Showing posts with label Bridge of Spies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bridge of Spies. Show all posts

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Share the wealth: Spotlight wins, Mad Max cleans up, Leo steals the show

Spotlight took home the award for Best Picture on Sunday night at the Academy Awards.

We can now put a bow on the most unpredictable Oscar season in recent memory. With four films battling it out for the top award going into the night, the Academy spread the love around to all of them. Tom McCarthy’s masterful investigative journalism drama Spotlight took Best Picture, as well as Best Original Screenplay, while George Miller’s action extravaganza Mad Max: Fury Road picked up six awards, all in the crafts categories.

Alejandro González Iñárritu won his second consecutive Best Director award – just the third person in history to achieve that feat – for his epic The Revenant, for which Leonardo DiCaprio earned his first Oscar for Best Actor and Emmanuel Lubezki won his record third straight Best Cinematography award. Adam McKay and Charles Randolph won Best Adapted Screenplay for McKay’s The Big Short, which was shut out elsewhere on the night.

With DiCaprio taking home Best Actor and frontrunners Brie Larson and Alicia Vikander winning Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress, respectively, the only surprise in the acting categories came in Best Supporting Actor, where Mark Rylance won for his glorious, subtle performance in Bridge of Spies, besting sentimental favorite Sylvester Stallone for Creed.

Chris Rock proved a tremendous host and pulled no punches when it came to the diversity issue that has hovered over this Oscars season. He was funny, sharp, and quick, moving the show along while also delivering a damn fine evening of entertainment. His bit with the Girl Scout cookies was hysterical – a relative of and improvement upon Ellen Degeneres’ pizza-delivery stunt from two years ago – and he successfully revisited one of the most famous sketches in recent Oscar history, asking movie-goers in Compton whether they had seen the nominees. They had not.

DiCaprio, who earned a standing ovation from a crowd clearly excited to hand the thespian his first Academy Award, thanked the people who made The Revenant possible and thanked his parent before going off on an impassioned speech about the environment and our responsibility to be stewards of the natural world. DiCaprio’s victory was as much a foregone conclusion as any on Oscar night, and the whole movie-loving world was waiting for this moment. DiCaprio owned every second of it with a speech that will be replayed and rewatched for decades to come.

The biggest surprise of the night came when the low-budget sci-fi thriller Ex Machina beat out four huge blockbuster hits in Best Visual Effects, likely due to split support among the more popular films. The win was one of my favorite moments of the evening on a show full of moments that made me cheer out loud. In addition to wins for DiCaprio, Spotlight, and Ex Machina, I was most excited for Bear Story in Best Animated Short, Stutterer in Best Live Action Short, and Ennio Morricone winning Best Original Score for The Hateful Eight.

I had some problems with the broadcast and some of the winners, but I am just so overjoyed for the Spotlight team and DiCaprio that I do not want to focus on those right now. I will have a more thorough reaction tomorrow, but for tonight, let’s just enjoy the fact the Academy awarded a masterpiece of American film its top award.

Good night. More to come tomorrow.

Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed 2015 Academy Awards Predictions*


Alright, I did not do so hot at this last year. I ignored the warning signs and went with my gut, which is always a fatal error in the predicting game. If it looks like a winner and talks like a winner, it is probably the winner. This year, I am throwing my lot in with the blockbuster epic to win it all by a couple touchdowns.

If you have followed the site this month, you know that movie is The Revenant. It is a big, artsy statement by a well respected director and features not just the best crafts of the year but the most, which is always a plus with this group. I am unsure how wise it is to predict something that has never happened – a filmmaker directing back-to-back Best Picture winners – but it feels like this is the year to throw out the past and embrace the now. The movie of “the now” just happens to be a survivalist revenge saga set in the American pioneer days. Go figure.

So, here they are, Last Cinema Standing’s Totally Accurate, 100 Percent Guaranteed 2015 Academy Awards Predictions*. Click on any category to jump to a full analysis of the nominees and check back after the ceremony for some thoughts about the winners and the show itself. Enjoy, everybody.

*Once again, I cannot vouch for the efficacy of this guarantee anywhere a human language is spoken.

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: Spotlight

Will win: Alejandro González Iñárritu for The Revenant
Should win: Alejandro González Iñárritu for The Revenant

Will win: Leonardo DiCaprio for The Revenant
Should win: Leonardo DiCaprio for The Revenant

Will win: Brie Larson for Room
Should win: Charlotte Rampling for 45 Years

Will win: Sylvester Stallone for Creed
Should win: Mark Rylance for Bridge of Spies

Will win: Alicia Vikander for The Danish Girl
Should win: Jennifer Jason Leigh for The Hateful Eight

Will win: Spotlight
Should win: Ex Machina

Will win: The Big Short
Should win: Room

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: The Revenant

Should win: Mad Max: Fury Road

Will win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Should win: Mad Max: Fury Road

Will win: Cinderella
Should win: Carol

Will win: Mad Max: Fury Road
Should win: Mad Max: Fury Road

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: The Revenant

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: The Revenant

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: Ex Machina

Will win: The Hateful Eight
Should win: The Hateful Eight

Will win: “’Til It Happens to You” from The Hunting Ground
Should win: “Simple Song #3” from Youth

Will win: Inside Out
Should win: Anomalisa

Will win: Amy
Should win: Winter on Fire: Ukraine’s Fight for Freedom

Will win: Son of Saul
Should win: Mustang

Will win: Stutterer
Should win: Shok

Will win: Claude Lanzmann: Spectres of the Shoah
Should win: Last Day of Freedom

Will win: Sanjay’s Super Team
Should win: World of Tomorrow

Predicted big winners

The Revenant – 7
Mad Max: Fury Road – 3

Friday, February 26, 2016

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Picture

The Revenant could make history Sunday night if it wins Best Picture at the Academy Awards.

