Showing posts with label Still Alice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Still Alice. Show all posts

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Totally accurate, 100 percent guaranteed Academy Awards predictions*



The big night is finally here, and Last Cinema Standing has spent the last two weeks trying to get you all prepared. It all comes down to this. What’s it going to be? Birdman or Boyhood? Richard Linklater or Alejandro González Iñárritu? Eddie Redmayne or Michael Keaton? Will American Sniper pull off a few surprises? Everything remains in flux until the envelopes are opened.

For now, here are Last Cinema Standing’s Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed Academy Awards Predictions*. Click on any category to jump to a full breakdown of that categories nominees and check back after the show to see me return with my tail between my legs and admit just how many of these I got flat-out wrong.

*Offer not valid in the U.S. or greater solar system.

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Selma

Will win: Richard Linklater for Boyhood
Should win: Alejandro González Iñárritu for Birdman

Will win: Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything
Should win: Michael Keaton for Birdman

Will win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Should win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice

Will win: JK Simmons for Whiplash
Should win: JK Simmons for Whiplash

Will win: Patricia Arquette for Boyhood
Should win: Emma Stone for Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: Birdman
Should win: Birdman

Will win: Boyhood
Should win: Boyhood

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: American Sniper
Should win: Birdman

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: Inherent Vice

Will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Will win: The Theory of Everything
Should win: Interstellar

Will win: “Glory” from Selma
Should win: “Everything Is Awesome” from The Lego Movie

Will win: Interstellar

Will win: Citizenfour
Should win: Citizenfour

Will win: Ida
Should win: Leviathan

Animated Feature**
Will win: How to Train Your Dragon 2
Should win: The Boxtrolls

Will win: The Phone Call
Should win: Aya

Will win: Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
Should win: Joanna

Will win: The Dam Keeper
Should win: The Dam Keeper

**This was the one category I did not break down in my Countdown to the Oscars previews because I have only seen two of the five nominees. Perhaps those of you with children can let me know what you thought of the rest – or those of you who just really enjoy animation. No judgments here at Last Cinema Standing.

Predicted big winners:

Boyhood – 4
The Grand Budapest Hotel – 4
The Theory of Everything – 3
American Sniper – 2

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Actress



Julianne Moore is the frontrunner for Best Actress for her work in the film Still Alice.

Each day as we make our way to the Academy Awards ceremony Feb. 22, Last Cinema Standing will take an in-depth look at each of the categories, sorting out the highs, the lows, and everything in between. Check back right here for analysis, predictions, and gripes as we inch toward the Dolby Theater and that world-famous red carpet.

Best Actress


The nominees are:

Rosamund Pike for Gone Girl
Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Felicity Jones for The Theory of Everything
Marion Cotillard for Two Days, One Night
Reese Witherspoon for Wild

Despite the consistent, misguided fear that Best Actress will be a weak field – a fallacy we addressed in this space a few months back – the Academy managed to put together a magnificent list of nominees this year. All five women do excellent work as powerful, strong-willed women. Nowhere in this group will you find a meek house frau or someone who is just a wife and mother. To be sure, there are wives and mothers in here, but they are not defined solely by their family lives. They are defined by their strength, perseverance, and agency.

The same could be said for these five actresses, among whom there are two first-time nominees, two former winners, and a beloved industry veteran with five nominations but no Oscar. Pike and Jones are enjoying their first trip to the ceremony, while Witherspoon and Cotillard are back for the first time since their respective wins in the category. Cotillard is the last person to win this award for a foreign-language performance – and the only person in the last 50 years to do so – a feat she will try to replicate this year.

In the past, voters tended to like ingénues or beautiful women who ugly themselves up such as Charlize Theron in Monster, Nicole Kidman in The Hours, or Hilary Swank in Boys Don’t Cry. Recently, however, they have been on a kick of giving this prize to an actress who plays a character with a mental illness. Three of the last four actresses to win this award played a character who is mentally ill, and somewhere in there is a joke about Margaret Thatcher making it four of the last four. This recent history bodes well for the presumed frontrunner and likely winner.

Julianne Moore for Still Alice – Moore has spent her career delivering knockout performance after knockout performance. She has been nominated for an Academy Award five times for roles in films as diverse as Boogie NightsFar From Heaven, and The End of the Affair. In Still Alice, she plays a world-renowned linguist who is struck in the prime of her life by early-onset Alzheimer’s. It strikes suddenly and deteriorates quickly, turning Alice into someone neither she nor her family recognizes anymore.

