the frontrunner for Best Actor for his portrayal of Stephen Hawking in The Theory of Everything.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

Best Actor


The nominees are:

Bradley Cooper for American Sniper
Michael Keaton for Birdman
Steve Carell for Foxcatcher
Benedict Cumberbatch for The Imitation Game
Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything

Best Actor is easily the most stacked category every year, with a ton of worthy contenders and too few spots to put them in. This year, for instance, you could put together a list of great performances that would make a tremendous list of nominees without including a single one of the actual nominees. As a thought experiment, here is my alternative list: Jake Gyllenhaal for Nightcrawler; Timothy Spall for Mr. Turner; Brendan Gleeson for Calvary; David Oyelowo for Selma; and Phillip Seymour Hoffman for A Most Wanted Man.

I could go on like this all day with Oscar Isaac in A Most Violent Year, John Lithgow in Love Is Strange, Joaquin Phoenix in Inherent Vice, Ellar Coltrane in Boyhood, Aleksey Serebryakov in Leviathan, and on and on and on. The point is that while the five nominated performances are each fantastic in their own right, the Best Actor category at the Oscars is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the best performances of the year. It is not just this year either, as similarly long lists could be made for any year. If you want to talk about Best Actress, it could fall the same way, though the contender field there is often unfairly narrow, and that is a good discussion to have another day.

What we have, then, are the five performances Academy members liked best, and all credit to them, they liked some damn good performances. Maybe most remarkable is that four of the five nominees, including the two frontrunners, are first-time nominees. None of these actors has won an Academy Award before. In fact, this is the only acting category this year not to feature a previous winner. The last time not one of the nominees was a previous winner was in 2006, so no matter who wins, it will be a history-making night for someone.

Michael Keaton for Birdman – No one in the Best Actor category this year had the same task as Keaton. While the other four nominees were all playing real people – meaning they had books, interviews, videos, etc., to base their performances on – Keaton created a whole new person from just the words on the page. Great words though they may be, they mean nothing without Keaton’s incomparable contribution. He is the heart and soul of Birdman, the burning fire at the center of the film. His performance lends poignancy, gravitas, and humanity to an otherwise caustically satirical endeavor.

Keaton is Riggan Thompson, not because of who he is in life but because of who he is as an actor. Keaton is not great as Thompson because he once played Batman and Thompson once played a Batman-like superhero called Birdman. A lot of actors have played superheroes at one time or another, and more now than ever before, but no other actor could have brought the deep wells of pain and anguish that Keaton brings to the part. This is not a case of stunt casting. It is an instance of casting the perfect actor in the role of a lifetime.

Keaton embraces all of the flaws and contradictions of a man who just wants to be seen as an artist but who has a history of selling out that goal. Every time he walks on stage, he takes with him the hurt of a failed marriage, a washed up career, and a lack of respect. Birdman does not tell the story of a man overcoming all these grievances but of a man who finally channels these grievances into the art he so desperately wishes to make. The words of the writers create this world, but it is Keaton who makes them fly off the page.

Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything – In a relatively brief career, Redmayne has been involved in a number of highly prestigious projects, including Tom Hooper’s Les Miserables, My Week with Marilyn, and The Good Shepherd, but perhaps none has carried more inherent prestige than this biopic of Stephen Hawking. For The Theory of Everything, Redmayne takes on the unenviable task of portraying a famous and beloved figure who is still very much alive and very much in the public consciousness.

Redmayne handles the project by going above and beyond the call of duty and does not so much play Hawking as become him. He has the look, the walk, and the attitude of a man whose body keeps him trapped but whose mind takes him places the rest of us could not even dream about. Characters with disabilities have always been seen somewhat derisively as Oscar bait, but Redmayne does not attempt to milk Hawking’s motor neuron disease for pathos. Instead, he treats it as a fact of life to be dealt with and overcome so that he may attend to more important matters.

In the film’s best scene – and one of the best scenes of the year – Hawking becomes frustrated that he cannot keep up with the pace of a dinner with friends and excuses himself from the table. He attempts to climb the stairs but collapses. He cannot go up or down. Then, he sees his son standing at the top of the stairs behind a safety gate, but the son does not seem as locked in as Hawking in this moment. He tries to reach out to his child, but he cannot connect with him. Redmayne is able to show us this haunting and tragic moment with his body, but he makes us understand it with the longing and despair on his face.