Welcome to the final day of Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, a category-by-category breakdown of the Academy Awards, all leading up to the Oscars on Feb. 28. If you have not been to the site before or have not been in a while, click through the list to the right and check out our analysis of the other 23 categories. If you joined us all month, your support is appreciated, and be sure to check back tomorrow and Sunday for a couple more fun features ahead of the big night.

Best Picture


The nominees are


Despite what some will try to tell you – both earnestly and derisively – there is no formula for an Oscar-winning film, certainly not for Best Picture. Perhaps you have some vague concept in your mind of a prestige picture – something arty or high-minded. Well, that is fair. These awards are meant to be high-minded. They are not the People’s Choice Awards. They are these people’s choice, the Academy’s.

Even so, there is no single connecting thread among films such as Birdman, 12 Years a Slave, Argo, The Artist, The King’s Speech, The Hurt Locker, Slumdog Millionaire, or No Country for Old Men. Those are the last eight Best Picture winners, and the only thing they have in common is quality. It is not as if these are exclusionary films, either, movies meant for the elite rather than the public. Only one of those films made less than $40 million at the box office, and three of them were blockbuster-sized hits, relative to their budgets.

No, the reason people like to claim the Academy is predictable or stagnant or boring is because the films they like do not win. All calls for increased racial and gender diversity are warranted and necessary, but as we have discussed, the Academy is not the root of the problem. It is the result. I do not begrudge anyone their boycott, but I also do not think it will solve anything. The Academy is simply an easy, highly visible target.

It is a weird world in which social media have made immediate reactions the only reactions that matter. True of almost everything now, it seems particularly true of art. New book? The consensus has formed before most of us have finished reading the dust jacket. New album? It is declared the greatest of all time, overhyped, and already overplayed before your download is even finished. New film? Well, we all know how that goes.

So, no matter which of these eight fantastic films wins, there will be a backlash, then a backlash to the backlash, then a thousand think-pieces on which film won, why, and what should have won. It will be talked to death for a day or two, then people will move on to the next thing. This is just the cycle of information now. However, thankfully, the work itself is not part of the cycle. Once the world moves on, the book is still there to read, the album to listen to, and the film to watch.

Keep that in mind over the next few days as you watch the Oscars or read about them. No matter what films win or do not win, were nominated or not nominated, every film you love is still out there to enjoy and share with others. No one person or organization can take that away. The art rises above it all. If the Academy stands for anything, it is the preservation of film – whether literally or in the public consciousness. If years from now people discover these films because the Academy nominated them, that victory will mean far more than any related to a little gold statue.

The Revenant (directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu) – What more is there to say about The Revenant? It is a flawlessly executed, immaculately realized film about man’s struggle with nature, vengeance, and his own soul. Right now, Iñárritu is the filmmaker other filmmakers want to be. His ambition and skill are unrivaled in the industry. No one else is making the kind of technically masterful, ideologically investigative films he makes.

This is not just the Iñárritu show, however. Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy give the performances of their lives. Cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki somehow finds new ways to paint with light and digital images. All the way down the line, every element of production fully commits to bringing the brutal and beautiful reality of The Revenant to life. We talked above about high-minded art. There is no film this year more artful or high-minded than this.

It absolutely can win Best Picture, and in fact, it is probably the frontrunner. A win would mean making history, the first time consecutive films by the same director will have won Best Picture. If that happens, it will be hard to argue against Iñárritu being the first to achieve it. Crafting two films as different but equally impressive as Birdman and The Revenant in back-to-back years is an achievement that deserves a place in history.

The Big Short (directed by Adam McKay) – You have to laugh so you do not cry. The Big Short employs a comedic lens to consider the massive fraud the banking industry perpetrated on all of us and the failure of seemingly anyone to care. People do not get away with huge crimes because they are crafty or smart or somehow do not get caught. The only reason crimes of this sort go unpunished is because we have created a system complicit – some might argue reliant – on their commission.

The Big Short is as infuriating as it is funny, the kind of film you shake your head in disbelief at as you try to forget that it is all real. It is too painful to acknowledge the truth. We were all lied to, and we all got screwed. We are still being lied to, and we are still getting screwed. Several of this year’s Best Picture nominees tackle vitally important topics, but this is the only one that directly affects each and every single one of us.

Barring an unprecedented victory by The Revenant, The Big Short has the best chance of taking the top prize. It has all the key nominations – Picture, Director, (Adapted) Screenplay, Editing, and an acting nomination – of which only one other film in this lineup can claim to have all (Spotlight). The Big Short won the Producers Guild award, which has predicted every Best Picture winner since 2007. The Producers Guild has not been wrong since it and the Academy switched to a preferential balloting system, which seeks greater consensus for a winner. If this is not the consensus pick, then the next film down is.

Spotlight (directed by Thomas McCarthy) – Here is how the preferential balloting system works, briefly. Voters rank all eight nominees. The film with the fewest first-place votes is eliminated, and its votes go to the second-ranked film on the individual ballots. This process of eliminating films and redistributing votes continues until one film garners 50 percent of votes plus one. What this means is that not only is it important to be everybody’s favorite film, but it is important to get a lot of second- and third-place votes as well.

Nobody dislikes McCarthy’s film. Even those who do not think it is the grandest artistic achievement of the year still think it is a good story well told. Spotlight will get a lot of No. 1 votes, and it will not be at the bottom of many lists. As films get eliminated from the balloting, many votes will be redistributed to Spotlight, as opposed to more divisive films such as The Revenant and Mad Max: Fury Road. This film is a certain beneficiary of the preferential system, which is just as well since it is the best of the nominated films anyway.