Moore is brilliant in a role that is obviously emotionally taxing but also surprisingly physical. As the disease progresses, Moore slackens her face and shuffles her feet, using small gestures and movements to suggest just how far Alice is slipping away. In the time right after the diagnosis, she is determined to fight it and angry over how something like this could happen to her. Later, the fear sets in as she is able to feel herself transforming into a shadow of her former self. Finally, there is nothing there at all.

Still Alice is an honest, bracing film that takes an unflinching look at how disease can shape our lives and the lives of those around us. Directors Wash Westmoreland and Richard Glatzer have cast a perfect actress in Moore. She has both the bravery and vulnerability to give herself over to this challenging role and the talent to make it come alive.

Reese Witherspoon for Wild – Witherspoon has had a rough stretch personally these last few years, but creatively, she is experiencing something of a renaissance. Appearing in the fantastic Mud in 2012 and Wild and Inherent Vice this year, she has shown a willingness to stretch as an actress and to take on roles in challenging, high-minded films. As Cheryl Strayed, a woman who embarks on a solo hike up the Pacific Crest Trail, Witherspoon devotes herself to a highly physical part that requires her to carry not only the weight of her pack but the weight of the film.

It would have been nice if the film had given Witherspoon’s performance more room to breathe because she is magnificent in the quiet, lonely moments on the trail. When she has nothing but the stars and her thoughts, Witherspoon is able to bring out the most in Strayed. However, the film piles on the voiceovers and flashbacks, pulling us away from the central journey and somewhat burying Witherspoon’s performance. The actress mostly shines through this, but it would have been interesting to see her in a more subdued version of this film.

Rosamund Pike for Gone Girl – As intense an emotional journey as Moore goes on in Still Alice and as physically trying as Witherspoon’s role was in Wild, no nominated performance asked more of its actress than the part of Amy Dunne in Gone Girl required of Pike. She is the smartest person in the room, an angel and the devil, and a goddess among mortals who by design never seems anything more than ordinary. She is a perfect sociopath.

If she were not in such a middling film that was clearly disliked by the Academy – as evidenced by this being its lone nomination – Pike might even have a shot at the upset win here. The movie was a huge hit, and the work is exceptional, but more than likely, Pike will have to be satisfied with just the nomination this time. Hopefully, the recognition means Pike will be afforded more opportunities to play intriguing, complex characters. If so, she will be back in the mix again someday. 

Felicity Jones for The Theory of Everything – Jones falls into the “If it’s new to me, then it’s news to me” category for me. Before The Theory of Everything, I had never seen anything she had done, except for one episode of Lena Dunham’s HBO show Girls, for which Jones played a character named Dot. I have no idea who that is. So, I had no frame of reference for what Jones was capable of, but when she appears in The Theory of Everything, she absolutely commands the screen. My introduction to Jones as an actress was one of the most pleasant surprises I experienced at the movies last year.

Jane Hawking, wife to the famed physicist Stephen Hawking (Eddie Redmayne), is a thankless character for an actor to play. Redmayne is playing the clearly flashier part, while Jones has the role marked by dogged determination and immense internal struggle. Her challenge as an actress is to make that internal conflict compelling to watch, and she proves more than able to rise to the challenge. Jones plays Jane Hawking as a graceful, strong, and flawed woman whose struggle feels real because we can read it on the actress’ face and hear it in her voice.

Marion Cotillard for Two Days, One Night – The surprise nominee in the category, Cotillard has turned in consistently strong work throughout a career that has spanned more than 20 years, but she really broke out onto the international stage the last time she was nominated for an Oscar, when she won Best Actress for La Vie en Rose in 2007. In the intervening years, she has starred in major Hollywood blockbusters for big-name directors such as Christopher Nolan and Michael Mann, but her best work remains in smaller films such as The Immigrant, Rust and Bone, and Two Days, One Night.

Cotillard was a big get for directors Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, who have spent their careers making art-house films about the struggles of average people. Some wondered how casting a big Hollywood star would affect the feel of the Dardennes’ work. The answer: She takes a good film about a simple moral dilemma and transforms it into a great film about the small human dramas that play out in our everyday lives. As a woman forced to beg and plead for her job, Cotillard maintains her sense of pride and poise, even as she throws herself on the mercy of her friends and co-workers.