Bradley Cooper for American Sniper – Cooper is the only previous Oscar nominee in this group, and he has been nominated in three consecutive years – for Best Actor in 2012 for Silver Linings Playbook, for Best Supporting Actor last year for American Hustle, and this year. It has been a kind of remarkable career transformation for Cooper, whom many of us first took notice of in The Hangover, though if you are a David Wain fan, you were enjoying Cooper’s comedy chops as far back as Wet Hot American Summer in 2001.

American Sniper was a passion project of Cooper’s, something he has wanted to bring to the screen for years. He chased it through numerous directors and production delays until he and director Clint Eastwood were finally able to bring the story of Chris Kyle to the screen. Cooper’s passion behind the scenes is clearly matched by his dedication on screen, as he transforms himself into a U.S. Navy SEAL.

Cooper has charisma to burn, but here, he channels that energy into a man who has a deep love for his country and an abiding need to defend it but for whom the horror of war gradually begins to take its toll. Cooper looks appropriately warrior-like in his action scenes, but when you watch him at home, that is where the real work appears. Cooper absolutely embodies a man who leaves a piece of his soul on the battlefield every time he goes out and who must fight to keep what he has left when there is no more war to fight.

Benedict Cumberbatch for The Imitation Game – Cumberbatch’s Best Actor case is an interesting one. On one level, he is fantastic in the film as mathematics genius and British war hero Alan Turing, but on another, taken out of the context of The Imitation Game, the performance feels like another in a string of recent performances by actors using the same set of tricks to portray a character who is clearly on the autism spectrum. Cumberbatch, himself, does a riff on the autistic genius who does not get along so well with people on his television show Sherlock. It is a trope that has become commonplace in modern storytelling, so how to judge Cumberbatch’s work here?

Objectively, it is an undeniably solid performance. Given a character who has difficulty showing emotion and who lives so much inside his own head, Cumberbatch communicates a world of feeling and soul simply with his body language and facial expressions. Really, Cumberbatch is marvelous as Turing. The problem is that Turing is not a well written character in the film. Because the character shows little depth, writer Graham Motion does not imbue him with any. Whatever depth we sense in Turing is thanks to Cumberbatch’s excellent portrayal.

Steve Carell for Foxcatcher – Let’s try not to make this about a comedic actor impressing everyone by going dramatic. In the first place, it has been done before with great success, and more than that, Carell already has a demonstrated facility with dramatic acting, even in ostensible comedies such as Little Miss Sunshine and Seeking a Friend for the End of the World. So, it would be great if we could all stop acting so surprised Carell was able to pull off such a magnificent portrayal of a mentally disturbed millionaire in Foxcatcher. He is a great actor, and that is what actors do.

John du Pont, as played by Carell, is a man devoid of either heart or soul. His ghostly pallor suggests a body drained of blood. What he subsists on is power, and he wields it like the only weapon he has. He is an impossibly careful man who speaks with a slow, deliberate cadence and does not so much walk as shuffle. Appearances are everything for him, and the worst fate that could befall him is to be perceived as weak or incompetent. Carell embraces the character as only a gifted actor could and pulls the nearly impossible trick of making a wealthy psychopath understandable, if not sympathetic.

The final analysis


It will be Keaton and Redmayne down to the wire, and Redmayne has a slight advantage, having won the Screen Actors Guild award and the British Academy of Film and Television award. Each won a Golden Globe – Keaton in comedy and Redmayne in drama. Early in the season, some thought Redmayne and Cumberbatch might split the British genius vote, paving the way for a Keaton win, but Cumberbatch’s campaign never materialized. Now, some are theorizing that Keaton and Redmayne may split the vote and clear a path for Cooper to win.

I never have really subscribed to the idea that a split vote could lead to a surprise winner. For that to be true, the third candidate would have to have as much support as the two leaders without losing any votes to them. The math just does not seem to work. I would love to see Keaton onstage accepting an Oscar. It would be one of the highlights of my night. However, all signs point to Redmayne winning for his transformative portrayal of Hawking, and it is hard to argue with that.

Will win: Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything
Should win: Michael Keaton for Birdman
Wish he had been here: Jake Gyllenhaal for Nightcrawler