McCarthy’s film is a masterpiece, grafting an arthouse sensibility onto a more middle-brow legal thriller and taking on one of the most important stories of this generation. Spotlight is not just the story of the investigative reporters who uncovered the sex abuse scandal within the Catholic Church. It is the story of a city and its legions of faithful who were betrayed by the very organization they trusted with their souls. No film this year hits harder or pulls fewer punches than Spotlight, which makes sense for a drama about journalists. Nothing comes before the truth.

Mad Max: Fury Road (directed by George Miller) – If you said back in June that Mad Max: Fury Road would be a Best Picture nominee – all credit due to the few people who did – then you were either mocked or quietly dismissed. The third sequel to an action franchise that started nearly 40 years ago would not be anyone’s idea of a sure-fire Oscar contender. Add to that the film itself, which is a wild, adrenaline-fueled ride through a post-apocalyptic wasteland, and you could forgive those who did not see its awards potential.

However, the one thing it has going for it that no other nominee – nor any other film this year – can claim is Miller. Miller is the brains, the soul, and the beating heart beneath all of this. At 70 years old and directing his first live-action film in 17 years, Miller has crafted a gonzo action epic that will be admired and studied for years to come. If sequels and reboots are Hollywood’s way of the future – as they are the way of its present – then this is the template by which all should be judged. Mad Max: Fury Road drives relentlessly forward rather than looking back. It infuses new energy and instills new ideas in a tired genre that apparently needed a kick in the pants from one of its old masters.

There were moments this season when it looked like Miller’s film might push its way to the top by sheer force of will. It is too big, too bold to ignore. Those moments seem to have passed, and the film will likely prove too divisive to win on a preferential ballot, though Miller is still a major threat to Iñárritu for the Best Director prize. The victory is for something this strange to get this close to the top award, and hopefully, it will inspire other films to take similar risks.

Room (directed by Lenny Abrahamson) – The power of great storytelling is that it puts you in the mind of the characters and allows you to experience, for a brief period of time, what they experience. Except for maybe The Revenant, which is on another scale entirely, no nominee this year does a better job of drawing the audience into the characters’ world than Room. The world it explores is claustrophobic, hellish, and frightening, but it is also all too real.

One thing that has been strangely forgotten throughout this Oscar season is the truth behind the fiction of Room. It is common for awards strategists to highlight their films’ importance through real-world parallels – Spotlight and the Catholic Church, The Big Short and Wall Street, The Revenant and the environment, etc. – but the tragedy of sexual slavery in this country and around the world has come up very little. One could argue it is more respectful not to use such a tragedy to campaign for awards, but those campaigns also have the ability to draw attention to an issue. It is unlikely it would have affected Room’s awards chances one way or the other, but it is unfortunate the opportunity to talk about such a pressing issue was mostly bypassed.

Abrahamson was a surprise nominee for Best Director, though wholly deserving of the recognition, and his nomination signaled strength for Room that had seemed to dissipate throughout the season. During the festival season last year, Room picked up the coveted audience award at the Toronto Film Festival. Since 2008, only one film to win that award has failed to be nominated for Best Picture, and three went on to win. Perhaps Room has proved a little too tough, too dark for some viewers, but it has lasted because those who see it do not soon forget its impact.

The Martian (directed by Ridley Scott) – In my review of The Martian, I talked about how satisfying it is to watch talented people work. Those comments were made in the context of the plot of the film, which follows a group of scientists working toward the common goal of bringing home an astronaut stranded on Mars. However, the same comments work just as well for the filmmakers behind The Martian, all of whom are talented craftspeople working together to bring a wonderfully imaginative, refreshingly un-cynical film to the screen.

I never mean workmanlike as a pejorative. There is nothing wrong with doing solid work on a difficult project. To me, it means unfussy, uncluttered, and unself-conscious, and in all those ways, The Martian is workmanlike. Scott depicts a simple, Robinson Crusoe-like premise in a straightforward fashion and does not feel the need to pile on overworked clichés or strained metaphors to impose deeper philosophical meaning on the story. It is meaningful enough to watch the process of science done well by talented experts, and it is engaging enough to watch an entertaining film made well by talented experts.

Bridge of Spies (directed by Steven Spielberg) – Only one director in history has had more films nominated for Best Picture than Spielberg (William Wyler with 13). As of this year, Spielberg has helmed 10 films that went on to vie for the top award. He is one of the most popular and successful film directors of all time. Some would say his success is because he makes popular entertainments such as the Indiana Jones and Jurassic Park series, but I would argue it is because he makes good films popular.

What other director could turn a three-hour holocaust drama into a $300 million-plus worldwide grosser? Who else but Spielberg could craft hit after hit after hit without forfeiting his directorial vision or personal connection to his material? So, Spielberg returns this year with a Cold War thriller about a good man standing up for what is right in complex, difficult times, and he casts the ultimate good-guy actor, Tom Hanks, as his leading man.

Bridge of Spies is timeless. It could have been made in any era and proven successful because its message is powerful, its filmmaking is impressive, and its story is engaging. This film will not win Best Picture, following in the footsteps of eight other Spielberg films to fall short of the top prize once nominated, but the director has made his magic once again. He has turned a forgotten footnote from mid-20th century history into a rousing entertainment, a $160 million global hit, and a Best Picture nominee.

Brooklyn (directed by John Crowley) – Smart, elegant, and delicately handled, Brooklyn is an immigrant story for a time when there has never been more discussion of the American Dream and who is entitled to it. I do not think anyone would argue Eilis Lacey (Saoirse Ronan), the intrepid traveler at the center of this tale, has not earned the right to pursue the life she desires. Hers is one of millions of immigrant stories, and she stands in for all the people whose stories we will never hear, never know, because so many of these people were never given a voice.

Brooklyn will seem like the lightweight if feel-good choice among these nominees. Some have and will continue to dismiss it as a silly little love story, a frivolity that does not hold up to closer inspection. On the contrary, Crowley’s film absolutely requires closer inspection. Only upon deeper examination do the film’s layers become clear. There is a romance at the center of the story, yes – though I would also argue when the stories of most of our lives are told, there is a romance at the center – but the margins of the story are suffused with the color and detail of the hardships and perseverance that define the immigrant experience in America.