The final analysis


Having won every meaningful precursor, this is Moore’s to lose, but she will not lose. A multiple nominee long overdue for an award and an industry favorite turning in career-topping work, Moore will win this in a walk. This is not to say the other nominated actresses would not make deserving winners, particularly Pike and Cotillard, but they simply will not win. For a sterling career and a magnificent turn in Still Alice, Moore will walk away Sunday with her first Oscar.

Will win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Should win: Julianne Moore for Still Alice
Wish she had been here: Charlotte Gainsbourg for Nymphomaniac

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Critical mass: The race is on to crown the year’s best films


Ellar Coltrane stars in the critical smash Boyhood.


If the Gotham Film Independent and Independent Spirit awards are the starting gun for the race to the Oscars, this week is when all the contenders shift into high gear. Within a two-week span, we will have heard announcements from the New York Film Critics Circle, the Los Angeles Film Critics Association, groups in Boston and Washington, as well as several online organizations. The Golden Globes, for whatever they are worth, will announce their nominees, and so will the Screen Actors Guild.

Around this time, a consensus forms in the critical community for what will be “the most critically acclaimed film of the year” – a phrase you may recognize from movie posters and DVD boxes. Of course, this is not one organization. There is no hive mind controlling what the mythical “they” will choose. Each group is made up of individual reviewers voting for what they like best. If one film rises to the top, we should consider it more confirmation than conspiracy.

Here is what has won with the announcing groups so far. See if you notice a pattern:

NY Film Critics Circle – Boyhood
LA Film Critics Association – Boyhood
Boston Film Critics – Boyhood
NY Online Film Critics – Boyhood
Boston Online Critics – Snowpiercer
Gotham Awards – Birdman
National Board of Review – A Most Violent Year

Clearly, Richard Linklater’s 12-years-in-the-making odyssey Boyhood is picking up the early steam. If we remember back to the film’s July opening and its sterling reviews, this is not particularly surprising. Film review aggregator sites such as Rotten Tomatoes (99 percent fresh) and Metacritic (100/100) would seem to suggest we can expect more of the same as the year wears on. There is nothing wrong with this necessarily, though one wishes more groups would think a little more outside the box as the Boston Online Critics did.

However, this does not mean much when it comes to what will likely win the Academy Award for Best Picture. As with most precursor awards and recognitions, critical acclaim does more to keep a film in the conversation for the Oscars than to propel it toward victory. Linklater, who has earned his share of recognition for writing and directing the film, should probably clear his schedule for the last Sunday in February, but he may not want to write that victory speech just yet. It is a long way from December to the Dolby Theatre stage.

With that in mind, let us take a look at some of the other contenders building momentum as the awards circuit barrels ahead.


Michael Keaton is generating best actor heat for his performance in Birdman.

Michael Keaton has picked up a number of best actor awards for his career-best work in Birdman, while Timothy Spall has earned kudos for his turn as famed painter J.M.W. Turner in Mr. Turner, which will be in theaters at the end of December. The Julianne Moore best actress train is off to a smashing start for her performance in Still Alice, but a bit more surprising has been the love for Marion Cotillard’s dual performances in The Immigrant and French-language drama Two Days, One Night.

In the supporting world, Patricia Arquette so far has ruled the roost for her performance as the mother of the central character in Boyhood, though the Los Angeles Film Critics threw a curveball today and awarded Arquette best actress. It is a development that will bear monitoring throughout the season. In best supporting actor, J.K. Simmons’ towering performance as a maniacal music teacher in Whiplash is head and shoulders above everything else and probably will remain there.


Tony Revolori and Saoirse Ronan star in Wes Anderson's colorful romp The Grand Budapest Hotel.

As mentioned, Linklater has earned the lion’s share of early directing awards for his opus, while also picking up some traction in the screenplay field. More intriguing there is the heat surrounding Wes Anderson’s Grand Budapest Hotel script, which will likely remain a player throughout the season. Elsewhere, Laura Poitras’ Edward Snowden documentary Citizenfour has dominated the nonfiction world, and The Lego Movie seems to be pulling away in the animated race.

There are still many kudos left to hand out on the road to the Academy Awards and much time left for this film or that to gain or lose momentum. I have found the best way to treat these early awards is as a crib sheet. If you have not caught up with everything – and really, how many of us can – the critics’ awards are a great map to the multiplexes, offering mostly fantastic suggestions for anyone wondering on what to spend their hard-earned $10-15.