The final analysis


There are three films that could win this award – The Revenant, The Big Short, and Spotlight. Each has picked up a win with a major industry group. The Revenant won the Directors Guild, The Big Short prevailed with the Producers Guild, and Spotlight triumphed with the Screen Actors Guild. The Big Short and Spotlight, as mentioned, have all the key nominations, but The Revenant is the nominations leader, hitting in every crafts category, two acting categories, Director, and Picture. The Revenant won the top prize with BAFTA and the Golden Globes, but it is divisive where The Big Short and Spotlight might do well with a consensus vote.

The truth is no one could possibly say what is going to happen. The Revenant has looked impressive recently with those major wins at the Directors Guild, BAFTA, and Golden Globes, but it could all be an illusion. Nothing is certain until the envelope is opened. Last year, I predicted against the prevailing winds of the season and was dead wrong. This year, I will go where the wind blows, and if it leads me astray, so be it. I am banking on The Revenant to make history.

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: Spotlight
Should have been here: The Tribe

This weekend: A ranking of all 57 nominees, predictions in all 24 categories, and more

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Supporting Actor

Sylvester Stallone could win his first Oscar for playing Rocky Balboa in Creed, nearly 40 years after he created the character.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day this month for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories.

Best Supporting Actor


The nominees are:

Christian Bale for The Big Short
Tom Hardy for The Revenant
Mark Ruffalo for Spotlight
Mark Rylance for Bridge of Spies
Sylvester Stallone for Creed

So often when we talk about great supporting performances, we talk about big, flashy characters who come in and steal every scene in which they appear. We think of out-sized villains or larger-than-life personas that make an immediate impression with some big show of power, strength, or often as not, oratory talent. There is nothing like that in the Best Supporting Actor category this year.

Sure, these nominated performances feature showy moments, and each of these actors certainly leaves his mark on these films, but this year, the nominees leave their mark with subtle character work and attention to detail. In so doing, they create portraits of relatable people with flaws and virtues similar to our own.

There is little to connect these five characters – a math genius with no people skills, a cowardly fur trapper, an idealistic journalist, a Soviet spy, and a broken-down boxer – but the one thread that carries through is the idea that each man, no matter his actions, believes what he is doing is right. These may not be noble people, and a couple may even be misguided or on the wrong side of history, but they pursue their causes faithfully because there is nothing else for them to do.

Sylvester Stallone for Creed – Sometimes, it really is as simple as the Academy wanting to see someone win. It may not be everybody’s favorite performance, but it would be hard to find people who would not at least enjoy watching Stallone accept an Oscar. Something about it just feels right – and for this role in particular. Rocky Balboa is his creation, one of America’s favorite fictional heroes, a cultural icon, and a figure many of us grew up idolizing. Rocky represents the best of us, and the character still resonates so deeply today because Stallone has spent nearly 40 years cultivating this legacy.

If Stallone wins – and he is the frontrunner right now – it will no doubt be for those 40 years of work and not just his singular performance in director Ryan Coogler’s Creed. This may or may not be fair – after all, none of the other actors had four decades to build a character – but it would not be undeserved. A close viewing of the Rocky series reveals an actor completely at one with his character.

Rocky is who he is not because of his role in these grand American sports epics but because of the little moments Stallone inserts that make up the fabric of the character. Stallone’s looks, his line deliveries, and his posture tell us everything we need to know about Rocky. Spoiler for one of the most popular films of all time that is also 40 years old, but Rocky loses the big fight in Rocky, and we love him anyway. The Rocky movies have never been about winning championships. They are about finding something special within yourself, the will to struggle, to fight, and to survive. That remains true of Coogler’s Creed, and it remains true of Rocky because Stallone makes sure of it.

Mark Rylance for Bridge of Spies – You may recall last month I named Rylance’s work in Steven Spielberg’s Cold War thriller my second favorite performance of the year. The quality of the work has only grown in my estimation since then. It is otherworldly how much Rylance communicates without doing much of anything. He never raises his voice, never furrows his brow, and generally never seems concerned about the reality staring him in the face.

Rudolf Abel is a man condemned, both literally by the U.S. court system and figuratively by his chosen profession. He has had a long time to come to terms with his fate, and Rylance plays this character fighting for his life as someone at peace with the decisions he has made that have brought him here. Though what he has done may be illegal in the eyes of the law, spying on the U.S. for the Soviet Union, he has no sense of guilt because he knows in this war, people do what they must to survive. Rylance turns this criminal into someone the audience roots for just by showing us the power of accepting one’s self.

Tom Hardy for The Revenant – What a year for Hardy – four wildly different turns in three utterly unique films, The Revenant, Mad Max: Fury Road, and Legend. He has always been a chameleon, disappearing into roles like few other actors of his generation. He is a big, intimidating presence, but he is just as likely to play debonair as destructor, and he seems most at home giving himself over to the demands of the part.

His character in The Revenant, John Fitzgerald, could easily be a stock villain – a selfish, mean bastard who is inherently evil – but Hardy has never taken the easy route. He digs into Fitzgerald to find the man beyond the action of the story. He plays him with sympathy and understanding, recognizing that each man is the hero of his own story. While the audience follows Hugh Glass (Leonardo DiCaprio) in his quest for vengeance, Fitzgerald similarly wants only to survive. His actions are cowardly, but cowardice is never in short supply in this world. Thanks to Hardy’s performance, though, the audience sees the roots of Fitzgerald’s choices, and if we do not like it, at least we can understand it.

Christian Bale for The Big Short – A three-time nominee, Bale is the only previous winner in this category, having earned an Oscar in 2010 for The Fighter, and is well known for his physical and emotional commitment to his roles. While on the surface, his transformation into Michael Burry for The Big Short may seem to pale in comparison to some of his other similarly lauded work, Bale absolutely takes on the skin of a man who knows he is right but does not have the aptitude for sharing that information with others.

Burry is quite clearly on the autism spectrum – like so many math geniuses in pop culture these days – but Bale employs none of the quirky, platitudinous mannerisms or line readings we have come to expect from these kinds of characters. Burry is just a man who can see the future in the numbers, and his job is to earn money for his clients with that knowledge. Because he understands numbers but not nuance, his life is constantly frustrating, and Bale taps into that frustration expertly.

Mark Ruffalo for Spotlight – Ruffalo was here just last year for his wonderful turn in Bennett Miller’s Foxcatcher. He is back for his standout performance as fiery journalist Mike Rezendes, the kind of man whose passion for his job sometimes clouds his judgment but whose goals are always noble. He is so appalled by the depth of the abuse and corruption he uncovers that it rattles him in ways he never could have imagined.

This is the only performance in the category this year to feature what one might call an “Oscar scene” – that big, showy moment we talked about above – and Ruffalo nails it. The goal of the Spotlight team is to dig deeper than anyone else is willing to go, to investigate more than anyone else has thought to, and to find what others missed.

As the scope of the Catholic Church’s cover-up becomes clear, Rezendes insists they publish their findings sooner rather than later, while the rest of the team says there is still more to find. Ruffalo never hits a false note during Rezendes’ impassioned speech about taking down the system that has allowed this to happen. The scene is the culmination of all the careful groundwork Ruffalo has laid to establish who this man is, what he cares about, and what he wants.

The final analysis


The most likely winners are Stallone and Rylance. Stallone has the nostalgia factor in his favor and the kind of story voters may want to give a happy ending. He also won the Golden Globe. However, Rylance mostly dominated the critics’ awards – at least among those who were nominated – and just picked up the BAFTA last Sunday. The Golden Globe may mean little for Stallone’s chances since the Hollywood Foreign Press loves celebrities and Stallone is a huge international star. However, Rylance’s win with BAFTA was not so surprising since he is a wildly popular stage actor in England.

Interestingly, each of the other three nominees is here representing one of the three Best Picture frontrunners. Should Stallone or Rylance falter, whichever of the other actors wins would be a major signal for which film might take the top award. If Hardy wins, we could be looking at a sweep for The Revenant. If it goes to Bale, then it means The Big Short’s seemingly waning strength has rebounded. A Ruffalo win would be a powerful statement for Spotlight. In the end, though, I expect Stallone to win and get a standing ovation to boot.

Will win: Sylvester Stallone for Creed
Should win: Mark Rylance for Bridge of Spies
Should have been here: Michael Shannon for 99 Homes

Tomorrow: Best Actress

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Original Screenplay

Inside Out is the seventh Pixar film nominated for Best Original Screenplay in the company's history.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day this month for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories.

Best Original Screenplay


The nominees are:

Straight Outta Compton

The Writers Guild of America handed out its awards last night – in a somewhat bewildering bi-coastal ceremony, it should be noted – and as predicted, The Big Short was cited for best adapted screenplay, and Spotlight came away with the best original screenplay award. We discussed yesterday how little the Writers Guild means in terms of predicting the Oscars, but it never hurts to have more hardware on your shelf to impress voters as they mark their ballots.

Regardless of the Writers Guild, those two films were always favored to win their respective screenplay categories at the Oscars, which puts both in good position to take Best Picture as well. The last Best Picture winner not to win a screenplay award was Million Dollar Baby in 2004. The last Best Picture winner not even nominated for a screenplay award was Titanic in 1997, which puts nominations leaders The Revenant and Mad Max: Fury Road in a more precarious position than they otherwise might seem.

Spotlight – I may have a few biases here, to which I will readily cop. Co-writer-director Thomas McCarthy’s Spotlight is my favorite nominated film and my No. 2 film of the year. As a journalist myself, it fills me with pride to see depicted the best of what my profession can accomplish, even if we often fail to live up to that standard. In fact, I think it happens to be the best movie about journalism ever made – no slight intended against the masterpiece All the President’s Men. McCarthy is also among my favorite independent writer-directors and has been since his excellent first film, The Station Agent.

What McCarthy and co-writer Josh Singer have accomplished with their screenplay for Spotlight is nothing less than a feat of journalism itself. They interviewed endlessly, researched doggedly, and revised relentlessly to portray with the utmost accuracy and sensitivity the Boston Globe’s quest to expose the depths of the Catholic Church’s abuse. Their dedication to the truth is like that of the reporters about whom they are writing because the story is too important to be anything but honest.

McCarthy, a double nominee this year in Best Original Screenplay and Best Director, was previously nominated as a co-writer on Pixar’s Up, which I believe to be the crowning achievement in Pixar’s storied history. Singer’s only previous feature writing credit came for The Fifth Estate, another film about the importance of information. Like The Big Short in Best Adapted Screenplay, Spotlight is the only Best Picture frontrunner in this group, and McCarthy and Singer should win this award in a walk, which is just as well since no other film deserves it more.

Ex Machina – Since 2000, only three writing teams have won this award. Generally, Best Original Screenplay goes to a single writer who has boldly expressed a unique vision of the world. Interestingly, this year, the only solo nominee in this category is Alex Garland for his sci-fi thriller Ex Machina, which is nothing if not a bold expression of a unique vision of the world. The film is a puzzle box that dares viewers to get lost in its labyrinthine web of psychological games and elaborate misdirection. It is a smart, intricately woven script that unlike so many others in its genre, trades in intelligent ideas rather than unintelligible action.