For people such as myself, who watch these things closely and tend to overanalyze, it is a crazy time of year. For the rest of the world, it is barely a blip on the radar. Yet, there is a happy medium. One need not be obsessed to see the value in year-end consensus. One need only be concerned with making good decisions when heading out to the movies. In the end, anything that fosters a love of quality film cannot be that crazy.

Saturday, December 6, 2014

New movie review: Still Alice



Julianne Moore plays Alice in the excellent new drama Still Alice.

Disease is the great enemy of our time. Though we fret about terrorism, gun violence, and unforeseeable accidents, most of us will not meet our ends in these ways. The forces that conspire to destroy us exist less from without than within ourselves. Cancer, heart disease, dementia – these are the fates most likely to befall us. If we are lucky, we will live long, happy lives filled with love and joy before it strikes. Some of us will not have this good fortune.

Richard Glatzer and Wash Westmoreland’s new film Still Alice concerns Alice Howland, a 50-year-old linguistics professor diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s. She is famous the world over for her insights into language and human communication. She is a smart, beautiful woman with an adoring husband and three grown children leading mostly model lives.

Into this happy world drops the disease, bringing darkness like a power outage. The tragedy of Alzheimer’s is that not everything goes black at once. Instead, it creeps around your home, turning out the lights in one room at a time until nothing is recognizable in the void. It is this slow deterioration of mind, body, and spirit that Still Alice captures so well. Alice is in an inexorable downward spiral, slipping from her children, her husband, and the life she knew.

Played by the always remarkable Julianne Moore, Alice is a woman who has been defined by her intelligence. More than once, her husband, John, calls her the smartest woman he knows or has ever known and says that is what attracted him to her. Though we never see her before the disease rears its ugly head, Moore’s performance gives the audience a sense of the woman who would have been a witty dinner companion, a sage adviser, and a marvelous lecturer.

It begins with little things. The word “lexicon” escapes her during a speech. She becomes disoriented while out for a run. She forgets appointments. Then, it progresses. She does not know her daughter’s name. She cannot find the bathroom in her home. The cruelty at this stage, however, is she is lucid enough to know what she is losing, and it scares her, as it would most of us.

In addition to Moore’s wondrous performance, Glatzer and Westmoreland do an excellent job of forcing the viewer to see things from Alice’s perspective as her mind becomes less and less able to process the world around her. Objects and people come in and go out of focus, familiar places are cast in unfamiliar light, and conversations sail past her before she can comprehend them. She is unmoored, and each day, she drifts further from who she once was.

While this is Alice’s story, she can be our narrator only until she becomes unreliable, at which point, the storytellers must shift their focus to the family. This switch is handled so deftly and delicately it would be easy to miss. Alice wakes up in the middle of the night and frantically searches for her lost phone, which she does not find. The next time we see her, she is doing a puzzle in the kitchen as her husband and oldest daughter cook. He discovers her cracked iPhone in a drawer.

She takes it and tells her daughter she had been searching for it the night before. As she sits, her husband whispers, “That was a month ago.” Just like that, we realize she is irretrievably lost. See, the thing with Alzheimer’s is that the shell remains. She looks the same, feels the same, smells the same, but she is fundamentally changed. When she tries to interact as she once could, the difference is made crystal clear.

Based on a novel of the same name by Lisa Genova, Glatzer and Westmoreland’s screenplay embraces the despair of Alice’s story and provides no easy answers or escape. Even when the opportunity presents itself to end on a note of triumph, the film carries on beyond that into the abyss of the disease. Alzheimer’s does not end in triumph. Whether it comes slowly or quickly, it always ends in defeat.

It is not a battle Alice faces alone, as she is surrounded by supportive family members who can do nothing but watch as the wife and mother they love dissolves before their eyes. Alec Baldwin plays John, and Kate Bosworth, Kristen Stewart, and Hunter Parrish appear as the couple’s three children. All do fine work, and Baldwin is particularly good, though they are a bit overshadowed by Moore’s central transformation.

Though distinctly tragic, there is something refreshing in watching a family on screen that is not defined by bickering, jealousy, and spite. They all care for one another and want to do the right thing. While the right thing in this case may be sad and unpleasant, it is justifiable and understandable. None of these people are villains. They are simply humans placed in an impossible situation and doing their best to act with tenderness and integrity. In Still Alice, the only villain is the disease.

See it? Yes.