Garland was a novelist in the 1990s who shot to fame after the release of director Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later, for which Garland wrote the rightly lauded and still admired screenplay. This is just his fourth feature script since that 2002 hit, but each one has explored similar themes of humanity, science, technology, and what makes us each unique or not. Garland was something of a surprise nominee, but his inclusion in the category is warranted and welcome. One only wishes the Academy had found room for this film elsewhere as well.

Inside Out – Pixar has a solid history of picking up Best Original Screenplay nominations. Since Toy Story was released in 1995, writers on Pixar films have nabbed seven nominations in this category, plus a Best Adapted Screenplay nod for Toy Story 3. It makes sense as the company has emphasized a story-first approach to filmmaking since its beginnings. Apart from the Toy Story trilogy, Inside Out is probably the company’s most critically acclaimed film. It explores the inner world of a preteen girl struggling with depression by taking the audience on a journey through her subconscious, accompanied by the emotions Joy and Sadness.

Co-writers Ronnie Del Carmen, Josh Cooley, and Meg LeFauve are all first-time nominees for whom Inside Out represents their first feature screenwriting credit. In contrast, co-writer-director Pete Docter has been nominated for Best Original Screenplay four times, Best Animated Feature three times, and Best Animated Short once. He won Best Animated Feature in 2009 as the director of Up. I criticized the film somewhat upon its release for not taking enough chances or imaginative leaps within its premise, but the premise itself is so inventive and the world of the story so fresh and interesting that that criticism seems less valid with added distance and time.

Straight Outta Compton – Amid this year’s backlash over the lack of diversity in the Oscar nominations was talk of the Academy nominating only the white writers of a critically acclaimed, predominantly black film. It seemed to me an odd point to make then and still does. The writers branch liked the work, regardless of the race of the writers, but one wonders why a film that speaks so directly to the black experience in America has four white writers in the first place. I say kudos to the Academy for acknowledging the story and shame on the producers for not finding a more diverse group of voices for its telling.

S. Leigh Savidge and Alan Wenkus reportedly began shopping their original version of the story in 2004, a version with a much narrower focus than the finished film. Andrea Berloff was later brought in to broaden the focus of the story, and finally, Jonathan Herman came on board to rework Berloff’s script. Savidge, Wenkus, and Berloff received story credit for the film, while Berloff and Herman shared the writing credit.

Though the film mostly avoids the “too many cooks in the kitchen” vibe suggested by its complicated origins, it relies heavily on some of the more obvious musical biopic tropes and is overlong. The nomination is not without merit, but it is likely running fourth or fifth in the category and will not win unless the Academy is feeling particularly guilty about its lack of diversity. Even then, awarding the film’s four white writers for telling the story of a black rap group is unlikely to assuage those feelings of guilt.

Bridge of Spies – After picking up three below-the-line mentions on nominations morning, when Bridge of Spies was called out for Best Original Screenplay, I felt certain Steven Spielberg would be nominated for Best Director and the film would be a force to be reckoned with in the Best Picture category. While the film picked up an impressive six nominations, Spielberg was not cited, and the film is most likely a Best Picture also-ran. What I forgot to consider was how much the Academy loves Joel and Ethan Coen, given their films are exactly the right kind of weird – arty but not outré.

The script, however, did not originate with the Coens but rather co-nominee Matt Charman, who had the initial idea to bring the story of James B. Donovan (Tom Hanks) to the screen. This is just Charman’s second feature script, while four-time Oscar winners the Coens need no introduction in the cinema world. They have shared Oscar wins for Best Original Screenplay, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Director, and Best Picture, and each has 14 nominations across five different categories. This is their first nomination for a film they did not direct themselves, and the nomination is probably as far as this goes.

The final analysis


It may be a race to the finish line for the top award, but on the way there, Spotlight will pick up this prize, and I will be ecstatic to see McCarthy with an Oscar. As with The Big Short in Best Adapted Screenplay, a win here for Spotlight would signify little, while a loss would be an early indication that something else will be named Best Picture. The other nominated screenplays range from solid to excellent, but nothing is in the same league as McCarthy and Singer’s accomplishment, and that should be enough to carry the day.

Will win: Spotlight
Should win: Spotlight
Should have been here: Mustang

Tomorrow: Best Animated Short

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Sound Mixing

Tom Hanks stars in Bridge of Spies, nominated for six Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Sound Mixing.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day this month for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories.

Best Sound Mixing


The nominees are:

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Today and tomorrow, we are going to cover the sound categories – Best Sound Mixing and Best Sound Editing. I gave a thorough explanation of each last year in a combined piece on both categories, which you can read here. Quickly, sound mixing refers to the levels of sound such as the score, dialogue, effects, etc., and sound editing refers to the creation of a film’s soundscape, essentially creating the sound effects.

When you talk about sound mixing, what you are really talking about is balance and mood as in finding the right levels for each element of a film’s sonic environment while also using disparities in those levels to help the story forward without intruding on its telling. Should the music be louder, should the dialogue be crisper, should the background noise come up, etc.? These are the types of questions the sound mixing team seeks to answer.

Loud films tend to do well with the Academy in this category since the contribution of the mixers is easier to discern, though the sound branch tends to nominate talky dramas nearly as often as action epics. The dramas rarely win, however. Most of the time, you are looking for a musical or a popular action film for the victory here. This year, we have no musicals nominated but four big action or adventure movies.

The Revenant – Director Alejandro González Iñárritu’s western saga is such a unique and stunning visual achievement that it is easy to get lost in its imagery, but the world the sound team creates makes the film as remarkable to hear as it is to see. The mixers have done an incredible job in this film of pulling together a thousand tiny elements into a cohesive whole that carries viewers through the narrative. The ominous, droning score, the nature sound effects, and the minimal dialogue blend together with the non-diegetic sounds that seem to come from inside the characters’ heads to turn The Revenant into a film that you experience viscerally, as well as intellectually and emotionally.

Supervising sound designer Randy Thom is a legend in the field with 15 nominations and two wins to his credit. Re-recording mixers Frank A. Montaño and Jon Taylor were both double nominees last year for Unbroken and Iñárritu’s Birdman. This is Taylor’s third nomination overall, while Montaño has eight total nominations and has never won. This is production sound mixer Chris Duesterdiek’s first nomination. The Revenant is a quieter film than tends to win in this category, but its overall popularity may carry this team to a well deserved Oscar win for its mammoth achievement.

Mad Max: Fury Road – For all the strangeness of seeing George Miller’s epic chase film nominated at the Oscars, the sound categories would seem like an obvious place for the film to show up even if it were not so popular. This is the kind of aggressive sound work the branch usually does cartwheels over. Just finding the levels for all the vehicles in this film would be an insane task, let alone the sandstorm sequence, the citadel scenes, and the quiet moments with nothing but the wind whipping across the desert.

Re-recording mixers Chris Jenkins and Gregg Rudloff each have a pair Oscar wins. Jenkins’ has five previous nominations, while Rudloff has seven, including last year for American Sniper. This is production sound mixer Ben Osmo’s first nomination. While the work is unimpeachable, for this team to come away with the win will likely require Mad Max: Fury Road to be a juggernaut across the crafts categories with Academy members checking off boxes for this film left and right.

The Martian – I will not have been the first person to point this out, but in terms of plot and technical achievement, Ridley Scott’s space castaway movie bears a striking resemblance to Apollo 13. They have even followed a somewhat similar path at the Oscars, each racking up a healthy haul of nominations (The Martian with 7; Apollo 13 with 9) but missing out in the Best Director category. Ultimately, Apollo 13 won just two awards in what turned out to be the year of Braveheart. One of those awards, however, was for Best Sound Mixing.

Space films tend to do well in this category when it comes to nominations because of the scale and variety of elements featured, from rocket ships and big explosions to extraterrestrial landscapes. The Martian has it all. Re-recording mixers Paul Massey and Mark Taylor are both multiple nominees who have never won, while this is production sound mixer Mac Ruth’s first nomination. As with every other place it is nominated alongside The Revenant and Mad Max: Fury Road, The Martian is probably running third or further back in this category. It is a case of too many accomplished epics and too few awards.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens – The other thing likely drawing votes away from The Martian is the other space epic in the category, the $2 billion box-office smash Star Wars: The Force Awakens. For what seem like obvious reasons, Star Wars films have always done well in this category. A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back each won the award, while Return of the Jedi and even The Phantom Menace came away with nominations.

Re-recording mixer Andy Nelson is a double nominee this year, along with his work on Bridge of Spies, the 19th and 20th nominations in his career. Re-recording mixer Christopher Scarabosio is a two-time nominee, and production sound mixer Stuart Wilson has been nominated three times now. Star Wars: The Force Awakens is a slick, rollicking space adventure, but it may not have the prestige to compete against the rest of the nominees in this category, especially given the other four are all Best Picture nominees as well.

Bridge of Spies – At first glance, this seems like a game of “one of these things is not like the other things,” with the talky legal drama Bridge of Spies pitted against four films painted on a much grander canvas. In reality though, such an assessment sells Steven Spielberg’s film short, and it would be just as accurate to think of it as a globetrotting spy thriller. For me, the most impressive aspects of this mix are the background elements – such as the far-off gunfire and sirens – that make James Donovan’s (Tom Hanks) experience so unsettling. There is nothing overt about the danger in Bridge of Spies, but the sound mix helps keep the sense of harm always lurking around the corner.

As I said, Nelson is now a 20-time nominee, and six of those nominations have come for Spielberg films. His two wins in the category have come for Saving Private Ryan and Tom Hooper’s Les Miserables. Re-recording mixer Gary Rydstrom has 18 nominations to his name and seven victories, four for Best Sound Mixing and three for Best Sound Editing. Sound mixer Drew Kunin has two nominations, notably fewer than either of his co-nominees but two more than most of us will ever have. It will be difficult for Bridge of Spies, however, to stand out among these nominees, so the nomination will most likely be the reward for this team.

The final analysis


Once again, it comes down to the two nominations leaders. The Revenant features the more subtle and some would say more artistic work this year, while Mad Max: Fury Road is the kind of bold statement that is just begging for recognition. Star Wars: The Force Awakens could be the spoiler here, but I am guessing The Revenant’s overall popularity will put it over the top.

Will win: The Revenant
Should win: The Revenant
Should have been here: Love and Mercy

Tomorrow: Best Sound Editing

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Countdown to the Oscars: Best Original Score

Ennio Morricone's score for The Hateful Eight is the frontrunner at the Academy Awards for Best Original Score.

Welcome to Last Cinema Standing’s Countdown to the Oscars, our daily look at this year’s Academy Awards race. Be sure to check back every day this month for analysis of each of the Academy’s 24 categories.

Best Original Score


The nominees are:

Sicario
Star Wars: The Force Awakens

So, I spent a lot of words yesterday tearing down the music branch for its uninspired nominations for Best Original Song. Last year, I used this space to gripe about the exclusion of the year’s best score due to the branch’s seemingly arbitrary rules. The entire system for determining eligibility and nominees in both music categories needs an overhaul.

However, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while, and though these may not be the five nominees I would have chosen, the music nominated for Best Original Score this year is fantastic across the board. A few of the best composers working today are nominated alongside two of the best film composers of all time, and their work covers a broad spectrum from big and bombastic adventure music to subtle and subdued drama.

Unusually for this category, only one nominated film is also nominated for Best Picture. The last time that happened was in 2003 with The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, which went on to win the award. In fact, a Best Picture nominee has won this award every year since 2003, though interestingly only three Best Picture winners in that 12-year span have also won Best Original Score. Either way, the run of Best Picture dominance in this category seems set to end this year as the Academy may finally be ready to reward one of the giants of the craft.

The Hateful Eight – Ennio Morricone is among the most famous composers in the world, and his compositions have been repurposed in countless ways across a wide variety of mediums. The main title theme to The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly might be one of the two or three most recognizable pieces of film score ever written. He has been nominated for six Oscars and received an honorary Academy Award in 2007 for his contributions to cinema.

Morricone had consciously avoided scoring westerns recently to avoid being thought of as only a western composer, and it took Quentin Tarantino to convince the Italian master to return to the genre that launched his career. The funny thing is – and Tarantino has acknowledged this in numerous interviews – Morricone pretty much avoided writing a western score. The music in The Hateful Eight sounds like it belongs in a horror movie more than a talky western.

Every element of the score oozes dread. From the sinister pounding of the drums to the whining and pulsing strings layered over it to the low-register lead, Morricone has perfectly tapped into the drawing-room mystery aspects of Tarantino’s script while bringing an unhinged energy that ultimately makes the music the best part of the film. The Hateful Eight is well liked enough by Academy members, and the season appears headed in the direction of awarding Morricone his first competitive Oscar. It would be a well-deserved and fitting honor.



Star Wars: The Force Awakens – The man who could stand in Morricone’s way, though, has been here before – more times than almost anybody. John Williams’ 50 Academy Award nominations are second only to Walt Disney for most nominations for an individual. His compositions for Jaws, Star Wars, and Raiders of the Lost Ark are part of the cultural heritage, and the American Film Institute named the theme to Star Wars the greatest score of all time. It does not get much more iconic than that.

If Morricone returning to the western genre is exciting, then Williams returning to the Star Wars universe is on another level. The 84-year-old Williams has reduced his work load significantly in recent years, but there is only one man for the job of composing a Star Wars soundtrack. His music for Star Wars: The Force Awakens is everything we have come to expect from Williams – big horns, driving strings, and dynamic tension between the quiet and the loud that signals adventure and mystery.

Williams has been nominated 19 times since his last win for Schindler’s List in 1993. Not among those 19 nominations are any of the Star Wars prequels, though he was nominated for each film in the original trilogy and won for A New Hope. Williams is a legend, and every single member of the Academy knows it, and it is possible that respect will carry him to a sixth Oscar.



Bridge of Spies – While Williams went off to compose the score for Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Thomas Newman stepped in to fill the musical void for director Steven Spielberg on the Cold War thriller Bridge of Spies. This is the first Spielberg film in 30 years not conducted by Williams, but Newman does an admirable job of getting on Spielberg’s wavelength and finding the right tones for an old-school story of heroism in the face of insurmountable odds.

The horns and military-style drums immediately stand out, and some of the main themes feel like a throwback to some of James Horner’s early 1990s compositions for films such as Patriot Games, Clear and Present Danger, and Apollo 13. Newman has been nominated 12 times for Best Original Score and once for Best Original Song, but he has never won.

Newman’s compositions throughout his career have tended to be more idiosyncratic than the Academy usually likes, and his more classical work on Bridge of Spies could be right up members’ alley. That, coupled with the Best Picture nomination for the film, would make him a threat for the win in most years, but with Williams and Morricone in the picture, Newman will likely be relegated to bridesmaid status once again.



Carol – A little more than six years ago on this site, I called Carter Burwell the best composer working in Hollywood. That feels even truer today than it did then. He is my personal favorite music composer of any kind, film or not. His scores for Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead, In Bruges, A Serious Man, and Where the Wild Things Are rank among my favorite albums of all time. He is best known probably for his work with the Coen Brothers – or perhaps among certain people for his Twilight scores – but his recent collaborations with director Todd Haynes on the Mildred Pierce miniseries and Carol have been equally fruitful.

For Carol, Burwell is working firmly within his favorite subgenre – off-kilter dramas about descent into darkness. The way his strings swirl around the listener while the piano holds the center together just spells gloom and madness, but it is never overbearing, which is key for a film as subtle and restrained as Carol. Burwell also introduces themes of romanticism into the score that he rarely uses but that perfectly complement the film’s thematic intent.

I am ecstatic that Burwell has received his first Oscar nomination. It is long overdue. He is unlikely to win and is probably running third or fourth in the category this year, but now that he is in the club, expect to see Burwell pop up as a perennial nominee. He will win one eventually, and when Burwell accepts his Oscar someday, that will be one of the happiest moments of my Oscar-watching life.



Sicario – Kudos to the music branch – how often do I say that? – for nominating something as strange and unsettling as Jóhann Jóhannsson’s work on Sicario. Jóhannsson earned his first Oscar nomination last year for his far more traditional score for The Theory of Everything. I had him pegged for the win last year as well, but he lost out to the overwhelming popularity of The Grand Budapest Hotel. This time, I would be shocked if Jóhannsson found himself onstage, not because the work is not deserving but because the Academy rarely goes for something this unusual in the category.

The driving percussion and punishing strings remind of Hans Zimmer’s iconic work on Inception but set in a world without hope. Amid the brutality and carnage of the U.S.-Mexico border wars, the music makes the characters’ sense of dread palpable for the audience. Deep feelings of disquiet creep into viewers minds thanks in large part to the way Jóhannsson’s score penetrates the narrative. You do not so much hear the music as feel it in your gut. That does not make it a good bet to win an Oscar, but it does make it a great score.


The final analysis


Morricone has the inside track here. Along with a Golden Globe win and general industry love, he is overdue for this honor, and voters know it. Williams could get in on sentiment, but much of the same sentiment that would drive him to a victory also holds true for Morricone. The other nominated scores are great and would be deserving winners, but a win for Morricone would be history-making, and that temptation might be too much to pass up for the Academy.

Will win: The Hateful Eight
Should win: The Hateful Eight
Should have been here: It Follows

Tomorrow: Best Sound Mixing